硅酸盐通报 ›› 2026, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (8): 2956-2966.DOI: 10.16552/j.cnki.issn1001-1625.2026.0247
• 道路材料 • 上一篇
收稿日期:2026-03-18
修订日期:2026-04-14
出版日期:2026-08-15
发布日期:2026-09-01
作者简介:宗炜(1985—),男,高级工程师。主要从事道路工程材料的研究。E-mail:114250260@qq.com
基金资助:
ZONG Wei(
), LIU Cheng, ZHENG Wuxi, ZHANG Qixin, DONG Xianzheng
Received:2026-03-18
Revised:2026-04-14
Published:2026-08-15
Online:2026-09-01
摘要:
为探究磷石膏在路面基层材料中的资源化利用,本文通过基础力学、冻融及干湿循环、干缩、膨胀及污染物浸出试验等,对磷石膏复合稳定碎石基层(磷石膏粉料代替细集料)与磷石膏人造集料基层(人造集料代替粗集料)的路用安全性能开展对比研究。结果表明,两种材料的力学性能均满足路用要求,磷石膏人造集料基层因人造集料筒压强度低、压碎值与软石含量高,360 d无侧限抗压强度较磷石膏复合稳定碎石基层低6.12 MPa。两种材料的抗冻性能、水稳定性能相近,但干缩性能差异显著,磷石膏复合稳定碎石基层呈微膨胀特性,60 d干缩系数为-0.13×10-6 με/%,而磷石膏人造集料基层收缩明显,干缩系数达195.42×10-6 με/%,干湿环境下性能衰减更显著。体积稳定性方面,磷石膏人造集料基层几乎不膨胀,累计膨胀率仅0.03%,磷石膏复合稳定碎石基层因钙矾石生成,累计膨胀率为0.35%,二者性能差异由钙矾石、C-S-H凝胶及结构密实度不同所致。两种材料中的总磷、氟化物浸出浓度均满足现行地表水Ⅲ类标准。
中图分类号:
宗炜, 刘成, 郑武西, 张启鑫, 董贤政. 磷石膏替代粗/细集料的基层路用性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(8): 2956-2966.
ZONG Wei, LIU Cheng, ZHENG Wuxi, ZHANG Qixin, DONG Xianzheng. Road Performance of Base with Phosphogypsum Replacing Coarse/Fine Aggregates[J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(8): 2956-2966.
| Condensation time /min | Compressive strength/MPa | Flexural strength/MPa | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial coagulation | Final coagulation | 3 d | 28 d | 3 d | 28 d |
| 193.0 | 254.0 | 26.6 | 49.8 | 6.6 | 9.3 |
表1 水泥的主要技术指标
Table 1 Main technical parameters of cement
| Condensation time /min | Compressive strength/MPa | Flexural strength/MPa | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial coagulation | Final coagulation | 3 d | 28 d | 3 d | 28 d |
| 193.0 | 254.0 | 26.6 | 49.8 | 6.6 | 9.3 |
| Index | Specification requirement | Assay result | Test procedure | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Specific surface area/(m2·kg-1) | ≥400 | 489 | GB/T 18046—2017 | |
| Activity index/% | 7 d | ≥70 | 89 | |
| 28 d | ≥95 | 102 | ||
表2 矿渣粉的主要技术指标
Table 2 Main technical parameters of slag
| Index | Specification requirement | Assay result | Test procedure | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Specific surface area/(m2·kg-1) | ≥400 | 489 | GB/T 18046—2017 | |
| Activity index/% | 7 d | ≥70 | 89 | |
| 28 d | ≥95 | 102 | ||
| Composition | CaO | SO3 | SiO2 | P2O5 | Fe2O3 | Al2O3 | F | Na2O | K2O | MgO | TiO2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mass fraction/% | 44.1 | 39.4 | 9.3 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.1 |
表3 磷石膏的主要化学组成
Table 3 Main chemical composition of phosphogypsum
| Composition | CaO | SO3 | SiO2 | P2O5 | Fe2O3 | Al2O3 | F | Na2O | K2O | MgO | TiO2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mass fraction/% | 44.1 | 39.4 | 9.3 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Type | Density/(g·cm-3) | Water absorption/% | Soft stone content/% | Cylinder compressive strength/MPa | Crushing value/% | Boiling mass loss/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phosphogypsum artificial aggregate | 1.58 | 18.32 | 14.49 | 5.82 | 42.14 | 4.62 |
| Crushed stone | 2.76 | 1.34 | 1.39 | 15.96 | 18.64 | 0.89 |
表4 磷石膏人造集料与碎石指标对比
Table 4 Comparison of indexes between phosphogypsum artificial aggregate and crushed stone
| Type | Density/(g·cm-3) | Water absorption/% | Soft stone content/% | Cylinder compressive strength/MPa | Crushing value/% | Boiling mass loss/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phosphogypsum artificial aggregate | 1.58 | 18.32 | 14.49 | 5.82 | 42.14 | 4.62 |
| Crushed stone | 2.76 | 1.34 | 1.39 | 15.96 | 18.64 | 0.89 |
| Type | Unconfined compressive strength/MPa | Splitting tensile strength/MPa | Flexural tensile strength/MPa | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 d | 28 d | 90 d | 180 d | 360 d | 90 d | 180 d | 360 d | 90 d | 180 d | 360 d | |
| Phosphogypsum artificial aggregate base | 4.02 | 5.51 | 6.24 | 6.58 | 6.96 | 0.77 | 0.89 | 0.91 | 1.38 | 1.54 | 1.68 |
| Phosphogypsum composite stabilized crushed stone base | 6.82 | 9.03 | 10.00 | 11.32 | 13.08 | 0.92 | 1.17 | 1.24 | 1.74 | 1.88 | 2.09 |
表5 力学强度试验结果
Table 5 Test results of mechanical strength
| Type | Unconfined compressive strength/MPa | Splitting tensile strength/MPa | Flexural tensile strength/MPa | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 d | 28 d | 90 d | 180 d | 360 d | 90 d | 180 d | 360 d | 90 d | 180 d | 360 d | |
| Phosphogypsum artificial aggregate base | 4.02 | 5.51 | 6.24 | 6.58 | 6.96 | 0.77 | 0.89 | 0.91 | 1.38 | 1.54 | 1.68 |
| Phosphogypsum composite stabilized crushed stone base | 6.82 | 9.03 | 10.00 | 11.32 | 13.08 | 0.92 | 1.17 | 1.24 | 1.74 | 1.88 | 2.09 |
| Type | Unconfined compressive strength/MPa | Mass change rate/% | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unfrozen specimen | Freeze-thaw specimens | ||
| Phosphogypsum artificial aggregate base | 5.51 | 4.88 | 2.71 |
| Phosphogypsum composite stabilized crushed stone base | 9.03 | 8.77 | 0.03 |
表6 冻融循环试验结果
Table 6 Test results of freeze-thaw cycles
| Type | Unconfined compressive strength/MPa | Mass change rate/% | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unfrozen specimen | Freeze-thaw specimens | ||
| Phosphogypsum artificial aggregate base | 5.51 | 4.88 | 2.71 |
| Phosphogypsum composite stabilized crushed stone base | 9.03 | 8.77 | 0.03 |
| Type | Unconfined compressive strength/MPa | Mass change rate/% | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28 d cured specimen | Dry-wet cycled specimen | ||
| Phosphogypsum artificial aggregate base | 5.51 | 5.37 | 1.86 |
| Phosphogypsum composite stabilized crushed stone base | 9.03 | 10.26 | 0.52 |
表7 干湿循环试验结果
Table 7 Test results of dry-wet cycles
| Type | Unconfined compressive strength/MPa | Mass change rate/% | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28 d cured specimen | Dry-wet cycled specimen | ||
| Phosphogypsum artificial aggregate base | 5.51 | 5.37 | 1.86 |
| Phosphogypsum composite stabilized crushed stone base | 9.03 | 10.26 | 0.52 |
| Item | pH | Concentration/(mg·L-1) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P | F | Pb | Cd | Cr | As | Hg | ||
| Phosphogypsum | 5.68 | 41.90 | 17.20 | ND | ND | ND | 0.016 80 | 0.000 310 |
| Phosphogypsum artificial aggregate | 8.83 | ND | 2.69 | ND | ND | ND | 0.000 35 | 0.000 360 |
| Phosphogypsum artificial aggregate base | 8.01 | 0.02 | 0.21 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| Phosphogypsum composite stabilized crushed stone base | 9.86 | 0.07 | 0.37 | ND | ND | ND | ND | 0.000 054 |
| (GB 3838—2002) Class Ⅲ | 6~9 | 0.2 | 1 | 0.05 | 0.005 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.000 1 |
| (GB/T 18484—2017) Class Ⅲ | 6.5~8.5 | — | 1 | 0.01 | 0.005 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.001 0 |
表8 特征污染物检测结果
Table 8 Test results of characteristic pollutants
| Item | pH | Concentration/(mg·L-1) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P | F | Pb | Cd | Cr | As | Hg | ||
| Phosphogypsum | 5.68 | 41.90 | 17.20 | ND | ND | ND | 0.016 80 | 0.000 310 |
| Phosphogypsum artificial aggregate | 8.83 | ND | 2.69 | ND | ND | ND | 0.000 35 | 0.000 360 |
| Phosphogypsum artificial aggregate base | 8.01 | 0.02 | 0.21 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| Phosphogypsum composite stabilized crushed stone base | 9.86 | 0.07 | 0.37 | ND | ND | ND | ND | 0.000 054 |
| (GB 3838—2002) Class Ⅲ | 6~9 | 0.2 | 1 | 0.05 | 0.005 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.000 1 |
| (GB/T 18484—2017) Class Ⅲ | 6.5~8.5 | — | 1 | 0.01 | 0.005 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.001 0 |
| [1] | 侯江, 郭卫广, 雍毅, 等. 基于文献计量学方法剖析磷石膏研究及进展[J]. 磷肥与复肥, 2021, 36(1): 32-35. |
| HOU J, GUO W G, YONG Y, et al. Analysis of research and development of phosphogypsum based on bibliometric method[J]. Phosphate & Compound Fertilizer, 2021, 36(1): 32-35 (in Chinese). | |
| [2] | 吴泳霖, 张伟, 奠波, 等. 磷石膏热分解研究现状[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(9): 3129-3137. |
| WU Y L, ZHANG W, DIAN B, et al. Research status of phosphogypsum pyrolysis[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2022, 41(9): 3129-3137 (in Chinese). | |
| [3] | 唐向阳, 何新建, 谢陈鑫, 等. 磷石膏资源化研究现状及展望[J]. 无机盐工业, 2025, 57(6): 18-26. |
| TANG X Y, HE X J, XIE C X, et al. Research status and prospects of phosphogypsum resource utilization[J]. Inorganic Chemicals Industry, 2025, 57(6): 18-26 (in Chinese). | |
| [4] | CUI Y, BAI J D, CHANG I S, et al. A systematic review of phosphogypsum recycling industry based on the survey data in China-applications, drivers, obstacles, and solutions[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2024, 105: 107405. |
| [5] | 宗 炜, 王远辉, 许 亮, 等. 工业固废磷石膏路面基层材料路用性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(2): 766-773. |
| ZONG W, WANG Y H, XU L, et al. Pavement performance of industrial solid waste phosphogypsum pavement base material[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2024, 43(2): 766-773 (in Chinese). | |
| [6] | 张家豪, 赵丽华, 高奥东, 等. 水泥稳定大掺量改性磷石膏的制备与性能研究[J]. 公路, 2024, 69(8): 107-113. |
| ZHANG J H, ZHAO L H, GAO A D, et al. Preparation and performance study of cement stabilized high content modified phosphogypsum[J]. Highway, 2024, 69(8): 107-113 (in Chinese). | |
| [7] | 孙奇奇. 大掺量磷石膏应用:磷石膏用于路面基层的研究[D]. 合肥:安徽建筑大学, 2024. |
| SUN Q Q.Application of heavily doped phosphogypsum: a study on the use of phosphogypsum for pavement base layers[D]. Hefei: Anhui Jianzhu University, 2024 (in Chinese). | |
| [8] | 胡彪, 吴赤球, 吕伟, 等. 改性磷石膏矿渣水泥在混凝土和路基材料中的应用研究[J]. 混凝土与水泥制品, 2022(4): 94-99. |
| HU B, WU C Q, LV W, et al. Study on the application of modified phosphogypsum slag cement in concrete and roadbed materials[J]. China Concrete and Cement Products, 2022(4): 94-99 (in Chinese). | |
| [9] | 何兆益, 邹萌, 姚启文, 等. 高掺量磷石膏-水泥-固化剂稳定碎石基层材料的性能及强度形成机理[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(1): 346-358. |
| HE Z Y, ZOU M, YAO Q W, et al. Performance and strength formation mechanism of high dosage phosphogypsum-cement-curing agent stabilized crushed stone base layer material[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2026, 45(1): 346-358 (in Chinese). | |
| [10] | 刘超, 赵德强, 马倩, 等. 水泥-磷石膏稳定碎石路面基层材料的研究与应用[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(6): 2121-2130. |
| LIU C, ZHAO D Q, MA Q, et al. Research and application of cement-phosphogypsum stabilized crushed stone pavement base material[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2023, 42(6): 2121-2130 (in Chinese). | |
| [11] | 陈文义, 郑少鹏, 陈亮亮, 等. 固化剂改性磷石膏路用基层基本力学及稳定性能分析[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(增刊1): 411-416. |
| CHEN W Y, ZHENG S P, CHEN L L, et al. Analysis on basic mechanics and stability properties of curing agent modified phosphogypsum road base[J]. Materials Reports, 2025, 39(issue 1): 411-416 (in Chinese). | |
| [12] | 肖心, 李敬伟, 侯祥山, 等. 固废基硫铝系高活性材料改性磷石膏制备路面基层材料试验研究[J]. 环境卫生工程, 2023, 31(4): 63-69. |
| XIAO X, LI J W, HOU X S, et al. Study on properties of pavement base material prepared using phosphogypsum modified by solid waste-based sulfoaluminate high-activity material[J]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 2023, 31(4): 63-69 (in Chinese). | |
| [13] | 谭文明, 胡浪, 张飞, 等. 富水环境下高掺量磷石膏公路基层材料长期力学性能及体积稳定性研究[J]. 材料导报, 2025, 39(增刊1): 405-410. |
| TAN W M, HU L, ZHANG F, et al. Study on the long-term mechanical properties and volume stability of highway base material with high content of phosphogypsum in water-rich environment[J]. Materials Reports, 2025, 39(issue 1): 405-410 (in Chinese). | |
| [14] | 杜辉, 贾敬鹏, 李晓龙, 等. 磷石膏再生骨料路面基层路用性能研究[J]. 公路, 2026, 71(1): 51-57. |
| DU H, JIA J P, LI X L, et al. Research on the road performance of phosphogypsum recycled aggregate in pavement base courses[J]. Highway, 2026, 71(1): 51-57 (in Chinese). | |
| [15] | 吕伟, 吴赤球, 龚文辉, 等. 改性磷石膏轻骨料在路基材料中的应用研究[J]. 混凝土与水泥制品, 2022(6): 82-86. |
| LV W, WU C Q, GONG W H, et al. Research on the application of modified phosphogypsum lightweight aggregate in subgrade materials[J]. China Concrete and Cement Products, 2022(6): 82-86 (in Chinese). | |
| [16] | 金飞龙. 半刚性基层损伤特性及服役状态评价[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2019. |
| JIN F L. Half -rigid grass-roots damage characteristics and service status evaluation[D]. Harbin: Harbin University of Technology, 2019 (in Chinese). | |
| [17] | 徐刚敏. 干湿循环下磷石膏稳定土强度特性及机理研究[D]. 贵州: 贵州大学, 2024. |
| XU G M. Study on strength characteristics and mechanism of phosphogypsum-stabilized soil under dry-wet cycles[D]. Guizhou: Guizhou University, 2024 (in Chinese). | |
| [18] | 王金山. 粗粒盐渍土盐胀及力学特性研究[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆大学, 2021. |
| WANG J S. Study on the characteristics of thick -grained salt salt and mechanics [D]. Urumqi: Xinjiang University, 2021 (in Chinese). | |
| [19] | 李冰雁, 李晨, 游晨, 等. 磷石膏堆场区域水环境中主要污染物分布特征及其风险评价[J]. 化工环保, 2024(2): 279-285. |
| LI B Y, LI C, YOU C, et al. Distribution characteristics and risk assessment of major pollutants in regional water environment of phosphogypsum yard[J]. Environmental Protection of Chemical Industry, 2024(2): 279-285 (in Chinese). | |
| [20] | 孙兆辉, 许志鸿, 王铁斌, 等. 水泥稳定碎石基层材料干缩及影响因素分析[J]. 建筑材料学报, 2006, 9(2): 166-171. |
| SUN Z H, XU Z H, WANG T B, et al. Research on dry shrinkage deformation properties of cement-stabilized macadam base course materials[J]. Journal of Building Materials, 2006, 9(2): 166-171 (in Chinese). | |
| [21] | 陈冠.改性磷石膏胶结充填体污染元素固化机制及其耐久性研究[D]. 武汉: 武汉科技大学, 2024. |
| CHEN G. Study on solidification mechanism of polluting elements of modified phosphogypsum cemented backfill and its durability[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University of Science and Technology, 2024 (in Chinese). |
| [1] | 唐佩, 朱美怡, 肜鹏杰, 陈伟. 电化学活化赤泥对过硫磷石膏矿渣水泥性能的提升研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(8): 2806-2816. |
| [2] | 程晓, 武发德, 王宏霞, 宋晓光, 高春勇, 郭君华, 李帆. 外加剂对磷石膏霉变的影响机制研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(8): 2839-2849. |
| [3] | 唐佩, 刘佳心, 曲波, 肜鹏杰, 陈伟. 热活化煤矸石及其在磷石膏矿渣水泥中的应用研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(8): 2829-2838. |
| [4] | 张雪梅, 靳晴晴, 常硕, 王露, 李照祺, 张兴照, 刘数华. 超硫酸盐水泥的化学收缩特性研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(7): 2215-2225. |
| [5] | 刘鑫, 李明阳, 张细和, 蓝少丁, 高旭. 赤泥与再生微粉协同调控磷石膏-矿渣基全固废胶凝材料的耐久性能与微观结构研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(7): 2478-2490. |
| [6] | 任骏, 晏云潇, 李苗源, 田镇赫, 赵立兴, 王大富. 微生物改性磷石膏对石膏矿渣水泥性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(5): 1671-1681. |
| [7] | 陈子涵, 郭煜东, 吕钦飞, 梁咏宁, 季韬. 碱当量对磷石膏-碱矿渣泡沫混凝土性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(4): 1315-1323. |
| [8] | 张少波, 马健云, 张新永, 高新文, 陈谦. 路用纤维微表处材料组成与性能评价研究进展[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(1): 309-324. |
| [9] | 何兆益, 邹萌, 姚启文, 曹东伟, 秦猛. 高掺量磷石膏-水泥-固化剂稳定碎石基层材料的性能及强度形成机理[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(1): 346-358. |
| [10] | 谢君, 杜雨阳, 吴少鹏, 李梦林, 李超. 多孔Mg-Al基水滑石温拌剂的制备及其对沥青混合料性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(9): 3462-3471. |
| [11] | 李义胜, 吕伟, 吴赤球, 余正康, 何静, 水中和. 高掺量磷石膏胶凝材料硬化体制备及其性能调节[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(8): 2944-2954. |
| [12] | 邓兴辉, 徐桂弘, 包立新, 徐韦洪, 陈孜伟, 杨步雷. 磷石膏基挤压异形砖(PG-ESB)力学性能及孔隙三参数分布特性[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(6): 2240-2249. |
| [13] | 苏瑛, 龚伟, 刘川北, 张俊. 基于机器学习的磷石膏轻骨料混凝土配合比设计与力学性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(5): 1656-1665. |
| [14] | 任骏, 余永昆, 毛雯婷, 张毓, 王大富. 基于磷石膏基细轻骨料的砂浆性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(4): 1420-1427. |
| [15] | 王紫嫣, 孙涛, 欧阳高尚. 过硫磷石膏矿渣水泥性能调控研究进展[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(4): 1208-1226. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||