硅酸盐通报 ›› 2026, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (8): 2839-2849.DOI: 10.16552/j.cnki.issn1001-1625.2026.0180
程晓1(
), 武发德1, 王宏霞1(
), 宋晓光2, 高春勇1, 郭君华1, 李帆3
收稿日期:2026-02-27
修订日期:2026-04-06
出版日期:2026-08-15
发布日期:2026-09-01
通信作者:
王宏霞,博士。E-mail:wxx022@126.com。作者简介:程晓(2001—),女,硕士研究生。主要从事磷石膏的研究。E-mail:2040477829@qq.com
基金资助:
CHENG Xiao1(
), WU Fade1, WANG Hongxia1(
), SONG Xiaoguang2, GAO Chunyong1, GUO Junhua1, LI Fan3
Received:2026-02-27
Revised:2026-04-06
Published:2026-08-15
Online:2026-09-01
摘要:
磷石膏制品霉变不仅会威胁人体健康,还会导致材料本身性能显著劣化。本文从磷石膏制品生产中常见的外加剂出发,研究了外加剂种类及掺量对磷石膏霉变的影响规律,通过XRF、EA、SEM、静态接触角等测试方法进行表征,进而初探磷石膏霉变机理。结果表明:减水剂掺量越高,磷石膏霉变率越高,在相同掺量条件下,萘系减水剂相较于聚羧酸减水剂更容易使磷石膏产生霉变;防水剂掺量越高,磷石膏霉变率越低,防水剂在一定程度上可提高防霉性能;磷石膏表面环境pH值越高,实验所选的六种菌种更易生长,磷石膏更易产生霉变;外加剂掺入所引入的C元素是加速霉变的主要元素,其次是N元素,K、Mg、Al、P作为微生物生长所需的大量元素对霉变有一定影响,但作用较小。
中图分类号:
程晓, 武发德, 王宏霞, 宋晓光, 高春勇, 郭君华, 李帆. 外加剂对磷石膏霉变的影响机制研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(8): 2839-2849.
CHENG Xiao, WU Fade, WANG Hongxia, SONG Xiaoguang, GAO Chunyong, GUO Junhua, LI Fan. Influence Mechanism of Additives on Mildew of Phosphogypsum[J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(8): 2839-2849.
| Composition | CaO | SO3 | SiO2 | Al2O3 | P2O5 | Fe2O3 | Na2O | F | K2O | TiO2 | MgO | SrO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mass fraction/% | 40.80 | 48.90 | 5.65 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.42 | 0.37 | 0.37 | 0.21 | 0.14 | 0.12 | 0.10 |
表1 磷石膏的主要化学组成
Table 1 Main chemical composition of phosphogypsum
| Composition | CaO | SO3 | SiO2 | Al2O3 | P2O5 | Fe2O3 | Na2O | F | K2O | TiO2 | MgO | SrO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mass fraction/% | 40.80 | 48.90 | 5.65 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.42 | 0.37 | 0.37 | 0.21 | 0.14 | 0.12 | 0.10 |
| Name | Bacterial No. |
|---|---|
| 黑曲霉(Aspergillus niger) | AS3.4463 |
| 土曲霉(Aspergillus terreus) | AS3.3935 |
| 宛氏拟青霉(Paecilomyces Varioti) | AS3.4253 |
| 绳状青霉(Penicillium funicolosum) | AS3.3875 |
| 出芽短梗霉(Aureobasium Pullulans) | AS3.3984 |
| 球毛壳(Chaetoomium globsum) | AS3.4254 |
表2 实验菌种类型
Table 2 Bacterial type used in experiment
| Name | Bacterial No. |
|---|---|
| 黑曲霉(Aspergillus niger) | AS3.4463 |
| 土曲霉(Aspergillus terreus) | AS3.3935 |
| 宛氏拟青霉(Paecilomyces Varioti) | AS3.4253 |
| 绳状青霉(Penicillium funicolosum) | AS3.3875 |
| 出芽短梗霉(Aureobasium Pullulans) | AS3.3984 |
| 球毛壳(Chaetoomium globsum) | AS3.4254 |
| Ingredient | NaNO3 | KH2PO4 | K2HPO4 | KCl | MgSO4·7H2O | FeSO4·7H2O | Sucrose |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mass/g | 2.00 | 0.70 | 0.30 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.01 | 5.00 |
表3 营养盐培养液成分
Table 3 Composition of nutrient salt culture solution
| Ingredient | NaNO3 | KH2PO4 | K2HPO4 | KCl | MgSO4·7H2O | FeSO4·7H2O | Sucrose |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mass/g | 2.00 | 0.70 | 0.30 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.01 | 5.00 |
| Specimen category | Element content/% | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | C | H | S | O | |
| Blank control group | 0 | 0.29 | 1.65 | 16.24 | 36.58 |
| 0.5% FDN specimen before mildew | 0.03 | 0.58 | 1.91 | 10.53 | 36.60 |
| 0.5% FDN specimen after mildew | 0 | 0 | 1.53 | 13.40 | 29.66 |
| 0.5% PCE specimen before mildew | 0.05 | 0.42 | 2.02 | 8.28 | 40.13 |
| 0.5% PCE specimen after mildew | 0 | 0 | 1.57 | 6.92 | 30.14 |
表4 试样霉变前后有机物元素EA测试分析结果
Table 4 EA test analysis results of organic elements in specimens before and after mildew
| Specimen category | Element content/% | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | C | H | S | O | |
| Blank control group | 0 | 0.29 | 1.65 | 16.24 | 36.58 |
| 0.5% FDN specimen before mildew | 0.03 | 0.58 | 1.91 | 10.53 | 36.60 |
| 0.5% FDN specimen after mildew | 0 | 0 | 1.53 | 13.40 | 29.66 |
| 0.5% PCE specimen before mildew | 0.05 | 0.42 | 2.02 | 8.28 | 40.13 |
| 0.5% PCE specimen after mildew | 0 | 0 | 1.57 | 6.92 | 30.14 |
| Specimen category | Element content/% | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ca | S | Si | Fe | K | P | Mg | Al | Sr | Y | |
| Blank control group | 53.948 | 37.995 | 1.582 | 0.608 | 0.575 | 0.956 | 0.315 | 0.231 | 0.187 | 0.010 |
0.5% FDN specimen before mildew | 60.235 | 35.983 | 1.391 | 0.665 | 0.576 | 0.408 | 0.338 | 0.210 | 0.184 | 0.011 |
0.5% FDN specimen after mildew | 61.632 | 35.446 | 1.177 | 0.643 | 0.388 | 0.182 | 0.151 | 0.180 | 0.190 | 0.011 |
0.5% PCE specimen before mildew | 61.154 | 35.919 | 1.074 | 0.692 | 0.378 | 0.309 | 0.155 | 0.124 | 0.185 | 0.010 |
0.5% PCE specimen after mildew | 61.057 | 35.620 | 1.190 | 0.695 | 0.377 | 0.361 | 0.121 | 0.136 | 0.186 | 0.012 |
表5 试样霉变前后XRF测试分析结果
Table 5 XRF test analysis results of specimens before and after mildew
| Specimen category | Element content/% | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ca | S | Si | Fe | K | P | Mg | Al | Sr | Y | |
| Blank control group | 53.948 | 37.995 | 1.582 | 0.608 | 0.575 | 0.956 | 0.315 | 0.231 | 0.187 | 0.010 |
0.5% FDN specimen before mildew | 60.235 | 35.983 | 1.391 | 0.665 | 0.576 | 0.408 | 0.338 | 0.210 | 0.184 | 0.011 |
0.5% FDN specimen after mildew | 61.632 | 35.446 | 1.177 | 0.643 | 0.388 | 0.182 | 0.151 | 0.180 | 0.190 | 0.011 |
0.5% PCE specimen before mildew | 61.154 | 35.919 | 1.074 | 0.692 | 0.378 | 0.309 | 0.155 | 0.124 | 0.185 | 0.010 |
0.5% PCE specimen after mildew | 61.057 | 35.620 | 1.190 | 0.695 | 0.377 | 0.361 | 0.121 | 0.136 | 0.186 | 0.012 |
| Specimen category | Element content/% | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | C | H | S | O | |
| Blank control group | 0 | 0.29 | 1.65 | 16.24 | 36.58 |
| 1.00% waterproofing agent specimen before mildew | 0.09 | 0.45 | 2.05 | 15.45 | 39.42 |
| 1.00% waterproofing agent specimen after mildew | 0 | 0 | 1.86 | 11.73 | 29.69 |
表6 试样霉变前后有机物元素EA测试分析结果
Table 6 EA test analysis results of organic elements in specimens before and after mildew
| Specimen category | Element content/% | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | C | H | S | O | |
| Blank control group | 0 | 0.29 | 1.65 | 16.24 | 36.58 |
| 1.00% waterproofing agent specimen before mildew | 0.09 | 0.45 | 2.05 | 15.45 | 39.42 |
| 1.00% waterproofing agent specimen after mildew | 0 | 0 | 1.86 | 11.73 | 29.69 |
| Specimen category | Element content/% | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ca | S | Si | Fe | K | P | Mg | Al | Sr | Y | |
| Blank control group | 53.948 | 37.995 | 1.582 | 0.608 | 0.575 | 0.956 | 0.315 | 0.231 | 0.187 | 0.010 |
| 1.00% waterproofing agent specimen before mildew | 58.248 | 35.303 | 2.781 | 0.640 | 0.917 | 0.602 | 0.728 | 0.594 | 0.177 | 0.010 |
| 1.00% waterproofing agent specimen after mildew | 60.302 | 35.396 | 2.486 | 0.652 | 0.268 | 0.301 | 0.093 | 0.308 | 0.183 | 0.010 |
表7 试样霉变前后XRF测试分析结果
Table 7 XRF test analysis results of specimens before and after mildew
| Specimen category | Element content/% | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ca | S | Si | Fe | K | P | Mg | Al | Sr | Y | |
| Blank control group | 53.948 | 37.995 | 1.582 | 0.608 | 0.575 | 0.956 | 0.315 | 0.231 | 0.187 | 0.010 |
| 1.00% waterproofing agent specimen before mildew | 58.248 | 35.303 | 2.781 | 0.640 | 0.917 | 0.602 | 0.728 | 0.594 | 0.177 | 0.010 |
| 1.00% waterproofing agent specimen after mildew | 60.302 | 35.396 | 2.486 | 0.652 | 0.268 | 0.301 | 0.093 | 0.308 | 0.183 | 0.010 |
| Dosage/% | 0 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH value | 5.40 | 6.02 | 6.33 | 7.43 | 9.52 | 10.52 |
表8 不同掺量pH调节剂试样的pH值
Table 8 pH values of specimens with different pH regulator dosages
| Dosage/% | 0 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH value | 5.40 | 6.02 | 6.33 | 7.43 | 9.52 | 10.52 |
| [1] | 祝国亮. 磷石膏的综合利用及其在环境领域的应用研究进展[J]. 生态产业科学与磷氟工程, 2024, 39(7): 65-70. |
| ZHU G L. Research progress on comprehensive utilization of phosphogypsum and its application in environment field[J]. Eco-industry Science & Phosphorus Fluorine Engineering, 2024, 39(7): 65-70 (in Chinese). | |
| [2] | AIT H S, SRAIDI A, KHALESS K, et al. Two steps leaching process for recovery of rare earths from Moroccan phosphogypsum[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2023, 427: 138976. |
| [3] | 周开雄. 工业湿法磷酸中的渣酸利用研究[D]. 昆明: 昆明理工大学, 2023. |
| ZHOU K X. Research on the utilization of slag acid in industrial wet phosphoric acid[D]. Kunming: Kunming University of Science and Technology, 2023 (in Chinese). | |
| [4] | 陈汉昭, 李德高, 黄迪, 等. 磷石膏综合利用的研究进展[J]. 云南化工, 2024, 51(9): 11-15. |
| CHEN H Z, LI D G, HUANG D, et al. Research progress on comprehensive utilization of phosphogypsum[J]. Yunnan Chemical Technology, 2024, 51(9): 11-15 (in Chinese). | |
| [5] | 张峻, 解维闵, 董雄波, 等. 磷石膏材料化综合利用研究进展[J]. 材料导报, 2023, 37(16): 163-174. |
| ZHANG J, XIE W M, DONG X B, et al. Research progress on comprehensive utilization of phosphogypsum for materials: a review[J]. Materials Reports, 2023, 37(16): 163-174 (in Chinese). | |
| [6] | 武发德, 张羽飞, 陈红霞, 等. 磷石膏在石膏板中的应用研究[J]. 磷肥与复肥, 2018, 33(10): 35-37+40. |
| WU F D, ZHANG Y F, CHEN H X, et al. Research on application of phosphogypsum in plasterboard production[J]. Phosphate & Compound Fertilizer, 2018, 33(10): 35-37+40 (in Chinese). | |
| [7] | 苗春, 李景程, 张德东. 住宅工程墙面壁纸霉变案例分析与预防[J]. 山西建筑, 2021, 47(16): 171-172. |
| MIAO C, LI J C, ZHANG D D. Case analysis and preventive measures for the mildew problem of wallpaper in residential project[J]. Shanxi Architecture, 2021, 47(16): 171-172 (in Chinese). | |
| [8] | SEDLBAUER K. Prediction of mould fungus formation on the surface of and inside building components[D]. Munich: Fraunhofer Institute for Building Physics, 2001. |
| [9] | LIU W S, LI L J, ZHOU X T. Molecular simulation study of the adhesion characteristics of β-phosphogypsum product surface to mold biomolecules[J]. Materials Research Express, 2023, 10(3): 035504. |
| [10] | 杨珖, 薄盛宏, 邓磊, 等. 聚羧酸减水剂对β-半水磷石膏性能的影响[J]. 新型建筑材料, 2023, 50(1): 124-127+153. |
| YANG G, BO S H, DENG L, et al. Effect of polycarboxylate superplasticizer on the properties of β-hemihydrate phosphogypsum[J]. New Building Materials, 2023, 50(1): 124-127+153 (in Chinese). | |
| [11] | GE H S, SUN Z P, LU Z C, et al. Influence and mechanism analysis of different types of water reducing agents on volume shrinkage of cement mortar[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2024, 82: 108204. |
| [12] | 李龙, 李北星, 陈鹏博, 等. 外加剂对磷建筑石膏的改性及其机理研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(7): 2400-2410. |
| LI L, LI B X, CHEN P B, et al. Modification and mechanism of phosphorus building gypsum using admixtures[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2022, 41(7): 2400-2410 (in Chinese). | |
| [13] | 马焕入. 磷建筑石膏在不同pH环境下与减水剂、防水剂适应性研究[D]. 重庆: 西南科技大学, 2024. |
| MA H R. Study on the adaptability of phosphorus building gypsum with water reducer and waterproof agent in different pH environments[D]. Chongqing: Southwest University of Science and Technology, 2024 (in Chinese). | |
| [14] | 刘婉双. β磷石膏水化产物霉变及防霉机制研究[D]. 贵州: 贵州大学, 2023. |
| LIU W S. Research on mildew and anti-mildew mechanism of β phosphogypsum hydration products[D]. Guizhou: Guizhou University, 2023 (in Chinese). | |
| [15] | 方双明. 耐水型抗霉磷石膏墙板的制备及性能研究[D]. 贵州: 贵州大学, 2024. |
| FANG S M. Study on the preparation and properties of water-resistant and mold-resistant phosphogypsum wallboard[D]. Guizhou: Guizhou University, 2024 (in Chinese). |
| [1] | 宗炜, 刘成, 郑武西, 张启鑫, 董贤政. 磷石膏替代粗/细集料的基层路用性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(8): 2956-2966. |
| [2] | 唐佩, 朱美怡, 肜鹏杰, 陈伟. 电化学活化赤泥对过硫磷石膏矿渣水泥性能的提升研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(8): 2806-2816. |
| [3] | 唐佩, 刘佳心, 曲波, 肜鹏杰, 陈伟. 热活化煤矸石及其在磷石膏矿渣水泥中的应用研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(8): 2829-2838. |
| [4] | 张雪梅, 靳晴晴, 常硕, 王露, 李照祺, 张兴照, 刘数华. 超硫酸盐水泥的化学收缩特性研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(7): 2215-2225. |
| [5] | 刘鑫, 李明阳, 张细和, 蓝少丁, 高旭. 赤泥与再生微粉协同调控磷石膏-矿渣基全固废胶凝材料的耐久性能与微观结构研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(7): 2478-2490. |
| [6] | 任骏, 晏云潇, 李苗源, 田镇赫, 赵立兴, 王大富. 微生物改性磷石膏对石膏矿渣水泥性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(5): 1671-1681. |
| [7] | 陈子涵, 郭煜东, 吕钦飞, 梁咏宁, 季韬. 碱当量对磷石膏-碱矿渣泡沫混凝土性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(4): 1315-1323. |
| [8] | 王天依, 古悦, 孙睿, 王栋民. 微波辅助法合成马来酸二甲酯聚羧酸减水剂的工艺优化及作用机制研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(2): 404-412. |
| [9] | 李盟, 孔德松, 黄腾, 何智浩, 王恩文, 韦云龙. Na-蒙脱石对聚羧酸减水剂的吸附特性及作用机制研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(2): 390-403. |
| [10] | 何兆益, 邹萌, 姚启文, 曹东伟, 秦猛. 高掺量磷石膏-水泥-固化剂稳定碎石基层材料的性能及强度形成机理[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(1): 346-358. |
| [11] | 李义胜, 吕伟, 吴赤球, 余正康, 何静, 水中和. 高掺量磷石膏胶凝材料硬化体制备及其性能调节[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(8): 2944-2954. |
| [12] | 胡建林, 李智林, 周永祥, 冷发光, 杜修力. 生石灰激发高炉矿渣-粉煤灰地质聚合物固化土力学特性研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(8): 2912-2923. |
| [13] | 赫明胜, 秦庆金, 高慧, 曲春雨, 秦永, 房奎圳, 郝建帅. 减水剂对镁渣-粉煤灰基流态固化土流变性及强度的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(7): 2710-2719. |
| [14] | 邓兴辉, 徐桂弘, 包立新, 徐韦洪, 陈孜伟, 杨步雷. 磷石膏基挤压异形砖(PG-ESB)力学性能及孔隙三参数分布特性[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(6): 2240-2249. |
| [15] | 王家明, 李静, 杨曙光, 李耀环, 顾凯, 苑博文, 刘东升, 郭启龙. 砂中残留絮凝剂PAM对水泥砂浆流动度影响及其降解方法研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(6): 2026-2035. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||