硅酸盐通报 ›› 2026, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (7): 2478-2490.DOI: 10.16552/j.cnki.issn1001-1625.2025.1258
刘鑫1(
), 李明阳1, 张细和1(
), 蓝少丁2, 高旭2
收稿日期:2025-12-15
修订日期:2026-01-29
出版日期:2026-07-15
发布日期:2026-08-13
通信作者:
张细和,正高级工程师。E-mail:zhangxihe_gyy@powerchina.cn作者简介:刘鑫(1988—),男,高级工程师。主要从事绿色胶凝材料方面的研究。E-mail:148345544@qq.com
LIU Xin1(
), LI Mingyang1, ZHANG Xihe1(
), LAN Shaoding2, GAO Xu2
Received:2025-12-15
Revised:2026-01-29
Published:2026-07-15
Online:2026-08-13
摘要:
本文采用磷石膏、矿渣、再生微粉、赤泥和生石灰制备磷石膏-矿渣基全固废胶凝材料,研究再生微粉和赤泥对胶凝材料力学性能、耐久性能和微观结构的影响及协同效应。结果表明,再生微粉和赤泥的掺入显著增强了胶凝材料的力学性能和耐久性能,复掺10%(质量分数)再生微粉与10%(质量分数)赤泥的试样性能相对较优,28 d抗压强度和抗折强度分别为43.2和7.4 MPa,相较磷石膏-矿渣基体系分别提升57.1%和57.4%,非稳态氯离子迁移系数和干燥收缩分别降低42.5%和43.6%,硫酸盐耐蚀系数由73.6%提高至85.6%。再生微粉兼具物理填充与化学活性,为水化反应提供成核位点和活性组分;同时,赤泥能提高体系碱度并引入额外的硅铝质矿物相,加速前驱体的溶解与聚合,并激发再生微粉潜在的火山灰活性。再生微粉与赤泥协同促进了水化硅(铝)酸钙凝胶的形成,并保持稳定的钙矾石产物数量,从而优化水化产物组成,实现孔隙结构致密化和宏观性能的全面提升。本研究有望为绿色胶凝材料的制备和固体废弃物的资源化利用提供技术借鉴。
中图分类号:
刘鑫, 李明阳, 张细和, 蓝少丁, 高旭. 赤泥与再生微粉协同调控磷石膏-矿渣基全固废胶凝材料的耐久性能与微观结构研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(7): 2478-2490.
LIU Xin, LI Mingyang, ZHANG Xihe, LAN Shaoding, GAO Xu. Durability and Microstructure of Phosphogypsum-Slag-Based All-Solid-Waste Cementitious Material Regulated by Red Mud and Recycled Cement Powder[J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(7): 2478-2490.
| Material | Mass fraction/% | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CaO | SiO2 | Al2O3 | SO3 | Na2O | K2O | Fe2O3 | P2O5 | MgO | LOI | |
| GGBS | 33.80 | 31.00 | 12.30 | 2.23 | 0.59 | 0.73 | 1.01 | 0.03 | 7.96 | 2.37 |
| PG | 40.78 | 5.60 | 0.36 | 51.88 | — | 0.09 | 0.28 | 0.71 | 0.06 | 0.12 |
| RCP | 47.53 | 23.53 | 8.98 | 2.41 | 0.61 | 0.81 | 2.02 | 0.06 | 1.65 | 10.12 |
| RM | 15.37 | 21.20 | 23.42 | 1.89 | 9.02 | 1.86 | 19.04 | 0.32 | 1.64 | 2.56 |
表1 胶凝材料的主要化学组成
Table 1 Main chemical composition of cementitious material
| Material | Mass fraction/% | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CaO | SiO2 | Al2O3 | SO3 | Na2O | K2O | Fe2O3 | P2O5 | MgO | LOI | |
| GGBS | 33.80 | 31.00 | 12.30 | 2.23 | 0.59 | 0.73 | 1.01 | 0.03 | 7.96 | 2.37 |
| PG | 40.78 | 5.60 | 0.36 | 51.88 | — | 0.09 | 0.28 | 0.71 | 0.06 | 0.12 |
| RCP | 47.53 | 23.53 | 8.98 | 2.41 | 0.61 | 0.81 | 2.02 | 0.06 | 1.65 | 10.12 |
| RM | 15.37 | 21.20 | 23.42 | 1.89 | 9.02 | 1.86 | 19.04 | 0.32 | 1.64 | 2.56 |
| Sample No. | Binder composition/% | Lime content/% | Water-binder ratio | Binder-sand ratio (mortar) | Concrete composition/(kg·m-3) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PG | GGBS | RCP | RM | Binder | Fine aggregate | Coarse aggregate | ||||
| Ref | 50 | 50 | — | — | 4 | 0.45 | 1∶3 | 450 | 720 | 1 080 |
| RP1 | 40 | 50 | 10 | — | 4 | 0.45 | 1∶3 | 450 | 720 | 1 080 |
| RP2 | 30 | 50 | 20 | — | 4 | 0.45 | 1∶3 | 450 | 720 | 1 080 |
| RM1 | 40 | 50 | — | 10 | 4 | 0.45 | 1∶3 | 450 | 720 | 1 080 |
| RM2 | 30 | 50 | — | 20 | 4 | 0.45 | 1∶3 | 450 | 720 | 1 080 |
| RPM1 | 40 | 50 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 0.45 | 1∶3 | 450 | 720 | 1 080 |
| RPM2 | 30 | 50 | 10 | 10 | 4 | 0.45 | 1∶3 | 450 | 720 | 1 080 |
表2 磷石膏-矿渣基全固废胶凝材料配合比
Table 2 Mix proportion of phosphogypsum-slag-based all-solid-waste cementitious material
| Sample No. | Binder composition/% | Lime content/% | Water-binder ratio | Binder-sand ratio (mortar) | Concrete composition/(kg·m-3) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PG | GGBS | RCP | RM | Binder | Fine aggregate | Coarse aggregate | ||||
| Ref | 50 | 50 | — | — | 4 | 0.45 | 1∶3 | 450 | 720 | 1 080 |
| RP1 | 40 | 50 | 10 | — | 4 | 0.45 | 1∶3 | 450 | 720 | 1 080 |
| RP2 | 30 | 50 | 20 | — | 4 | 0.45 | 1∶3 | 450 | 720 | 1 080 |
| RM1 | 40 | 50 | — | 10 | 4 | 0.45 | 1∶3 | 450 | 720 | 1 080 |
| RM2 | 30 | 50 | — | 20 | 4 | 0.45 | 1∶3 | 450 | 720 | 1 080 |
| RPM1 | 40 | 50 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 0.45 | 1∶3 | 450 | 720 | 1 080 |
| RPM2 | 30 | 50 | 10 | 10 | 4 | 0.45 | 1∶3 | 450 | 720 | 1 080 |
| [1] | CHEN L, LUAN X Y, HAN F, et al. Life cycle environmental and economic assessment of phosphogypsum utilization in China[J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2025, 212: 107938. |
| [2] |
QU F L, ZHANG Y Y, LI M D, et al. Resource recycling of industrial waste phosphogypsum in cementitious materials: pretreatment, properties, and applications[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2025, 376: 124291.
DOI URL |
| [3] | XIA Y, WANG L, ZHAO R L, et al. Industrial gypsum-driven in-situ ettringite formation for enhanced all-solid-waste alkali-activated materials[J]. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2026, 309: 113077. |
| [4] |
SONG Y P, ZHANG J X, WU H S, et al. All-solid-waste alkali-activated materials: a critical review of multi-waste synergy, heavy metal stabilization, and sustainable engineering applications[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2025, 13(6): 119204.
DOI URL |
| [5] |
MURALI G, WONG L S, ABDULKADIR I, et al. Sustainable transformation of waste phosphogypsum into geopolymer concrete: comprehensive review on strength, durability, and microstructural characteristics[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2025, 111: 113597.
DOI URL |
| [6] |
WANG Y G, LIANG Y, SHANG W Z, et al. Revealing the evolution of mechanical performance, environmental performance and microstructure in red mud cementitious materials[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2025, 110: 113083.
DOI URL |
| [7] |
MA T L, DONG Y B, LIN H. Red mud-based all-solid-waste cementitious materials: a review of synthesis, heavy metals immobilization and feasibility application[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2025, 13(5): 117999.
DOI URL |
| [8] |
XU J, XU F, WU Y, et al. Investigation on properties and mechanism of non-calcined Bayer red mud-phosphogypsum cementitious binder[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 379: 134661.
DOI URL |
| [9] |
SUN C B, CHEN X, LU L Z, et al. Synergistic recycling of ground granulated blast furnace slag-red mud-phosphogypsum for developing low-carbon composite cementitious material: performance characterization and process optimization[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2025, 473: 141025.
DOI URL |
| [10] |
LI Z, BIAN Y D, ZHAO J H, et al. Recycled concrete fine powder (RFP) as cement partial replacement: influences on the physical properties, hydration characteristics, and microstructure of blended cement[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2022, 62: 105326.
DOI URL |
| [11] |
WANG C, YU Q J, ZHAN B G, et al. Activity quantification and assessment of recycled concrete powder based on the contributions of the dilution effect, physical effect and chemical effect[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2024, 442: 140918.
DOI URL |
| [12] |
AQUINO ROCHA J H, TOLEDO FILHO R D. The utilization of recycled concrete powder as supplementary cementitious material in cement-based materials: a systematic literature review[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2023, 76: 107319.
DOI URL |
| [13] |
ZHAI W Q, SUN R M, XIE Y D, et al. Thermal-activated recycled cement powder synergized with fly ash as supplementary cementitious in Portland cement: strength, microstructure and environmental benefits[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2025, 474: 141018.
DOI URL |
| [14] |
MA Z M, LIU X, HU R H, et al. Using recycled aggregate and powder from high-strength mortar waste for durable cement-based materials: microstructure and chloride transport[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2023, 417: 137998.
DOI URL |
| [15] |
LIN R S, HUANG G, MA F Y, et al. Investigation of phosphogypsum-based cementitious materials: the effect of lime modification[J]. Developments in the Built Environment, 2024, 18: 100477.
DOI URL |
| [16] |
TANG L, HE Z Y, XIA Y H, et al. Development of phosphogypsum-based full-solid-waste cementitious materials: mechanical properties, hydration mechanisms, and pollutant stabilization mechanisms[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2025, 110: 113100.
DOI URL |
| [17] |
REN Z S, WANG L, WANG H, et al. Carbonation behavior of solidified/stabilized cadmium in phosphogypsum slag-based cementitious materials[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2024, 437: 136848.
DOI URL |
| [18] |
WANG Y F, LIU P, KONG D W, et al. Investigation of the properties and microscopic mechanism of red mud-phosphogypsum-based composite cementitious materials[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2025, 101: 111962.
DOI URL |
| [19] |
HOU S D, HU R H, XU L, et al. Understanding the chloride migration in recycled powder concrete: effects of recycled powder type, replacement rate and substitution pattern[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2024, 436: 136825.
DOI URL |
| [20] |
CHEN K L, LIN W T, LIU Q, et al. Micro-characterizations and geopolymerization mechanism of ternary cementless composite with reactive ultra-fine fly ash, red mud and recycled powder[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2022, 343: 128091.
DOI URL |
| [21] |
SUN H, XIE M X, JIA L T, et al. Development of low-carbon binders from ground granulated blast furnace slag activated by red mud, phosphogypsum, and calcium carbide slag: mechanical and hydration properties[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2025, 111: 113229.
DOI URL |
| [22] |
PEREZ-CORTES P, ESCALANTE-GARCIA J I. Gel composition and molecular structure of alkali-activated metakaolin-limestone cements[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2020, 137: 106211.
DOI URL |
| [23] |
LAN S D, ELMAASRAWY M, CHEN J Y, et al. Microstructure and macro performance characterization of low-slag alkali-activated UHPC based on simplex centroid design method[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2025, 494: 143386.
DOI URL |
| [24] |
MA B H, LI Y Q, LAN T, et al. Hydration mechanism and mechanical properties of slag-phosphogypsum solid waste-based cementitious composite incorporated silica fume[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2025, 485: 141923.
DOI URL |
| [25] | MA Y W, GONG J H, OUYANG X W, et al. Roles of recycled concrete powder on the properties of alkali-activated slag: reaction products and microstructure development[J]. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2025, 301: 112493. |
| [26] |
TAO H Y, TANG J Y, ZHANG C J, et al. Synergistic utilization of recycle cement powder and glass powder to prepare low-carbon and environmentally friendly mortar: mechanical properties, microstructure, and environmental assessment[J]. Materials Today Sustainability, 2025, 32: 101228.
DOI URL |
| [27] |
ZHANG W, XUE C H, ZHAO D Z, et al. Chloride leaching and strength development of alkali-activated materials with municipal solid waste incineration fly ash, red mud and carbide slag[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2025, 392: 126766.
DOI URL |
| [28] | FANG Y, ZHANG L, HU T, et al. A comprehensive review on shrinkage behaviors of alkali-activated metakaolin-blast furnace slag cementitious materials: shrinkage mechanism, properties and mitigate strategies[J]. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 2025, 22: e04391. |
| [29] |
GAO Q, LI X G, SHI X D, et al. Clean and high-value recycling approach for waste concrete powder: mechano-chemical activation of pozzolanic activity[J]. Powder Technology, 2025, 458: 120988.
DOI URL |
| [30] |
MAO X Q, QU W J, ZHU P, et al. Influence of recycled powder on chloride penetration resistance of green reactive powder concrete[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 251: 119049.
DOI URL |
| [1] | 王言珩, 张家伟, 任凯, 严国超, 孔少奇, 李岗, 李博宇, 吴旷旷. 多源固废基胶凝充填体的配比优化与微观机理研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(7): 2448-2465. |
| [2] | 金子豪, 邹自勇, 贺行洋, 苏英, 陈淑琴. 湿磨碳化钢渣对磷建筑石膏性能及微观结构的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(7): 2347-2356. |
| [3] | 张文琮, 保钦凡, 王雨秋, 满保良, 黄果, 郭荣鑫. 硫酸钙晶须对粉煤灰-水泥复合材料水化和微观结构的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(7): 2428-2437. |
| [4] | 张雪梅, 靳晴晴, 常硕, 王露, 李照祺, 张兴照, 刘数华. 超硫酸盐水泥的化学收缩特性研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(7): 2215-2225. |
| [5] | 李富云, 黄胜晶, 焦威力, 邓孝炜, 陈春恒, 韦驰, 赖芳, 李晶. 赤泥基复合水化晶种对硅酸盐水泥砂浆性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(7): 2237-2249. |
| [6] | 欧阳琦, 尹健, 李思娇, 陈怡豪, 覃宇航, 曾一. 复合降碱改性生态多孔混凝土抗硫酸盐侵蚀性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(7): 2290-2298. |
| [7] | 王月, 丛培良. 粉煤灰-电石渣-脱硫石膏胶凝材料力学性能与反应特性[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(7): 2438-2447. |
| [8] | 郝贠洪, 佟海岩, 王栋民, 孙浩, 杜根杰. 多因素交互作用下固废基生态矿区充填材料的制备及性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(7): 2466-2477. |
| [9] | 胡庆浩, 李绍纯, 陈旭, 张书畅. 低浓度CO2条件40 ℃环境对水泥胶砂早期碳化与水化反应进程影响研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(6): 1892-1902. |
| [10] | 肖庆一, 张紫腾, 马明晓, 荆文龙, 李子祎. 芦苇纤维增强流态粉煤灰的力学性能及微观结构分析[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(6): 2181-2190. |
| [11] | 吴言坤, 陈健, 郝建帅, 房奎圳. 钢渣-矿渣-水泥-脱硫石膏四元胶凝体系的水化硬化机理与性能优化研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(6): 2052-2062. |
| [12] | 任骏, 晏云潇, 李苗源, 田镇赫, 赵立兴, 王大富. 微生物改性磷石膏对石膏矿渣水泥性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(5): 1671-1681. |
| [13] | 田淑梅, 罗皓文, 汪洪星, 阮俊浩, 赵田甜, 张笑一, 巫尚蔚. 基于地聚合反应和纳米材料复配优化的赤泥固化研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(5): 1693-1708. |
| [14] | 姚勇, 梁添, 胡亚南, 张玲玲, 刘蕾. 干湿循环下碱激发胶凝材料固化粉质黏土的强度特性与微观机理[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(5): 1801-1811. |
| [15] | 张蕴哲, 陈敏孙, 王洪磊, 周新贵, 余金山. 陶瓷基复合材料的激光烧蚀行为及发展趋势[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(5): 1727-1740. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||