硅酸盐通报 ›› 2026, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (9): 3140-3150.DOI: 10.16552/j.cnki.issn1001-1625.2026.0216
彭双1(
), 高鹏2(
), 周明凯1, 薛秀3, 王宇强2, 秦志庆4
收稿日期:2026-03-10
修订日期:2026-04-21
出版日期:2026-09-15
发布日期:2026-10-09
通信作者:
高鹏,硕士研究生,助理研究员。E-mail:13572186187@163.com作者简介:彭双(2000—),女,硕士研究生。主要从事固废资源化利用方面的研究。E-mail:2849700747@qq.com
基金资助:
PENG Shuang1(
), GAO Peng2(
), ZHOU Mingkai1, XUE Xiu3, WANG Yuqiang2, QIN Zhiqing4
Received:2026-03-10
Revised:2026-04-21
Published:2026-09-15
Online:2026-10-09
摘要:
利用消石灰与循环流化床锅炉灰渣(CFB灰渣)的协同激发作用制备可控低强度材料(CLSM)。针对消石灰固化CFB灰渣基CLSM膨胀性能的发展规律、影响因素及机理尚不明确的问题,研究了灰渣比、消石灰掺量和用水量对CLSM固结体无侧限抗压强度和线性膨胀率的影响。结合XRD、SEM和热重分析,分析了反应产物特征及其作用机理。结果表明,在本试验范围内,灰渣比为40∶60时,28 d无侧限抗压强度达到最大值,为7.7 MPa;灰渣比增加仅使线性膨胀率小幅上升。消石灰掺量为最显著的影响因素,当掺量为0%~25%时,CLSM固结体的无侧限抗压强度和线性膨胀率均随消石灰掺量增加而显著提升;掺量由0%增至5%时,28 d无侧限抗压强度由0.7 MPa提高至6.2 MPa,线性膨胀率由0%增至1.0%,增幅最明显。用水量的增加显著降低了CLSM固结体线性膨胀率,用水量从590 kg/m3增加到650 kg/m3,线性膨胀率降低了62.5%。微观分析表明,消石灰化CFB灰渣形成的主要水化产物为钙矾石(AFt)、水化硅酸钙(C-S-H)凝胶和水化硅铝酸钙(C-A-S-H)凝胶;AFt主要在早期生成,凝胶相在后期持续发展。用水量增加会使体系结构疏松、孔隙增多,从而削弱固结体的强度与膨胀性能。
中图分类号:
彭双, 高鹏, 周明凯, 薛秀, 王宇强, 秦志庆. 消石灰固化CFB灰渣基可控低强度材料的强度与膨胀性能[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(9): 3140-3150.
PENG Shuang, GAO Peng, ZHOU Mingkai, XUE Xiu, WANG Yuqiang, QIN Zhiqing. Strength and Expansion Properties of Hydrated Lime-Solidified CFB Ash-Slag-Based Controlled Low-Strength Material[J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(9): 3140-3150.
| Composition | Al2O3 | SiO2 | SO3 | CaO | Fe2O3 | MgO | LOI | f-CaO | Anhydrite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mass fraction/% | 23.5 | 34.7 | 9.1 | 16.5 | 4.0 | 0.7 | 11.3 | 0.39 | 8.66 |
表1 CFBFA的主要化学组成
Table 1 Main chemical composition of CFBFA
| Composition | Al2O3 | SiO2 | SO3 | CaO | Fe2O3 | MgO | LOI | f-CaO | Anhydrite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mass fraction/% | 23.5 | 34.7 | 9.1 | 16.5 | 4.0 | 0.7 | 11.3 | 0.39 | 8.66 |
| Sieve size/mm | 9.50 | 4.75 | 2.36 | 1.18 | 0.60 | 0.30 | 0.15 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cumulative residue mass fraction/% | 0 | 9 | 21 | 35 | 49 | 75 | 84 |
表2 原始CFBS的颗粒级配
Table 2 Particle gradation of raw CFBS
| Sieve size/mm | 9.50 | 4.75 | 2.36 | 1.18 | 0.60 | 0.30 | 0.15 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cumulative residue mass fraction/% | 0 | 9 | 21 | 35 | 49 | 75 | 84 |
| Composition | SiO2 | Al2O3 | Fe2O3 | CaO | MgO | SO3 | LOI | f-CaO | Anhydrite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mass fraction/% | 46.6 | 29.3 | 3.6 | 7.1 | 0.6 | 6.4 | 3.7 | 3.6 | 4.0 |
表3 CFBS的主要化学组成
Table 3 Main chemical composition of CFBS
| Composition | SiO2 | Al2O3 | Fe2O3 | CaO | MgO | SO3 | LOI | f-CaO | Anhydrite |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mass fraction/% | 46.6 | 29.3 | 3.6 | 7.1 | 0.6 | 6.4 | 3.7 | 3.6 | 4.0 |
| Group | Mass fraction/% | Water content/(kg·m-3) | W/S | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CFBFA | CFBS | Hydrated lime content | |||
| A30S70 | 30 | 70 | 15 | 620 | 0.62 |
| A40S60 | 40 | 60 | 15 | 620 | 0.62 |
| A50S50 | 50 | 50 | 15 | 620 | 0.62 |
| L0 | 40 | 60 | 0 | 620 | 0.62 |
| L1 | 40 | 60 | 1 | 620 | 0.62 |
| L3 | 40 | 60 | 3 | 620 | 0.62 |
| L5 | 40 | 60 | 5 | 620 | 0.62 |
| L15 | 40 | 60 | 15 | 620 | 0.62 |
| L25 | 40 | 60 | 25 | 620 | 0.62 |
| W590 | 40 | 60 | 15 | 590 | 0.59 |
| W620 | 40 | 60 | 15 | 620 | 0.62 |
| W650 | 40 | 60 | 15 | 650 | 0.65 |
表4 消石灰固化CFB灰渣CLSM配合比
Table 4 Mix proportion of hydrated lime-solidified CFB ash-slag CLSM
| Group | Mass fraction/% | Water content/(kg·m-3) | W/S | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CFBFA | CFBS | Hydrated lime content | |||
| A30S70 | 30 | 70 | 15 | 620 | 0.62 |
| A40S60 | 40 | 60 | 15 | 620 | 0.62 |
| A50S50 | 50 | 50 | 15 | 620 | 0.62 |
| L0 | 40 | 60 | 0 | 620 | 0.62 |
| L1 | 40 | 60 | 1 | 620 | 0.62 |
| L3 | 40 | 60 | 3 | 620 | 0.62 |
| L5 | 40 | 60 | 5 | 620 | 0.62 |
| L15 | 40 | 60 | 15 | 620 | 0.62 |
| L25 | 40 | 60 | 25 | 620 | 0.62 |
| W590 | 40 | 60 | 15 | 590 | 0.59 |
| W620 | 40 | 60 | 15 | 620 | 0.62 |
| W650 | 40 | 60 | 15 | 650 | 0.65 |
图4 不同灰渣比下CLSM固结体无侧限抗压强度和线性膨胀率
Fig.4 Unconfined compressive strength and linear expansion ratio of hardened CLSM specimens with different ash-slag ratios
图5 不同消石灰掺量下CLSM固结体无侧限抗压强度和线性膨胀率
Fig.5 Unconfined compressive strength and linear expansion ratio of hardened CLSM specimens with different hydrated lime content
图6 不同消石灰掺量下CLSM固结体28 d无侧限抗压强度与线性膨胀率的关系
Fig.6 28 d unconfined compressive strength and linear expansion ratio of hardened CLSM specimens with different hydrated lime content
图10 不同用水量下CLSM固结体无侧限抗压强度和线性膨胀率
Fig.10 Unconfined compressive strength and linear expansion ratio of hardened CLSM specimens with different water content
| [1] |
GUO W B, ZHOU M K, LIU Y Q, et al. Research on expansion characteristics of circulating fluidized bed boiler bottom slag as concrete fine aggregate[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2025, 101: 111953.
DOI URL |
| [2] |
GUO W B, ZHOU M K, LIU Y Q, et al. Effect of SO3 content in circulating fluidized bed fly ash on expansion performance of circulating fluidized bed ash-slag unfired brick[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2025, 489: 142239.
DOI URL |
| [3] |
CHEN X, ZHANG J C, LU M Y, et al. Study on the effect of calcium and sulfur content on the properties of fly ash based geopolymer[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2022, 314: 125650.
DOI URL |
| [4] | 赵亚娣. CFB炉渣自密实再生混凝土力学性能及耐久性试验研究[D]. 银川: 宁夏大学, 2024. |
| ZHAO Y D. Experimental study on the mechanical properties and durability of self-compacting recycled concrete using CFB slag as fine aggregate[D]. Yinchuan: Ningxia University, 2024 (in Chinese). | |
| [5] | 李卫红, 郭文斌, 郭向兵, 等. CFB灰渣混凝土的组成设计与应用研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(7): 2530-2538. |
| LI W H, GUO W B, GUO X B, et al. Composition design and application of CFB ash-slag concrete[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2024, 43(7): 2530-2538 (in Chinese). | |
| [6] |
梁新春, 周明凯, 高 鹏, 等. CFB灰渣对水泥稳定红砂岩集料的增强改性作用[J]. 公路交通科技, 2024, 41(5): 35-43.
DOI |
| LIANG X C, ZHOU M K, GAO P, et al. Reinforcement and modification effect of CFB fly ash and bottom ash on cement stabilized red sandstone aggregate[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2024, 41(5): 35-43 (in Chinese). | |
| [7] | 韩东霄, 阎蕊珍, 李 倩, 等. 不同养护条件下掺循环流化床固硫灰硬化水泥浆的膨胀性能[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(12): 4332-4341. |
| HAN D X, YAN R Z, LI Q, et al. Expansion performance of hardened cement paste with circulating fluidized bed fly ash under different curing conditions[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2022, 41(12): 4332-4341 (in Chinese). | |
| [8] | 周明凯, 叶 青, 陈 潇, 等. CFB灰渣抹灰砂浆的组成设计与性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(2): 425-432+449. |
| ZHOU M K, YE Q, CHEN X, et al. Composition design and performance of CFB fly ash and CFB slag plastering mortar[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2022, 41(2): 425-432+449 (in Chinese). | |
| [9] |
LEE B Y, JEON S M, GEUN CHO C, et al. Evaluation of time to shrinkage-induced crack initiation in OPC and slag cement matrices incorporating circulating fluidized bed combustion bottom ash[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 257: 119507.
DOI URL |
| [10] |
CHENG Z, MENG Q S, LIU L, et al. Properties and hydration mechanism of slow-setting and expansive cement based on CFB ash and slag[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2024, 96: 110631.
DOI URL |
| [11] |
ZHANG W, GU J R, ZHOU X, et al. Circulating fluidized bed fly ash based multi-solid wastes road base materials: hydration characteristics and utilization of SO3 and f-CaO[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 316: 128355.
DOI URL |
| [12] | 杜兴全, 李军, 黄中, 等. 循环流化床灰渣改性制备水泥混合料试验研究[J]. 电力学报, 2023, 38(4): 267-277. |
| DU X Q, LI J, HUANG Z, et al. Experimental study on preparation of cement mixture by modification of circulating fluidized bed ash[J]. Journal of Electric Power, 2023, 38(4): 267-277 (in Chinese). | |
| [13] |
WANG C H, LI Y D, WEN P H, et al. A comprehensive review on mechanical properties of green controlled low strength materials[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2023, 363: 129611.
DOI URL |
| [14] | 周永祥, 霍孟浩, 侯 莉, 等. 低强度流态填筑材料的研究现状及展望[J]. 材料导报, 2024, 38(15): 126-134. |
| ZHOU Y X, HUO M H, HOU L, et al. Current research and prospect of low strength flowable filling materials[J]. Materials Reports, 2024, 38(15): 126-134 (in Chinese). | |
| [15] |
JANG J G, PARK S M, CHUNG S, et al. Utilization of circulating fluidized bed combustion ash in producing controlled low-strength materials with cement or sodium carbonate as activator[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 159: 642-651.
DOI URL |
| [16] | 徐冬杰. 循环流化床灰渣注浆充填材料应用研究[D]. 邯郸: 河北工程大学, 2021. |
| XU D J. Study on the application of circulating fluidized bed ash grouting filling material[D]. Handan: Hebei University of Engineering, 2021 (in Chinese). | |
| [17] | 夏静萍. CFB灰渣注浆充填材料的设计与关键性能研究[J]. 公路, 2021, 66(8): 99-104. |
| XIA J P. Design and study of key properties of CFB ash-slag grouting backfill materials[J]. Highway, 2021, 66(8): 99-104 (in Chinese). | |
| [18] | LV J Z, WANG X Y, YANG J C, et al. Effect of lime on the physical, mechanical, and hydration properties of circulating fluidized bed fly ash-blast furnace slag-based cementitious materials[J]. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 2024, 20: e02738. |
| [19] |
ZHANG S Q, SHI T Y, NI W, et al. The mechanism of hydrating and solidifying green mine fill materials using circulating fluidized bed fly ash-slag-based agent[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2021, 415: 125625.
DOI URL |
| [20] | 安 赛, 王宝民, 陈文秀, 等. 电石渣激发矿渣-粉煤灰复合胶凝材料的作用机制[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(4): 1333-1343. |
| AN S, WANG B M, CHEN W X, et al. Interaction mechanism of carbide slag activating slag-fly ash composite cementitious materials[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2023, 42(4): 1333-1343 (in Chinese). | |
| [21] |
GUO Q Q, CHEN Y H, XU J, et al. Investigation on mechanical parameters and microstructure of soil-based controlled low-strength materials with polycarboxylate superplasticizer[J]. Applied Sciences, 2024, 14(3): 1029.
DOI URL |
| [1] | 周辉勇, 王艳朝, 高华, 郭威, 凡涛涛, 司春棣, 马喜报. 水玻璃参数对碱激发地聚物工作与力学性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(9): 3163-3173. |
| [2] | 李硕, 秦艳慧, 李蒙恩, 马浩原, 尹金帅, 郑璐璐, 邓苏文. 基于机器学习的混凝土抗压强度全龄期预测与解释性研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(9): 3070-3082. |
| [3] | 陈明胜, 杨宁, 刘天乐, 郑少军, 刘鹏. 碳化养护对磷石膏基复合胶凝材料力学性能与耐水性的影响及机理研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(9): 3222-3232. |
| [4] | 董勇刚, 贾红军, 潘雅婷, 马希凯, 江辉, 周强, 陈潇. 铁尾矿砂稳定用复合固化剂的设计与应用[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(9): 3317-3329. |
| [5] | 李维红, 邓永杰, 王朝英, 钟建军, 吕立博, 麻海燕, 余红发, 李栋伟. 混搅挤一体化快速3D打印实现速凝混凝土可连续建造的验证[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(8): 2699-2710. |
| [6] | 刘莉, 丁盼, 向洋生, 侯莉. 磁化水对不同强度等级混凝土性能与微观结构的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(8): 2676-2685. |
| [7] | 田沈华, 李北星, 肖祥, 周骏康. 基于机器学习的混凝土抗压强度预测:模型筛选与性能比较[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(8): 2711-2723. |
| [8] | 李梦阳, 张超, 王志航, 张悦, 宋晓博, 白二雷, 马建军. 冲击荷载下碳纤维对聚合物改性混凝土力学性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(8): 2664-2675. |
| [9] | 李明明, 姜东兵. SAP对碱激发泡沫混凝土自收缩与热力学性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(8): 2686-2698. |
| [10] | 王言珩, 张家伟, 任凯, 严国超, 孔少奇, 李岗, 李博宇, 吴旷旷. 多源固废基胶凝充填体的配比优化与微观机理研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(7): 2448-2465. |
| [11] | 田成龙, 陶圆, 刘乐平, 相继春, 崔学民, 贺艳. 真空脱水快速评估碱激发矿渣的收缩性能及机理研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(7): 2379-2388. |
| [12] | 马莲霞, 刘超, 陈伟, 朱文轩, 赵维飞, 杨秋菊. 3D打印混凝土力学各向异性及孔隙演化机理[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(6): 1914-1923. |
| [13] | 黄锐, 康鹏, 李勤良, 王涛, 邹东, 张俊云, 张乐, 陈春陆. 基于响应面法的四川盆地沟谷相软弱土固化配合比优化研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(6): 2191-2202. |
| [14] | 朱家俊, 廖宜顺, 郭俊萍, 李文华, 李凌云. 水化热抑制剂对铁铝酸盐水泥水化的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(5): 1483-1490. |
| [15] | 李小庆, 王浦, 方启兴, 吴鹏, 田尉军, 党悦, 刘金鑫, 徐湘田. 水下桩基混凝土早期强度预测模型及护筒拆除龄期研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(5): 1571-1579. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||