硅酸盐通报 ›› 2026, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (7): 2260-2274.DOI: 10.16552/j.cnki.issn1001-1625.2025.1263
收稿日期:2025-12-16
修订日期:2026-03-20
出版日期:2026-07-15
发布日期:2026-08-13
作者简介:许成祥(1965—),男,博士,教授。主要从事土木工程防灾减灾方面的研究。E-mail:cx_xu@sina.com
基金资助:
XU Chengxiang1,2(
), WANG Rui1, XU Qiqi3, YANG Zhao1,2
Received:2025-12-16
Revised:2026-03-20
Published:2026-07-15
Online:2026-08-13
摘要:
为研究冻融作用下钢-聚乙烯醇混杂纤维增强混凝土(S-PVA HFRC)与钢筋的黏结性能,本文选取钢纤维体积率、PVA纤维体积率、矿粉取代率为正交试验因素设计并制作了75个S-PVA HFRC试件,对其进行不同次数冻融循环作用,并完成单调荷载下的中心拉拔试验。研究了不同参数下S-PVA HFRC试件中心拉拔试验的破坏形态、黏结强度、界面黏结刚度及韧性等,探讨了各参数对冻融作用下S-PVA HFRC黏结滑移力学性能的影响规律。结果表明:S-PVA HFRC试件均表现为钢筋拔出破坏;S-PVA HFRC试件黏结强度随冻融次数增加呈降低的趋势,在历经相同次数冻融循环后,S-PVA HFRC试件的黏结强度和峰值滑移均高于未掺纤维的混凝土试件,历经50次冻融循环后S-PVA HFRC试件黏结强度提升最为显著,相较于未掺纤维混凝土试件,钢纤维体积分数为1.3%、PVA纤维体积分数为0.2%、矿粉取代率为15%(质量分数)时S-PVA HFRC试件提升幅度最大,达53.75%;掺入混杂纤维能有效减缓冻融损伤对界面黏结刚度的影响,并显著提高试件的耗能能力;提出的考虑冻融作用下S-PVA HFRC与钢筋之间的黏结-滑移模型,与试验实测结果吻合良好。
中图分类号:
许成祥, 王瑞, 许奇琦, 杨曌. 冻融作用下钢-PVA混杂纤维增强混凝土与钢筋黏结性能试验研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(7): 2260-2274.
XU Chengxiang, WANG Rui, XU Qiqi, YANG Zhao. Experimental Study on Bond Performance Between Steel-PVA Hybrid Fiber Reinforced Concrete and Steel Bars under Freeze-Thaw Cycles[J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(7): 2260-2274.
| Item | Fiber type | Length/mm | Equivalent diameter/mm | Aspect ratio | Density/(g·cm-3) | Tensile strength/MPa | Elastic modulus/GPa |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steel fiber | Milled wave type | 36 | 0.6 | 60 | 7.8 | 660 | 200 |
| PVA fiber | Bundled monofilament type | 12 | 0.031 | 381.7 | 1.3 | 1 830 | 40 |
表1 纤维性能参数
Table 1 Performance parameters of fibers
| Item | Fiber type | Length/mm | Equivalent diameter/mm | Aspect ratio | Density/(g·cm-3) | Tensile strength/MPa | Elastic modulus/GPa |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steel fiber | Milled wave type | 36 | 0.6 | 60 | 7.8 | 660 | 200 |
| PVA fiber | Bundled monofilament type | 12 | 0.031 | 381.7 | 1.3 | 1 830 | 40 |
| Water-cement ratio | Material dosage/(kg·m-3) | Sand ratio/% | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cement | Coarse aggregate | Fine aggregate | Water | Water reducer | ||
| 0.407 | 396.2 | 1 263.1 | 594.4 | 161.3 | 5.6 | 32 |
表2 混凝土基准配合比
Table 2 Reference mix proportion of concrete
| Water-cement ratio | Material dosage/(kg·m-3) | Sand ratio/% | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cement | Coarse aggregate | Fine aggregate | Water | Water reducer | ||
| 0.407 | 396.2 | 1 263.1 | 594.4 | 161.3 | 5.6 | 32 |
| Level | Factor | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Steel fiber content/% | PVA fiber content/% | Mineral powder content/% | |
| 1 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 15 |
| 2 | 1.3 | 0.2 | 30 |
表3 正交试验因素
Table 3 Factors of orthogonal test
| Level | Factor | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Steel fiber content/% | PVA fiber content/% | Mineral powder content/% | |
| 1 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 15 |
| 2 | 1.3 | 0.2 | 30 |
| Group | Steel fiber content/% | PVA fiber content/% | Mineral powder content/% |
|---|---|---|---|
| NC | — | — | — |
| A | 0.8 | 0.1 | 15 |
| B | 0.8 | 0.2 | 30 |
| C | 1.3 | 0.1 | 30 |
| D | 1.3 | 0.2 | 15 |
表4 正交试验方案
Table 4 Orthogonal test scheme
| Group | Steel fiber content/% | PVA fiber content/% | Mineral powder content/% |
|---|---|---|---|
| NC | — | — | — |
| A | 0.8 | 0.1 | 15 |
| B | 0.8 | 0.2 | 30 |
| C | 1.3 | 0.1 | 30 |
| D | 1.3 | 0.2 | 15 |
| Specimen group | Freeze-thaw cycle | Ultimate load average | Compressive strength average | Ultimate bond strength average | Peak slip | Failure mode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NC-0 | 0 | 71.40 | 58.91 | 18.95 | 0.51 | S |
| NC-25 | 25 | 61.76 | 55.83 | 16.39 | 0.80 | S |
| NC-50 | 50 | 30.71 | 46.32 | 8.15 | 1.36 | P |
| NC-75 | 75 | 30.18 | 29.01 | 8.01 | 1.76 | P |
| NC-100 | 100 | 24.42 | 22.79 | 6.48 | 1.82 | P |
| A-0 | 0 | 76.08 | 60.13 | 20.19 | 0.78 | P |
| A-25 | 25 | 70.65 | 56.94 | 18.75 | 1.43 | P |
| A-50 | 50 | 41.79 | 49.95 | 11.09 | 2.23 | P |
| A-75 | 75 | 38.70 | 44.27 | 10.27 | 2.30 | P |
| A-100 | 100 | 33.08 | 34.65 | 8.78 | 2.34 | P |
| B-0 | 0 | 83.50 | 61.74 | 22.16 | 0.92 | P |
| B-25 | 25 | 74.31 | 59.64 | 19.72 | 1.73 | P |
| B-50 | 50 | 44.31 | 50.24 | 11.76 | 2.43 | P |
| B-75 | 75 | 40.69 | 42.60 | 10.80 | 2.41 | P |
| B-100 | 100 | 39.30 | 37.60 | 10.43 | 2.63 | P |
| C-0 | 0 | 84.89 | 67.92 | 22.53 | 1.04 | P |
| C-25 | 25 | 76.91 | 66.68 | 20.41 | 1.98 | P |
| C-50 | 50 | 44.92 | 56.50 | 11.92 | 2.45 | P |
| C-75 | 75 | 39.11 | 48.69 | 10.38 | 2.47 | P |
| C-100 | 100 | 35.42 | 40.69 | 9.40 | 2.68 | P |
| D-0 | 0 | 88.70 | 65.87 | 23.54 | 1.10 | P |
| D-25 | 25 | 78.60 | 64.49 | 20.86 | 2.12 | P |
| D-50 | 50 | 57.80 | 56.91 | 15.34 | 2.47 | P |
| D-75 | 75 | 45.89 | 49.67 | 12.18 | 2.69 | P |
| D-100 | 100 | 42.77 | 38.19 | 11.35 | 2.76 | P |
表5 试验结果及破坏模式
Table 5 Experimental results and failure modes
| Specimen group | Freeze-thaw cycle | Ultimate load average | Compressive strength average | Ultimate bond strength average | Peak slip | Failure mode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NC-0 | 0 | 71.40 | 58.91 | 18.95 | 0.51 | S |
| NC-25 | 25 | 61.76 | 55.83 | 16.39 | 0.80 | S |
| NC-50 | 50 | 30.71 | 46.32 | 8.15 | 1.36 | P |
| NC-75 | 75 | 30.18 | 29.01 | 8.01 | 1.76 | P |
| NC-100 | 100 | 24.42 | 22.79 | 6.48 | 1.82 | P |
| A-0 | 0 | 76.08 | 60.13 | 20.19 | 0.78 | P |
| A-25 | 25 | 70.65 | 56.94 | 18.75 | 1.43 | P |
| A-50 | 50 | 41.79 | 49.95 | 11.09 | 2.23 | P |
| A-75 | 75 | 38.70 | 44.27 | 10.27 | 2.30 | P |
| A-100 | 100 | 33.08 | 34.65 | 8.78 | 2.34 | P |
| B-0 | 0 | 83.50 | 61.74 | 22.16 | 0.92 | P |
| B-25 | 25 | 74.31 | 59.64 | 19.72 | 1.73 | P |
| B-50 | 50 | 44.31 | 50.24 | 11.76 | 2.43 | P |
| B-75 | 75 | 40.69 | 42.60 | 10.80 | 2.41 | P |
| B-100 | 100 | 39.30 | 37.60 | 10.43 | 2.63 | P |
| C-0 | 0 | 84.89 | 67.92 | 22.53 | 1.04 | P |
| C-25 | 25 | 76.91 | 66.68 | 20.41 | 1.98 | P |
| C-50 | 50 | 44.92 | 56.50 | 11.92 | 2.45 | P |
| C-75 | 75 | 39.11 | 48.69 | 10.38 | 2.47 | P |
| C-100 | 100 | 35.42 | 40.69 | 9.40 | 2.68 | P |
| D-0 | 0 | 88.70 | 65.87 | 23.54 | 1.10 | P |
| D-25 | 25 | 78.60 | 64.49 | 20.86 | 2.12 | P |
| D-50 | 50 | 57.80 | 56.91 | 15.34 | 2.47 | P |
| D-75 | 75 | 45.89 | 49.67 | 12.18 | 2.69 | P |
| D-100 | 100 | 42.77 | 38.19 | 11.35 | 2.76 | P |
| Index | Freeze-thaw cycle | Factor | Range R | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ultimate bond strength | 0 | Steel fiber | 21.18 | 23.04 | 1.86 |
| PVA fiber | 21.36 | 22.85 | 1.49 | ||
| Mineral powder | 21.87 | 22.35 | 0.48 | ||
| 25 | Steel fiber | 19.24 | 20.64 | 1.40 | |
| PVA fiber | 19.58 | 20.29 | 0.71 | ||
| Mineral powder | 19.81 | 20.07 | 0.26 | ||
| 50 | Steel fiber | 11.43 | 13.63 | 2.21 | |
| PVA fiber | 11.51 | 13.55 | 2.05 | ||
| Mineral powder | 13.22 | 11.84 | 1.38 | ||
| 75 | Steel fiber | 10.54 | 12.61 | 2.08 | |
| PVA fiber | 10.33 | 12.82 | 2.50 | ||
| Mineral powder | 12.56 | 10.59 | 1.97 | ||
| 100 | Steel fiber | 8.55 | 10.38 | 1.83 | |
| PVA fiber | 8.03 | 10.89 | 2.86 | ||
| Mineral powder | 9.01 | 9.92 | 0.91 |
表6 极限黏结强度极差分析结果
Table 6 Range analysis of ultimate bond strength
| Index | Freeze-thaw cycle | Factor | Range R | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ultimate bond strength | 0 | Steel fiber | 21.18 | 23.04 | 1.86 |
| PVA fiber | 21.36 | 22.85 | 1.49 | ||
| Mineral powder | 21.87 | 22.35 | 0.48 | ||
| 25 | Steel fiber | 19.24 | 20.64 | 1.40 | |
| PVA fiber | 19.58 | 20.29 | 0.71 | ||
| Mineral powder | 19.81 | 20.07 | 0.26 | ||
| 50 | Steel fiber | 11.43 | 13.63 | 2.21 | |
| PVA fiber | 11.51 | 13.55 | 2.05 | ||
| Mineral powder | 13.22 | 11.84 | 1.38 | ||
| 75 | Steel fiber | 10.54 | 12.61 | 2.08 | |
| PVA fiber | 10.33 | 12.82 | 2.50 | ||
| Mineral powder | 12.56 | 10.59 | 1.97 | ||
| 100 | Steel fiber | 8.55 | 10.38 | 1.83 | |
| PVA fiber | 8.03 | 10.89 | 2.86 | ||
| Mineral powder | 9.01 | 9.92 | 0.91 |
| Freeze-thaw cycle | Interfacial bond stiffness of S-PVA HFRC specimens after different freeze-thaw cycles | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group NC | Group A | Group B | Group C | Group D | |
| 0 | 37.16 | 25.88 | 24.09 | 21.66 | 21.4 |
| 25 | 20.49 | 13.11 | 11.4 | 10.31 | 9.84 |
| 50 | 5.99 | 4.97 | 4.84 | 4.87 | 6.21 |
| 75 | 4.1 | 4.47 | 4.48 | 4.2 | 4.53 |
| 100 | 3.56 | 3.75 | 3.97 | 3.51 | 4.11 |
表7 S-PVA HFRC试件的界面黏结刚度
Table 7 Interfacial bond stiffness of S-PVA HFRC specimens
| Freeze-thaw cycle | Interfacial bond stiffness of S-PVA HFRC specimens after different freeze-thaw cycles | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group NC | Group A | Group B | Group C | Group D | |
| 0 | 37.16 | 25.88 | 24.09 | 21.66 | 21.4 |
| 25 | 20.49 | 13.11 | 11.4 | 10.31 | 9.84 |
| 50 | 5.99 | 4.97 | 4.84 | 4.87 | 6.21 |
| 75 | 4.1 | 4.47 | 4.48 | 4.2 | 4.53 |
| 100 | 3.56 | 3.75 | 3.97 | 3.51 | 4.11 |
| Freeze-thaw cycle | Energy dissipation factor of S-PVA HFRC specimens after different freeze-thaw cycles | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group NC | Group A | Group B | Group C | Group D | |
| 0 | 0.13 | 0.12 | 0.14 | 0.21 | 0.36 |
| 25 | 0.15 | 0.21 | 0.23 | 0.20 | 0.21 |
| 50 | 0.19 | 0.23 | 0.27 | 0.25 | 0.31 |
| 75 | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.25 | 0.22 | 0.35 |
| 100 | 0.15 | 0.30 | 0.39 | 0.29 | 0.20 |
表8 S-PVA HFRC试件的耗能因子
Table 8 Energy dissipation factor of S-PVA HFRC specimens
| Freeze-thaw cycle | Energy dissipation factor of S-PVA HFRC specimens after different freeze-thaw cycles | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group NC | Group A | Group B | Group C | Group D | |
| 0 | 0.13 | 0.12 | 0.14 | 0.21 | 0.36 |
| 25 | 0.15 | 0.21 | 0.23 | 0.20 | 0.21 |
| 50 | 0.19 | 0.23 | 0.27 | 0.25 | 0.31 |
| 75 | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.25 | 0.22 | 0.35 |
| 100 | 0.15 | 0.30 | 0.39 | 0.29 | 0.20 |
| Group | Determination coefficient R2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| N | 0.025 2 | 0.728 6 | 0.894 0 |
| A | 0.011 7 | 0.857 3 | 0.895 4 |
| B | 0.021 9 | 0.713 5 | 0.885 3 |
| C | 0.015 3 | 0.809 5 | 0.902 3 |
| D | 0.011 3 | 0.845 5 | 0.958 9 |
表9 拟合值结果
Table 9 Fitted parameters
| Group | Determination coefficient R2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| N | 0.025 2 | 0.728 6 | 0.894 0 |
| A | 0.011 7 | 0.857 3 | 0.895 4 |
| B | 0.021 9 | 0.713 5 | 0.885 3 |
| C | 0.015 3 | 0.809 5 | 0.902 3 |
| D | 0.011 3 | 0.845 5 | 0.958 9 |
| Freeze-thaw cycle | R2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group NC | Group A | Group B | Group C | Group D | |
| 0 | 0.970 | 0.985 | 0.961 | 0.973 | 0.965 |
| 25 | 0.943 | 0.960 | 0.977 | 0.967 | 0.982 |
| 50 | 0.979 | 0.936 | 0.980 | 0.948 | 0.964 |
| 75 | 0.978 | 0.986 | 0.979 | 0.985 | 0.971 |
| 100 | 0.993 | 0.958 | 0.967 | 0.971 | 0.864 |
表10 S-PVA HFRC试件黏结应力-滑移上升段曲线的决定系数R2
Table 10 R2 for ascending branch of bond stress-slip response of S-PVA HFRC specimens
| Freeze-thaw cycle | R2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group NC | Group A | Group B | Group C | Group D | |
| 0 | 0.970 | 0.985 | 0.961 | 0.973 | 0.965 |
| 25 | 0.943 | 0.960 | 0.977 | 0.967 | 0.982 |
| 50 | 0.979 | 0.936 | 0.980 | 0.948 | 0.964 |
| 75 | 0.978 | 0.986 | 0.979 | 0.985 | 0.971 |
| 100 | 0.993 | 0.958 | 0.967 | 0.971 | 0.864 |
| Freeze-thaw cycle | R2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group NC | Group A | Group B | Group C | Group D | |
| 0 | 0.935 | 0.924 | 0.948 | 0.992 | 0.974 |
| 25 | 0.943 | 0.987 | 0.964 | 0.906 | 0.987 |
| 50 | 0.959 | 0.925 | 0.930 | 0.945 | 0.945 |
| 75 | 0.771 | 0.935 | 0.917 | 0.939 | 0.869 |
| 100 | 0.889 | 0.90 | 0.994 | 0.992 | 0.865 |
表11 S-PVA HFRC试件黏结应力-滑移下降段曲线的决定系数R2
Table 11 R2 for descending branch of bond stress-slip response of S-PVA HFRC specimens
| Freeze-thaw cycle | R2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group NC | Group A | Group B | Group C | Group D | |
| 0 | 0.935 | 0.924 | 0.948 | 0.992 | 0.974 |
| 25 | 0.943 | 0.987 | 0.964 | 0.906 | 0.987 |
| 50 | 0.959 | 0.925 | 0.930 | 0.945 | 0.945 |
| 75 | 0.771 | 0.935 | 0.917 | 0.939 | 0.869 |
| 100 | 0.889 | 0.90 | 0.994 | 0.992 | 0.865 |
| [1] | 董昊良, 李化建, 杨志强, 等. 混凝土冻融破坏机理及寿命预测方法[J]. 材料导报, 2024, 38(2): 143-153. |
| DONG H L, LI H J, YANG Z Q, et al. Freeze-thaw failure mechanisms and service life prediction methods of concrete[J]. Materials Reports, 2024, 38(2): 143-153 (in Chinese). | |
| [2] | 刘恩铭, 林明强, 谢群. 再生粗骨料混凝土抗冻性能研究进展[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(9): 2963-2978. |
| LIU E M, LIN M Q, XIE Q. Research progress on frost resistance property of recycled coarse aggregate concrete[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2022, 41(9): 2963-2978 (in Chinese). | |
| [3] |
WANG R J, HU Z Y, LI Y, et al. Review on the deterioration and approaches to enhance the durability of concrete in the freeze-thaw environment[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2022, 321: 126371.
DOI URL |
| [4] |
CAO W, HU G W, LIU X R, et al. Study on the performance evolution and deterioration mechanism of deformed plastic-steel fiber reinforced sprayed concrete (DPSC) under sulfate erosion[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2025, 115: 114495.
DOI URL |
| [5] |
LIU S Q, XU X Q, LI W J, et al. Salt freeze-thaw resistance and damage evolution model of concrete reinforced with corrosion-resistant coated steel fiber[J]. Structures, 2025, 76: 108900.
DOI URL |
| [6] |
YI F Y, LI H H, WU Y F, et al. Experimental assessment of freeze-thaw deterioration in compression-cast fiber-reinforced concrete[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2024, 98: 111424.
DOI URL |
| [7] |
徐存东, 杨百昌, 王海若, 等. 复合盐冻侵蚀下玄武岩纤维混凝土力学性能试验研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(6): 2101-2110.
DOI |
|
XU C D, YANG B C, WANG H R, et al. Mechanical properties of basalt fiber concrete under compound salt freezing erosion[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2025, 44(6): 2101-2110 (in Chinese).
DOI |
|
| [8] |
DONG F Y, WANG H P, YU J T, et al. Effect of freeze-thaw cycling on mechanical properties of polyethylene fiber and steel fiber reinforced concrete[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 295: 123427.
DOI URL |
| [9] | XIA D T, YU S T, YU J L, et al. Damage characteristics of hybrid fiber reinforced concrete under the freeze-thaw cycles and compound-salt attack[J]. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 2023, 18: e01814. |
| [10] | 邵善庆, 龚爱民, 罗加辉, 等. 混杂玄武岩纤维混凝土孔隙结构及抗冻性[J]. 水力发电学报, 2025, 44(2): 116-124. |
| SHAO S Q, GONG A M, LUO J H, et al. Pore structure and frost resistance of mixed basalt fiber concrete[J]. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 2025, 44(2): 116-124 (in Chinese). | |
| [11] |
CHU S H, UNLUER C, YOO D Y, et al. Bond of steel reinforcing bars in self-prestressed hybrid steel fiber reinforced concrete[J]. Engineering Structures, 2023, 291: 116390.
DOI URL |
| [12] |
ZHANG Q, LEI S C, LI J T, et al. A hybrid method for bond-slip behavior of reinforcement rebar in steel-polypropylene hybrid fiber reinforced concrete structures in marine environments[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2024, 300: 117437.
DOI URL |
| [13] | 宁喜亮, 刘朕钰, 李媛媛, 等. 氯盐-冻融耦合作用下GFRP筋与纤维自密实混凝土粘结耐久性能[J]. 复合材料学报, 2025, 42(9): 5189-5202. |
| NING X L, LIU Z Y, LI Y Y, et al. Bond durability between GFRP rebars and fiber reinforced self-compacting concrete under coupled chloride salt and freeze-thaw cycles[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2025, 42(9): 5189-5202 (in Chinese). | |
| [14] | PHAM T M. Fibre-reinforced concrete: state-of-the-art-review on bridging mechanism, mechanical properties, durability, and eco-economic analysis[J]. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 2025, 22: e04574. |
| [15] |
SMARZEWSKI P. Mechanical properties and durability of ultra-high performance concrete containing steel fibers[J]. Composite Structures, 2025, 371: 119471.
DOI URL |
| [16] | 许成祥, 李先琪, 许奇琦, 等. 高温后钢-PVA混杂纤维高性能混凝土爆裂性能[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2025, 25(27): 11783-11792. |
| XU C X, LI X Q, XU Q Q, et al. Bursting performance of high performance concrete with steel-PVA hybrid fibre after high temperature[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2025, 25(27): 11783-11792 (in Chinese). | |
| [17] |
ZHANG J H, CHEN S S, GU F, et al. Multi-scale reinforcing effect of steel-PVA fibers and carbon nanotubes on fully recycled aggregate concrete: mechanical properties and microstructures[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2025, 113: 114067.
DOI URL |
| [18] | 徐佳宁, 刘中宪, 刘华新. 冻融循环下纤维再生混凝土与BFRP筋粘结强度试验研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2018, 37(10): 3355-3360. |
| XU J N, LIU Z X, LIU H X. Experimental study on bond strength of fiber recycled concrete and BFRP bar under freeze-thaw rycles[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2018, 37(10): 3355-3360 (in Chinese). | |
| [19] | 许成祥, 张家琪. 钢-PVA混杂纤维高性能混凝土抗渗性能试验研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(6): 2130-2136+2148. |
| XU C X, ZHANG J Q. Permeability resistance test of steel-PVA hybrid fiber high performance concrete[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2024, 43(6): 2130-2136+2148 (in Chinese). | |
| [20] | NIU D T, GONG S Y, GUO B B, et al. Study on frost resistance of steel-PVA hybrid fiber concrete[M]// Advances in Frontier Research on Engineering Structures. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2023: 105-112. |
| [21] | 朱佳鹏, 孙敏. 钢-聚乙烯醇纤维混凝土与锈蚀钢筋粘结性能研究[J]. 水电能源科学, 2017, 35(6): 100-103. |
| ZHU J P, SUN M. Study on bond behavior between steel-PVA reinforced concrete and corroded steel bars[J]. Water Resources and Power, 2017, 35(6): 100-103 (in Chinese). | |
| [22] | 许成祥, 吕红杰, 许奇琦, 等. 高温后钢-PVA混杂纤维高性能混凝土与变形钢筋黏结性能试验[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2024, 24(20): 8615-8623. |
| XU C X, LYU H J, XU Q Q, et al. Experiment of the bond behavior between steel-PVA hybrid fiber high performance concrete and deformed bars after elevated temperature[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2024, 24(20): 8615-8623 (in Chinese). | |
| [23] | 牛荻涛, 姜磊, 白敏. 钢纤维混凝土抗冻性能试验研究[J]. 土木建筑与环境工程, 2012, 34(4): 80-84+98. |
| NIU D T, JIANG L, BAI M. Experimental analysis on the frost resistance of steel fiber reinforced concrete[J]. Journal of Civil, Architectural & Environmental Engineering, 2012, 34(4): 80-84+98 (in Chinese). | |
| [24] | 刘曙光, 尹立强, 闫长旺, 等. 聚乙烯醇纤维对盐冻混凝土抗折强度的影响[J]. 材料导报, 2015, 29(24): 92-97. |
| LIU S G, YIN L Q, YAN C W, et al. Improved flexural strength resistance of PVA fiber-reinforced concrete subjected to freezing and thawing cycles in chloride environment[J]. Materials Reports, 2015, 29(24): 92-97 (in Chinese). | |
| [25] |
KARAHAN O, ATIŞ C D. The durability properties of polypropylene fiber reinforced fly ash concrete[J]. Materials & Design, 2011, 32(2): 1044-1049.
DOI URL |
| [26] | 牛建刚, 王梦雨, 李京军, 等. 冻融后塑钢纤维轻骨料混凝土与钢筋黏结性能试验研究[J]. 应用基础与工程科学学报, 2021, 29(2): 459-470. |
| NIU J G, WANG M Y, LI J J, et al. Study on the bond behavior between plastic-steel fiber reinforced lightweight aggregate concrete and rebar after freezing-thawing[J]. Journal of Basic Science and Engineering, 2021, 29(2): 459-470 (in Chinese). | |
| [27] |
HOU L J, LIU H, XU S L, et al. Effect of corrosion on bond behaviors of rebar embedded in ultra-high toughness cementitious composite[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2017, 138: 141-150.
DOI URL |
| [28] | 王博, 白国良, 代慧娟, 等. 再生混凝土与钢筋粘结滑移性能的试验研究及力学分析[J]. 工程力学, 2013, 30(10): 54-64. |
| WANG B, BAI G L, DAI H J, et al. Experimental and mechanical analysis of bond-slip performance between recycled concrete and rebar[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2013, 30(10): 54-64 (in Chinese). | |
| [29] |
GARCIA-TAENGUA E, MARTÍ-VARGAS J R, SERNA P. Bond of reinforcing bars to steel fiber reinforced concrete[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2016, 105: 275-284.
DOI URL |
| [30] |
JI X D, SONG Y P, LIU Y. Effect of freeze-thaw cycles on bond strength between steel bars and concrete[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology-Mater Sci Ed, 2008, 23(4): 584-588.
DOI URL |
| [31] | 曹芙波, 唐磊杰, 丁兵兵, 等. 冻融损伤后钢筋与再生混凝土黏结滑移性能试验研究[J]. 工程力学, 2017, 34( ): 244-251. |
| CAO F B, TANG L J, DING B B, et al. Study on bond-slip properties between steel bars and recycled concrete after freeze-thaw cycles[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2017, 34(supplement 1): 244-251 (in Chinese). | |
| [32] | NILSON A H. Internal measurement of bond slip[J]. Journal Proceedings, 1972, 69(7): 439-441. |
| [33] | 徐礼华, 陈平, 黄乐, 等. 钢-聚丙烯混杂纤维混凝土与变形钢筋黏结性能试验研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2015, 48(4): 15-22. |
| XU L H, CHEN P, HUANG L, et al. Experimental research on bond properties between hybrid steel-polypropylene fiber reinforced concrete and deformed bar[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2015, 48(4): 15-22 (in Chinese). |
| [1] | 马越, 张博, 吴守军, 刘彦钰, 刘彪, 贺维. 盐冻-干湿循环下钢纤维混凝土耐久性研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(7): 2250-2259. |
| [2] | 刘亚君, 薛善彬, 郑子昊, 史志浩, 王文焕. 冻融循环对硅烷改性ECC力学与吸水性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(6): 1876-1891. |
| [3] | 孔昕, 吴佳明, 宋本腾, 王振兴, 叶正茂. 陶砂轻质砂浆的组分配合比优化及性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(2): 413-425. |
| [4] | 李小鹏, 赵军, 陈哲涵, 梁梦阳. 高性能微细钢纤维硫铝酸盐水泥混凝土收缩性能及预测模型[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(2): 461-470. |
| [5] | 郭永民, 张龙娇, 安新正, 李伟志, 安树好, 纪梦琦, 王燕. 钢纤维混凝土声发射参数设定与声源定位精度研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(2): 471-481. |
| [6] | 曹伟, 李新阳, 刘福酉. 氧化镁激发矿粉-玄武岩纤维固化盾构渣土的强度与耐干湿循环性能[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(2): 725-734. |
| [7] | 李彤, 王庆贺, 张逸超. 冻融循环作用下相变混凝土温度响应及热力场调控机理研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(1): 69-80. |
| [8] | 赵宇, 王哲, 朱伶俐. 纤维对3D打印UHPC流变性能和力学性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(8): 2823-2838. |
| [9] | 王佳慧, 王凤池, 孙畅. 回收轮胎聚合物纤维水泥改良碳酸盐渍土抗冻性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(7): 2720-2729. |
| [10] | 张亚芳, 叶国诚, 曾科, 许敬彬, 包嗣海. 基于细观力学的GS-UHPCC界面黏结行为研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(6): 2070-2078. |
| [11] | 任恩重, 张翔, 董珑慧. 冻融循环下灌浆修复裂缝混凝土试件力学特性研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(6): 2135-2148. |
| [12] | 倪静, 朱莉莉, 耿雪玉. 生物聚合物联合纤维固化黄土的耐久性研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(6): 2222-2232. |
| [13] | 王宁宁, 胡康飞, 包益鋆, 张文文, 卜静武, 陈徐东. 矿粉和粉煤灰掺量对可控性低强度材料(CLSM)性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(5): 1726-1733. |
| [14] | 刘昊信, 乔宏霞, 马法荣, 付勇, 魏定邦, 张磊. 复合盐冻融循环下机制砂混凝土的劣化规律及寿命预测[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(5): 1634-1645. |
| [15] | 王玉清, 姚浥芯, 云泽亚, 蔡思远, 刘曙光. 风积沙PVA-FRCC早期收缩性能及配合比研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(5): 1666-1675. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||