硅酸盐通报 ›› 2026, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (2): 562-572.DOI: 10.16552/j.cnki.issn1001-1625.2025.0810
所属专题: 资源综合利用
收稿日期:2025-08-11
修订日期:2025-09-08
出版日期:2026-02-15
发布日期:2026-03-09
通信作者:
张晓翔,工程师。E-mail:zhangxiaoxiang@czjky.com作者简介:温和(1980—),男,副教授。主要从事水泥基材料、绿色高性能混凝土方面的研究。E-mail:dawenhe@foxmail.com
基金资助:
WEN He1(
), ZHANG Xiaoxiang2(
), GU Lei2, DENG Jiaxin2
Received:2025-08-11
Revised:2025-09-08
Published:2026-02-15
Online:2026-03-09
摘要:
普通胶凝材料的碳化已有广泛研究,但低热水泥与钢渣的协同碳化行为仍缺乏系统探索。钢渣中富含游离CaO和潜在水化活性,可促进低热水泥体系碳化反应。本研究通过调控胶砂比、水灰比和钢渣掺量,考察不同碳化时间及养护条件下的抗压强度、孔结构和矿物相演变。结果表明,适当预养护能调节剩余水灰比,促进CO2扩散并提高碳化效率。在胶砂比为3∶5、低水灰比条件下,试样在48 h内基本完成碳化,主要碳化产物为方解石,文石的形成与碳化速率相关。抗压强度与碳化程度呈良好相关性,碳化48 h后抗压强度最高达68.8 MPa。孔结构分析显示,碳化及后续水化可显著细化孔径并提高试样致密性。XRD、TG-DTG、FT-IR和SEM-EDS揭示碳化生成的CaCO3与水化产物形成三维交联结构,显著改善试样的微观密实性与力学性能。
中图分类号:
温和, 张晓翔, 顾磊, 邓加鑫. 低热水泥钢渣砂浆碳化-水化协同机制与微观结构演化[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(2): 562-572.
WEN He, ZHANG Xiaoxiang, GU Lei, DENG Jiaxin. Synergistic Carbonation-Hydration Mechanisms and Microstructural Evolution in Low-Heat Cement and Steel Slag Mortars[J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(2): 562-572.
| Material | Mass fraction/% | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CaO | SiO2 | Fe2O3 | MgO | Al2O3 | MnO | P2O5 | TiO2 | Cr2O3 | Other | |
| Low heat cement | 62.43 | 21.53 | 4.23 | 1.08 | 4.57 | 3.24 | 0.68 | 0.37 | 0.55 | 1.32 |
| Steel slag | 40.88 | 13.85 | 29.26 | 4.24 | 2.24 | 4.49 | 2.83 | 1.08 | 0.44 | 0.69 |
表1 低热水泥和钢渣粉的主要化学组成
Table 1 Main chemical composition of low heat cement and steel slag powder
| Material | Mass fraction/% | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CaO | SiO2 | Fe2O3 | MgO | Al2O3 | MnO | P2O5 | TiO2 | Cr2O3 | Other | |
| Low heat cement | 62.43 | 21.53 | 4.23 | 1.08 | 4.57 | 3.24 | 0.68 | 0.37 | 0.55 | 1.32 |
| Steel slag | 40.88 | 13.85 | 29.26 | 4.24 | 2.24 | 4.49 | 2.83 | 1.08 | 0.44 | 0.69 |
| Material | Mass fraction/% | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C2S | C3S | C3A | C4AF | Total | |
| Low heat cement | 41.80 | 30.80 | 2.86 | 15.00 | 90.46 |
表2 低热水泥的主要矿物组成
Table 2 Main mineral composition of low heat cement
| Material | Mass fraction/% | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C2S | C3S | C3A | C4AF | Total | |
| Low heat cement | 41.80 | 30.80 | 2.86 | 15.00 | 90.46 |
| Sample No. | Low heatcement mass fraction/% | Steel slagmassfraction/% | Binder-sand ratio (mass ratio) | Water-binder ratio (mass ratio) | Water reducer massfraction/% | CO2 curingtime/h | Standard curing time/d |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | 100 | 0 | 1∶1 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 48 | — |
| A2 | 50 | 50 | 1∶1 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 48 | — |
| B1 | 100 | 0 | 3∶5 | 0.25 | 0.8 | 12, 24, 48 | 3, 7, 28 |
| B2 | 75 | 25 | 3∶5 | 0.25 | 0.8 | 12, 24, 48 | 3, 7, 28 |
| B3 | 50 | 50 | 3∶5 | 0.20 | 1.2 | 12, 24, 48 | 3, 7, 28 |
| B4 | 50 | 50 | 3∶5 | 0.25 | 0.8 | 12, 24, 48 | 3, 7, 28 |
| B5 | 50 | 50 | 3∶5 | 0.30 | 0.1 | 12, 24, 48 | 3, 7, 28 |
表 3 试验配合比设计及养护时间
Table 3 Mix ratio design and curing time
| Sample No. | Low heatcement mass fraction/% | Steel slagmassfraction/% | Binder-sand ratio (mass ratio) | Water-binder ratio (mass ratio) | Water reducer massfraction/% | CO2 curingtime/h | Standard curing time/d |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | 100 | 0 | 1∶1 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 48 | — |
| A2 | 50 | 50 | 1∶1 | 0.25 | 0.5 | 48 | — |
| B1 | 100 | 0 | 3∶5 | 0.25 | 0.8 | 12, 24, 48 | 3, 7, 28 |
| B2 | 75 | 25 | 3∶5 | 0.25 | 0.8 | 12, 24, 48 | 3, 7, 28 |
| B3 | 50 | 50 | 3∶5 | 0.20 | 1.2 | 12, 24, 48 | 3, 7, 28 |
| B4 | 50 | 50 | 3∶5 | 0.25 | 0.8 | 12, 24, 48 | 3, 7, 28 |
| B5 | 50 | 50 | 3∶5 | 0.30 | 0.1 | 12, 24, 48 | 3, 7, 28 |
| Sample No. | Total porosity/% | Average pore diameter/nm | Median pore diameter/nm | Pore size distribution/% | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| <20 nm | 20~50 nm | >50 nm | ||||
| B1-C48 | 9.29 | 31.40 | 10.16 | 15.46 | 37.01 | 47.53 |
| B3-C48 | 14.88 | 185.32 | 42.44 | 29.43 | 10.32 | 60.25 |
| B4-C48 | 14.04 | 184.88 | 36.58 | 31.22 | 13.41 | 55.37 |
| B1-C48-H28 | 8.03 | 47.72 | 10.09 | 13.48 | 43.79 | 42.73 |
| B3-C48-H28 | 13.47 | 126.11 | 17.43 | 38.86 | 19.65 | 41.49 |
| B4-C48-H28 | 13.67 | 177.57 | 35.03 | 34.53 | 11.29 | 54.18 |
表4 孔结构特征参数
Table 4 Pore structure parameter
| Sample No. | Total porosity/% | Average pore diameter/nm | Median pore diameter/nm | Pore size distribution/% | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| <20 nm | 20~50 nm | >50 nm | ||||
| B1-C48 | 9.29 | 31.40 | 10.16 | 15.46 | 37.01 | 47.53 |
| B3-C48 | 14.88 | 185.32 | 42.44 | 29.43 | 10.32 | 60.25 |
| B4-C48 | 14.04 | 184.88 | 36.58 | 31.22 | 13.41 | 55.37 |
| B1-C48-H28 | 8.03 | 47.72 | 10.09 | 13.48 | 43.79 | 42.73 |
| B3-C48-H28 | 13.47 | 126.11 | 17.43 | 38.86 | 19.65 | 41.49 |
| B4-C48-H28 | 13.67 | 177.57 | 35.03 | 34.53 | 11.29 | 54.18 |
图8 低热水泥钢渣砂浆碳化48 h并标准养护28 d FT-IR 谱
Fig.8 FT-IR spectra of low-heat cement and steel slag mortar after carbonation for 48 h and standard cured for 28 d
| [1] | 沈鑫, 郭随华, 李文伟, 等. 低热硅酸盐水泥水化及性能研究现状[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(2): 383-392. |
| SHEN X, GUO S H, LI W W, et al. Research status on hydration and properties of low-heat Portland cement[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2023, 42(2): 383-392 (in Chinese). | |
| [2] | 郑旭恒, 胡昱, 王亚军, 等. 低热硅酸盐水泥设计的大体积海工混凝土的水化热、耐久性、抗裂性[J]. 混凝土, 2025(6): 219-223. |
| ZHENG X H, HU Y, WANG Y J, et al. Heat of hydration, durability and cracking resistance of mass marine engineering concrete designed with low-heat Portland cement[J]. Concrete, 2025(6): 219-223 (in Chinese). | |
| [3] | 胡昱, 牛旭婧, 杨宁, 等. 低热水泥混凝土早期塑性开裂风险研究[J]. 混凝土, 2021(3): 19-22+26. |
| HU Y, NIU X J, YANG N, et al. Study on the risk of early plastic cracking of low heat cement concrete[J]. Concrete, 2021(3): 19-22+26 (in Chinese). | |
| [4] | 魏国力, 游杰勇, 李培彦, 等. 低热水泥复掺粉煤灰体系的强度放热与水化演变研究[J]. 混凝土, 2022(2): 54-59. |
| WEI G L, YOU J Y, LI P Y, et al. Study on strength exothermic and hydration evolution of low heat cement mixed with fly ash[J]. Concrete, 2022(2): 54-59 (in Chinese). | |
| [5] |
XIN J D, ZHANG G X, LIU Y, et al. Environmental impact and thermal cracking resistance of low heat cement (LHC) and moderate heat cement (MHC) concrete at early ages[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2020, 32: 101668.
DOI URL |
| [6] |
史迪, 叶家元, 张文生, 等. 钢渣碳化砖的碱激发-碳化协同作用机制[J]. 钢铁研究学报, 2021, 33(11): 1127-1133.
DOI |
|
SHI D, YE J Y, ZHANG W S, et al. Synergistic mechanisms of alkali-activation and carbonation of carbonated steel slag bricks[J]. Journal of Iron and Steel Research, 2021, 33(11): 1127-1133 (in Chinese).
DOI |
|
| [7] | 曾海马, 刘志超, 王发洲. 碳化养护对大掺量钢渣砂浆的力学性能及显微结构的影响[J]. 硅酸盐学报, 2020, 48(11): 1801-1807. |
| ZENG H M, LIU Z C, WANG F Z. Effect of accelerated carbonation curing on mechanical property and microstructure of high volume steel slag mortar[J]. Journal of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2020, 48(11): 1801-1807 (in Chinese). | |
| [8] |
LUO Z T, WANG Y, YANG G J, et al. Effect of curing temperature on carbonation behavior of steel slag compacts[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 291: 123369.
DOI URL |
| [9] |
MO L W, ZHANG F, DENG M, et al. Accelerated carbonation and performance of concrete made with steel slag as binding materials and aggregates[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2017, 83: 138-145.
DOI URL |
| [10] | 郜效娇, 卢豹, 蒋伟丽, 等. 压蒸条件下钢渣的碳化过程[J]. 材料导报, 2016, 30(4): 106-110. |
| GAO X J, LU B, JIANG W L, et al. Study on carbonization process of steel slag under pressure steam conditions[J]. Materials Reports, 2016, 30(4): 106-110 (in Chinese). | |
| [11] |
HUO B B, ZHANG Y M, WANG D M. Optimizing CO2 capture property of alkali-activated ladle slag materials with sodium dodecyl sulfate[J]. Powder Technology, 2025, 449: 120388.
DOI URL |
| [12] |
CHANG J, WANG D, FANG Y F. Effects of mineralogical changes in BOFS during carbonation on pH and Ca and Si leaching[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 192: 584-592.
DOI URL |
| [13] |
JIANG T, CUI K, CHANG J. Development of low-carbon cement: carbonation of compounded C2S by β-C2S and γ-C2S[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2023, 139: 105071.
DOI URL |
| [14] |
CHANG J, JIANG T, CUI K. Influence on compressive strength and CO2 capture after accelerated carbonation of combination β-C2S with γ-C2S[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 312: 125359.
DOI URL |
| [15] |
LV C Y, LIU Z C, WANG F Z, et al. Understanding the role of different phases in γ-C2S based carbonatable clinkers[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2024, 185: 107642.
DOI URL |
| [16] |
ZHAO S X, LIU Z C, WANG F Z, et al. Elucidating factors on the strength of carbonated compacts: insights from the carbonation of γ-C2S, β-C2S and C3S[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2025, 155: 105806.
DOI URL |
| [17] | ZHANG D, GHOULEH Z, SHAO Y X. Review on carbonation curing of cement-based materials[J]. Journal of CO2 Utilization, 2017, 21: 119-131. |
| [18] |
ASHRAF W, OLEK J, TIAN N N. Multiscale characterization of carbonated wollastonite paste and application of homogenization schemes to predict its effective elastic modulus[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2016, 72: 284-298.
DOI URL |
| [19] | 莫立武, 刘朋, 徐茂淳. 钢渣碳化及其在建筑材料低碳制造中的应用[J]. 建筑材料学报, 2024, 27(12): 1122-1128. |
| MO L W, LIU P, XU M C. Carbonation of steel slag and its application in producing low-carbon construction materials[J]. Journal of Building Materials, 2024, 27(12): 1122-1128 (in Chinese). | |
| [20] |
ZHANG X X, ZHANG D, WANG P, et al. Optimizing the properties of carbonated steel slag brick based on response surface method (RSM)[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2025, 473: 140921.
DOI URL |
| [21] | 史才军, 邹庆焱, 何富强. 二氧化碳养护混凝土的动力学研究[J]. 硅酸盐学报, 2010, 38(7): 1179-1184. |
| SHI C J, ZOU Q Y, HE F Q. Study on CO2 curing kinetics of concrete[J]. Journal of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2010, 38(7): 1179-1184 (in Chinese). | |
| [22] | 涂贞军. 混凝土的二氧化碳养护技术研究[D]. 长沙: 湖南大学, 2010. |
| TU Z J. Research of carbon dioxide concrete curing technology[D]. Changsha: Hunan University, 2010 (in Chinese). | |
| [23] |
SHI C J, HE F Q, WU Y Z. Effect of pre-conditioning on CO2 curing of lightweight concrete blocks mixtures[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2012, 26(1): 257-267.
DOI URL |
| [24] |
MORSHED A Z, SHAO Y X. Influence of moisture content on CO2 uptake in lightweight concrete subject to early carbonation[J]. Journal of Sustainable Cement-Based Materials, 2013, 2(2): 144-160.
DOI URL |
| [25] |
HE P P, SHI C J, TU Z J, et al. Effect of further water curing on compressive strength and microstructure of CO2-cured concrete[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2016, 72: 80-88.
DOI URL |
| [26] |
VAN BALEN K. Carbonation reaction of lime, kinetics at ambient temperature[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2005, 35(4): 647-657.
DOI URL |
| [27] | 史才军, 何平平, 涂贞军, 等. 预养护对二氧化碳养护混凝土过程及显微结构的影响[J]. 硅酸盐学报, 2014, 42(8): 996-1004. |
| SHI C J, HE P P, TU Z J, et al. Effect of pre-conditioning on process and microstructure of carbon dioxide cured concrete[J]. Journal of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2014, 42(8): 996-1004 (in Chinese). | |
| [28] |
UKWATTAGE N L, RANJITH P G, LI X. Steel-making slag for mineral sequestration of carbon dioxide by accelerated carbonation[J]. Measurement, 2017, 97: 15-22.
DOI URL |
| [29] | 卢豹. 硅酸盐水泥CO2养护及后续水化研究[D]. 长沙: 湖南大学, 2020. |
| LU B. Study on CO2 curing and subsequent hydration of Portland cement[D]. Changsha: Hunan University, 2020 (in Chinese). | |
| [30] |
FERNÁNDEZ-CARRASCO L, TORRÉNS-MARTÍN D, MARTÍNEZ-RAMÍREZ S. Carbonation of ternary building cementing materials[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2012, 34(10): 1180-1186.
DOI URL |
| [31] |
AGHAJANIAN S, NIEMINEN H, LAARI A, et al. Integration of a calcium carbonate crystallization process and membrane contactor-based CO2 capture[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2021, 274: 119043.
DOI URL |
| [32] |
GOÑI S, GAZTAÑAGA M T, GUERRERO A. Role of cement type on carbonation attack[J]. Journal of Materials Research, 2002, 17(7): 1834-1842.
DOI URL |
| [33] |
CHANG J, FANG Y F, SHANG X P. The role of β-C2S and γ-C2S in carbon capture and strength development[J]. Materials and Structures, 2016, 49(10): 4417-4424.
DOI URL |
| [34] |
SILVA D A, ROMAN H R, GLEIZE P J P. Evidences of chemical interaction between EVA and hydrating Portland cement[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2002, 32(9): 1383-1390.
DOI URL |
| [35] |
YU P, KIRKPATRICK R J, POE B, et al. Structure of calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H): near-, mid-, and far-infrared spectroscopy[J]. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 1999, 82(3): 742-748.
DOI URL |
| [36] |
EL-HASSAN H, SHAO Y X. Early carbonation curing of concrete masonry units with Portland limestone cement[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2015, 62: 168-177.
DOI URL |
| [37] |
YLMÉN R, JÄGLID U, STEENARI B M, et al. Early hydration and setting of Portland cement monitored by IR, SEM and Vicat techniques[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2009, 39(5): 433-439.
DOI URL |
| [38] |
SHEN P L, JIANG Y, ZHANG Y Y, et al. Production of aragonite whiskers by carbonation of fine recycled concrete wastes: an alternative pathway for efficient CO2 sequestration[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2023, 173: 113079.
DOI URL |
| [39] | 吴胜坤, 黄天勇, 谢岩, 等. 二氧化碳矿化养护水泥基材料研究进展[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(6): 1897-1911. |
| WU S K, HUANG T Y, XIE Y, et al. Review on CO2 mineral carbonation-cured cement-based materials[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2023, 42(6): 1897-1911 (in Chinese). |
| [1] | 魏舒鹏, 崔晨晨, 王德辉, 罗正东, 罗进, 王亚军, 陈英豪. 混凝土裂缝用地聚物注浆修复材料的性能优化及应用研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(4): 1220-1230. |
| [2] | 王海皓, 甘元初, 侯庆振, 陈振富, 金丹, 付新博. 疏水改性煅烧硅藻土砂浆的制备及性能[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(4): 1122-1131. |
| [3] | 韩磊, 曹红星, 任家芳, 郭志翔, 宋普涛, 王晶, 冷发光. 黄河细砂对泡沫轻质土性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(4): 1248-1255. |
| [4] | 王解放, 许德金, 李胜, 任万里, 陈佩圆. 纤维素醚对衬砌混凝土力学与工作性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(4): 1175-1183. |
| [5] | 杨雪滢, 王开元, 王耀城, 占宝剑, 邢锋. 自然风化作用下碳化养护水泥基材料的力学性能劣化机制[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(4): 1132-1141. |
| [6] | 洪川海, 梁瑞庆, 梁振升, 张伯涛, 唐雪梅, 阮国威, 林嘉祥. 海水珊瑚砂粉工程水泥基复合材料高温暴露后的性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(4): 1151-1159. |
| [7] | 朱世栋, 陈纨年, 李忠慧, 张宇, 张云升, 李王鑫. 振动搅拌对粉煤灰混凝土性能与碳排放的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(4): 1193-1207. |
| [8] | 郭阳光, 秦拥军, 罗玲, 谌君诚, 李琦, 程昊. 硅灰-玻璃纤维全再生粗骨料混凝土力学性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(4): 1296-1303. |
| [9] | 谌君诚, 罗玲, 秦拥军, 郭阳光, 李琦, 程昊. 硅灰-聚甲醛纤维再生水工混凝土力学和耐水性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(4): 1304-1314. |
| [10] | 倪宇博, 陈志斌, 曾广, 罗琼, 陈巧, 刘佳, 李文俊, 邹澳琪, 王静, 田培静, 韩建军. ZrO2对Li2O-Al2O3-B2O3微晶玻璃析晶行为及微波介电性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(3): 835-844. |
| [11] | 贾旭赫, 赵仁龙, 张继红, 谢俊. Al2O3/SiO2对Li2O-Al2O3-SiO2-MgO微晶玻璃析晶行为及力学性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(3): 845-852. |
| [12] | 许凯钦, 廖宜顺, 张普, 张冬, 齐冬有. -10 ℃条件下硝酸钙对铁铝酸盐水泥性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(2): 380-389. |
| [13] | 王熠江, 李梓俊, 何智海, 陆俊. 微波养护对香灰-水泥复合胶凝材料强度及微观结构的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(2): 540-548. |
| [14] | 芮振华, 吕翔宇, 郭灿, 黄山, 牛冬瑜. 钼尾矿砂取代量对机制砂水泥砂浆力学性能及微观结构的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(2): 573-581. |
| [15] | 杨元庆, 王甜, 郭瑞, 朱建锋, 李强, 王芬, 罗宏杰. 山西霍州窑古瓷的微观结构与物化组成初步分析[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(2): 634-645. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||