硅酸盐通报 ›› 2026, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (8): 2770-2781.DOI: 10.16552/j.cnki.issn1001-1625.2026.0226
收稿日期:2026-03-12
修订日期:2026-04-29
出版日期:2026-08-15
发布日期:2026-09-01
通信作者:
李北星,博士,教授。E-mail:libx0212@126.com作者简介:周骏康(2000—),男,硕士研究生。主要从事水泥混凝土材料方面的研究。E-mail:zhoujk0728@163.com
基金资助:
ZHOU Junkang1(
), LI Beixing1(
), TIAN Jikun2, TIAN Shenhua1
Received:2026-03-12
Revised:2026-04-29
Published:2026-08-15
Online:2026-09-01
摘要:
为揭示矿物掺合料对低热水泥水化动力学的影响规律,采用等温量热法测定了20%(质量分数,下同)、30%、40%掺量下单掺粉煤灰、单掺矿渣粉,以及粉煤灰-矿渣粉复掺的三种胶凝体系的水化放热速率和放热量。结合Krstulovic-Dabic水化动力学模型,定量分析了各水化阶段动力学参数的变化规律,并通过力学性能测试进行验证。结果表明,矿物掺合料的掺入降低了低热水泥的水化热和胶砂强度。Krstulovic-Dabic模型拟合显示,粉煤灰和矿渣粉对水化动力学的影响呈不同规律,单掺粉煤灰及粉煤灰-矿渣粉复掺时,扩散控制阶段速率常数
中图分类号:
周骏康, 李北星, 田继坤, 田沈华. 矿物掺合料对低热水泥水化动力学的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(8): 2770-2781.
ZHOU Junkang, LI Beixing, TIAN Jikun, TIAN Shenhua. Effect of Mineral Admixtures on Hydration Kinetics of Low-Heat Portland Cement[J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(8): 2770-2781.
| Material | Mass fraction/% | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CaO | SiO2 | Fe2O3 | Al2O3 | MgO | TiO2 | SO3 | K2O | Na2O | LOI | |
| PLH | 60.7 | 22.8 | 5.0 | 3.5 | 3.7 | 0.2 | 1.9 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.6 |
| FA | 8.4 | 48.8 | 6.1 | 24.3 | 1.4 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 1.9 | 1.1 | 3.4 |
| SL | 50.3 | 27.3 | 2.2 | 9.9 | 4.3 | 0.5 | 2.8 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
表1 胶凝材料的主要化学成分
Table 1 Main chemical composition of cementitious materials
| Material | Mass fraction/% | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CaO | SiO2 | Fe2O3 | Al2O3 | MgO | TiO2 | SO3 | K2O | Na2O | LOI | |
| PLH | 60.7 | 22.8 | 5.0 | 3.5 | 3.7 | 0.2 | 1.9 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.6 |
| FA | 8.4 | 48.8 | 6.1 | 24.3 | 1.4 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 1.9 | 1.1 | 3.4 |
| SL | 50.3 | 27.3 | 2.2 | 9.9 | 4.3 | 0.5 | 2.8 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Mineral composition | C3S | C2S | C3A | C4AF |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage/% | 37.7B(39.8R) | 36.9B(43.0R) | 0.8B(1.2R) | 15.2B(16.0R) |
表2 低热水泥的主要矿物组成
Table 2 Main mineral composition of low-heat Portland cement
| Mineral composition | C3S | C2S | C3A | C4AF |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage/% | 37.7B(39.8R) | 36.9B(43.0R) | 0.8B(1.2R) | 15.2B(16.0R) |
| Sample | Mass fraction/% | Water-to-binder ratio | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLH | FA | SL | ||
| PLH100 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0.4 |
| FA20 | 80 | 20 | 0 | 0.4 |
| FA30 | 70 | 30 | 0 | 0.4 |
| FA40 | 60 | 40 | 0 | 0.4 |
| SL20 | 80 | 0 | 20 | 0.4 |
| SL30 | 70 | 0 | 30 | 0.4 |
| SL40 | 60 | 0 | 40 | 0.4 |
| FA10SL10 | 80 | 10 | 10 | 0.4 |
| FA15SL15 | 70 | 15 | 15 | 0.4 |
| FA20SL20 | 60 | 20 | 20 | 0.4 |
表3 试验配合比
Table 3 Mix proportions of test samples
| Sample | Mass fraction/% | Water-to-binder ratio | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLH | FA | SL | ||
| PLH100 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0.4 |
| FA20 | 80 | 20 | 0 | 0.4 |
| FA30 | 70 | 30 | 0 | 0.4 |
| FA40 | 60 | 40 | 0 | 0.4 |
| SL20 | 80 | 0 | 20 | 0.4 |
| SL30 | 70 | 0 | 30 | 0.4 |
| SL40 | 60 | 0 | 40 | 0.4 |
| FA10SL10 | 80 | 10 | 10 | 0.4 |
| FA15SL15 | 70 | 15 | 15 | 0.4 |
| FA20SL20 | 60 | 20 | 20 | 0.4 |
| Sample | Q7/(J·g-1) | Sample | Q7/(J·g-1) |
|---|---|---|---|
| PLH100 | 211.9 | SL30 | 177.3 |
| FA20 | 179.3 | SL40 | 160.9 |
| FA30 | 160.2 | FA10SL10 | 191.1 |
| FA40 | 131.1 | FA15SL15 | 173.2 |
| SL20 | 193.2 | FA20SL20 | 156.5 |
表4 复合胶凝体系7 d水化放热量
Table 4 Hydration heat release at 7 d for composite cementitious system
| Sample | Q7/(J·g-1) | Sample | Q7/(J·g-1) |
|---|---|---|---|
| PLH100 | 211.9 | SL30 | 177.3 |
| FA20 | 179.3 | SL40 | 160.9 |
| FA30 | 160.2 | FA10SL10 | 191.1 |
| FA40 | 131.1 | FA15SL15 | 173.2 |
| SL20 | 193.2 | FA20SL20 | 156.5 |
| Sample | Qmax/(J·g-1) | Sample | Qmax/(J·g-1) |
|---|---|---|---|
| PLH100 | 249.7 | SL30 | 208.3 |
| FA20 | 215.0 | SL40 | 187.5 |
| FA30 | 194.3 | FA10SL10 | 223.8 |
| FA40 | 161.8 | FA15SL15 | 204.9 |
| SL20 | 228.4 | FA20SL20 | 188.4 |
表5 复合胶凝体系的总水化放热量
Table 5 Total hydration heat release of composite cementitious system
| Sample | Qmax/(J·g-1) | Sample | Qmax/(J·g-1) |
|---|---|---|---|
| PLH100 | 249.7 | SL30 | 208.3 |
| FA20 | 215.0 | SL40 | 187.5 |
| FA30 | 194.3 | FA10SL10 | 223.8 |
| FA40 | 161.8 | FA15SL15 | 204.9 |
| SL20 | 228.4 | FA20SL20 | 188.4 |
| Sample | n | K1′ | K2′ | K3′ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLH100 | 2.715 85 | 0.042 25 | 0.010 48 | 0.001 19 |
| FA20 | 2.809 48 | 0.043 52 | 0.010 12 | 0.001 06 |
| FA30 | 2.814 21 | 0.044 09 | 0.009 42 | 0.000 95 |
| FA40 | 2.273 11 | 0.036 45 | 0.008 13 | 0.000 76 |
| SL20 | 2.805 99 | 0.044 23 | 0.010 03 | 0.001 11 |
| SL30 | 2.670 34 | 0.045 60 | 0.010 23 | 0.001 15 |
| SL40 | 2.390 43 | 0.049 02 | 0.010 08 | 0.001 21 |
| FA10SL10 | 2.544 54 | 0.044 86 | 0.010 03 | 0.001 03 |
| FA15SL15 | 2.605 14 | 0.044 47 | 0.009 85 | 0.000 99 |
| FA20SL20 | 2.836 46 | 0.044 93 | 0.009 24 | 0.000 90 |
表6 复合胶凝体系的水化动力学参数
Table 6 Hydration kinetic parameters of composite cementitious systems
| Sample | n | K1′ | K2′ | K3′ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLH100 | 2.715 85 | 0.042 25 | 0.010 48 | 0.001 19 |
| FA20 | 2.809 48 | 0.043 52 | 0.010 12 | 0.001 06 |
| FA30 | 2.814 21 | 0.044 09 | 0.009 42 | 0.000 95 |
| FA40 | 2.273 11 | 0.036 45 | 0.008 13 | 0.000 76 |
| SL20 | 2.805 99 | 0.044 23 | 0.010 03 | 0.001 11 |
| SL30 | 2.670 34 | 0.045 60 | 0.010 23 | 0.001 15 |
| SL40 | 2.390 43 | 0.049 02 | 0.010 08 | 0.001 21 |
| FA10SL10 | 2.544 54 | 0.044 86 | 0.010 03 | 0.001 03 |
| FA15SL15 | 2.605 14 | 0.044 47 | 0.009 85 | 0.000 99 |
| FA20SL20 | 2.836 46 | 0.044 93 | 0.009 24 | 0.000 90 |
| Sample | α1 | α2 | α2-α1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| PLH100 | 0.127 | 0.162 | 0.035 |
| FA20 | 0.124 | 0.157 | 0.033 |
| FA30 | 0.104 | 0.142 | 0.038 |
| FA40 | 0.090 | 0.137 | 0.047 |
| SL20 | 0.113 | 0.155 | 0.042 |
| SL30 | 0.109 | 0.160 | 0.051 |
| SL40 | 0.100 | 0.169 | 0.069 |
| FA10SL10 | 0.114 | 0.146 | 0.032 |
| FA15SL15 | 0.108 | 0.143 | 0.035 |
| FA20SL20 | 0.097 | 0.138 | 0.041 |
表7 复合胶凝体系水化阶段转变时的水化程度
Table 7 Hydration degree during transition of hydration stages in composite cementitious systems
| Sample | α1 | α2 | α2-α1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| PLH100 | 0.127 | 0.162 | 0.035 |
| FA20 | 0.124 | 0.157 | 0.033 |
| FA30 | 0.104 | 0.142 | 0.038 |
| FA40 | 0.090 | 0.137 | 0.047 |
| SL20 | 0.113 | 0.155 | 0.042 |
| SL30 | 0.109 | 0.160 | 0.051 |
| SL40 | 0.100 | 0.169 | 0.069 |
| FA10SL10 | 0.114 | 0.146 | 0.032 |
| FA15SL15 | 0.108 | 0.143 | 0.035 |
| FA20SL20 | 0.097 | 0.138 | 0.041 |
| [1] | 钟翔, 李北星. 温度匹配养护对大掺量矿物掺合料混凝土抗压强度及早期水化性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2019, 38(10): 3080-3086. |
| ZHONG X, LI B X. Effect of temperature match curing on compressive strength and early hydration properties of concrete with high volume of mineral admixture[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2019, 38(10): 3080-3086 (in Chinese). | |
| [2] | 杨彦鑫, 周和祥, 马建林, 等. 大体积混凝土承台温度控制及分布规律[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2019, 38(5): 1497-1502+1509. |
| YANG Y X, ZHOU H X, MA J L, et al. Study on temperature control and distribution of mass concrete cap[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2019, 38(5): 1497-1502+1509 (in Chinese). | |
| [3] | KIM S J, YANG K H, MOON G D. Hydration characteristics of low-heat cement substituted by fly ash and limestone powder[J]. Materials, 2015, 8(9): 5847-5861. |
| [4] | ZHOU Y F, LI W W, PENG Y X, et al. Hydration and fractal analysis on low-heat Portland cement pastes using thermodynamics-based methods[J]. Fractal and Fractional, 2023, 7(8): 606. |
| [5] | HAN F H, HE X J, ZHANG Z Q, et al. Hydration heat of slag or fly ash in the composite binder at different temperatures[J]. Thermochimica Acta, 2017, 655: 202-210. |
| [6] | LUAN C Q, YUAN L W, WANG J B, et al. Uncovering the mechanism of the role of fly ash in the self-healing ability of mortar with different curing ages[J]. Materials, 2023, 16(9): 3453. |
| [7] | JIANG C M, XIA L, LI S X, et al. Impact of ground granulated blast furnace slag on calcium leaching of low-heat Portland cement paste[J]. Materials, 2024, 17(15): 3857. |
| [8] | MOKAL M P, MANDAL R, NAYAK S, et al. Efficacy of high-volume fly ash and slag on the physicomechanical, durability, and analytical characteristics of high-strength mass concrete[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2023, 76: 107295. |
| [9] | KRSTULOVIĆ R, DABIĆ P. A conceptual model of the cement hydration process[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2000, 30(5): 693-698. |
| [10] | SUN H G. Determination of low-temperature crack resistance of asphalt mastics based on relaxation properties[J]. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 2023, 19: e02389. |
| [11] | BAI R, ZHANG J, YAN C W, et al. Hydration characteristics of cementitious composites containing calcium silicate slag powder[J]. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2023, 27(7): 2952-2963. |
| [12] | WU C R, XIAO Z P, WEI J J, et al. Early hydration behaviours and kinetics of Portland cement composites incorporating low-calcium circulating fluidized bed fly ash[J]. Journal of Composites Science, 2025, 9(12): 671. |
| [13] | LAGIER F, KURTIS K E. Influence of Portland cement composition on early age reactions with metakaolin[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2007, 37(10): 1411-1417. |
| [14] | FERNÁNDEZ Á, LOTHENBACH B, ALONSO M C, et al. Thermodynamic modelling of short and long term hydration of ternary binders. Influence of Portland cement composition and blast furnace slag content[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 166: 510-521. |
| [15] | LV X D, YANG L, WANG F Z, et al. Hydration, microstructure characteristics, and mechanical properties of high-ferrite Portland cement in the presence of fly ash and phosphorus slag[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2023, 136: 104862. |
| [16] | 宁全纪, 陈阳杰, 曹园章, 等. 低热硅酸盐水泥早期水化热动力学研究[J]. 新型建筑材料, 2023, 50(8): 44-51+69. |
| NING Q J, CHEN Y J, CAO Y Z, et al. Thermodynamic and kinetic studies on early hydration of low-heat cement[J]. New Building Materials, 2023, 50(8): 44-51+69 (in Chinese). | |
| [17] | MEHDIPOUR I, KHAYAT K H. Effect of particle-size distribution and specific surface area of different binder systems on packing density and flow characteristics of cement paste[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2017, 78: 120-131. |
| [18] | LI Y, DENG Y G, LIU R Q. Hydration kinetics of Portland cement-silica fume binary system at low temperature[J]. Materials, 2019, 12(23): 3896. |
| [19] | CHENG Q H, MENG W Q, MA K L. Hydration heat and hydration kinetics of cement paste compound with molybdenum tailings powder: a research article[J]. Coatings, 2023, 13(12): 2073. |
| [20] | DING Z Y, ZHOU J H, SU Q, et al. Hydration kinetics for alkaline activation of slag from color variation data[J]. Molecules, 2021, 26(12): 3764. |
| [21] | KNUDSEN T. The dispersion model for hydration of Portland cement I. General concepts[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 1984, 14(5): 622-630. |
| [22] | SHENG X W, XIAO S M, ZHENG W Q, et al. Hydration kinetics analysis of cementitious paste composites produced by binary and ternary binder materials for potential use in massive concrete structures[J]. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 2023, 18: e02209. |
| [23] | SUN Y, LEE H S. Effect of fly ash with or without mechanical activation on early-age cement hydration: a comparative case study by boundary nucleation and growth model[J]. Thermochimica Acta, 2022, 716: 179306. |
| [24] | JOZIĆ D, LJUBIČIĆ B, PETROVIĆ A, et al. The influence of GGBFS as an additive replacement on the kinetics of cement hydration and the mechanical properties of cement mortars[J]. Buildings, 2023, 13(8): 1960. |
| [25] | DING X B, DU H Y, WU E F, et al. Investigating the hydration, mechanical properties, and pozzolanic activity of cement paste containing co-combustion fly ash[J]. Buildings, 2024, 14(5): 1305. |
| [26] | ZHU X H, RICHARDSON I G. Morphology-structural change of C-A-S-H gel in blended cements[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2023, 168: 107156. |
| [27] | YOSHIDA S, ELAKNESWARAN Y, NAWA T. Electrostatic properties of C-S-H and C-A-S-H for predicting calcium and chloride adsorption[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2021, 121: 104109. |
| [28] | ATALLAH J, BIGNONNET F, RANAIVOMANANA H, et al. An analytical model for the long term slag hydration kinetics in slag blended cement established from a large experimental database[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2024, 448: 138160. |
| [29] | ZHANG N, LI H X, LIU X M. Hydration kinetics of cementitious materials composed of red mud and coal gangue[J]. International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy, and Materials, 2016, 23(10): 1215-1224. |
| [1] | 许晴, 杨淑庆, 冯炜, 李林, 崔宏志. 复合固废矿物掺合料替代粉煤灰抑制混凝土碱硅酸反应的机制[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(8): 2760-2769. |
| [2] | 吴文滔, 涂广升, 廖家兴, 张超杰, 涂兵田, 王皓. SPS结合热等静压烧结制备Mg0.75Al2.16O4透明陶瓷及其性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(8): 2899-2908. |
| [3] | 冯俊杰, 李毅霄, 马艳, 耿圣涵, 申星月, 严少洋, 王新武, 刘琦. 钼尾矿生态型超高性能混凝土性能及综合效益研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(8): 2782-2793. |
| [4] | 唐佩, 刘佳心, 曲波, 肜鹏杰, 陈伟. 热活化煤矸石及其在磷石膏矿渣水泥中的应用研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(8): 2829-2838. |
| [5] | 吴浪, 潘文馨, 胡佳欣, 雷斌, 艾建平. 石灰石粉-矿渣-水泥(LS3)胶凝体系的水化动力学模型及力学性能预测[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(8): 2624-2636. |
| [6] | 徐广, 杜向琴, 吴廷杰, 朱元帅, 王春益, 刘兴杰. 混掺陶瓷-纤维-橡胶复合砂浆的宏观性能与微观结构分析[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(8): 2794-2805. |
| [7] | 聂京凯, 侯东, 邹建明, 陈田, 张一铭, 韩钰, 何强. 氮化硅陶瓷增韧技术研究进展[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(8): 2850-2862. |
| [8] | 余哲俊, 王景然, 张锦化, 韩兵强, 倪月娥. 回收风机叶片纤维与玻璃纤维对硅酸盐水泥性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(7): 2408-2418. |
| [9] | 欧阳琦, 尹健, 李思娇, 陈怡豪, 覃宇航, 曾一. 复合降碱改性生态多孔混凝土抗硫酸盐侵蚀性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(7): 2290-2298. |
| [10] | 王月, 丛培良. 粉煤灰-电石渣-脱硫石膏胶凝材料力学性能与反应特性[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(7): 2438-2447. |
| [11] | 郝贠洪, 佟海岩, 王栋民, 孙浩, 杜根杰. 多因素交互作用下固废基生态矿区充填材料的制备及性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(7): 2466-2477. |
| [12] | 申彦利, 魏冠超, 王鹏, 王嘉炜, 徐磊, 王辉, 王志岭, 卫爱魁. 再生骨料水泥稳定碎石力学性能分析与最优配合比预测[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(7): 2561-2572. |
| [13] | 金子豪, 邹自勇, 贺行洋, 苏英, 陈淑琴. 湿磨碳化钢渣对磷建筑石膏性能及微观结构的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(7): 2347-2356. |
| [14] | 肖伟, 李一航, 王栋琦, 钟祖良, 周仁, 朱开新. 硅灰-粉煤灰复掺对混凝土强度演化与抗渗性能的影响机理[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(7): 2419-2427. |
| [15] | 张文琮, 保钦凡, 王雨秋, 满保良, 黄果, 郭荣鑫. 硫酸钙晶须对粉煤灰-水泥复合材料水化和微观结构的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(7): 2428-2437. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||