硅酸盐通报 ›› 2026, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (7): 2357-2367.DOI: 10.16552/j.cnki.issn1001-1625.2025.1179
吕鹏1(
), 陆波涌2, 钱伦2, 黄身烨3, 宋佳欣3, 谢隆杰3, 黄伟3(
)
收稿日期:2025-12-01
修订日期:2026-02-14
出版日期:2026-07-15
发布日期:2026-08-13
通信作者:
黄伟,博士,助理研究员。E-mail:WeiHuang@fzu.edu.cn作者简介:吕鹏(1982—),男,高级工程师。主要从事高等级公路施工与管理研究。E-mail:lvp82411@126.com
基金资助:
LYU Peng1(
), LU Boyong2, QIAN Lun2, HUANG Shenye3, SONG Jiaxin3, XIE Longjie3, HUANG Wei3(
)
Received:2025-12-01
Revised:2026-02-14
Published:2026-07-15
Online:2026-08-13
摘要:
为实现镍铁渣的高效资源化利用,本文系统研究了机械活化与热活化对其火山灰活性的影响机制。通过激光粒度分析、X射线衍射(XRD)、比强度法及电化学交流阻抗谱等表征方法,综合表征了不同活化条件下镍铁渣的颗粒特性、晶体结构、力学性能及电化学行为。结果表明:机械活化60 min可显著细化颗粒并诱导晶格非晶化,使镍铁渣28 d活性指数提升至0.88;500 ℃热活化能有效破坏稳定晶相并促进活性组分溶出,镍铁渣28 d活性指数达0.93。电化学分析进一步表明,上述优化条件显著提高了体系的电荷转移电阻,促进了致密微观结构的形成。本研究明确了机械活化与热活化提升镍铁渣活性的最优路径,为其在胶凝材料中的高效利用提供了依据。
中图分类号:
吕鹏, 陆波涌, 钱伦, 黄身烨, 宋佳欣, 谢隆杰, 黄伟. 机械活化与热活化对镍铁渣活性的提升机制研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(7): 2357-2367.
LYU Peng, LU Boyong, QIAN Lun, HUANG Shenye, SONG Jiaxin, XIE Longjie, HUANG Wei. Mechanism of Mechanical and Thermal Activation to Improve Activity of Ferronickel Slag[J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(7): 2357-2367.
| Composition | SiO2 | Al2O3 | Fe2O3 | CaO | MgO | Na2O | K2O | SO3 | TiO2 | MnO | Cr2O3 | Ni2O3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mass fraction/% | 27.51 | 21.59 | 0.95 | 29.97 | 13.75 | 0.56 | 0.22 | 2.27 | 0.66 | 1.52 | 0.78 | 0.22 |
表1 镍铁渣的主要化学成分
Table 1 Main chemical composition of ferronickel slag
| Composition | SiO2 | Al2O3 | Fe2O3 | CaO | MgO | Na2O | K2O | SO3 | TiO2 | MnO | Cr2O3 | Ni2O3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mass fraction/% | 27.51 | 21.59 | 0.95 | 29.97 | 13.75 | 0.56 | 0.22 | 2.27 | 0.66 | 1.52 | 0.78 | 0.22 |
| Type | Size/μm | Fineness/μm | Density/(g∙cm-3) | SiO2 mass fraction/% | Fe2O3 mass fraction/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quartz powder | 37 | 37 | — | — | — |
表2 石英砂的基本性能指标
Table 2 Basic property index of quartz sand
| Type | Size/μm | Fineness/μm | Density/(g∙cm-3) | SiO2 mass fraction/% | Fe2O3 mass fraction/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quartz powder | 37 | 37 | — | — | — |
| Sample No. | Quartz sand mass/g | Water mass/g | Mechanical activation time/min | Thermal activation temperature/℃ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ferronickel slag mass/g | Slag mass/g | Cement mass/g | |||||
| S1-30% | 0 | 127.2 | 296.8 | 954 | 169.6 | 0 | — |
| C1-0% | 0 | 0 | 424.0 | 954 | 169.6 | 0 | — |
| M0-30% | 127.2 | 0 | 296.8 | 954 | 169.6 | 0 | — |
| M1-30% | 127.2 | 0 | 296.8 | 954 | 169.6 | 40 | — |
| M2-30% | 127.2 | 0 | 296.8 | 954 | 169.6 | 50 | — |
| M3-30% | 127.2 | 0 | 296.8 | 954 | 169.6 | 60 | — |
| M4-30% | 127.2 | 0 | 296.8 | 954 | 169.6 | 70 | — |
| T0-30% | 127.2 | 0 | 296.8 | 954 | 169.6 | — | 0 |
| T1-30% | 127.2 | 0 | 296.8 | 954 | 169.6 | — | 400 |
| T2-30% | 127.2 | 0 | 296.8 | 954 | 169.6 | — | 500 |
| T3-30% | 127.2 | 0 | 296.8 | 954 | 169.6 | — | 600 |
| T4-30% | 127.2 | 0 | 296.8 | 954 | 169.6 | — | 700 |
表3 不同机械活化时间和热活化温度处理的镍铁渣砂浆配合比
Table 3 Mix proportion of ferronickel slag mortar with different mechanical activation time and thermal activation temperatures
| Sample No. | Quartz sand mass/g | Water mass/g | Mechanical activation time/min | Thermal activation temperature/℃ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ferronickel slag mass/g | Slag mass/g | Cement mass/g | |||||
| S1-30% | 0 | 127.2 | 296.8 | 954 | 169.6 | 0 | — |
| C1-0% | 0 | 0 | 424.0 | 954 | 169.6 | 0 | — |
| M0-30% | 127.2 | 0 | 296.8 | 954 | 169.6 | 0 | — |
| M1-30% | 127.2 | 0 | 296.8 | 954 | 169.6 | 40 | — |
| M2-30% | 127.2 | 0 | 296.8 | 954 | 169.6 | 50 | — |
| M3-30% | 127.2 | 0 | 296.8 | 954 | 169.6 | 60 | — |
| M4-30% | 127.2 | 0 | 296.8 | 954 | 169.6 | 70 | — |
| T0-30% | 127.2 | 0 | 296.8 | 954 | 169.6 | — | 0 |
| T1-30% | 127.2 | 0 | 296.8 | 954 | 169.6 | — | 400 |
| T2-30% | 127.2 | 0 | 296.8 | 954 | 169.6 | — | 500 |
| T3-30% | 127.2 | 0 | 296.8 | 954 | 169.6 | — | 600 |
| T4-30% | 127.2 | 0 | 296.8 | 954 | 169.6 | — | 700 |
| Curing age/d | Activity index | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M0-30% | M1-30% | M2-30% | M3-30% | M4-30% | |
| 3 | 0.62 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 0.66 |
| 7 | 0.64 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.80 | 0.70 |
| 28 | 0.72 | 0.79 | 0.81 | 0.88 | 0.77 |
表4 不同机械活化时间下镍铁渣的活性指数
Table 4 Activity index of ferronickel slag under different mechanical activation time
| Curing age/d | Activity index | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M0-30% | M1-30% | M2-30% | M3-30% | M4-30% | |
| 3 | 0.62 | 0.67 | 0.70 | 0.75 | 0.66 |
| 7 | 0.64 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.80 | 0.70 |
| 28 | 0.72 | 0.79 | 0.81 | 0.88 | 0.77 |
| Curing age/d | Activity index | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T0-30% | T1-30% | T2-30% | T3-30% | T4-30% | |
| 3 | 0.61 | 0.84 | 0.88 | 0.84 | 0.77 |
| 7 | 0.63 | 0.86 | 0.92 | 0.85 | 0.81 |
| 28 | 0.73 | 0.81 | 0.93 | 0.83 | 0.80 |
表5 不同热活化温度下镍铁渣的活性指数
Table 5 Activity index of ferronickel slag under different thermal activation temperatures
| Curing age/d | Activity index | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T0-30% | T1-30% | T2-30% | T3-30% | T4-30% | |
| 3 | 0.61 | 0.84 | 0.88 | 0.84 | 0.77 |
| 7 | 0.63 | 0.86 | 0.92 | 0.85 | 0.81 |
| 28 | 0.73 | 0.81 | 0.93 | 0.83 | 0.80 |
| Curing age/d | Resistance/(Ω·cm-2) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1-30% | C1-0% | M0-30% | M1-30% | M2-30% | M3-30% | M4-30% | |
| 1 | 4.90 | 5.49 | 2.46 | 2.86 | 3.10 | 3.50 | 2.78 |
| 3 | 11.26 | 12.62 | 5.66 | 6.57 | 7.12 | 8.04 | 6.39 |
| 7 | 18.16 | 18.67 | 8.78 | 10.70 | 11.80 | 13.17 | 10.43 |
| 14 | 22.17 | 26.86 | 15.11 | 18.04 | 18.88 | 21.82 | 17.20 |
| 28 | 24.36 | 29.51 | 16.60 | 19.82 | 20.74 | 23.97 | 18.90 |
表6 不同机械活化时间下镍铁渣砂浆的电阻
Table 6 Resistance of ferronickel slag mortar under different mechanical activation time
| Curing age/d | Resistance/(Ω·cm-2) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1-30% | C1-0% | M0-30% | M1-30% | M2-30% | M3-30% | M4-30% | |
| 1 | 4.90 | 5.49 | 2.46 | 2.86 | 3.10 | 3.50 | 2.78 |
| 3 | 11.26 | 12.62 | 5.66 | 6.57 | 7.12 | 8.04 | 6.39 |
| 7 | 18.16 | 18.67 | 8.78 | 10.70 | 11.80 | 13.17 | 10.43 |
| 14 | 22.17 | 26.86 | 15.11 | 18.04 | 18.88 | 21.82 | 17.20 |
| 28 | 24.36 | 29.51 | 16.60 | 19.82 | 20.74 | 23.97 | 18.90 |
| Curing age/d | Resistance/(Ω·cm-2) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1-30% | C1-0% | T0-30% | T1-30% | T2-30% | T3-30% | T4-30% | |
| 1 | 4.94 | 5.53 | 2.42 | 4.25 | 4.57 | 4.03 | 3.69 |
| 3 | 11.36 | 12.72 | 5.58 | 9.78 | 10.51 | 9.18 | 8.50 |
| 7 | 18.30 | 18.81 | 8.65 | 14.96 | 16.60 | 14.68 | 13.59 |
| 14 | 21.96 | 26.65 | 15.32 | 18.67 | 20.70 | 19.51 | 18.25 |
| 28 | 24.13 | 29.28 | 16.83 | 20.51 | 23.04 | 21.44 | 20.05 |
表7 不同热活化温度下镍铁渣砂浆电阻
Table 7 Resistance of ferronickel slag mortar under different thermal activation temperatures
| Curing age/d | Resistance/(Ω·cm-2) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1-30% | C1-0% | T0-30% | T1-30% | T2-30% | T3-30% | T4-30% | |
| 1 | 4.94 | 5.53 | 2.42 | 4.25 | 4.57 | 4.03 | 3.69 |
| 3 | 11.36 | 12.72 | 5.58 | 9.78 | 10.51 | 9.18 | 8.50 |
| 7 | 18.30 | 18.81 | 8.65 | 14.96 | 16.60 | 14.68 | 13.59 |
| 14 | 21.96 | 26.65 | 15.32 | 18.67 | 20.70 | 19.51 | 18.25 |
| 28 | 24.13 | 29.28 | 16.83 | 20.51 | 23.04 | 21.44 | 20.05 |
| [1] | 李小明, 沈苗, 王翀, 等. 镍渣资源化利用现状及发展趋势分析[J]. 材料导报, 2017, 31(5): 100-105. |
| LI X M, SHEN M, WANG C, et al. Current situation and development of comprehensive utilization of nickel slag[J]. Materials Review, 2017, 31(5): 100-105 (in Chinese). | |
| [2] |
WANG D Q, MA B, PANG L, et al. Alkali-activated blast furnace ferronickel slag for Cr immobilization[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2024, 150: 105560.
DOI URL |
| [3] |
WANG W L, CHEN J Y, YU J, et al. Adjusting the melting and crystallization behaviors of ferronickel slag via partially replacing of SiO2 by B2O3 for mineral wool production[J]. Waste Management, 2020, 111: 34-40.
DOI URL |
| [4] |
HUANG Y D, WANG Q, SHI M X. Characteristics and reactivity of ferronickel slag powder[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2017, 156: 773-789.
DOI URL |
| [5] |
ZHOU Y Q, SHI C F. Experimental study of electric furnace ferronickel slag as a supplementary cementitious material in massive high-strength concrete[J]. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 2022, 147(8): 4983-4993.
DOI |
| [6] |
WANG Y B, HE X Y, SU Y, et al. Efficiency of wet-grinding on the mechano-chemical activation of granulated blast furnace slag (GBFS)[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2019, 199: 185-193.
DOI URL |
| [7] |
ZHU H J, MA M Y, HE X Y, et al. Effect of wet-grinding steel slag on the properties of Portland cement: an activated method and rheology analysis[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 286: 122823.
DOI URL |
| [8] |
TAN H B, LI M G, HE X Y, et al. Effect of wet grinded lithium slag on compressive strength and hydration of sulphoaluminate cement system[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 267: 120465.
DOI URL |
| [9] |
ZHU S, HU J G, ZHANG C H, et al. Study on optimization and mechanism of mechanical activation process of titanium-bearing blast furnace slag[J]. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 2022, 19: 3130-3144.
DOI URL |
| [10] | 张 涛, 陈铁军, 潘料庭, 等. 机械活化和不锈钢渣掺量对矿渣胶凝材料性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(2): 553-561. |
| ZHANG T, CHEN T J, PAN L T, et al. Effects of mechanical activation and stainless steel slag content on the properties of slag cementitious materials[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2022, 41(2): 553-561 (in Chinese). | |
| [11] |
WANG Y R, WANG D M, ZHENG Y, et al. Thermal activation mechanism and activity evaluation of lithium slag: insights from simulated hydration[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2024, 411: 134615.
DOI URL |
| [12] |
LI Y, TANG X, ZHAO H Z, et al. Influence of calcination temperature on steel slag activity for preparing a gel material[J]. Journal of Iron and Steel Research International, 2025, 32: 1-13.
DOI |
| [13] |
RAMANATHAN S, KASANIYA M, TUEN M, et al. Linking reactivity test outputs to properties of cementitious pastes made with supplementary cementitious materials[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2020, 114: 103742.
DOI URL |
| [14] |
KANG S X, WANG J Z, HU C, et al. The influence of mechanochemical activation on the rheological properties and strength development of geopolymer[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2024, 96: 110585.
DOI URL |
| [15] |
ZERZOURI M, HAMZAOUI R, ZIYANI L, et al. Influence of slag based pre-geopolymer powders obtained by mechanosynthesis on structure, microstructure and mechanical performance of geopolymer pastes[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2022, 361: 129637.
DOI URL |
| [16] |
MINO L, SPOTO G, BORDIGA S, et al. Particles morphology and surface properties as investigated by HRTEM, FTIR, and periodic DFT calculations: from pyrogenic TiO2 (P25) to nanoanatase[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2012, 116(32): 17008-17018.
DOI URL |
| [17] |
REAL S, CARRICO A, BOGAS J A, et al. Influence of the treatment temperature on the microstructure and hydration behavior of thermoactivated recycled cement[J]. Materials, 2020, 13(18): 3937.
DOI URL |
| [18] |
DJOBO J N Y, ELIMBI A, TCHAKOUTÉ H K, et al. Mechanical activation of volcanic ash for geopolymer synthesis: effect on reaction kinetics, gel characteristics, physical and mechanical properties[J]. RSC Advances, 2016, 6(45): 39106-39117.
DOI URL |
| [19] |
KUMAR R, KUMAR S, BADJENA S, et al. Hydration of mechanically activated granulated blast furnace slag[J]. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, 2005, 36(6): 873-883.
DOI URL |
| [20] |
ZHANG X Z, ZHANG Z Y, ZHOU J B, et al. Thermal behavior and mechanism study of geopolymers prepared from ferronickel slag with high fire resistance[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2024, 438: 137282.
DOI URL |
| [21] |
LUO Y, LI S H, KLIMA K M, et al. Degradation mechanism of hybrid fly ash/slag based geopolymers exposed to elevated temperatures[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2022, 151: 106649.
DOI URL |
| [22] |
KALINA R D, AL-SHMAISANI S, FERRON R D, et al. False positives in ASTM C618 specifications for natural pozzolans[J]. ACI Materials Journal, 2019, 116(1): 165-172.
DOI |
| [23] |
HUANG W, HE L, CHEN Z D, et al. Effect of endogenous chloride ion on the corrosion behavior of reinforcement embedded in sea-sand UHPC matrix in different immersion environments[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2024, 90: 109376.
DOI URL |
| [1] | 廖云天, 彭文洁, 李博, 陈伟, 郑旭航. 活化工艺对高岭土基低碳水泥性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(6): 1979-1987. |
| [2] | 王伟, 叶子, 于淇, 张亚梅. 镍铁渣初始粒径对水泥砂浆碱骨料反应的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(4): 1109-1121. |
| [3] | 崔英彬, 连海坤, 刘芳芳, 王珍, 凡涛涛, 司春棣, 李子轩. 煤矸石粉活性提升方式优选与活化机理研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(2): 528-539. |
| [4] | 邱军付, 张瑞峰, 贺鑫鑫, 赵宇翔, 胡家磊, 李雅曦. 热处理温度和放置时间对建筑垃圾分离渣土活性影响的机理研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(9): 3355-3366. |
| [5] | 杨凯璐, 杨鼎宜, 陆世敏, 陈龙祥, 毛翔, 赵健. 偏高岭土活性测定方法的比较与优化[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(7): 2514-2527. |
| [6] | 李建华, 邓强, 赵中军, 贾向阳, 唐国旺, 周锴, 房奎圳, 袁荟凯. 低钙粉煤灰玻璃体含量对强度发展的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(6): 2201-2209. |
| [7] | 马召林, 明阳, 李文俊, 任昊, 刘永道, 田唯, 张国志, 陈飞翔, 窦广元, 范志宏. 多元固废协同制备超细高活性矿物掺合料及性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(5): 1824-1833. |
| [8] | 张秀泽, 黄敏, 黄慕洋, 黎梦珂, 葛楚怡, 廖先清, 包申旭. 热活化盾构渣土基陶粒的制备及机理研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(4): 1556-1565. |
| [9] | 仇秀梅, 刘意, 刘亚东, 蔡浩, 刘叶冬阳, 梁雅琪. 活化累托石绿色制备自成型A型分子筛泡沫的研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(12): 4623-4632. |
| [10] | 宁高朋, 周正元, 夏光华, 吴文新, 曹天忆, 陈雨珊. 烧结温度及机械活化时间对陶瓷固废制备陶瓷砖的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(8): 3026-3033. |
| [11] | 胡凯伟, 陈轩, 李廷锋, 张俊杰, 高璇, 杨涛. 机械活化对碳酸钠激发矿渣胶凝材料早期性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(7): 2577-2583. |
| [12] | 伍媛婷, 王媛晨, 王昭, 刘虎林, 王巍, 任思谦, 花春峰. 有机醇胺TEA-M-无机盐体系对固硫灰渣活性激发的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(2): 572-583. |
| [13] | 王文耀, 罗琦, 鲁刘磊, 赖金, 黄文昊, 庄荣传, 汪峻峰, 马俊. 碱性水热活化选硫尾矿基地聚合物的制备及性能[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(10): 3704-3714. |
| [14] | 王亚楠, 赵德强, 李正旺, 郜祥, 沈卫国, 王桂明, 张文生. 钢渣烧结过程的矿物相转变及性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(5): 1731-1739. |
| [15] | 胡彪, 李先海, 晏祥政, 赵永庆. 热活化煤矸石粉对基体-骨料界面过渡区性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(4): 1315-1322. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||