热活化盾构渣土基陶粒的制备及机理研究

doi:10.16552/j.cnki.issn1001-1625.2024.1187

硅酸盐通报 ›› 2025, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (4): 1556-1565.DOI: 10.16552/j.cnki.issn1001-1625.2024.1187

热活化盾构渣土基陶粒的制备及机理研究

张秀泽¹, 黄敏^1,2, 黄慕洋^1,3, 黎梦珂^1,3, 葛楚怡¹, 廖先清², 包申旭^1,3

1.武汉理工大学资源与环境工程学院,武汉 430070;
2.湖北省农业科学院农业质量标准与检测技术研究所,武汉 430064;
3.武汉理工大学关键非金属矿产资源绿色利用教育部重点实验室,武汉 430070

收稿日期:2024-10-09 修订日期:2025-01-17 出版日期:2025-04-15 发布日期:2025-04-18
通信作者: 包申旭,博士,教授。E-mail:sxbao@whut.edu.cn
作者简介:张秀泽(2000—),女,硕士研究生。主要从事固体废物资源化利用的研究。E-mail:576312457@qq.com
基金资助:
湖北省重点研发项目资助(2022BAA029)

Preparation and Mechanism of Thermal Activation Shield Muck-Based Ceramsite

ZHANG Xiuze¹, HUANG Min^1,2, HUANG Muyang^1,3, LI Mengke^1,3, GE Chuyi¹, LIAO Xianqing², BAO Shenxu^1,3

1. School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China;
2. Institute of Agricultural Quality Standards and Testing Technology Research, Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan 430064, China;
3. Key Laboratory of Green Utilization of Critical Non-metallic Mineral Resources, Ministry of Education, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China

Received:2024-10-09 Revised:2025-01-17 Published:2025-04-15 Online:2025-04-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 盾构渣土(SM)活性低、处理难度大,传统“预烧-烧结”制备烧结陶粒的工艺流程复杂、变温频繁、生产效率低。本文采用热活化和NaOH-水玻璃激发的联合工艺,利用热活化盾构渣土(BSM)和高炉矿渣(GGBFS)制备陶粒,探究热活化温度、原料配比、热活化时间和养护时间对陶粒物理性能的影响。结果表明:热活化温度为1 000 ℃、m(SM/BSM)∶m(GGBFS)为6∶4、热活化时间为0.5 h、养护时间为28 d时制备的陶粒性能优异,28 d抗压强度达10.38 MPa,颗粒密度为1.90 g·cm^-3,堆积密度为895 kg·m^-3,吸水率为5.69%。微观形貌分析表明,陶粒内部水化反应产生了水化硅酸钙(C-S-H)和钠(钙)铝硅酸盐水合物(N(C)-A-S-H)复合凝胶,封闭大部分孔隙,使晶粒间紧密结合,从而提升了陶粒的抗压强度。本研究可优化盾构渣土基陶粒的制备工艺,提高实际生产效率。

关键词: 陶粒, 盾构渣土, 热活化, 碱激发

Abstract: Shield muck (SM) is characterized by low activation and challenging disposal. The conventional ‘pre-firing-sintering’ process for preparing ceramsites is complex, thetemperature changes frequently, and the production is low. In this paper, the combined process of thermal activation and NaOH-waterglass activation was used to prepare ceramsites from burning shield muck (BSM) and ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS). The effects of thermal activated temperatures, material ratios, thermal activated time, and curing time on the physical properties of ceramsites were investigated in detail.The results show that when the thermal activation temperature is 1 000 ℃, m(SM/BSM)∶m(GGBFS) is 6∶4, the thermal activation time is 0.5 h, and the curing time is 28 d, the performance of the prepared ceramsite is excellent. The 28 d compressive strength of ceramsite is 10.38 MPa, the particle density is 1.90 g·cm^-3, the bulk density is 895 kg·m^-3, and the water absorption is 5.69%. The results of micromorphology analysis show that the hydration reaction inside the ceramsites produced calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H) and sodium (calcium) silicaluminate hydrate (N(C)-A-S-H) composite gel, which closed most of the pores and made the grains closely bonded, thus improving the compressive strength of the ceramsites. This study can optimize the preparation technology of shield muck-based ceramsites, improving the efficiency of industrial production.

Key words: ceramsite, shield muck, thermal activation, alkali activation

中图分类号:

X705

张秀泽, 黄敏, 黄慕洋, 黎梦珂, 葛楚怡, 廖先清, 包申旭. 热活化盾构渣土基陶粒的制备及机理研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(4): 1556-1565.

ZHANG Xiuze, HUANG Min, HUANG Muyang, LI Mengke, GE Chuyi, LIAO Xianqing, BAO Shenxu. Preparation and Mechanism of Thermal Activation Shield Muck-Based Ceramsite[J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2025, 44(4): 1556-1565.

参考文献

[1] 侯秀芳, 冯晨, 燕汉民, 等. 2023年中国内地城市轨道交通运营线路概况[J]. 都市快轨交通, 2024, 37(1): 10-16.
HOU X F, FENG C, YAN H M, et al. Overview of urban rail transit operational lines in Chinese mainland in 2023[J]. Urban Rapid Rail Transit, 2024, 37(1): 10-16 (in Chinese).
[2] 朱俊涛, 张飞龙, 李可, 等. 稻壳灰替代型微膨胀同步注浆料的制备及性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(10): 3715-3725.
Juntao Z H U, Feilong Z, Ke L I, et al. Preparation and Properties of Rice Husk Ash Substitute Micro Expansion Synchronous Grouting Material[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2024, 43(10): 3715-3725 (in Chinese).
[3] 张钦喜, 陶韬, 王晓杰, 等. 钻孔灌注桩废弃泥浆处理的试验研究[J]. 水利学报, 2015, 46(增刊1): 40-45.
ZHANG Q X, TAO T, WANG X J, et al. Experimental study on treatment of waste slurry in cast-in-situ bored pile[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2015, 46(supplement 1): 40-45 (in Chinese).
[4] 周文君. 矿渣复合材料固化工程泥浆的力学及耐久性研究[D]. 淮南: 安徽理工大学, 2021.
ZHOU W J. Study on mechanics and durability of slag composite solidified engineering slurry[D]. Huainan: Anhui University of Science & Technology, 2021 (in Chinese).
[5] 郭卫社, 王百泉, 李沿宗, 等. 盾构渣土无害化处理、资源化利用现状与展望[J]. 隧道建设(中英文), 2020, 40(8): 1101-111.
GUO W S, WANG B Q, LI Y Z, et al. Status quo and prospect of harmless disposal and reclamation of shield muck in China[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2020, 40(8): 1101-1112 (in Chinese).
[6] NI Z L, WANG S Y, ZHENG X C, et al. Application of geopolymer in synchronous grouting for reusing of the shield muck in silty clay layer[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2024, 419: 135345.
[7] 姚清松, 蔡坤坤, 刘超, 等. 粉质黏土地层基坑渣土免烧砖配比及力学性能研究[J]. 隧道建设(中英文), 2020, 40(增刊1): 145-151.
YAO Q S, CAI K K, LIU C, et al. Study on proportioning and mechanical properties of unfired bricks based on foundation pit muck in silty clay stratum[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2020, 40(supplement 1): 145-151 (in Chinese).
[8] 季维生. 700密度等级渣土陶粒制备及其性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2017, 36(7): 2209-2214.
JI W S. Preparation and performance of 700 density grades muck-ceramsite[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2017, 36(7): 2209-2214 (in Chinese).
[9] 杨雅秀. 绿泥石族矿物热学性质的研究[J]. 矿物学报, 1992, 12(1): 36-44.
YANG Y X. A study on the thermal behaviour of chlorite-group minerals[J]. Acta Mineralogica Sinica, 1992, 12(1): 36-44 (in Chinese).
[10] DYCK B, WATERS D J, ST-ONGE M R, et al. Muscovite dehydration melting: reaction mechanisms, microstructures, and implications for anatexis[J]. Journal of Metamorphic Geology, 2020, 38(1): 29-52.
[11] JIANG T, LI G H, QIU G Z, et al. Thermal activation and alkali dissolution of silicon from illite[J]. Applied Clay Science, 2008, 40(1): 81-89.
[12] XU X Q, BAO S X, ZHANG Y M, et al. Role of particle fineness and reactive silicon-aluminum ratio in mechanical properties and microstructure of geopolymers[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 313: 12548.
[13] LUO Y P, BAO S X, ZHANG Y M. Preparation of one-part geopolymeric precursors using vanadium tailing by thermal activation[J]. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 2020, 103(2): 779-783.
[14] QURESHI M N, GHOSH S. Effect of Si/Al ratio on engineering properties of alkali-activated GGBS pastes[J]. Green Materials, 2014, 2(3): 123-131.
[15] SHI C J, KRIVENKO P V, ROY D. Alkali-activated cements and concretes[M]. Abingdon, UK: Taylor & Francis, 2006.
[16] 王林浩, 程寅, 高树峰, 等. 煤系高岭石热活化及其对水泥净浆长期强度的影响研究[J]. 太原理工大学学报, 2024, 55(2): 325-330.
WANG L H, CHENG Y, GAO S F, et al. Study on thermal activation of coal-bearing kaolinite and its influence on long-term strength of cement paste[J]. Journal of Taiyuan University of Technology, 2024, 55(2): 325-330 (in Chinese).
[17] 沈凡, 韦国苏, 庞若楠, 等. 利用磷尾矿烧制轻质陶粒及其性能研究[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2020, 20(6): 2303-2308.
SHEN F, WEI G S, PANG R N, et al. On lightweight ceramsite smelting from phosphorus tailings and its properties to be achieved[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2020, 20(6): 2303-2308 (in Chinese).
[18] CHEESEMAN C R, MAKINDE A, BETHANIS S. Properties of lightweight aggregate produced by rapid sintering of incinerator bottom ash[J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2005, 43(2): 147-162.
[19] LI Y D, WU D F, ZHANG J P, et al. Measurement and statistics of single pellet mechanical strength of differently shaped catalysts[J]. Powder Technology, 2000, 113(1/2): 176-184.
[20] BAO S X, QIN L, ZHANG Y M, et al. A combined calcination method for activating mixed shale residue and red mud for preparation of geopolymer[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 297: 123789.
[21] LLOYD R R, PROVIS J L, VAN DEVENTER J S J. Pore solution composition and alkali diffusion in inorganic polymer cement[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2010, 40(9): 1386-1392.
[22] PUERTAS F, VARGA C, ALONSO M M. Rheology of alkali-activated slag pastes. Effect of the nature and concentration of the activating solution[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2014, 53: 279-288.
[23] NASIR M, JOHARI M A M, ADESINA A, et al. Evolution of room-cured alkali-activated silicomanganese fume-based green mortar designed using Taguchi method[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 307: 124970.
[24] LIU Z, WANG J X, JIANG Q K, et al. A green route to sustainable alkali-activated materials by heat and chemical activation of lithium slag[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 225: 1184-1193.
[25] CHEN B J, PANG L F, ZHOU Z B, et al. Study on the activation mechanism and hydration properties of gold tailings activated by mechanical-chemical-thermal coupling[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2022, 48: 104014.
[26] BERNAL S A, PROVIS J L, ROSE V, et al. Evolution of binder structure in sodium silicate-activated slag-metakaolin blends[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2011, 33(1): 46-54.
[27] TANGSTAD M. Phase transformation in quartz at elevated temperatures[J]. Aspects in Mining & Mineral Science, 2021, 6(1): 691-699.
[28] ISHWARYA G, SINGH B, DESHWAL S, et al. Effect of sodium carbonate/sodium silicate activator on the rheology, geopolymerization and strength of fly ash/slag geopolymer pastes[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2019, 97: 226-238.

热活化盾构渣土基陶粒的制备及机理研究

Preparation and Mechanism of Thermal Activation Shield Muck-Based Ceramsite

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	肖慈宇, 张海燕, 詹建潮, 卜继斌. 渣土余泥免烧轻质高强陶粒的制备及应用[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(4): 1428-1437.
[2]	孙旭超, 李瑞, 薛璐韬, 吴开振, 吴晓勇, 李育彪, 池汝安. 矿山剥离料制备陶粒滤料工艺与机理研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(4): 1546-1555.
[3]	吕阳, 葛云露, 赵博宇, 陈扬, 但建明, 周阳, 柯凯, 李相国. 生物质灰对碱激发矿渣胶凝材料性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(4): 1288-1296.
[4]	王紫嫣, 孙涛, 欧阳高尚. 过硫磷石膏矿渣水泥性能调控研究进展[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(4): 1208-1226.
[5]	苏壮飞, 程尧, 刘泽. 矿渣改性碱激发硅锰渣胶凝材料的宏观性能与微观特性研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(4): 1276-1287.
[6]	刘琳, 邵鑫, 庞昆, 郑蕻陈. 基于机器学习的碱激发矿渣-粉煤灰混凝土抗压强度与弹性模量影响因素分析[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(4): 1398-1407.
[7]	刘德坤, 孙琦. 碱激发钢铁固废混凝土强度形成机理[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(3): 1057-1068.
[8]	吕阳, 吴远帅, 葛云露, 陈扬, 许金生, 蹇守卫, 但建明, 温小栋, 李相国. 稻壳灰与SAP协同内养护对碱激发矿渣胶凝材料性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(2): 634-641.
[9]	陈沁媛, 闫一凡, 赵振华, 张爱国, 关强, 何跃. 固废基陶粒重金属固化效果及产品性能的影响因素研究进展[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(2): 515-530.
[10]	邢莉, 郭林秀, 张云玲, 白频波, 郭璐, 田玉明. 陈腐作用增强煤层气用陶粒支撑剂性能的研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(2): 700-706.
[11]	耿春雷, 郭宏达, 董阳, 张栋, 巩思宇, 李俏. 陶粒泡沫混凝土成型方式及性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(1): 124-132.
[12]	李琪, 王亮, 王浩, 王成龙, 徐建, 胡伟. 碳化再生微粉对碱激发矿渣材料的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(1): 289-296.
[13]	孙开强, 刘琳, 郑蕻陈. 碱激发矿渣-粉煤灰胶凝材料力学性能影响因素分析[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(9): 3313-3319.
[14]	范小春, 杨东升, 张宇, 高旭, 喻立举. 外加剂对碱激发胶凝材料干燥收缩性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(8): 2788-2796.
[15]	王彦朝, 吕景辉, 王英倡, 郭永昌. PE/PP混杂纤维应变硬化碱激发复合材料力学性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(8): 2879-2887.