BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY ›› 2026, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (7): 2368-2378.DOI: 10.16552/j.cnki.issn1001-1625.2026.0050
• Solid Waste and Eco-Materials • Previous Articles Next Articles
DU Liwentao(
), REN Xuehong(
), ZHANG Hongtao, YE Jiayuan, ZHANG Wensheng
Received:2026-01-14
Revised:2026-03-01
Online:2026-07-15
Published:2026-08-13
Contact:
REN Xuehong
CLC Number:
DU Liwentao, REN Xuehong, ZHANG Hongtao, YE Jiayuan, ZHANG Wensheng. Carbon Accounting Method for Cement under Different Steel Slag Treatment Methods Based on Material Genes[J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(7): 2368-2378.
| Mineral | ΔH/(GJ·t-1) | CO2 emission from fuel/(kg·t-1) | CO2 emission from feedstock decomposition/(kg·t-1) | Total CO2 emission/(kg·t-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C3S | 1.85 | 282 | 578 | 860 |
| C2S | 1.34 | 204 | 511 | 715 |
| C3A | 1.95 | 298 | 489 | 787 |
| C4AF | 1.36 | 208 | 362 | 570 |
Table 1 Process and fuel CO2 emissions of four major cement minerals
| Mineral | ΔH/(GJ·t-1) | CO2 emission from fuel/(kg·t-1) | CO2 emission from feedstock decomposition/(kg·t-1) | Total CO2 emission/(kg·t-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C3S | 1.85 | 282 | 578 | 860 |
| C2S | 1.34 | 204 | 511 | 715 |
| C3A | 1.95 | 298 | 489 | 787 |
| C4AF | 1.36 | 208 | 362 | 570 |
| Transportation mode | Carbon emission factor/[kgCO2e·(t·km)-1] |
|---|---|
| Light-duty gasoline truck transportation (2 t payload) | 0.334 |
| Medium-duty gasoline truck transportation (8 t payload) | 0.115 |
| Heavy-duty gasoline truck transportation (10 t payload) | 0.104 |
| Heavy-duty gasoline truck transportation (18 t payload) | 0.104 |
| Light-duty diesel truck transportation (2 t payload) | 0.286 |
| Medium-duty diesel truck transportation (8 t payload) | 0.179 |
| Heavy-duty diesel truck transportation (10 t payload) | 0.162 |
| Heavy-duty diesel truck transportation (18 t payload) | 0.129 |
| Heavy-duty diesel truck transportation (30 t payload) | 0.078 |
| Heavy-duty diesel truck transportation (46 t payload) | 0.057 |
| Electric locomotive transportation | 0.010 |
| Diesel locomotive transportation | 0.011 |
| Railway transportation (China market average) | 0.010 |
| Liquid cargo ship transportation (2 000 t payload) | 0.019 |
| Dry bulk carrier transportation (2 500 t payload) | 0.015 |
| Container ship transportation (200 TEU payload) | 0.012 |
Table 2 Carbon emission factors of various modes of transportation
| Transportation mode | Carbon emission factor/[kgCO2e·(t·km)-1] |
|---|---|
| Light-duty gasoline truck transportation (2 t payload) | 0.334 |
| Medium-duty gasoline truck transportation (8 t payload) | 0.115 |
| Heavy-duty gasoline truck transportation (10 t payload) | 0.104 |
| Heavy-duty gasoline truck transportation (18 t payload) | 0.104 |
| Light-duty diesel truck transportation (2 t payload) | 0.286 |
| Medium-duty diesel truck transportation (8 t payload) | 0.179 |
| Heavy-duty diesel truck transportation (10 t payload) | 0.162 |
| Heavy-duty diesel truck transportation (18 t payload) | 0.129 |
| Heavy-duty diesel truck transportation (30 t payload) | 0.078 |
| Heavy-duty diesel truck transportation (46 t payload) | 0.057 |
| Electric locomotive transportation | 0.010 |
| Diesel locomotive transportation | 0.011 |
| Railway transportation (China market average) | 0.010 |
| Liquid cargo ship transportation (2 000 t payload) | 0.019 |
| Dry bulk carrier transportation (2 500 t payload) | 0.015 |
| Container ship transportation (200 TEU payload) | 0.012 |
| Type | Mass fraction/% | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SiO2 | Al2O3 | Fe2O3 | CaO | MgO | Other | Loss | |
| Limestone | 4.40 | 0.64 | 0.32 | 52.41 | 0.47 | 0.35 | 41.30 |
| Fly ash | 46.34 | 44.77 | 2.29 | 2.55 | 0.37 | 0.37 | 0.92 |
| Steel slag | 33.30 | 7.48 | 38.56 | 12.34 | 2.44 | 7.36 | -2.1 |
| Sandstone | 87.35 | 3.92 | 3.10 | 0.35 | 0.11 | 0.02 | 2.08 |
Table 3 Chemical composition of raw materials used in silicate cement
| Type | Mass fraction/% | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SiO2 | Al2O3 | Fe2O3 | CaO | MgO | Other | Loss | |
| Limestone | 4.40 | 0.64 | 0.32 | 52.41 | 0.47 | 0.35 | 41.30 |
| Fly ash | 46.34 | 44.77 | 2.29 | 2.55 | 0.37 | 0.37 | 0.92 |
| Steel slag | 33.30 | 7.48 | 38.56 | 12.34 | 2.44 | 7.36 | -2.1 |
| Sandstone | 87.35 | 3.92 | 3.10 | 0.35 | 0.11 | 0.02 | 2.08 |
| Raw material | Mass fraction/% | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SiO2 | Al2O3 | Fe2O3 | CaO | MgO | Other | |
| SC1[ | 17.53 | 6.25 | 26.36 | 35.70 | 6.45 | 4.57 |
| SC2[ | 24.01 | 1.59 | 21.30 | 45.50 | 5.53 | 2.07 |
| SC3[ | 17.34 | 4.17 | 19.99 | 43.22 | 5.91 | 10.15 |
| SC4[ | 16.70 | 2.60 | 25.52 | 43.19 | 3.25 | 6.93 |
| SC5[ | 15.57 | 3.90 | 23.87 | 36.45 | 7.28 | 9.81 |
Table 4 Chemical composition of steel slag used in different steel slag disposal methods
| Raw material | Mass fraction/% | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SiO2 | Al2O3 | Fe2O3 | CaO | MgO | Other | |
| SC1[ | 17.53 | 6.25 | 26.36 | 35.70 | 6.45 | 4.57 |
| SC2[ | 24.01 | 1.59 | 21.30 | 45.50 | 5.53 | 2.07 |
| SC3[ | 17.34 | 4.17 | 19.99 | 43.22 | 5.91 | 10.15 |
| SC4[ | 16.70 | 2.60 | 25.52 | 43.19 | 3.25 | 6.93 |
| SC5[ | 15.57 | 3.90 | 23.87 | 36.45 | 7.28 | 9.81 |
| Type | P1 | SC1 | SC2 | SC3 | SC4 | SC5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cpi /(kgCO2·t-1) | 520.11 | 510.26 | 520.11 | 520.11 | 520.11 | 508.93 |
| Cfi /(kgCO2·t-1) | 254.99 | 258.90 | 254.99 | 254.99 | 254.99 | 258.76 |
Table 5 Calculation results of carbon emissions related to process and fuel
| Type | P1 | SC1 | SC2 | SC3 | SC4 | SC5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cpi /(kgCO2·t-1) | 520.11 | 510.26 | 520.11 | 520.11 | 520.11 | 508.93 |
| Cfi /(kgCO2·t-1) | 254.99 | 258.90 | 254.99 | 254.99 | 254.99 | 258.76 |
| Material type | w/(kWh·t-1) | F80/μm | P80/μm | A1 | A2 | A3 | A4 | A5 | W/kWh |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steel slag | 14.2 | 3 827 | 16 | 1.435 5 | 0.936 | 1 | 1 | 1.3 | 58 |
Table 6 Parameters required for steel slag grinding
| Material type | w/(kWh·t-1) | F80/μm | P80/μm | A1 | A2 | A3 | A4 | A5 | W/kWh |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steel slag | 14.2 | 3 827 | 16 | 1.435 5 | 0.936 | 1 | 1 | 1.3 | 58 |
| Type | P1 | SC1 | SC2 | SC3 | SC4 | SC5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ce/(kgCO2·t-1) | 26.10 | 27.94 | 39.12 | 35.87 | 29.02 | 36.74 |
Table 7 Calculation results of carbon emissions related to electricity
| Type | P1 | SC1 | SC2 | SC3 | SC4 | SC5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ce/(kgCO2·t-1) | 26.10 | 27.94 | 39.12 | 35.87 | 29.02 | 36.74 |
| Type | P1 | SC1 | SC2 | SC3 | SC4 | SC5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ct/(kgCO2·t-1) | 29.08 | 27.92 | 31.12 | 17.45 | 264.63 | 234.97 |
Table 8 Calculation results of carbon emissions related to transportation
| Type | P1 | SC1 | SC2 | SC3 | SC4 | SC5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ct/(kgCO2·t-1) | 29.08 | 27.92 | 31.12 | 17.45 | 264.63 | 234.97 |
| Fuel type | Low heating value (LHV i ) | Typical emission factors (EF i ) |
|---|---|---|
| Bituminous coal | 24~30 MJ/kg | 94.6 kgCO₂/GJ |
| Natural gas | 35~38 MJ/m³ | 56.1 kgCO₂/GJ |
| Biomass fuel | 15~18 MJ/kg | 0(carbon neutral) |
| Waste tires | 32~35 MJ/kg | 85.0 kgCO₂/GJ |
Table 9 Lower heating value and typical carbon emission factor of various fuels
| Fuel type | Low heating value (LHV i ) | Typical emission factors (EF i ) |
|---|---|---|
| Bituminous coal | 24~30 MJ/kg | 94.6 kgCO₂/GJ |
| Natural gas | 35~38 MJ/m³ | 56.1 kgCO₂/GJ |
| Biomass fuel | 15~18 MJ/kg | 0(carbon neutral) |
| Waste tires | 32~35 MJ/kg | 85.0 kgCO₂/GJ |
| Type | Carbon emission intensity ratio (3 d) | Carbon emission intensity ratio except Ct(3 d) | Carbon emission intensity ratio (28 d) | Carbon emission intensity ratio except Ct (28 d) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SC1[ | 26.46 | 25.52 | 17.72 | 17.09 |
| SC2[ | 41.34 | 39.66 | 18.08 | 17.35 |
| SC3[ | 35.34 | 34.51 | — | — |
| SC4[ | 21.89 | 16.04 | 12.95 | 9.49 |
| SC5[ | 51.25 | 39.27 | 21.33 | 16.34 |
Table 10 Carbon emission intensity ratio of various cement
| Type | Carbon emission intensity ratio (3 d) | Carbon emission intensity ratio except Ct(3 d) | Carbon emission intensity ratio (28 d) | Carbon emission intensity ratio except Ct (28 d) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SC1[ | 26.46 | 25.52 | 17.72 | 17.09 |
| SC2[ | 41.34 | 39.66 | 18.08 | 17.35 |
| SC3[ | 35.34 | 34.51 | — | — |
| SC4[ | 21.89 | 16.04 | 12.95 | 9.49 |
| SC5[ | 51.25 | 39.27 | 21.33 | 16.34 |
| [1] |
CHENG D Y, REINER D M, YANG F, et al. Projecting future carbon emissions from cement production in developing countries[J]. Nature Communications, 2023, 14: 8213.
DOI PMID |
| [2] |
FU S T, KWON E E, LEE J. Upcycling steel slag into construction materials[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2024, 444: 137882.
DOI URL |
| [3] | CHEN Z H, CANG Z Z, YANG F M, et al. Carbonation of steelmaking slag presents an opportunity for carbon neutral: a review[J]. Journal of CO2 Utilization, 2021, 54: 101738. |
| [4] |
ZHOU F F, PAN G H, WANG Q P, et al. Effects of the surface nano-reconstruction of steel slag on the performance of cement-based materials[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2025, 475: 141172.
DOI URL |
| [5] |
FAN C L, WEI R F, CHENG T, et al. The positive contributions of steel slag in reducing carbon dioxide emissions in the steel industry: waste heat recovery, carbon sequestration, and resource utilization[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2024, 498: 155379.
DOI URL |
| [6] |
DUAN W J, DONG X Y, GAO L H, et al. Chemical utilization of slag waste heat for carbon emission reduction in the iron and steel industry[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2025, 13(4): 117224.
DOI URL |
| [7] | 谭忆秋, 吕慧杰, 徐慧宁. 材料基因思想在沥青路面材料领域的应用展望[J]. 交通运输研究, 2020, 6(5): 2-12. |
|
TAN Y Q, LÜ H J, XU H N. Application prospect of material genetics idea in asphalt pavement materials[J]. Transport Research, 2020, 6(5): 2-12 (in Chinese).
DOI |
|
| [8] |
GARTNER E. Industrially interesting approaches to “low-CO2” cements[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2004, 34(9): 1489-1498.
DOI URL |
| [9] |
BARCELO L, KLINE J, WALENTA G, et al. Cement and carbon emissions[J]. Materials and Structures, 2014, 47(6): 1055-1065.
DOI URL |
| [10] |
SCHNEIDER M, ROMER M, TSCHUDIN M, et al. Sustainable cement production: present and future[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2011, 41(7): 642-650.
DOI URL |
| [11] | 赵乃仁, 周文轶. 采用辊压机的粉磨系统的选型计算讨论[J]. 水泥工程, 2007(4): 1-12+22. |
| ZHAO N R, ZHOU W Y. Discussion on selection and calculation of grinding system using roller press[J]. Cement Engineering, 2007(4): 1-12+22 (in Chinese). | |
| [12] |
LI R, WEI Y C, CAI W G, et al. Tracking cement transportation carbon emissions in China: historical assessment and future simulation[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2025, 110: 107696.
DOI URL |
| [13] |
JU J T, CAO H B, GUO W K, et al. Experimental study on calcination of Portland cement clinker using different contents of stainless steel slag[J]. Materials, 2024, 17(10): 2305.
DOI URL |
| [14] |
TSAKIRIDIS P E, PAPADIMITRIOU G D, TSIVILIS S, et al. Utilization of steel slag for Portland cement clinker production[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2008, 152(2): 805-811.
DOI URL |
| [15] | 蒋亮, 韩霄, 李茂辉, 等. 高温重构钢渣复合水泥的制备与性能研究[J]. 金属矿山, 2018(8): 185-190. |
| JIANG L, HAN X, LI M H, et al. Preparation and properties of Portland cement mixed with high temperature reconstituted steel slag[J]. Metal Mine, 2018(8): 185-190 (in Chinese). | |
| [16] |
YANG S Q, DONG X W, ZHAO X D, et al. High value-added utilization of waste glass powder and steel slag for a novel zero-clinker cement: coactivation mechanism and environmental impact[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2025, 474: 141032.
DOI URL |
| [17] | 张恒飞, 刘茂举, 王东哲, 等. 钢渣碳化技术影响因素的研究进展[J]. 中国建材科技, 2023, 32(1): 74-78. |
| ZHANG H F, LIU M J, WANG D Z, et al. Research progress of influencing factors of steel slag carbonation technology[J]. China Building Materials Science & Technology, 2023, 32(1): 74-78 (in Chinese). | |
| [18] |
LIU P, GU Y H, ZHONG J K, et al. Carbonated steel slag powder in cement: retardation mechanism and triethanolamine-enhanced hydration strategy[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2025, 492: 142881.
DOI URL |
| [19] |
ZHAO D Q, ZHANG D, SHEN W G, et al. Investigation on industrial trial production of multi-phased clinker with crude granular steel slag[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 337: 130467.
DOI URL |
| [20] |
ZHAO D Q, SHEN W G, WANG Y N, et al. Direct use of original granular steel slag to prepare multi-phased clinker: sintering mechanism and properties[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2023, 390: 131575.
DOI URL |
| [21] |
GAO P, ZHA W, CHU Y T, et al. Calculation model for CO2 emissions of blended cement production[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2025, 489: 144646.
DOI URL |
| [22] | 廖晓樱, 罗 帆, 刘 昊. 物料相对易磨性与粉磨功指数的比较[J]. 水泥, 2003(4): 22-25. |
| LIAO X Y, LUO F, LIU H. Comparison between stuff relative grindability and grinding power index[J]. Cement, 2003(4): 22-25 (in Chinese). | |
| [23] |
GAO T M, SHEN L, SHEN M, et al. Analysis on differences of carbon dioxide emission from cement production and their major determinants[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2015, 103: 160-170.
DOI URL |
| [24] |
YU J, WANG K B. Study on characteristics of steel slag for CO2 capture[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2011, 25(11): 5483-5492.
DOI URL |
| [25] |
BONENFANT D, KHAROUNE L, SAUVE S, et al. CO2 sequestration potential of steel slags at ambient pressure and temperature[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2008, 47(20): 7610-7616.
DOI URL |
| [26] | HEDMAN B. Waste heat recovery in Turkish cement industry review of existing installations and assessment of remaining potential[M]. Washington: IFC, 2019. |
| [27] |
LYKAS P, BELLOS E, ATSONIOS K, et al. Thermodynamic and economic investigation of a waste heat recovery system with thermoelectric generators in the cement industry[J]. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress, 2025, 60: 103431.
DOI URL |
| [28] |
MOSSIE A T, KHATIWADA D, PALM B, et al. Techno-economic analysis of waste heat recovery power plants in cement industry: a case study in Ethiopia[J]. Next Energy, 2025, 8: 100339.
DOI URL |
| [29] |
KOOKOS I K, PONTIKES Y, ANGELOPOULOS G N, et al. Classical and alternative fuel mix optimization in cement production using mathematical programming[J]. Fuel, 2011, 90(3): 1277-1284.
DOI URL |
| [30] |
LU H Y, PRICE L, ZHANG Q. Capturing the invisible resource: analysis of waste heat potential in Chinese industry[J]. Applied Energy, 2016, 161: 497-511.
DOI URL |
| [1] | WANG Fuhuan, LI Yanjie, LYU Haoping, YANG Lingqiang. Mechanical Properties of Glass Powder-Modified Polypropylene Fiber-Reinforced Cementitious Composites [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(7): 2397-2407. |
| [2] | LIU Xin, LI Mingyang, ZHANG Xihe, LAN Shaoding, GAO Xu. Durability and Microstructure of Phosphogypsum-Slag-Based All-Solid-Waste Cementitious Material Regulated by Red Mud and Recycled Cement Powder [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(7): 2478-2490. |
| [3] | YU Zhejun, WANG Jingran, ZHANG Jinhua, HAN Bingqiang, NI Yue’e. Effects of Recycled Wind Turbine Blade Fibers and Glass Fibers on Properties of Portland Cement [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(7): 2408-2418. |
| [4] | JIN Zihao, ZOU Ziyong, HE Xingyang, SU Ying, CHEN Shuqin. Effect of Wet Grinding Carbonized Steel Slag on Properties and Microstructure of Beta-Hemihydrate Phosphogypsum [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(7): 2347-2356. |
| [5] | ZHANG Wencong, BAO Qinfan, WANG Yuqiu, MAN Baoliang, HUANG Guo, GUO Rongxin. Effects of Calcium Sulfate Whiskers on Hydration and Microstructure of Fly Ash-Cement Composites [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(7): 2428-2437. |
| [6] | JING Hongyu, DUAN Siyu, YANG Songqiao, WANG Yonggang, ZHOU Dongdong, LU Guangjun, MA Zhibin. Effect of Circulating Fluidized Bed Slag Particle Size on Properties of Cement-Based Composite Cementitious Materials [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(7): 2335-2346. |
| [7] | ZHANG Xuemei, JIN Qingqing, CHANG Shuo, WANG Lu, LI Zhaoqi, ZHANG Xingzhao, LIU Shuhua. Chemical Shrinkage Characteristics of Supersulfated Cement [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(7): 2215-2225. |
| [8] | CAO Yujie, LIU Lv, HUANG Dong, HUANG Chaoqun, LIU Yunpeng. Influence of Oleic Acid Modified Ultrafine Cement on Performance of Grouting Materials [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(7): 2226-2236. |
| [9] | LI Fuyun, HUANG Shengjing, JIAO Weili, DENG Xiaowei, CHEN Chunheng, WEI Chi, LAI Fang, LI Jing. Effects of Red Mud-Based Composite Hydration Seeds on Properties of Portland Cement Mortar [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(7): 2237-2249. |
| [10] | YANG Jin, LIU Xiao, HE Xingyang, SU Ying, WANG Jinfu. Sensitivity of Absorption Behavior of Superabsorbent Polymers in Cementitious Materials [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(7): 2324-2334. |
| [11] | ZHANG Liu, GONG Ming, DING Pan, ZHOU Fei, YANG Fengyuan, LU Zhongyuan, LI Jun. Effect of Natural Gypsum Content on Hydration and Performances of High-Alumina Ladle Slag Based Compound Cementitious Materials [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(7): 2389-2396. |
| [12] | WANG Yue, CONG Peiliang. Mechanical Properties and Reaction Characteristics of Fly Ash-Calcium Carbide Residue-Desulfurization Gypsum Cementitious Materials [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(7): 2438-2447. |
| [13] | SHEN Yanli, WEI Guanchao, WANG Peng, WANG Jiawei, XU Lei, WANG Hui, WANG Zhiling, WEI Aikui. Mechanical Properties Analysis and Optimal Mix Proportion Prediction of Cement-Stabilized Crushed Stone with Recycled Aggregate [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(7): 2561-2572. |
| [14] | WANG Yanheng, ZHANG Jiawei, REN Kai, YAN Guochao, KONG Shaoqi, LI Gang, LI Boyu, WU Kuangkuang. Optimization of Mix Proportion and Micro-Mechanism Study of Multi-Source Solid Waste-Based Cementitious Backfill [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(7): 2448-2465. |
| [15] | HE Yanhui, WANG Huan, ZOU Yong, CHEN Cheng, XU Peng, HE Zhihao. Influence of Carbonized Recycled Cement Concrete Powder on Performance of Foamed Concrete [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(6): 2063-2074. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||