BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY ›› 2026, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (6): 1864-1875.DOI: 10.16552/j.cnki.issn1001-1625.2025.1276
• Cement and Concrete • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHOU Zheng1(
), ZHOU Yutong1, ZHAO Zhoufeng1, QIU Lyuchao1, ZHANG Shiyuan1, WANG Liting2, PENG Bo2, JIAN Shouwei2, TAN Hongbo2
Received:2025-12-18
Revised:2026-02-10
Online:2026-06-15
Published:2026-07-14
CLC Number:
ZHOU Zheng, ZHOU Yutong, ZHAO Zhoufeng, QIU Lyuchao, ZHANG Shiyuan, WANG Liting, PENG Bo, JIAN Shouwei, TAN Hongbo. Influences of Multiple Components on Performance Deterioration of Magnesium Potassium Phosphate Cement under High-Temperature[J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(6): 1864-1875.
| Material | Mass fraction/% | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MgO | SiO2 | CaO | Fe2O3 | Al2O3 | K2O | Na2O | LOI | |
| Dead-burned MgO | 89.717 | 3.409 | 1.979 | 1.684 | 0.893 | 0.037 | — | 1.808 |
| Glass beads | — | 82.353 | 8.897 | 0.136 | 0.123 | 0.006 | 1.381 | 6.944 |
| Expanded vermiculite | 12.378 | 44.079 | 3.358 | 13.624 | 17.253 | 5.238 | — | 4.057 |
Table 1 Main chemical composition of raw materials
| Material | Mass fraction/% | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MgO | SiO2 | CaO | Fe2O3 | Al2O3 | K2O | Na2O | LOI | |
| Dead-burned MgO | 89.717 | 3.409 | 1.979 | 1.684 | 0.893 | 0.037 | — | 1.808 |
| Glass beads | — | 82.353 | 8.897 | 0.136 | 0.123 | 0.006 | 1.381 | 6.944 |
| Expanded vermiculite | 12.378 | 44.079 | 3.358 | 13.624 | 17.253 | 5.238 | — | 4.057 |
| Factor | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Water-binder ratio (A) | 0.25 | 0.30 | 0.35 |
| Silica sol content (B)/% | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| Expanded vermiculite content (C)/% | 5 | 10 | 15 |
| Glass beads content (D)/% | 4 | 8 | 12 |
Table 2 Factor level design for MKPC orthogonal tests
| Factor | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Water-binder ratio (A) | 0.25 | 0.30 | 0.35 |
| Silica sol content (B)/% | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| Expanded vermiculite content (C)/% | 5 | 10 | 15 |
| Glass beads content (D)/% | 4 | 8 | 12 |
| Number | Sample | Mass/g | A | B/% | C/% | D/% | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KH2PO4 | MgO | Borax | ||||||
| 1 | A1B1C1D1 | 2 118.4 | 1 881.6 | 320 | 0.25 | 3 | 5 | 4 |
| 2 | A1B2C2D2 | 0.25 | 4 | 10 | 8 | |||
| 3 | A1B3C3D3 | 0.25 | 5 | 15 | 12 | |||
| 4 | A2B1C2D3 | 0.30 | 3 | 10 | 12 | |||
| 5 | A2B2C3D1 | 0.30 | 4 | 15 | 4 | |||
| 6 | A2B3C1D2 | 0.30 | 5 | 5 | 8 | |||
| 7 | A3B1C3D2 | 0.35 | 3 | 15 | 8 | |||
| 8 | A3B2C1D3 | 0.35 | 4 | 5 | 12 | |||
| 9 | A3B3C2D1 | 0.35 | 5 | 10 | 4 | |||
Table 3 Mix ratio design for MKPC orthogonal tests
| Number | Sample | Mass/g | A | B/% | C/% | D/% | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KH2PO4 | MgO | Borax | ||||||
| 1 | A1B1C1D1 | 2 118.4 | 1 881.6 | 320 | 0.25 | 3 | 5 | 4 |
| 2 | A1B2C2D2 | 0.25 | 4 | 10 | 8 | |||
| 3 | A1B3C3D3 | 0.25 | 5 | 15 | 12 | |||
| 4 | A2B1C2D3 | 0.30 | 3 | 10 | 12 | |||
| 5 | A2B2C3D1 | 0.30 | 4 | 15 | 4 | |||
| 6 | A2B3C1D2 | 0.30 | 5 | 5 | 8 | |||
| 7 | A3B1C3D2 | 0.35 | 3 | 15 | 8 | |||
| 8 | A3B2C1D3 | 0.35 | 4 | 5 | 12 | |||
| 9 | A3B3C2D1 | 0.35 | 5 | 10 | 4 | |||
| Experimental index | RA | RB | RC | RD | Influence sequence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial setting time/min | 59.58 | 12.34 | 10.40 | 19.50 | A>D>B>C |
| Final setting time/min | 105.74 | 33.69 | 55.55 | 56.03 | A>D>C>B |
| Fluidity/mm | 27.00 | 11.00 | 33.33 | 9.67 | C>A>B>D |
Table 4 Range analysis of influences of different factors on working performance of MKPC
| Experimental index | RA | RB | RC | RD | Influence sequence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial setting time/min | 59.58 | 12.34 | 10.40 | 19.50 | A>D>B>C |
| Final setting time/min | 105.74 | 33.69 | 55.55 | 56.03 | A>D>C>B |
| Fluidity/mm | 27.00 | 11.00 | 33.33 | 9.67 | C>A>B>D |
| Experimental index | RA | RB | RC | RD | Influence sequence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compressive strength/MPa | 5.07 | 2.38 | 1.57 | 3.07 | A>D>B>C |
| Bonding strength/MPa | 0.26 | 0.08 | 0.15 | 0.21 | A>D>C>B |
Table 5 Range analysis of influences of different factors on mechanical properties of MKPC
| Experimental index | RA | RB | RC | RD | Influence sequence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compressive strength/MPa | 5.07 | 2.38 | 1.57 | 3.07 | A>D>B>C |
| Bonding strength/MPa | 0.26 | 0.08 | 0.15 | 0.21 | A>D>C>B |
| Temperature/℃ | Compressive strength/MPa | Influence sequence | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RA | RB | RC | RD | ||
| 800 | 1.29 | 0.38 | 0.94 | 0.98 | A>D>C>B |
| 1 000 | 1.55 | 0.53 | 1.15 | 2.37 | D>A>C>B |
| 1 200 | 1.21 | 0.50 | 0.58 | 0.73 | A>D>C>B |
Table 6 Range analysis of influences of different factors on compressive strength of MKPC after high-temperature treatment
| Temperature/℃ | Compressive strength/MPa | Influence sequence | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RA | RB | RC | RD | ||
| 800 | 1.29 | 0.38 | 0.94 | 0.98 | A>D>C>B |
| 1 000 | 1.55 | 0.53 | 1.15 | 2.37 | D>A>C>B |
| 1 200 | 1.21 | 0.50 | 0.58 | 0.73 | A>D>C>B |
| Temperature/℃ | Volume reduction rate/% | Influence sequence | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RA | RB | RC | RD | ||
| 800 | 0.84 | 0.43 | 1.37 | 0.93 | C>D>A>B |
| 1 000 | 0.58 | 0.12 | 1.78 | 1.26 | C>D>A>B |
| 1 200 | 0.96 | 0.30 | 1.52 | 0.63 | C>A>D>B |
Table 7 Range analysis of influences of different factors on volume reduction rate of MKPC after high-temperature treatment
| Temperature/℃ | Volume reduction rate/% | Influence sequence | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RA | RB | RC | RD | ||
| 800 | 0.84 | 0.43 | 1.37 | 0.93 | C>D>A>B |
| 1 000 | 0.58 | 0.12 | 1.78 | 1.26 | C>D>A>B |
| 1 200 | 0.96 | 0.30 | 1.52 | 0.63 | C>A>D>B |
| Element | Mass fraction/% | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Point 1 | Point 2 | Point 3 | Point 4 | Point 5 | |
| O | 44.49 | 38.15 | 30.23 | 46.76 | 29.45 |
| Mg | 31.01 | 13.91 | 26.26 | 10.76 | 24.88 |
| Al | 0.27 | 0.21 | 1.26 | — | 1.87 |
| Si | 20.10 | 0.28 | 20.68 | — | 28.98 |
| P | 1.02 | 20.86 | 0.95 | 14.93 | 0.80 |
| K | 1.73 | 25.44 | 6.13 | 27.55 | 6.22 |
| Ca | 0.19 | 0.84 | 3.27 | — | 2.88 |
| Fe | 1.18 | 0.31 | 11.23 | — | 4.93 |
Table 8 EDS point scan element content distribution
| Element | Mass fraction/% | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Point 1 | Point 2 | Point 3 | Point 4 | Point 5 | |
| O | 44.49 | 38.15 | 30.23 | 46.76 | 29.45 |
| Mg | 31.01 | 13.91 | 26.26 | 10.76 | 24.88 |
| Al | 0.27 | 0.21 | 1.26 | — | 1.87 |
| Si | 20.10 | 0.28 | 20.68 | — | 28.98 |
| P | 1.02 | 20.86 | 0.95 | 14.93 | 0.80 |
| K | 1.73 | 25.44 | 6.13 | 27.55 | 6.22 |
| Ca | 0.19 | 0.84 | 3.27 | — | 2.88 |
| Fe | 1.18 | 0.31 | 11.23 | — | 4.93 |
| [1] |
DAI X B, REN W X, QIN J H, et al. Influence and mechanism of borax on the physico-mechanical properties of magnesium potassium phosphate cement exposed to high temperatures[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2023, 376: 131015.
DOI URL |
| [2] | QIAN W Y, SUN W, GUO S, et al. Effect of temperature variation on bonding properties of magnesium potassium phosphate cement: a multiscale analysis[J]. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 2024, 21: e03993. |
| [3] | 唐浩. 磷酸镁水泥基材料的钢筋防护性能与机理研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2021. |
| TANG H. Study on steel bar protection performance and mechanism of magnesium phosphate cement-based materials[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing University, 2021 (in Chinese). | |
| [4] | LAI Z Y, CHEN J W, YU Y P, et al. Effect of magnesium hydroxide on the properties of fireproof coatings for steel structure based on magnesium phosphate cement[J]. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 2024, 21: e03853. |
| [5] | 艾红红. 磷酸钾镁水泥防火板性能及机理研究[D]. 福州: 福州大学, 2016. |
| AI H H. Study on properties and mechanism of magnesium potassium phosphate cement fireproof board[D]. Fuzhou: Fuzhou University, 2016 (in Chinese). | |
| [6] |
LI Y, WANG N, LONG S R, et al. Research on the properties of brucite-based magnesium phosphate cement fire resistive coating for steel structures[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2024, 449: 138481.
DOI URL |
| [7] |
WANG D Q, YUE Y F, MI T W, et al. Effect of magnesia-to-phosphate ratio on the passivation of mild steel in magnesium potassium phosphate cement[J]. Corrosion Science, 2020, 174: 108848.
DOI URL |
| [8] |
FANG B D, HU Z J, SHI T, et al. Research progress on the properties and applications of magnesium phosphate cement[J]. Ceramics International, 2023, 49(3): 4001-4016.
DOI URL |
| [9] | 李军. 侵蚀环境下磷酸铵镁水泥基涂料的耐久性能及机理研究[D]. 徐州: 中国矿业大学, 2018. |
| LI J. Study on durability performance and mechanism of magnesium ammonium phosphate cement-based coating in corrosive environment[D]. Xuzhou: China University of Mining and Technology, 2018 (in Chinese). | |
| [10] |
YAN K, YU X, REN P F, et al. Experimental research on fire resistance of the concrete beams strengthened with the CFRP sheets pasted by magnesium phosphate inorganic adhesive[J]. Engineering Structures, 2025, 330: 119946.
DOI URL |
| [11] |
WANG X, HU X, YANG J M, et al. Research progress on interfacial bonding between magnesium phosphate cement and steel: a review[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2022, 342: 127925.
DOI URL |
| [12] | 邵晓燕. 磷酸钾镁水泥基钢结构防火涂料的制备研究[D]. 福州: 福州大学, 2017. |
| SHAO X Y. Study on preparation of magnesium potassium phosphate cement-based fireproof coating for steel structure[D]. Fuzhou: Fuzhou University, 2017 (in Chinese). | |
| [13] |
FANG Y, YIN X H, CUI P, et al. Properties of magnesium potassium phosphate cement-expanded perlite composites applied as fire resistance coating[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 293: 123513.
DOI URL |
| [14] |
YANG Y Q, LIU Y, YAN Z Z, et al. High-temperature resistance of modified potassium magnesium phosphate cement[J]. Materials, 2022, 15(24): 8967.
DOI URL |
| [15] | 温 婧. MKPC基钢结构防火涂料组成结构设计及其防火性能评价[D]. 淮南: 安徽理工大学, 2020. |
| WEN J. Composition and structure design of MKPC-based fireproof coating for steel structure and its fireproof performance evaluation[D]. Huainan: Anhui University of Science and Technology, 2020 (in Chinese). | |
| [16] | FANG C, WEN J, LI Y, et al. Effects of the modified expanded perlite materials on magnesium phosphate cement-based fireproof mortars: mechanical property, thermal conductivity and microstructure[J]. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 2025, 22: e04140. |
| [17] | 张爱莲. 磷酸镁水泥的耐高温改性及粘贴碳纤维布面内剪切性能研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2017. |
| ZHANG A L. Study on high-temperature modification of magnesium phosphate cement and in-plane shear performance of bonded carbon fiber cloth[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2017 (in Chinese). | |
| [18] | 陈新, 陈士堃, 闫东明, 等. 磷酸镁涂层高温后力学性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(3): 1031-1038. |
| CHEN X, CHEN S K, YAN D M, et al. Mechanical properties of magnesium phosphate coatings after high temperature[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2022, 41(3): 1031-1038 (in Chinese). | |
| [19] | 李晓, 赵莹莹, 故丽孜巴·阿不都热西提, 等. 磷酸镁水泥高温性能研究进展[J]. 材料导报, 2024, 38(17): 41-48. |
| LI X, ZHAO Y Y, GULIZIBA‧ABUDUREXITI, et al. Research progress on high-temperature performance of magnesium phosphate cement[J]. Materials Reports, 2024, 38(17): 41-48 (in Chinese). | |
| [20] | 刘志. 基于CFD-FEM的钢结构桥梁火灾响应研究[D]. 南京: 东南大学, 2021. |
| LIU Z. Study on fire response of steel structure bridge based on CFD-FEM[D]. Nanjing: Southeast University, 2021 (in Chinese). | |
| [21] | 黄迪. 基于火灾随机性的高大空间钢结构建筑多风险分析[D]. 徐州: 中国矿业大学, 2019. |
| HUANG D. Multi-risk analysis of tall and large space steel structure buildings based on fire randomness[D]. Xuzhou: China University of Mining and Technology, 2019 (in Chinese). | |
| [22] |
GARDNER L J, WALLING S A, CORKHILL C L, et al. Temperature transformation of blended magnesium potassium phosphate cement binders[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2021, 141: 106332.
DOI URL |
| [23] |
BANERJEE R H, NELWAMONDO S M M, RAJE N, et al. Radiation stability testing of hydrated and heat-treated magnesium potassium phosphates for back end nuclear fuel cycle applications[J]. Ceramics International, 2024, 50(1): 2405-2414.
DOI URL |
| [24] |
GAO X J, ZHANG A L, LI S X, et al. The resistance to high temperature of magnesia phosphate cement paste containing wollastonite[J]. Materials and Structures, 2016, 49(8): 3423-3434.
DOI URL |
| [1] | LI Yue, ZHOU Guanghui, YANG Bin, JIN Kaikai, JIANG Zezhou, QIU Ziheng, SHAO Weiwei. Optimization Design and Performance Study of Shotcrete Mix Proportion for Tunnels in High-Altitude Mountainous Regions [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(6): 1924-1936. |
| [2] | ZHAO Tianpu, ZHAN Xuefang, LIU Xiaojun, HUANG Dan, ZHAO Yibin, WANG Haolei. Preparation and Performance Prediction of Multi-Component Blended Green ECC Based on Orthogonal Experiment [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(6): 1988-2001. |
| [3] | LIU Meifang, LIU Jianzheng, HU Liqun, GAO Shengfa, LIU Jiahong, LI Guochao. Mix Ratio Optimization of Slag-Fly Ash Geopolymer Grouting Materials [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(2): 695-711. |
| [4] | JIANG Haoyang, HU Zhide, ZHAO Sixie, ZHANG Hansong, XU Chunxia. Effect of Ambient Temperature on Hydration Temperature Rise of Magnesium Phosphate Cement [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2025, 44(9): 3147-3155. |
| [5] | ZHENG Yingwu, MA Hongjian, HOU Ning, SHEN Hengming, HUANG Feng. Mix Ratio Optimization and Performance Study of Fly Ash Based Grouting Water Blocking Materials under Dynamic Water Conditions [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2025, 44(8): 2933-2943. |
| [6] | ZHAO Jian, YANG Dingyi, LU Shimin, YANG Kailu, MAO Xiang, CHEN Longxiang, WANG Tongzhang. Preparation and Performance Improvement of Ultra-High Strength Strain Hardening Cement-Based Composite [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2025, 44(3): 785-801. |
| [7] | BAI Liang, LI Yuanhang, WANG Xin, ZHENG Hui, LIANG Xingwen. Influence Mechanism of Compounding Calcium Aluminate Cement and Wollastonite on Corrosion Resistance of Magnesium Potassium Phosphate Cement [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2025, 44(2): 393-402. |
| [8] | LI Shuichang, HUANG Chen, MO Shimin, ZHAO Xicheng. Effects of Compounding Mineral Admixtures on High-Temperature Resistance of Magnesium Potassium Phosphate Cement [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2025, 44(10): 3773-3780. |
| [9] | HOU Yuying, YANG Jianming, XU Xiaohui, HU Xuexin, CHEN Weiliang, HU Xiamin, JIANG Dequan, XIONG Caiqiang, LI Tao. Sulfate Corrosion Behavior in Solution Fully Soaked Magnesium Potassium Phosphate Cement Slurry [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2025, 44(1): 31-39. |
| [10] | LIU Rui, LIU Ze, ZHAO Lijie, ZHANG Shuai, WANG Dongmin. Mixture Ratio of Lithium Slag-Based Controllable Low Strength Materials Based on Orthogonal Experiment [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2024, 43(7): 2548-2555. |
| [11] | XU Chengxiang, ZHANG Jiaqi. Permeability Resistance Test of Steel-PVA Hybrid Fiber High Performance Concrete [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2024, 43(6): 2130-2136. |
| [12] | XIONG Jiangmin, DUAN Ning, LU Chenglong, ZHANG Yinfeng, LI Chongrui. Effect of Ammonia on Particle Size and Stability of Silica Sol Prepared by Sol-Gel Method [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2023, 42(7): 2589-2596. |
| [13] | ZHANG Huifang, GONG Linyang, REN Yana, HUANG Jianguo, KOU Bin, YAN Zhengwei, ZHANG Zhanchao, LIU Weijie, WEI Wenbo. Composite Experiments Design, Mechanical Properties and Microstructure Analysis of Solid Waste Composite Grouting Material [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2023, 42(11): 4006-4016. |
| [14] | WEI Kailun, ZHAO Weiquan, FAN Henghui. Proportion Optimization of Silica Sol Grout Based on Response Surface Method [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2022, 41(6): 2015-2023. |
| [15] | MIAO Hanliang, ZHAO Bin, JI Rongjian, YANG Jianming. Evaluation on Frost Resistance of Early Age Magnesium Potassium Phosphate Cement Mortar [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2021, 40(4): 1128-1136. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||