BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY ›› 2026, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (6): 1988-2001.DOI: 10.16552/j.cnki.issn1001-1625.2025.1245
• Solid Waste and Eco-Materials • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHAO Tianpu1(
), ZHAN Xuefang1,2(
), LIU Xiaojun1, HUANG Dan1, ZHAO Yibin1, WANG Haolei1
Received:2025-12-12
Revised:2026-01-05
Online:2026-06-15
Published:2026-07-14
Contact:
ZHAN Xuefang
CLC Number:
ZHAO Tianpu, ZHAN Xuefang, LIU Xiaojun, HUANG Dan, ZHAO Yibin, WANG Haolei. Preparation and Performance Prediction of Multi-Component Blended Green ECC Based on Orthogonal Experiment[J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(6): 1988-2001.
| Material | Mass fraction/% | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CaO | SiO2 | Al2O3 | K2O | Fe2O3 | Cl- | MgO | SO3 | P2O5 | MnO | |
| PC | 64.83 | 21.51 | 5.08 | 0 | 3.74 | 0 | 2.48 | 0.52 | 0 | 0 |
| FA | 0.26 | 50.26 | 31.14 | 0 | 4.16 | 0 | 1.21 | 2.16 | 0 | 0 |
| RHA | 4.31 | 82.32 | 0.46 | 7.00 | 0.18 | 1.22 | 0.68 | 1.57 | 1.81 | 0.38 |
| RSA | 10.87 | 56.96 | 1.45 | 18.35 | 0.49 | 2.51 | 3.00 | 2.66 | 1.53 | 1.83 |
| CSA | 15.59 | 35.72 | 2.20 | 24.37 | 1.29 | 3.45 | 5.80 | 3.21 | 7.76 | 0.29 |
Table 1 Main chemical composition of PC, FA, and combustion ash of agricultural solid wastes
| Material | Mass fraction/% | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CaO | SiO2 | Al2O3 | K2O | Fe2O3 | Cl- | MgO | SO3 | P2O5 | MnO | |
| PC | 64.83 | 21.51 | 5.08 | 0 | 3.74 | 0 | 2.48 | 0.52 | 0 | 0 |
| FA | 0.26 | 50.26 | 31.14 | 0 | 4.16 | 0 | 1.21 | 2.16 | 0 | 0 |
| RHA | 4.31 | 82.32 | 0.46 | 7.00 | 0.18 | 1.22 | 0.68 | 1.57 | 1.81 | 0.38 |
| RSA | 10.87 | 56.96 | 1.45 | 18.35 | 0.49 | 2.51 | 3.00 | 2.66 | 1.53 | 1.83 |
| CSA | 15.59 | 35.72 | 2.20 | 24.37 | 1.29 | 3.45 | 5.80 | 3.21 | 7.76 | 0.29 |
| Sample No. | Mix proportion/(kg·m-3) | Sand-to-binder | Water-to-binder ratio | Flowability factor | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PC | FA | Sand | Water | ||||
| 1 | 553 | 663 | 438 | 324 | 0.36 | 0.36 | 16.60 |
| 2 | 553 | 663 | 304 | 324 | 0.25 | 0.36 | 17.58 |
| 3 | 553 | 663 | 182 | 324 | 0.15 | 0.36 | 16.31 |
| 4 | 553 | 663 | 304 | 342 | 0.25 | 0.38 | 18.62 |
| 5 | 553 | 663 | 304 | 360 | 0.25 | 0.40 | 17.82 |
Table 2 Experimental mix proportion and results of flowability test
| Sample No. | Mix proportion/(kg·m-3) | Sand-to-binder | Water-to-binder ratio | Flowability factor | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PC | FA | Sand | Water | ||||
| 1 | 553 | 663 | 438 | 324 | 0.36 | 0.36 | 16.60 |
| 2 | 553 | 663 | 304 | 324 | 0.25 | 0.36 | 17.58 |
| 3 | 553 | 663 | 182 | 324 | 0.15 | 0.36 | 16.31 |
| 4 | 553 | 663 | 304 | 342 | 0.25 | 0.38 | 18.62 |
| 5 | 553 | 663 | 304 | 360 | 0.25 | 0.40 | 17.82 |
| Sample No. | Mix proportion/(kg·m-3) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PC | FA | Sand | RSA | RHA | CSA | Water | PVA fiber | HRWRA | |
| ECC | 553.00 | 663 | 304 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 342 | 26 | 12.20 |
| RSA5CSA5 | 497.70 | 663 | 304 | 27.65 | 0 | 27.65 | 342 | 26 | 12.20 |
| RSA10CSA10 | 442.40 | 663 | 304 | 55.30 | 0 | 55.30 | 342 | 26 | 12.20 |
| RHA5CSA5 | 497.70 | 663 | 304 | 0 | 27.65 | 27.65 | 342 | 26 | 12.20 |
| RHA10CSA10 | 442.40 | 663 | 304 | 0 | 55.30 | 55.30 | 342 | 26 | 12.20 |
| RHA5RSA5CSA10 | 442.40 | 663 | 304 | 27.65 | 27.65 | 55.30 | 342 | 26 | 12.20 |
| RHA5RSA10 | 470.05 | 663 | 304 | 0 | 27.65 | 55.30 | 342 | 26 | 12.20 |
| RHA10RSA5 | 470.05 | 663 | 304 | 0 | 55.30 | 27.65 | 342 | 26 | 12.20 |
| RHA10RSA10CSA5 | 414.75 | 663 | 304 | 55.30 | 55.30 | 27.65 | 342 | 26 | 12.20 |
Table 3 Mix proportion of multi-component blended green ECC
| Sample No. | Mix proportion/(kg·m-3) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PC | FA | Sand | RSA | RHA | CSA | Water | PVA fiber | HRWRA | |
| ECC | 553.00 | 663 | 304 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 342 | 26 | 12.20 |
| RSA5CSA5 | 497.70 | 663 | 304 | 27.65 | 0 | 27.65 | 342 | 26 | 12.20 |
| RSA10CSA10 | 442.40 | 663 | 304 | 55.30 | 0 | 55.30 | 342 | 26 | 12.20 |
| RHA5CSA5 | 497.70 | 663 | 304 | 0 | 27.65 | 27.65 | 342 | 26 | 12.20 |
| RHA10CSA10 | 442.40 | 663 | 304 | 0 | 55.30 | 55.30 | 342 | 26 | 12.20 |
| RHA5RSA5CSA10 | 442.40 | 663 | 304 | 27.65 | 27.65 | 55.30 | 342 | 26 | 12.20 |
| RHA5RSA10 | 470.05 | 663 | 304 | 0 | 27.65 | 55.30 | 342 | 26 | 12.20 |
| RHA10RSA5 | 470.05 | 663 | 304 | 0 | 55.30 | 27.65 | 342 | 26 | 12.20 |
| RHA10RSA10CSA5 | 414.75 | 663 | 304 | 55.30 | 55.30 | 27.65 | 342 | 26 | 12.20 |
| Performance index | Factor | K0j | K5j | K10j | k0j | k5j | k10j | Rj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compressive strength/MPa | RHA | 76.87 | 77.53 | 72.22 | 25.62 | 25.84 | 24.07 | 1.77 |
| RSA | 72.38 | 78.58 | 75.66 | 24.13 | 26.19 | 25.22 | 2.07 | |
| CSA | 42.62 | 111.86 | 72.14 | 21.31 | 27.97 | 24.05 | 6.66 | |
| Ultimate tensile strain/% | RHA | 10.03 | 13.98 | 18.43 | 3.34 | 4.66 | 6.14 | 2.80 |
| RSA | 13.92 | 14.33 | 14.19 | 4.64 | 4.78 | 4.73 | 0.14 | |
| CSA | 15.17 | 14.48 | 12.79 | 5.06 | 4.83 | 4.26 | 0.79 | |
| Deflection/mm | RHA | 31.82 | 32.54 | 36.55 | 10.61 | 10.85 | 12.18 | 1.58 |
| RSA | 36.25 | 30.86 | 33.80 | 12.08 | 10.29 | 11.27 | 1.80 | |
| CSA | 25.31 | 34.76 | 40.84 | 8.44 | 11.59 | 13.61 | 5.18 |
Table 4 7 d range analysis results of multi-component blended green ECC
| Performance index | Factor | K0j | K5j | K10j | k0j | k5j | k10j | Rj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compressive strength/MPa | RHA | 76.87 | 77.53 | 72.22 | 25.62 | 25.84 | 24.07 | 1.77 |
| RSA | 72.38 | 78.58 | 75.66 | 24.13 | 26.19 | 25.22 | 2.07 | |
| CSA | 42.62 | 111.86 | 72.14 | 21.31 | 27.97 | 24.05 | 6.66 | |
| Ultimate tensile strain/% | RHA | 10.03 | 13.98 | 18.43 | 3.34 | 4.66 | 6.14 | 2.80 |
| RSA | 13.92 | 14.33 | 14.19 | 4.64 | 4.78 | 4.73 | 0.14 | |
| CSA | 15.17 | 14.48 | 12.79 | 5.06 | 4.83 | 4.26 | 0.79 | |
| Deflection/mm | RHA | 31.82 | 32.54 | 36.55 | 10.61 | 10.85 | 12.18 | 1.58 |
| RSA | 36.25 | 30.86 | 33.80 | 12.08 | 10.29 | 11.27 | 1.80 | |
| CSA | 25.31 | 34.76 | 40.84 | 8.44 | 11.59 | 13.61 | 5.18 |
| Performance index | Factor | K0j | K5j | K10j | k0j | k5j | k10j | Rj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First-cracking stress/MPa | RHA | 17.97 | 17.21 | 13.82 | 5.99 | 5.74 | 4.61 | 1.38 |
| RSA | 20.88 | 16.76 | 11.36 | 6.96 | 5.59 | 3.79 | 3.17 | |
| CSA | 15.02 | 21.31 | 12.67 | 5.01 | 7.10 | 4.22 | 2.88 | |
| Compressive strength/MPa | RHA | 108.68 | 109.66 | 106.88 | 36.23 | 36.55 | 35.63 | 0.93 |
| RSA | 103.78 | 112.99 | 108.45 | 34.59 | 37.66 | 36.15 | 3.07 | |
| CSA | 98.28 | 123.10 | 103.84 | 32.76 | 41.03 | 34.61 | 8.27 | |
| Ultimate tensile strain/% | RHA | 8.91 | 12.11 | 16.08 | 2.97 | 4.04 | 5.36 | 2.39 |
| RSA | 12.05 | 12.75 | 12.30 | 4.02 | 4.25 | 4.10 | 0.23 | |
| CSA | 13.18 | 12.75 | 11.17 | 4.39 | 4.25 | 3.72 | 0.67 | |
| Deflection/mm | RHA | 39.10 | 44.87 | 68.80 | 13.03 | 14.96 | 22.93 | 9.90 |
| RSA | 50.36 | 50.34 | 52.07 | 16.79 | 16.78 | 17.36 | 0.58 | |
| CSA | 57.47 | 41.57 | 53.73 | 19.16 | 13.86 | 17.91 | 5.30 | |
| Flexural strength/MPa | RHA | 30.06 | 31.26 | 25.78 | 10.02 | 10.42 | 8.59 | 1.83 |
| RSA | 31.42 | 29.39 | 26.29 | 10.47 | 9.80 | 8.76 | 1.71 | |
| CSA | 27.15 | 35.33 | 24.62 | 9.05 | 11.48 | 8.21 | 3.57 |
Table 5 28 d range analysis results of multi-component blended green ECC
| Performance index | Factor | K0j | K5j | K10j | k0j | k5j | k10j | Rj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First-cracking stress/MPa | RHA | 17.97 | 17.21 | 13.82 | 5.99 | 5.74 | 4.61 | 1.38 |
| RSA | 20.88 | 16.76 | 11.36 | 6.96 | 5.59 | 3.79 | 3.17 | |
| CSA | 15.02 | 21.31 | 12.67 | 5.01 | 7.10 | 4.22 | 2.88 | |
| Compressive strength/MPa | RHA | 108.68 | 109.66 | 106.88 | 36.23 | 36.55 | 35.63 | 0.93 |
| RSA | 103.78 | 112.99 | 108.45 | 34.59 | 37.66 | 36.15 | 3.07 | |
| CSA | 98.28 | 123.10 | 103.84 | 32.76 | 41.03 | 34.61 | 8.27 | |
| Ultimate tensile strain/% | RHA | 8.91 | 12.11 | 16.08 | 2.97 | 4.04 | 5.36 | 2.39 |
| RSA | 12.05 | 12.75 | 12.30 | 4.02 | 4.25 | 4.10 | 0.23 | |
| CSA | 13.18 | 12.75 | 11.17 | 4.39 | 4.25 | 3.72 | 0.67 | |
| Deflection/mm | RHA | 39.10 | 44.87 | 68.80 | 13.03 | 14.96 | 22.93 | 9.90 |
| RSA | 50.36 | 50.34 | 52.07 | 16.79 | 16.78 | 17.36 | 0.58 | |
| CSA | 57.47 | 41.57 | 53.73 | 19.16 | 13.86 | 17.91 | 5.30 | |
| Flexural strength/MPa | RHA | 30.06 | 31.26 | 25.78 | 10.02 | 10.42 | 8.59 | 1.83 |
| RSA | 31.42 | 29.39 | 26.29 | 10.47 | 9.80 | 8.76 | 1.71 | |
| CSA | 27.15 | 35.33 | 24.62 | 9.05 | 11.48 | 8.21 | 3.57 |
| Performance index | Source | Sum of squares | Df | Mean square | F | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28 d compressive strength | Regression | 9.33 | 3 | 3.11 | 0.13 | 0.941 |
| Residual | 123.70 | 5 | 24.74 | — | — | |
| Total | 133.02 | 8 | — | — | — |
Table 6 Variance analysis of 28 d compressive strength
| Performance index | Source | Sum of squares | Df | Mean square | F | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28 d compressive strength | Regression | 9.33 | 3 | 3.11 | 0.13 | 0.941 |
| Residual | 123.70 | 5 | 24.74 | — | — | |
| Total | 133.02 | 8 | — | — | — |
| Source | Sum of squres | Df | Mean square | F | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regression | 113.10 | 2 | 56.55 | 17.03 | 0.003 |
| Residual | 19.92 | 6 | 3.32 | — | — |
| Total | 133.02 | 8 | — | — | — |
Table 7 Variance analysis of 28 d compressive strength by quardratic model
| Source | Sum of squres | Df | Mean square | F | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regression | 113.10 | 2 | 56.55 | 17.03 | 0.003 |
| Residual | 19.92 | 6 | 3.32 | — | — |
| Total | 133.02 | 8 | — | — | — |
| Performance index | Source | Sum of squares | Df | Mean square | F | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28 d ultimate tensile strain | Regression | 9.25 | 3 | 3.08 | 24.76 | 0.002 |
| Residual | 0.62 | 5 | 0.13 | — | — | |
| Total | 9.88 | 8 | — | — | — |
Table 8 Variance analysis of 28 d ultimate tensile strain
| Performance index | Source | Sum of squares | Df | Mean square | F | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28 d ultimate tensile strain | Regression | 9.25 | 3 | 3.08 | 24.76 | 0.002 |
| Residual | 0.62 | 5 | 0.13 | — | — | |
| Total | 9.88 | 8 | — | — | — |
| [1] |
LI V C, LEUNG C K Y. Steady-state and multiple cracking of short random fiber composites[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 1992, 118(11): 2246-2264.
DOI URL |
| [2] | LI V C, WANG S X, WU C. Tensile strain-hardening behavior of polyvinyl alcohol engineered cementitious composite (PVA-ECC)[J]. ACI Materials Journal, 2001, 98(6): 483-492. |
| [3] |
GUO P W, BAO Y, MENG W N. Review of using glass in high-performance fiber-reinforced cementitious composites[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2021, 120: 104032.
DOI URL |
| [4] |
AMIN S K, ALLAM M E, GARAS G L, et al. A study of the chemical effect of marble and granite slurry on green mortar compressive strength[J]. Bulletin of the National Research Centre, 2020, 44(1): 19.
DOI |
| [5] | 王洪涛, 杨斌. 硅灰掺量对再生高延性水泥复合材料的力学性能和抗氯离子渗透性能的影响[J]. 混凝土, 2025(3): 138-141. |
| WANG H T, YANG B. Effect of silica fume dosage on mechanical properties and anti-chloride ion penetration performance of recycled high ductility cementitious composites[J]. Concrete, 2025(3): 138-141 (in Chinese). | |
| [6] |
董智福, 谭海龙, 余江滔. 含粉煤灰陶粒高延性水泥基复合材料研发与有限元模拟[J]. 结构工程师, 2025, 41(4): 111-121.
DOI |
|
DONG Z F, TAN H L, YU J T. Development and finite element simulation analysis of engineered cementitious composites with fly ash cold-bonded aggregate[J]. Structural Engineers, 2025, 41(4): 111-121 (in Chinese).
DOI |
|
| [7] |
XIA Y, LIU M H, ZHAO Y D, et al. Utilization of sewage sludge ash in ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC): microstructure and life-cycle assessment[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2023, 326: 116690.
DOI URL |
| [8] |
ASHISH D K, VERMA S K, JU M, et al. High volume waste foundry sand self-compacting concrete-transitioning industrial symbiosis[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2023, 173: 666-692.
DOI URL |
| [9] |
KLATHAE T, TRAN T N H, MEN S, et al. Strength, chloride resistance, and water permeability of high volume sugarcane bagasse ash high strength concrete incorporating limestone powder[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 311: 125326.
DOI URL |
| [10] |
DUQUE-ACEVEDO M, LANCELLOTTI I, ANDREOLA F, et al. Management of agricultural waste biomass as raw material for the construction sector: an analysis of sustainable and circular alternatives[J]. Environmental Sciences Europe, 2022, 34(1): 70.
DOI |
| [11] |
AL-ALWAN A A K, AL-BAZOON M, MUSSA F II, et al. The impact of using rice husk ash as a replacement material in concrete: an experimental study[J]. Journal of King Saud University-Engineering Sciences, 2024, 36(4): 249-255.
DOI URL |
| [12] |
FIGUEIREDO R L, PAVÍA S. A study of the parameters that determine the reactivity of sugarcane bagasse ashes (SCBA) for use as a binder in construction[J]. SN Applied Sciences, 2020, 2(9): 1515.
DOI |
| [13] |
ZHANG Z G, YANG F, LIU J C, et al. Eco-friendly high strength, high ductility engineered cementitious composites (ECC) with substitution of fly ash by rice husk ash[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2020, 137: 106200.
DOI URL |
| [14] | LIU F F, JIN B H, HE Q, et al. Influence of rice husk ash on the mechanical properties of ultra-high strength engineered cementitious composites (UHS-ECC)[J]. PLOS One, 2024, 19(4): e0301927. |
| [15] | SALEM S, HAMDY Y, ABDELRAOUF E S, et al. Towards sustainable concrete: cement replacement using Egyptian cornstalk ash[J]. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 2022, 17: e01193. |
| [16] | 吴倩倩, 蔡海兵, 胡时, 等. 高延性水泥基复合材料(ECC)正交试验[J]. 土木工程, 2023, 12(3): 298-306. |
|
WU Q Q, CAI H B, HU S, et al. Orthogonal test of high ductility engineering cementitious composites (ECC)[J]. Hans Journal of Civil Engineering, 2023, 12(3): 298-306 (in Chinese).
DOI URL |
|
| [17] | LI V C, WU H C, WANG S. Large-scale processing of engineered cementitious composites[J]. ACI Materials Journal, 2008, 105(4): 358-366. |
| [18] | British Standards Institution (BSI). Methods of test for mortar for masonry—Part 3: Determination of consistence of fresh mortar (by flow table): [S]. London: BSI, 1999. |
| [19] | Japan Society of Civil Engineers (JSCE). Recommendations for design and construction of high performance fiber reinforced cement composites with multiple fine cracks (HPFRCC) [S]. Tokyo: JSCE, 2008. |
| [20] | 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 建筑砂浆基本性能试验方法标准: [S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2009. |
| Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China. Standard for test method of basic properties of construction mortar: [S]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2009 (in Chinese). | |
| [21] | 中国工程建设标准化协会. 纤维混凝土试验方法标准: [S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2010. |
| China Association for Engineering Construction Standardization. Standard test methods for fiber reinforced concrete: [S]. Beijing: China Planning Press, 2009 (in Chinese). |
| [1] | LIU Yajun, XUE Shanbin, ZHENG Zihao, SHI Zhihao, WANG Wenhuan. Influence of Freeze-Thaw Cycles on Mechanical and Water Absorption Properties of Silane-Modified ECC [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(6): 1876-1891. |
| [2] | HONG Chuanhai, LIANG Ruiqing, LIANG Zhensheng, ZHANG Botao, TANG Xuemei, RUAN Guowei, LIN Jiaxiang. Properties of Seawater Coral Sand Powder Engineered Cementitious Composites after High-Temperature Exposure [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(4): 1151-1159. |
| [3] | CHEN Yu, QIU Siyuan, CHEN Xusheng, ZHANG Yamei. Research Progress on Applications of Seawater and Sea-Sand Engineered Cementitious Composites for Offshore Construction [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(2): 367-379. |
| [4] | YU Jiexin, ZHU Yiting, ZHUANG Xu, CHEN Yushuang, ZHANG Guangda, XU Li. Mechanical Properties of Green Engineering Cementitious Composites with Tailing Sand as Aggregate [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2025, 44(9): 3337-3346. |
| [5] | HUANG Jie, SHUI Zhonghe, QI Xibo, LIU Jiabao, HUANG Zhoulong, HE Jing. Effect of EVA Latex on Properties of Ultra-High Performance Engineered Cementitious Composites [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2025, 44(8): 2752-2761. |
| [6] | YU Xin, WANG Long, HE Pingping, LIU Yusong. Performance of Engineered Cementitious Composites Prepared with Gold Tailing Sand as Fine Aggregate [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2025, 44(7): 2566-2577. |
| [7] | FAN Jiahui, ZHANG Yike, YUAN Chengfang. Freeze-Thaw Damage Characteristic and Modeling of Yellow River Sand High-Ductility Engineered Cementitious Composites [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2025, 44(6): 2060-2069. |
| [8] | SU Jun, SI Yuan, CAI Xinhua, WANG Yamin. Influence of Steel Slag Powder on Basic Mechanical Properties of PE-ECC [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2025, 44(4): 1367-1376. |
| [9] | FAN Lin, YANG Zhao, QI Xiaolong, DENG Fangqian. Tensile Properties of PP/PVA Hybrid Fiber Engineered Cementitious Composites Reinforced by SMAF [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2025, 44(3): 811-820. |
| [10] | ZHAO Yu, GU Lixin, SHEN Guanghai, ZHU Lingli. Dynamic Compressive Properties of High Strength and High Ductility Engineered Cementitious Composites [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2025, 44(11): 4060-4070. |
| [11] | HUI Yongjun, ZHANG Junjie, ZHANG Ge, YUAN Chengfang. Experimental Study on Printability of 3D-Printed Yellow River Sand-Based Engineered Cementitious Composites [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2025, 44(11): 4123-4131. |
| [12] | QIN Yulin, MU Chaomin, ZHANG Xiaoyu, ZHONG Meiting, ZHANG Yu. Effects of Hybrid Glass Fiber and Steel Fiber on Dynamic Splitting Tensile Properties of Seawater Coral Sand Engineered Cementitious Composites [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2025, 44(10): 3547-3561. |
| [13] | HAN Zimo, YANG Guoliang, LI Feng, ZHANG Zhifei, BI Jingjiu, ZHAO Kangpu, LIU Yi. Experimental Study on Cracking Resistance of Polyvinyl Alcohol Fiber Concrete under Dynamic Loading [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2025, 44(1): 59-68. |
| [14] | LI Yanyan, DU Xiaoli, WANG Haowei, XU Kai. Dynamic and Static Mechanical Properties of Silica Fume-Polypropylene Fiber Double Doped Concrete [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2024, 43(9): 3320-3329. |
| [15] | CHE Jialing, WU Jie, GU Jiawei, HUANG Yu, LIU Haifeng. Uniaxial Compressive Mechanical Performance of Basalt Fiber Fabric-Steel-PVA Engineered Cementitious Composites [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2024, 43(7): 2363-2371. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||