硅酸盐通报 ›› 2026, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (6): 2052-2062.DOI: 10.16552/j.cnki.issn1001-1625.2025.1110
吴言坤1,2(
), 陈健1,3,4, 郝建帅2(
), 房奎圳2
收稿日期:2025-11-12
修订日期:2025-12-08
出版日期:2026-06-15
发布日期:2026-07-16
通信作者:
郝建帅,博士研究生。E-mail: BQT2200604034@student.cumtb.edu.cn作者简介:吴言坤(1974—),男,正高级工程师,主要从事水下盾构隧道工程的研究。E-mail: wuyankun1974@sina.com
基金资助:
WU Yankun1,2(
), CHEN Jian1,3,4, HAO Jianshuai2(
), FANG Kuizhen2
Received:2025-11-12
Revised:2025-12-08
Published:2026-06-15
Online:2026-07-16
摘要:
为实现大宗工业固废的高附加值资源化利用,本文构建了以钢渣(SS)-矿渣(GBFS)协同为核心,辅以水泥与脱硫石膏(DG)激发的四元胶凝体系。本研究通过系统的配合比设计与压汞法孔隙测试(MIP)、扫描电子显微镜(SEM)等微观表征手段,揭示了该四元胶凝体系在复合激发作用下的协同水化机制,阐明了水化产物钙矾石(AFt)与水化硅酸钙(C-S-H)凝胶交织生成、持续消耗Ca(OH)2,从而驱动孔隙显著细化与结构致密化。研究确定了各关键组分的最优质量分数:矿渣40%、水泥10%、脱硫石膏8%~12%。水化动力学分析表明,体系呈典型的三段式放热特征,依次对应铝酸盐相反应、水泥主矿物水化及矿渣后期激发。其中石膏提供的硫酸盐与水泥提供的碱度共同激发了矿渣与钢渣的活性,促使水化产物AFt与C-S-H凝胶持续生成并大量消耗Ca(OH)2。MIP与SEM测试结果进一步证实,四元胶凝体系在28 d龄期时实现了显著的微观结构致密化,有害孔(>50 nm)占比大幅降低,无害凝胶孔(<50 nm)占比从68%增至81%,C-S-H凝胶亦由交错分布发展为连续的蜂窝状结构,与AFt晶体紧密交织形成致密网络。本研究阐明了四元胶凝体系通过协同激发与孔隙细化实现强度发展的机理,为开发高性能低碳建筑材料提供了技术路径。
中图分类号:
吴言坤, 陈健, 郝建帅, 房奎圳. 钢渣-矿渣-水泥-脱硫石膏四元胶凝体系的水化硬化机理与性能优化研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(6): 2052-2062.
WU Yankun, CHEN Jian, HAO Jianshuai, FANG Kuizhen. Hydration and Hardening Mechanism and Property Optimization of SS-GBFS-Cement-DG Quaternary Cementitious System[J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(6): 2052-2062.
| Raw material | Mass fraction/% | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CaO | Fe2O3 | SiO2 | Al2O3 | MgO | MnO | SO3 | P2O5 | TiO2 | Na2O | |
| SS | 43.45 | 27.17 | 12.47 | 4.38 | 4.09 | 3.73 | 1.45 | 1.16 | 0.96 | 0.31 |
| GBFS | 54.17 | 0.58 | 22.86 | 10.40 | 6.15 | 0.62 | 1.81 | 0.58 | 1.72 | 0.43 |
| DG | 54.36 | 0.41 | 1.76 | 0.59 | 0.72 | 0.01 | 41.19 | 0.12 | 0.04 | 0.40 |
| Cement | 65.79 | 4.64 | 16.77 | 6.80 | 1.69 | 0.09 | 2.71 | 0.13 | 0.72 | 0.22 |
表1 原材料的主要化学成分
Table 1 Main chemical composition of raw materials
| Raw material | Mass fraction/% | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CaO | Fe2O3 | SiO2 | Al2O3 | MgO | MnO | SO3 | P2O5 | TiO2 | Na2O | |
| SS | 43.45 | 27.17 | 12.47 | 4.38 | 4.09 | 3.73 | 1.45 | 1.16 | 0.96 | 0.31 |
| GBFS | 54.17 | 0.58 | 22.86 | 10.40 | 6.15 | 0.62 | 1.81 | 0.58 | 1.72 | 0.43 |
| DG | 54.36 | 0.41 | 1.76 | 0.59 | 0.72 | 0.01 | 41.19 | 0.12 | 0.04 | 0.40 |
| Cement | 65.79 | 4.64 | 16.77 | 6.80 | 1.69 | 0.09 | 2.71 | 0.13 | 0.72 | 0.22 |
| No. | Mass fraction/% | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GBFS | Cement | DG | SS | |
| 1 | 0 | 10 | 12 | 78 |
| 2 | 10 | 10 | 12 | 68 |
| 7 | 20 | 10 | 12 | 58 |
| 4 | 30 | 10 | 12 | 48 |
| 5 | 40 | 10 | 12 | 38 |
| 10 | 50 | 10 | 12 | 28 |
| 11 | 60 | 10 | 12 | 18 |
| 12 | 10 | 0 | 12 | 78 |
| 13 | 10 | 5 | 12 | 73 |
| 14 | 10 | 10 | 12 | 68 |
| 15 | 10 | 15 | 12 | 63 |
| 16 | 10 | 20 | 12 | 58 |
| 17 | 20 | 0 | 12 | 68 |
| 18 | 20 | 5 | 12 | 63 |
| 19 | 20 | 10 | 12 | 58 |
| 20 | 20 | 15 | 12 | 53 |
| 21 | 20 | 20 | 12 | 48 |
| 22 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 80 |
| 23 | 10 | 10 | 4 | 76 |
| 24 | 10 | 10 | 8 | 72 |
| 25 | 10 | 10 | 12 | 68 |
| 26 | 10 | 10 | 16 | 64 |
| 27 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 60 |
| 28 | 20 | 10 | 0 | 70 |
| 29 | 20 | 10 | 4 | 66 |
| 30 | 20 | 10 | 8 | 62 |
| 31 | 20 | 10 | 12 | 68 |
| 32 | 20 | 10 | 16 | 64 |
| 33 | 20 | 10 | 20 | 50 |
表2 四元胶凝体系的配合比设计
Table 2 Mix proportion design of quaternary cementitious system
| No. | Mass fraction/% | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GBFS | Cement | DG | SS | |
| 1 | 0 | 10 | 12 | 78 |
| 2 | 10 | 10 | 12 | 68 |
| 7 | 20 | 10 | 12 | 58 |
| 4 | 30 | 10 | 12 | 48 |
| 5 | 40 | 10 | 12 | 38 |
| 10 | 50 | 10 | 12 | 28 |
| 11 | 60 | 10 | 12 | 18 |
| 12 | 10 | 0 | 12 | 78 |
| 13 | 10 | 5 | 12 | 73 |
| 14 | 10 | 10 | 12 | 68 |
| 15 | 10 | 15 | 12 | 63 |
| 16 | 10 | 20 | 12 | 58 |
| 17 | 20 | 0 | 12 | 68 |
| 18 | 20 | 5 | 12 | 63 |
| 19 | 20 | 10 | 12 | 58 |
| 20 | 20 | 15 | 12 | 53 |
| 21 | 20 | 20 | 12 | 48 |
| 22 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 80 |
| 23 | 10 | 10 | 4 | 76 |
| 24 | 10 | 10 | 8 | 72 |
| 25 | 10 | 10 | 12 | 68 |
| 26 | 10 | 10 | 16 | 64 |
| 27 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 60 |
| 28 | 20 | 10 | 0 | 70 |
| 29 | 20 | 10 | 4 | 66 |
| 30 | 20 | 10 | 8 | 62 |
| 31 | 20 | 10 | 12 | 68 |
| 32 | 20 | 10 | 16 | 64 |
| 33 | 20 | 10 | 20 | 50 |
| Curing age/d | Mass loss/% | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50~260 ℃ | 415~530 ℃ | 590~760 ℃ | 50~1 000 ℃ | |
| 28 | 12.7 | 0.4 | 3.8 | 23.0 |
| 7 | 9.8 | 0.6 | 2.6 | 18.5 |
表3 硬化浆体在不同温度区间的质量损失率
Table 3 Mass loss of hardened paste in different temperature ranges
| Curing age/d | Mass loss/% | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50~260 ℃ | 415~530 ℃ | 590~760 ℃ | 50~1 000 ℃ | |
| 28 | 12.7 | 0.4 | 3.8 | 23.0 |
| 7 | 9.8 | 0.6 | 2.6 | 18.5 |
| Curing age/d | Volume fraction/% | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <4.5 nm | 4.5~<50 nm | 50~100 nm | >100 nm | |
| 7 | 5 | 63 | 17 | 15 |
| 28 | 6 | 75 | 8 | 11 |
表4 硬化浆体中各级孔径占比
Table 4 Proportion of pore size at different levels in hardened paste
| Curing age/d | Volume fraction/% | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <4.5 nm | 4.5~<50 nm | 50~100 nm | >100 nm | |
| 7 | 5 | 63 | 17 | 15 |
| 28 | 6 | 75 | 8 | 11 |
| [1] | 陈 明, 赵大鹏, 张敬祥, 等. 同步注浆材料中盾构渣土的再利用及性能试验[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2025, 62(4): 248-258. |
| CHEN M, ZHAO D P, ZHANG J X, et al. The reuse and performance testing of shield tunnel mucks in synchronous grouting materials[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2025, 62(4): 248-258 (in Chinese). | |
| [2] |
HAO J S, LIN Z J, WANG Q, et al. Utilization of tunnel waste slurry and steel slag for preparation of backfill grouting materials: properties and hydration behavior[J]. Cleaner Materials, 2025, 18: 100341.
DOI URL |
| [3] |
赫明胜, 秦庆金, 高 慧, 等. 减水剂对镁渣-粉煤灰基流态固化土流变性及强度的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(7): 2710-2719.
DOI |
|
HE M S, QIN Q J, GAO H, et al. Effects of water-reducing agents on rheological property and strength of magnesium slag-fly ash-based flowable solidified soil[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2025, 44(7): 2710-2719 (in Chinese).
DOI |
|
| [4] |
FANG K Z, LIN Z, WANG Q, et al. Magnesium slag-fly ash-cement binders for flowable solidified soil: hydration behavior, rheological control and strength performance[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2025, 112: 113987.
DOI URL |
| [5] | HAO J S, ZHOU Z H, ZHANG L F. Optimisation and mechanism of steel slag-cement based grouting for water ingress control[J]. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 2025, 23: e05211. |
| [6] |
ZHAO J H, YAN P Y, WANG D M. Research on mineral characteristics of converter steel slag and its comprehensive utilization of internal and external recycle[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 156: 50-61.
DOI URL |
| [7] | 郝建帅, 周子涵, 陈忠辉, 等. 钢渣在矿山充填胶凝材料中的水化硬化性能研究现状分析[J]. 矿业科学学报, 2024, 9(4): 573-585. |
| HAO J S, ZHOU Z H, CHEN Z H, et al. Review of hydration and hardening properties of steel slag in mine filling cementitious materials[J]. Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 2024, 9(4): 573-585 (in Chinese). | |
| [8] |
ZHUANG S Y, WANG Q. Inhibition mechanisms of steel slag on the early-age hydration of cement[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2021, 140: 106283.
DOI URL |
| [9] |
NUNES V A, BORGES P H R. Recent advances in the reuse of steel slags and future perspectives as binder and aggregate for alkali-activated materials[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 281: 122605.
DOI URL |
| [10] |
DU H H, XU D, LI X, et al. Application of molten iron desulfurization slag to replace steel slag as an alkaline component in solid waste-based cementitious materials[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 377: 134353.
DOI URL |
| [11] | 霍彬彬, 张亚梅, 王栋民, 等. 甲酸干法化学改性钢渣粉及其浆体性能研究[J]. 矿业科学学报, 2022, 7(5): 522-528. |
| HUO B B, ZHANG Y M, WANG D M, et al. Investigating the performance of dry chemically modified steel slag powder and pastes by formic acid[J]. Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 2022, 7(5): 522-528 (in Chinese). | |
| [12] |
HUO B B, LI B L, HUANG S Y, et al. Hydration and soundness properties of phosphoric acid modified steel slag powder[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 254: 119319.
DOI URL |
| [13] |
LIU Y, ZHANG Z Q, HOU G H, et al. Preparation of sustainable and green cement-based composite binders with high-volume steel slag powder and ultrafine blast furnace slag powder[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 289: 125133.
DOI URL |
| [14] |
WANG J, LIU X M, ZHANG Z Q, et al. Synergistic utilization, critical mechanisms, and environmental suitability of bauxite residue (red mud) based multi-solid wastes cementitious materials and special concrete[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2024, 361: 121255.
DOI URL |
| [15] |
HAO J S, ZHOU Z H, CHEN Z H, et al. Mechanical performance and damage mechanisms of steel slag-cement pasted backfill under high-temperature cured and cyclic static loading for deep-mining applications[J]. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 2025, 35: 5698-5716.
DOI URL |
| [16] |
ZHANG M G, LI K Q, NI W, et al. Preparation of mine backfilling from steel slag-based non-clinker combined with ultra-fine tailing[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2022, 320: 126248.
DOI URL |
| [17] |
HAO X S, LIU X M, ZHANG Z Q, et al. In-depth insight into the cementitious synergistic effect of steel slag and red mud on the properties of composite cementitious materials[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2022, 52: 104449.
DOI URL |
| [18] |
YANG Z X, XIONG X L, CHEN S H, et al. Effect of fineness on the hydration and microstructure of cementitious materials with high-volume steel slag and blast furnace slag[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2023, 72: 106682.
DOI URL |
| [19] | 刘满超. 矿山充填胶凝材料的研究及应用[D]. 石家庄: 河北科技大学, 2018. |
| LIU M C. Research and application of backfilling cementing material for mine industry[D]. Shijiazhuang: Hebei University of Science and Technology, 2018 (in Chinese). | |
| [20] | 阎爱云, 倪 文, 黄晓燕, 等. 膏体充填用矿渣: 钢渣基胶结剂协同固化Pb2+ [J]. 工程科学学报, 2016, 38(7): 899-905. |
| YAN A Y, NI W, HUANG X Y, et al. Solidification/stabilization of Pb2+ within a blast furnace slag-steel slag based cementing agent for paste backfilling[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering, 2016, 38(7): 899-905 (in Chinese). | |
| [21] |
WANG X, NI W, LI J J, et al. Carbonation of steel slag and gypsum for building materials and associated reaction mechanisms[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2019, 125: 105893.
DOI URL |
| [22] |
HAO J S, ZHOU Z H, CHEN Z H, et al. Synergistic mechanisms of steel slag, granulated blast furnace slag, and desulfurization gypsum in high-content steel slag-based cementitious backfill materials[J]. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 2025, 35(6): 1005-1018.
DOI URL |
| [23] |
JOSEPH S, SKIBSTED J, CIZER Ö. A quantitative study of the C3A hydration[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2019, 115: 145-159.
DOI URL |
| [24] |
WANG Q, YAN P Y, HAN S. The influence of steel slag on the hydration of cement during the hydration process of complex binder[J]. Science China Technological Sciences, 2011, 54(2): 388-394.
DOI URL |
| [25] | 庄诗雨. 钢渣延缓水泥早期水化的机理及应用[D]. 北京: 清华大学, 2022. |
| ZHUANG S Y. Mechanism and application of steel slag delaying early hydration of cement[D]. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2022 (in Chinese). | |
| [26] |
YAO G, LIU Q, WANG J X, et al. Effect of mechanical grinding on pozzolanic activity and hydration properties of siliceous gold ore tailings[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 217: 12-21.
DOI URL |
| [27] |
ZHAO J H, WANG D M, YAN P Y. Design and experimental study of a ternary blended cement containing high volume steel slag and blast-furnace slag based on Fuller distribution model[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2017, 140: 248-256.
DOI URL |
| [28] |
HAO J S, ZHOU Z H, CHEN Z H, et al. Utilization of high-volume steel slag in sustainable low carbon cementitious composites for mine backfill: synergistic mechanisms and environmental benefits[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2025, 202: 107689.
DOI URL |
| [1] | 何彦辉, 王欢, 邹勇, 陈诚, 许芃, 何智浩. 碳化回收水泥混凝土粉末对泡沫混凝土性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(6): 2063-2074. |
| [2] | 范鑫芳, 洪东波, 林亮亮, 郑爱钦, 王珏, 殷增斌. 微波烧结/热等静压制备Al2O3/SiCw复合陶瓷的微观组织与性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(6): 2113-2121. |
| [3] | 程坤阳, 刘晓林, 冯元, 王彦鹏, 张蕊, 于本田. 多元复合固废胶凝体系的力学性能与收缩特性[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(6): 2041-2051. |
| [4] | 胡成, 王启杰, 向玮衡, 梁钰湲, 曹康, 蔡广润. 复合矿物掺合料对热湿养护水泥砂浆强度和毛细吸水率的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(6): 2034-2040. |
| [5] | 刘亚君, 薛善彬, 郑子昊, 史志浩, 王文焕. 冻融循环对硅烷改性ECC力学与吸水性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(6): 1876-1891. |
| [6] | 胡庆浩, 李绍纯, 陈旭, 张书畅. 低浓度CO2条件40 ℃环境对水泥胶砂早期碳化与水化反应进程影响研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(6): 1892-1902. |
| [7] | 赵天璞, 占雪芳, 刘晓军, 黄聃, 赵怡彬, 王皓磊. 基于正交试验的多元共混绿色ECC制备与性能预测[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(6): 1988-2001. |
| [8] | 肖庆一, 张紫腾, 马明晓, 荆文龙, 李子祎. 芦苇纤维增强流态粉煤灰的力学性能及微观结构分析[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(6): 2181-2190. |
| [9] | 任骏, 庹珉泰, 毛江鸿, 陈昌雨, 曾根生, 刘翔云, 李钟. 冷冻法制备PVA-ECC增强增韧单元的力学性能试验研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(5): 1513-1526. |
| [10] | 孔硕, 耿永娟, 刘彦岑, 李绍纯. 二氧化硅改性环氧涂层的制备及其对钢筋的防护性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(5): 1580-1590. |
| [11] | 汤小松, 宋秋磊, 骆静静, 张程, 张宇洋. 不同材料组成与养护工艺下钢渣基泡沫混凝土的固碳性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(5): 1663-1670. |
| [12] | 任骏, 晏云潇, 李苗源, 田镇赫, 赵立兴, 王大富. 微生物改性磷石膏对石膏矿渣水泥性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(5): 1671-1681. |
| [13] | 李有, 王雪琪, 赵玉霞, 郑木莲, 黄洁, 卢川, 李宜锋. 骨架密实型水泥稳定碎石-钢渣混合料收缩补偿机理与性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(5): 1823-1837. |
| [14] | 谢祥兵, 贾亚鹏, 李程, 侯博研, 张雁翔, 万赈民, 邵景干. 微纳米气泡水对水泥稳定碎石物理力学性能影响及机理研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(5): 1838-1850. |
| [15] | 姚鑫荣, 王洪磊, 余金山, 周新贵. 纳米浸渍瞬态共晶工艺制备SiCf/SiC复合材料的研究进展[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(5): 1757-1776. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||