硅酸盐通报 ›› 2026, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (4): 1184-1192.DOI: 10.16552/j.cnki.issn1001-1625.2025.0921
李顺凯1,2(
), 陈荣辉1, 董勋3, 窦华康1, 孙凤品1
收稿日期:2025-09-15
修订日期:2025-12-02
出版日期:2026-04-20
发布日期:2026-05-14
作者简介:李顺凯(1979—),男,博士,教授级高级工程师。主要从事喷射混凝土方面的研究。E-mail:331052860@qq.com
基金资助:
LI Shunkai1,2(
), CHEN Ronghui1, DONG Xun3, DOU Huakang1, SUN Fengpin1
Received:2025-09-15
Revised:2025-12-02
Published:2026-04-20
Online:2026-05-14
摘要:
针对普通喷射混凝土凝结时间长、极早期强度发展速率较慢等问题,本文采用自制促凝早强剂对其进行改性,研究促凝早强剂对水泥净浆凝结时间、喷射混凝土工作性能和力学性能的影响,并借助水化热、X射线衍射(XRD)、热重(TG-DTG)和扫描电子显微镜(SEM)等测试对其改性机理进行分析。结果表明:促凝早强剂的掺入会略微降低混凝土工作性能,但能显著改善喷射混凝土的促凝效果和力学性能。当促凝早强剂掺量为4%(质量分数)时,混凝土坍落度降低至185 mm;与未掺促凝早强剂组相比,初凝时间和终凝时间分别缩短50.0%和45.5%;3 h、8 h、1 d和28 d抗压强度分别提高128.6%、79.7%、26.7%和2.6%。机理分析表明:促凝早强剂中硫铝酸盐熟料和纳米材料可显著加快水泥浆体水化进程,促进针棒状钙矾石(AFt)和絮状水化硅酸钙(C-S-H)凝胶等水化产物的生成,使混凝土内部结构更加密实,从而有效提升喷射混凝土的促凝效果和力学性能。
中图分类号:
李顺凯, 陈荣辉, 董勋, 窦华康, 孙凤品. 促凝早强剂对喷射混凝土性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(4): 1184-1192.
LI Shunkai, CHEN Ronghui, DONG Xun, DOU Huakang, SUN Fengpin. Effect of Accelerator and Early Strength Agent on Properties of Shotcrete[J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(4): 1184-1192.
| Mineral composition | C3S | C2S | C3A | C4AF | Other |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mass fraction/% | 58.61 | 18.67 | 6.45 | 11.05 | 5.23 |
表1 普通硅酸盐水泥的矿物组成
Table 1 Mineral composition of ordinary Portland cement
| Mineral composition | C3S | C2S | C3A | C4AF | Other |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mass fraction/% | 58.61 | 18.67 | 6.45 | 11.05 | 5.23 |
| Chemical composition | CaO | SiO2 | Al2O3 | Fe2O3 | MgO | Na2O | K2O | SO3 | TiO2 | Other |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mass fraction/% | 61.36 | 22.92 | 5.97 | 3.75 | 0.97 | 0.12 | 0.70 | 3.02 | 0.39 | 0.80 |
表2 普通硅酸盐水泥的化学组成
Table 2 Chemical composition of ordinary Portland cement
| Chemical composition | CaO | SiO2 | Al2O3 | Fe2O3 | MgO | Na2O | K2O | SO3 | TiO2 | Other |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mass fraction/% | 61.36 | 22.92 | 5.97 | 3.75 | 0.97 | 0.12 | 0.70 | 3.02 | 0.39 | 0.80 |
| Physical property | Initial setting time/min | Final setting time/min | 3 d compressive strength/MPa | 28 d compressive strength/MPa |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Measured value | 133 | 246 | 29.0 | 45.3 |
表3 普通硅酸盐水泥的物理性能
Table 3 Physical properties of ordinary Portland cement
| Physical property | Initial setting time/min | Final setting time/min | 3 d compressive strength/MPa | 28 d compressive strength/MPa |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Measured value | 133 | 246 | 29.0 | 45.3 |
| Performance indicator | Solid mass fraction/% | pH value | Initial setting time/min | Final setting time/min | Compressive strength/MPa | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 d | 28 d | |||||
| Measured value | 49.0 | 2.21 | 4.3 | 10.6 | 7.3 | 46.7 |
表4 无碱液体速凝剂主要参数
Table 4 Main parameters of alkali-free liquid accelerator
| Performance indicator | Solid mass fraction/% | pH value | Initial setting time/min | Final setting time/min | Compressive strength/MPa | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 d | 28 d | |||||
| Measured value | 49.0 | 2.21 | 4.3 | 10.6 | 7.3 | 46.7 |
| Sample No. | Mix ratio/(kg·m-3) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cement | Water | Accelerator and early strength agent | Accelerator | |
| A0 | 400 | 140 | 0 | 24 |
| A1 | 400 | 140 | 4 | 24 |
| A2 | 400 | 140 | 8 | 24 |
| A3 | 400 | 140 | 12 | 24 |
| A4 | 400 | 140 | 16 | 24 |
| A5 | 400 | 140 | 20 | 24 |
表5 水泥净浆配合比
Table 5 Mix ratio of cement paste
| Sample No. | Mix ratio/(kg·m-3) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cement | Water | Accelerator and early strength agent | Accelerator | |
| A0 | 400 | 140 | 0 | 24 |
| A1 | 400 | 140 | 4 | 24 |
| A2 | 400 | 140 | 8 | 24 |
| A3 | 400 | 140 | 12 | 24 |
| A4 | 400 | 140 | 16 | 24 |
| A5 | 400 | 140 | 20 | 24 |
| Sample No. | Mix proportion/(kg·m-3) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cement | Water | Sand | Stone | Water reducer | Accelerator andearly strength agent | Accelerator | |
| C0 | 479 | 187 | 876 | 808 | 4.79 | 0 | 28.74 |
| C1 | 479 | 187 | 876 | 808 | 4.79 | 4.79 | 28.74 |
| C2 | 479 | 187 | 876 | 808 | 4.79 | 9.58 | 28.74 |
| C3 | 479 | 187 | 876 | 808 | 4.79 | 14.37 | 28.74 |
| C4 | 479 | 187 | 876 | 808 | 4.79 | 19.16 | 28.74 |
| C5 | 479 | 187 | 876 | 808 | 4.79 | 23.95 | 28.74 |
表6 喷射混凝土配合比
Table 6 Mix proportion of shotcrete
| Sample No. | Mix proportion/(kg·m-3) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cement | Water | Sand | Stone | Water reducer | Accelerator andearly strength agent | Accelerator | |
| C0 | 479 | 187 | 876 | 808 | 4.79 | 0 | 28.74 |
| C1 | 479 | 187 | 876 | 808 | 4.79 | 4.79 | 28.74 |
| C2 | 479 | 187 | 876 | 808 | 4.79 | 9.58 | 28.74 |
| C3 | 479 | 187 | 876 | 808 | 4.79 | 14.37 | 28.74 |
| C4 | 479 | 187 | 876 | 808 | 4.79 | 19.16 | 28.74 |
| C5 | 479 | 187 | 876 | 808 | 4.79 | 23.95 | 28.74 |
| Accelerator and early strength agentmass fraction/% | Temperature/℃ | Weight loss percentage/% | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8 h | 1 d | ||
| 0 | 50~120 | 4.7 | 4.8 |
| 390~450 | — | 4.9 | |
| 1 | 50~120 | 4.9 | 5.5 |
| 390~450 | — | 4.6 | |
| 4 | 50~120 | 5.2 | 6.1 |
| 390~450 | — | 4.2 | |
表7 掺促凝早强剂水泥浆体失重百分比
Table 7 Weight loss percentage of cement paste with accelerator and early strength agent
| Accelerator and early strength agentmass fraction/% | Temperature/℃ | Weight loss percentage/% | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8 h | 1 d | ||
| 0 | 50~120 | 4.7 | 4.8 |
| 390~450 | — | 4.9 | |
| 1 | 50~120 | 4.9 | 5.5 |
| 390~450 | — | 4.6 | |
| 4 | 50~120 | 5.2 | 6.1 |
| 390~450 | — | 4.2 | |
| [1] | SALVADOR R P, CAVALARO S H P, SEGURA I, et al. Early age hydration of cement pastes with alkaline and alkali-free accelerators for sprayed concrete[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2016, 111: 386-398. |
| [2] | 元强, 彭茂庆, 李岳林, 等. 高地热对隧道喷射混凝土力学性能、孔结构和水化产物的影响综述[J]. 铁道建筑, 2021, 61(8): 53-58. |
| YUAN Q, PENG M Q, LI Y L, et al. Review on the influence of high geothermal on mechanical property, pore structure and hydration product of tunnel shotcrete[J]. Railway Engineering, 2021, 61(8): 53-58 (in Chinese). | |
| [3] | YU C L, CHEN X J, TIAN Y, et al. Characterization methods and improvement strategies of shotcrete shootability: a systematic review[J]. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 2025, 25(2): 78. |
| [4] | XU G W, HE C, WANG J, et al. Study on the damage evolution of secondary tunnel lining in layered rock stratum[J]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2020, 79(7): 3533-3557. |
| [5] | 王朋, 宋章, 张广泽, 等. CZ铁路隧道重难点地质问题及减灾防治对策[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2020, 37(12): 89-94. |
| WANG P, SONG Z, ZHANG G Z, et al. Important and difficult geological problems of tunnel and its disaster reduction and prevention measures for CZ railway[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2020, 37(12): 89-94 (in Chinese). | |
| [6] | 王家滨, 牛荻涛, 张永利. 喷射混凝土力学性能、渗透性及耐久性试验研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2016, 49(5): 96-109. |
| WANG J B, NIU D T, ZHANG Y L. Investigation of mechanical, permeability and durability performance of shotcrete with and without steel fiber[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2016, 49(5): 96-109 (in Chinese). | |
| [7] | 成丽华, 杜航, 杨永浩, 等. 微纳米气泡水对喷射混凝土性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(12): 4378-4388. |
| CHENG L H, DU H, YANG Y H, et al. Effect of micro-nano bubble water on performance of shotcrete[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2024, 43(12): 4378-4388 (in Chinese). | |
| [8] | YUN K K, PANOV V, KIM S, et al. Influence of colloidal silica and silica fume on the rheology and mechanical properties of high-performance shotcrete[J]. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2022, 26(6): 2737-2746. |
| [9] | 王家赫. 高性能喷射混凝土对外加剂与功能性掺合料的需求研究[J]. 混凝土, 2021(6): 73-75+79. |
| WANG J H. Study on the demand of high performance shotcrete for accelerator and functional admixture[J]. Concrete, 2021(6): 73-75+79 (in Chinese). | |
| [10] | KANG B, KIM G, LEE T, et al. Effects of blast furnace slag powder and limestone powder on the mechanical properties and durability of shotcrete using monocalcium aluminate setting accelerator[J]. Materials, 2022, 15(7): 2495. |
| [11] | CUI Y, TAN Z S, ZHOU Z L, et al. Preparation and application of low rebound liquid alkali-free accelerator for shotcrete[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2023, 367: 130220. |
| [12] | 刘远, 朱芳芳, 张远永, 等. 甲酸铝改性硫酸铝基无碱液体速凝剂对水泥性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(12): 4330-4338. |
| LIU Y, ZHU F F, ZHANG Y Y, et al. Effect of aluminum sulfate based alkali-free liquid accelerator modified by aluminum formate on cement properties[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2024, 43(12): 4330-4338 (in Chinese). | |
| [13] | 李雪松. 增黏剂和石灰石粉掺入对喷射混凝土性能影响的试验研究[J]. 水利水电技术(中英文), 2022, 53(增刊2): 410-415. |
| LI X S. Experimental study on the influence of tackifier and limestone powder on the properties of shotcrete[J]. Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, 2022, 53(supplement 2): 410-415 (in Chinese). | |
| [14] | ZHANG L C, LI S C, YAN Q, et al. Study on the effect of new type liquid accelerator on the performance of shotcrete[J]. Frattura Ed Integrità Strutturale, 2017, 11(41): 356-368. |
| [15] | 孙振平, 田俊涛, 杨海静, 等. 混凝土中无碱液体速凝剂与水泥及掺合料适应性的影响因素及影响规律[J]. 混凝土世界, 2023(4): 82-85. |
| SUN Z P, TIAN J T, YANG H J, et al. The influencing laws of cement and mineral admixtures on the adaptability of alkali-free liquid accelerators in concrete[J]. China Concrete, 2023(4): 82-85 (in Chinese). | |
| [16] | NIU M D, LI G X, ZHANG J B, et al. Preparation of alkali-free liquid accelerator based on aluminum sulfate and its accelerating mechanism on the hydration of cement pastes[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 253: 119246. |
| [17] | 陈超, 孙振平. 硅灰对掺有无碱速凝剂水泥浆体性能的影响[J]. 材料导报, 2019, 33(14): 2348-2353. |
| CHEN C, SUN Z P. Effect of silica fume on the properties of cement paste with alkali-free accelerator[J]. Materials Review, 2019, 33(14): 2348-2353 (in Chinese). | |
| [18] | 张丰, 白银, 蔡跃波, 等. 混凝土低温早强剂研究现状[J]. 材料导报, 2017, 31(21): 106-113. |
| ZHANG F, BAI Y, CAI Y B, et al. Research status of low temperature early strength agents for concrete[J]. Materials Review, 2017, 31(21): 106-113 (in Chinese). | |
| [19] | YUAN Q, ZHOU D J, HUANG H, et al. Structural build-up, hydration and strength development of cement-based materials with accelerators[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 259: 119775. |
| [20] | BULLARD J W, JENNINGS H M, LIVINGSTON R A, et al. Mechanisms of cement hydration[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2011, 41(12): 1208-1223. |
| [21] | TRAMONTIN SOUZA M, ONGHERO L, NUNES CORREA B, et al. Novel low-cost shrinkage-compensating admixture for ordinary Portland cement[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 230: 117024. |
| [22] | GAO D Y, MENG Y, YANG L, et al. Effect of ground granulated blast furnace slag on the properties of calcium sulfoaluminate cement[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2019, 227: 116665. |
| [23] | TRAUCHESSEC R, MECHLING J M, LECOMTE A, et al. Hydration of ordinary Portland cement and calcium sulfoaluminate cement blends[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2015, 56: 106-114. |
| [24] | LI Y Q, LI Y, MA H Y, et al. The hydration, microstructure, and mechanical properties of vaterite calcined clay cement (VC3)[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2024, 175: 107374. |
| [25] | LI M G, DENG X F, JIAN S W, et al. Effects of ettringite seed on the hydration and properties of supersulphated phosphogypsum-slag cement[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2024, 452: 142105. |
| [1] | 魏舒鹏, 崔晨晨, 王德辉, 罗正东, 罗进, 王亚军, 陈英豪. 混凝土裂缝用地聚物注浆修复材料的性能优化及应用研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(4): 1220-1230. |
| [2] | 王海皓, 甘元初, 侯庆振, 陈振富, 金丹, 付新博. 疏水改性煅烧硅藻土砂浆的制备及性能[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(4): 1122-1131. |
| [3] | 杨雪滢, 王开元, 王耀城, 占宝剑, 邢锋. 自然风化作用下碳化养护水泥基材料的力学性能劣化机制[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(4): 1132-1141. |
| [4] | 林明智, 陈旸, 陈波. 浅水海砂骨料矿物特征及物理力学性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(4): 1240-1247. |
| [5] | 邹仁华, 胡小龙, 冯泽平, 牛高辉, 邱继生. 煤矸石混合砂混凝土宏观力学性能及微观机理研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(4): 1266-1281. |
| [6] | 郭阳光, 秦拥军, 罗玲, 谌君诚, 李琦, 程昊. 硅灰-玻璃纤维全再生粗骨料混凝土力学性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(4): 1296-1303. |
| [7] | 谌君诚, 罗玲, 秦拥军, 郭阳光, 李琦, 程昊. 硅灰-聚甲醛纤维再生水工混凝土力学和耐水性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(4): 1304-1314. |
| [8] | 贾旭赫, 赵仁龙, 张继红, 谢俊. Al2O3/SiO2对Li2O-Al2O3-SiO2-MgO微晶玻璃析晶行为及力学性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(3): 845-852. |
| [9] | 陈宇, 邱思远, 陈旭升, 张亚梅. 面向海工建设的海水海砂工程水泥基复合材料研究进展[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(2): 367-379. |
| [10] | 许凯钦, 廖宜顺, 张普, 张冬, 齐冬有. -10 ℃条件下硝酸钙对铁铝酸盐水泥性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(2): 380-389. |
| [11] | 孔昕, 吴佳明, 宋本腾, 王振兴, 叶正茂. 陶砂轻质砂浆的组分配合比优化及性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(2): 413-425. |
| [12] | 舒畅, 陈振中, 王伟, 梅友静, 王宁宁, 张亚梅. 流态固化土的固化机理及性能调控研究综述[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(2): 503-516. |
| [13] | 王熠江, 李梓俊, 何智海, 陆俊. 微波养护对香灰-水泥复合胶凝材料强度及微观结构的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(2): 540-548. |
| [14] | 张小龙, 孙为国, 王伟, 王朝晖, 晏茂豪, 刘红强, 杨军宏. 基于响应面法的全固废胶凝材料配合比优化设计及性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(2): 549-561. |
| [15] | 芮振华, 吕翔宇, 郭灿, 黄山, 牛冬瑜. 钼尾矿砂取代量对机制砂水泥砂浆力学性能及微观结构的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(2): 573-581. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||