硅酸盐通报 ›› 2026, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (9): 2984-2998.DOI: 10.16552/j.cnki.issn1001-1625.2026.0253
张风顺1(
), 柴虎成1,2, 宋明江1, 郭家俊1, 张海波1,2(
)
收稿日期:2026-03-19
修订日期:2026-04-29
出版日期:2026-09-15
发布日期:2026-10-09
通信作者:
张海波,博士,教授。E-mail:zzhb@hpu.edu.cn作者简介:张风顺(2001—),男,硕士研究生。主要从事绿色建筑材料的研究。E-mail:2751354927@qq.com
基金资助:
ZHANG Fengshun1(
), CHAI Hucheng1,2, SONG Mingjiang1, GUO Jiajun1, ZHANG Haibo1,2(
)
Received:2026-03-19
Revised:2026-04-29
Published:2026-09-15
Online:2026-10-09
摘要:
针对煤矿巷道因积水出现底板泥岩大面积泥化的问题,制备了丙烯酰胺(AM)改性铝酸盐水泥基材料,系统研究了丙烯酰胺掺量对铝酸盐水泥基材料凝结时间、力学性能及微观结构的影响,并探讨了改性机理。结果表明,高掺量丙烯酰胺缩短了铝酸盐水泥基材料的凝结时间,提高了其抗折强度、形变能力和压缩破坏吸收能。当丙烯酰胺掺量为20%(质量分数)时,与未掺丙烯酰胺时相比,铝酸盐水泥基材料的初凝时间和终凝时间分别缩短了44.8%和35.4%,抗折强度提高了115.6%,压缩破坏应变提高了808.0%,压缩破坏吸收能提高了1 833.4%。丙烯酰胺改性的硬化泥岩试样表现出更好的耐水侵蚀性能,浸水环境下的抗折强度、抗压强度损失率分别为3.1%、3.8%。该研究为煤矿巷道泥化底板泥岩的快速硬化提供了一种高性能材料,对煤矿巷道的稳定与安全保障具有重要意义。
中图分类号:
张风顺, 柴虎成, 宋明江, 郭家俊, 张海波. 丙烯酰胺改性铝酸盐水泥基材料及其硬化泥岩性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(9): 2984-2998.
ZHANG Fengshun, CHAI Hucheng, SONG Mingjiang, GUO Jiajun, ZHANG Haibo. Properties of Acrylamide-Modified Calcium Aluminate Cement-Based Materials and Their Hardened Mudstone[J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(9): 2984-2998.
| Raw material | Mass fraction/% | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Al2O3 | CaO | Fe2O3 | MgO | Na2O | SiO2 | SO3 | |
| CAC | 70.6 | 27.3 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| OPC | 8.7 | 55.1 | 3.2 | 3.5 | 1.2 | 21.9 | 4.5 |
| GM | 0.1 | 39.5 | 0.1 | 4.2 | 0.4 | 1.7 | 53.4 |
表1 COG原材料化学组成
Table 1 Chemical composition of COG raw materials
| Raw material | Mass fraction/% | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Al2O3 | CaO | Fe2O3 | MgO | Na2O | SiO2 | SO3 | |
| CAC | 70.6 | 27.3 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| OPC | 8.7 | 55.1 | 3.2 | 3.5 | 1.2 | 21.9 | 4.5 |
| GM | 0.1 | 39.5 | 0.1 | 4.2 | 0.4 | 1.7 | 53.4 |
| Chemical composition | Al2O3 | CaO | Fe2O3 | SiO2 | TiO2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mass fraction/% | 42.6 | 3.1 | 2.2 | 50.3 | 1.7 |
表2 泥岩化学组成
Table 2 Chemical composition of mudstone
| Chemical composition | Al2O3 | CaO | Fe2O3 | SiO2 | TiO2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mass fraction/% | 42.6 | 3.1 | 2.2 | 50.3 | 1.7 |
| Mineral composition | Kaolinite | Quartz | Chlorite | Muscovite | Amorphous clay |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mass fraction/% | 33.2 | 16.3 | 8.2 | 8.1 | 34.2 |
表3 泥岩矿物组成
Table 3 Mineral composition of mudstone
| Mineral composition | Kaolinite | Quartz | Chlorite | Muscovite | Amorphous clay |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mass fraction/% | 33.2 | 16.3 | 8.2 | 8.1 | 34.2 |
| Group | Mass/g | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAC | OPC | GM | AM | APS | MBA | Water | |
| A0 | 500 | 100 | 400 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 600 |
| A5 | 500 | 100 | 400 | 50 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 600 |
| A10 | 500 | 100 | 400 | 100 | 1.50 | 1.00 | 600 |
| A15 | 500 | 100 | 400 | 150 | 2.25 | 1.50 | 600 |
| A20 | 500 | 100 | 400 | 200 | 3.00 | 2.00 | 600 |
| A30 | 500 | 100 | 400 | 300 | 4.50 | 3.00 | 600 |
表4 AM改性COG试验设计
Table 4 Experimental design of AM-modified COG
| Group | Mass/g | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAC | OPC | GM | AM | APS | MBA | Water | |
| A0 | 500 | 100 | 400 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 600 |
| A5 | 500 | 100 | 400 | 50 | 0.75 | 0.50 | 600 |
| A10 | 500 | 100 | 400 | 100 | 1.50 | 1.00 | 600 |
| A15 | 500 | 100 | 400 | 150 | 2.25 | 1.50 | 600 |
| A20 | 500 | 100 | 400 | 200 | 3.00 | 2.00 | 600 |
| A30 | 500 | 100 | 400 | 300 | 4.50 | 3.00 | 600 |
| Group | Peak compressive strength/MPa | Compressive failure strain/% | Compressive failure absorbed energy/(J·m-3) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 d | 3 d | 7 d | 28 d | 1 d | 3 d | 7 d | 28 d | 1 d | 3 d | 7 d | 28 d | |
| A0 | 15.0 | 16.6 | 20.8 | 31.6 | 3.1 | 2.7 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 19.0 | 24.7 | 21.9 | 32.9 |
| A5 | 5.3 | 9.3 | 16.6 | 28.6 | 5.0 | 5.6 | 5.1 | 5.0 | 15.8 | 26.7 | 35.9 | 57.9 |
| A10 | 11.6 | 15.6 | 17.6 | 24.8 | 6.8 | 6.9 | 10.3 | 9.7 | 33.7 | 52.1 | 103.9 | 150.8 |
| A15 | 12.5 | 14.7 | 18.4 | 24.0 | 18.4 | 15.1 | 15.5 | 14.1 | 161.2 | 144.6 | 168.4 | 216.9 |
| A20 | 12.9 | 16.2 | 19.0 | 26.8 | 28.2 | 29.5 | 25.4 | 22.7 | 235.1 | 237.0 | 484.0 | 636.1 |
| A30 | 18.9 | 19.5 | 26.2 | 34.3 | 59.2 | 54.8 | 56.5 | 33.5 | 420.6 | 427.7 | 772.4 | 727.8 |
表5 压缩峰值强度、压缩破坏应变和压缩破坏吸收能
Table 5 Peak compressive strength, compressive failure strain and compressive failure absorbed energy
| Group | Peak compressive strength/MPa | Compressive failure strain/% | Compressive failure absorbed energy/(J·m-3) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 d | 3 d | 7 d | 28 d | 1 d | 3 d | 7 d | 28 d | 1 d | 3 d | 7 d | 28 d | |
| A0 | 15.0 | 16.6 | 20.8 | 31.6 | 3.1 | 2.7 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 19.0 | 24.7 | 21.9 | 32.9 |
| A5 | 5.3 | 9.3 | 16.6 | 28.6 | 5.0 | 5.6 | 5.1 | 5.0 | 15.8 | 26.7 | 35.9 | 57.9 |
| A10 | 11.6 | 15.6 | 17.6 | 24.8 | 6.8 | 6.9 | 10.3 | 9.7 | 33.7 | 52.1 | 103.9 | 150.8 |
| A15 | 12.5 | 14.7 | 18.4 | 24.0 | 18.4 | 15.1 | 15.5 | 14.1 | 161.2 | 144.6 | 168.4 | 216.9 |
| A20 | 12.9 | 16.2 | 19.0 | 26.8 | 28.2 | 29.5 | 25.4 | 22.7 | 235.1 | 237.0 | 484.0 | 636.1 |
| A30 | 18.9 | 19.5 | 26.2 | 34.3 | 59.2 | 54.8 | 56.5 | 33.5 | 420.6 | 427.7 | 772.4 | 727.8 |
| Group | Mass loss/% | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50~130 ℃ | 130~180 ℃ | 180~280 ℃ | 380~500 ℃ | |
| A0 | 11.5 | 3.1 | 8.5 | 0 |
| A5 | 12.8 | 2.5 | 7.6 | 2.7 |
| A10 | 8.8 | 2.6 | 7.1 | 4.3 |
| A15 | 8.3 | 2.8 | 7.2 | 5.2 |
| A20 | 7.5 | 2.6 | 7.2 | 6.7 |
| A30 | 7.1 | 2.5 | 5.5 | 9.4 |
表6 AM改性COG的热分析曲线各失重峰的失重率
Table 6 Mass loss of each mass loss peak in thermal analysis curves of AM-modified COG
| Group | Mass loss/% | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50~130 ℃ | 130~180 ℃ | 180~280 ℃ | 380~500 ℃ | |
| A0 | 11.5 | 3.1 | 8.5 | 0 |
| A5 | 12.8 | 2.5 | 7.6 | 2.7 |
| A10 | 8.8 | 2.6 | 7.1 | 4.3 |
| A15 | 8.3 | 2.8 | 7.2 | 5.2 |
| A20 | 7.5 | 2.6 | 7.2 | 6.7 |
| A30 | 7.1 | 2.5 | 5.5 | 9.4 |
| Group | Initial setting time/min | Final setting time/min |
|---|---|---|
| A0MS | 57 | 73 |
| A20MS | 32 | 51 |
表7 A0MS和A20MS的凝结时间
Table 7 Setting time of A0MS and A20MS
| Group | Initial setting time/min | Final setting time/min |
|---|---|---|
| A0MS | 57 | 73 |
| A20MS | 32 | 51 |
| Group | Curing condition | Mass loss/% | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50~130 ℃ | 130~180 ℃ | 180~280 ℃ | 380~500 ℃ | ||
| A0MS | Standard curing | 6.2 | 1.0 | 4.5 | 3.0 |
| Water-soaked curing | 6.1 | 1.0 | 4.4 | 3.0 | |
| A20MS | Standard curing | 8.0 | 0.7 | 4.2 | 4.6 |
| Water-soaked curing | 7.9 | 0.4 | 3.9 | 4.8 | |
表8 两种养护环境下A0MS和A20MS的热分析曲线各失重峰的失重率
Table 8 Mass loss of each mass loss peak in thermal analysis curves of A0MS and A20MS under two curing conditions
| Group | Curing condition | Mass loss/% | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50~130 ℃ | 130~180 ℃ | 180~280 ℃ | 380~500 ℃ | ||
| A0MS | Standard curing | 6.2 | 1.0 | 4.5 | 3.0 |
| Water-soaked curing | 6.1 | 1.0 | 4.4 | 3.0 | |
| A20MS | Standard curing | 8.0 | 0.7 | 4.2 | 4.6 |
| Water-soaked curing | 7.9 | 0.4 | 3.9 | 4.8 | |
| Group | Curing condition | Pore size distribution/% | Beneficial pores content/% | Harmful pores content/% | Total porosity/% | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0~<10 nm | 10~<50 nm | 50~100 nm | >100 nm | |||||
| A0MS | Standard curing | 30.7 | 15.4 | 4.0 | 49.9 | 46.1 | 53.9 | 25.5 |
| Water-soaked curing | 5.5 | 28.8 | 24.4 | 41.3 | 34.3 | 65.7 | 27.8 | |
| A20MS | Standard curing | 24.8 | 32.4 | 12.7 | 30.1 | 57.2 | 42.8 | 20.9 |
| Water-soaked curing | 23.7 | 40.6 | 15.1 | 20.6 | 64.3 | 35.7 | 22.8 | |
表9 两种养护环境下A0MS和A20MS的孔隙率和孔结构分布
Table 9 Porosity and pore structure distribution of A0MS and A20MS under two curing conditions
| Group | Curing condition | Pore size distribution/% | Beneficial pores content/% | Harmful pores content/% | Total porosity/% | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0~<10 nm | 10~<50 nm | 50~100 nm | >100 nm | |||||
| A0MS | Standard curing | 30.7 | 15.4 | 4.0 | 49.9 | 46.1 | 53.9 | 25.5 |
| Water-soaked curing | 5.5 | 28.8 | 24.4 | 41.3 | 34.3 | 65.7 | 27.8 | |
| A20MS | Standard curing | 24.8 | 32.4 | 12.7 | 30.1 | 57.2 | 42.8 | 20.9 |
| Water-soaked curing | 23.7 | 40.6 | 15.1 | 20.6 | 64.3 | 35.7 | 22.8 | |
图14 两种养护环境下A0MS和A20MS的背散射图像、灰度曲线和不同颜色标记物相分布图
Fig.14 Backscattering images, greyscale curves, and phase distribution maps marked with different colors of A0MS and A20MS under two curing conditions
| [1] |
刘方宁, 刘 健, 吕梁胜. 矿物掺合料对低水胶比铝酸钙水泥浆体流变性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(11): 4080-4091.
DOI |
|
LIU F N, LIU J, LYU L S. Effects of mineral admixtures on rheological properties of calcium aluminate cement slurry with low water-binder ratio[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2025, 44(11): 4080-4091 (in Chinese).
DOI |
|
| [2] |
KOBAYASHI M, TAKAHASHI K, KAWABATA Y, et al. Physicochemical properties of Portland cement/calcium aluminate cement/calcium sulfate ternary binder exposed to long-term deep-sea conditions[J]. Materials and Structures, 2022, 55(7): 182.
DOI |
| [3] |
HUNG C C, ATMAJAYANTI A T, MEIJI V C D, et al. Impact of aluminate cements on the durability and mechanical performance of strain-hardening cementitious composites[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2024, 89: 109416.
DOI URL |
| [4] |
XU L L, WANG P M, ZHANG G F. Calorimetric study on the influence of calcium sulfate on the hydration of Portland cement-calcium aluminate cement mixtures[J]. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 2012, 110(2): 725-731.
DOI URL |
| [5] |
TIAN Y, MA H Y, LI Z J, et al. Organic and inorganic reactions in polyacrylate modified cement mortars[J]. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering, 2012, 41: 208-214.
DOI URL |
| [6] |
FAN L D, XU F, WANG S R, et al. A review on the modification mechanism of polymer on cement-based materials[J]. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 2023, 26: 5816-5837.
DOI URL |
| [7] |
SU F Y, HE T S, HE Z M, et al. Mechanism of acrylate emulsion-modified cement-based materials[J]. Molecules, 2024, 29(6): 1260.
DOI URL |
| [8] | FENG G H, LI K, ZHANG J, et al. Research review of water-based epoxy resin modified cement based materials[J]. Journal of Ceramic Processing Research, 2025, 26(3): 406-417. |
| [9] |
ALIZADEH R, BEAUDOIN J J, RAKI L, et al. C-S-H/polyaniline nanocomposites prepared by in situ polymerization[J]. Journal of Materials Science, 2011, 46(2): 460-467.
DOI URL |
| [10] | CHEN B M, QIAO G, HOU D S, et al. Cement-based material modified by in-situ polymerization: from experiments to molecular dynamics investigation[J]. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2020, 194: 108036. |
| [11] |
WANG J R, ZHANG H B, ZHU Y, et al. Acrylamide in-situ polymerization of toughened sulphoaluminate cement-based grouting materials[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2022, 319: 126105.
DOI URL |
| [12] |
GUO Z Y, WANG C W, ZHAO L Y, et al. Study on the toughening of calcium aluminate cement-based grouting materials by in-situ polymerization of acrylamide and the mechanism of toughness change[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2025, 469: 140524.
DOI URL |
| [13] | 王继茹. 丙烯酰胺增韧硫铝酸盐水泥基材料研究[D]. 焦作: 河南理工大学, 2022. |
| WANG J R. Study on acrylamide toughened sulphoaluminate cement-based materials[D]. Jiaozuo: Henan Polytechnic University, 2022 (in Chinese). | |
| [14] |
LIU Q, LI Y J, WANG Q, et al. Strengthening cement paste via organic-inorganic network formation[J]. Materials and Structures, 2024, 57(6): 137.
DOI |
| [15] |
YAO H, FAN M H, HUANG T J, et al. Retardation and bridging effect of anionic polyacrylamide in cement paste and its relationship with early properties[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 306: 124822.
DOI URL |
| [16] |
LIANG R, LIU Q, HOU D S, et al. Flexural strength enhancement of cement paste through monomer incorporation and in situ bond formation[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2022, 152: 106675.
DOI URL |
| [17] |
WANG F J, LIU H T, WANG X Z, et al. Enhancement of flexural strength of cement paste by in-situ polymerization of polyacrylamide[J]. Journal of Sustainable Cement-Based Materials, 2025, 14(7): 1269-1280.
DOI URL |
| [18] | 冯 攀, 刘钊龙, 邵丽静, 等. 原位聚合对3D打印砂浆力学性能的影响及机理[J]. 硅酸盐学报, 2023, 51(5): 1093-1103. |
| FENG P, LIU Z L, SHAO L J, et al. Effects of in-situ polymerization on mechanical properties of 3D printing mortars and its mechanism[J]. Journal of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2023, 51(5): 1093-1103 (in Chinese). | |
| [19] |
ZHANG H B, YAO S W, WANG J R, et al. Tensile properties of sulfoaluminate cement-based grouting materials toughened by in-situ polymerization of acrylamide[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2023, 375: 130885.
DOI URL |
| [20] | KIATKAMJORNWONG S, WONGWATTHANASATIEN R. Superabsorbent polymer of poly [acrylamide-co-(acrylic acid)] by foamed polymerization. I. synthesis and water swelling properties[J]. Macromolecular Symposia, 2004, 207(1): 229-240. |
| [21] |
DING M T, SU H, LI Y, et al. Properties of polyacrylamide hydrogel enhanced by kaolinite with expanded layer structure[J]. Materials Today Chemistry, 2022, 26: 101049.
DOI URL |
| [22] |
ZHANG Z J, YUAN Z T, ZHUANG L, et al. Adsorption mechanism of polyacrylamide on kaolinite surface in the presence of Ca2+: insights from DFT calculation[J]. Chemical Physics Letters, 2021, 776: 138672.
DOI URL |
| [23] |
DENG G, HE Y J, LU L N, et al. Pore structure evolution and sulfate attack of high-volume slag blended mortars under standard curing and steam curing[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2023, 363: 129878.
DOI URL |
| [24] |
ZHANG H T, JIANG B B, ZHANG H Q, et al. Water quality characteristics and water-rock interaction mechanisms of coal mine underground reservoirs[J]. ACS Omega, 2024, 9(26): 28726-28737.
DOI PMID |
| [25] |
LYU K, SHE W, MIAO C W, et al. Quantitative characterization of pore morphology in hardened cement paste via SEM-BSE image analysis[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2019, 202: 589-602.
DOI URL |
| [26] |
CHAI H C, ZHANG H B, HOU C Y, et al. Experimental study on chloride corrosion resistance of sulphoaluminate cement modified by acrylamide in situ polymerization[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2023, 73: 106730.
DOI URL |
| [27] |
CHAI H C, LIU S H, ZHAO L Y, et al. Enhancing sulfate resistance of sulfate-aluminate cement grouting material through acrylamide in-situ polymerization modification[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2023, 408: 133799.
DOI URL |
| [1] | 李顺凯, 陈荣辉, 董勋, 窦华康, 孙凤品. 促凝早强剂对喷射混凝土性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(4): 1184-1192. |
| [2] | 张少波, 马健云, 张新永, 高新文, 陈谦. 路用纤维微表处材料组成与性能评价研究进展[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(1): 309-324. |
| [3] | 蒋恒, 柴虎成, 刘二层, 张海波, 宋常胜, 巩志力. 原位聚合对水泥基注浆加固材料性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(6): 2149-2158. |
| [4] | 殷俊, 钱雄, 胡传林. 聚丙烯酰胺与减水剂对水泥水化的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(9): 3118-3127. |
| [5] | 刘松辉, 张猗峥, 安家宜, 管学茂. 聚丙烯酰胺的合成及其改性水泥基材料研究进展[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(12): 4285-4294. |
| [6] | 孙庭超, 曾德明, 曹明莉. 硅烷偶联剂改性钢纤维水泥基复合材料弯曲性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(7): 2326-2335. |
| [7] | 何香香, 梅军鹏, 姜天华, 李海南, 徐智东, 王智鑫, 周兰兰, 周至阳. EVA对硫铝酸盐水泥净浆微观结构和力学性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(8): 2628-2636. |
| [8] | 宋向阳, 刘霖, 张永鹏. 聚丙烯酰胺改良土-膨润土的渗透性及对苯酚的吸附[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(6): 2201-2208. |
| [9] | 葛梦龙, 叶倩倩, 康海娇, 李建章. 外加剂改性氯氧镁水泥研究进展[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(4): 1202-1210. |
| [10] | 翟健梁, 赖淏, 毛楠, 田桂成, 王昊宇, 郭豪彦, 熊锐. 复掺矿物掺合料对氯氧镁水泥耐水性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(10): 3590-3598. |
| [11] | 石鑫, 徐玲玲, 冯涛, 韩健, 张盼. 水分散聚合物乳液改性水泥砂浆的研究进展[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2021, 40(8): 2497-2507. |
| [12] | 王明伟, 谢祥兵, 李广慧, 兰翔. 基于动态力学的纳米碳粉-橡胶粉-SBS改性沥青相态结构分析[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2021, 40(7): 2444-2453. |
| [13] | 袁学锋, 王花. 硅酸盐水泥基复合电解质的制备及其在建筑储能器件中的应用[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2021, 40(12): 3938-3944. |
| [14] | 刘凌;黄天勇;王肇嘉;刘博. 聚丙烯酰胺对砂浆微观结构与性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2020, 39(9): 2777-2781. |
| [15] | 郑佳敏;管俊芳. PAC+PAM协同絮凝埃洛石的行为研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2020, 39(4): 1214-1218. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||