硅酸盐通报 ›› 2026, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (9): 2999-3009.DOI: 10.16552/j.cnki.issn1001-1625.2026.0241
杨伟辉1(
), 刘国顺1,2, 李悦3, 黄栋4, 黄超群4, 刘云鹏1(
)
收稿日期:2026-03-17
修订日期:2026-04-17
出版日期:2026-09-15
发布日期:2026-10-09
通信作者:
刘云鹏,博士,研究员。E-mail:liuyunpeng@whut.edu.cn作者简介:杨伟辉(2000—),男,硕士研究生。主要从事注浆材料方面的研究。E-mail:1076327561@qq.com
基金资助:
YANG Weihui1(
), LIU Guoshun1,2, LI Yue3, HUANG Dong4, HUANG Chaoqun4, LIU Yunpeng1(
)
Received:2026-03-17
Revised:2026-04-17
Published:2026-09-15
Online:2026-10-09
摘要:
开发分别适用于MgO浆液和磷酸二氢铵溶液的增稠组分,以协同提升磷酸镁水泥基(MPC)注浆材料的抗水分散性。通过流变特性、水陆强度比及抗动水冲刷留存率等宏观性能测试,并结合XRD、SEM、电导率等表征研究了MPC注浆材料的抗水分散特性及机理。结果表明:羟丙基甲基纤维素(HPMC)在MgO浆液中可形成稳定的空间网络结构,提高浆液悬浮稳定性;但在磷酸盐溶液存在时,盐析作用会破坏其空间网络结构的稳定性。聚丙烯酸钠(PAAS)在硼砂作用下可形成稳定的三维网络结构,具有抵抗盐析作用的能力,从而提升体系抗水分散性。当HPMC掺量为MgO质量的0.2%,PAAS掺量为磷酸二氢铵与硼砂总质量的0.8%时,MPC注浆材料在0.8 m/s水流速度下的抗动水冲刷留存率可达0.88。研究结果为磷酸镁水泥在地下工程动水封堵中的应用提供了新的技术途径。
中图分类号:
杨伟辉, 刘国顺, 李悦, 黄栋, 黄超群, 刘云鹏. 聚丙烯酸钠改性磷酸镁水泥基注浆材料抗水分散性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(9): 2999-3009.
YANG Weihui, LIU Guoshun, LI Yue, HUANG Dong, HUANG Chaoqun, LIU Yunpeng. Water Dispersion Resistance of Sodium Polyacrylate Modified Magnesium Phosphate Cement-Based Grouting Material[J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(9): 2999-3009.
| Component A | MgO | MgO+0.2%HPMC | MgO+0.2%PAAS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bleeding rate/% | — | 0 | 3.23 |
| Fluidity/mm | 250 | 230 | 200 |
表1 聚合物对MgO浆体泌水率和流动度的影响
Table 1 Effect of polymer on bleeding rate and fluidity of MgO slurry
| Component A | MgO | MgO+0.2%HPMC | MgO+0.2%PAAS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bleeding rate/% | — | 0 | 3.23 |
| Fluidity/mm | 250 | 230 | 200 |
| Sample | Mass/g | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Component A | Component B | ||||||||
| L-M | D-M | HPMC | H2O | NH4H2PO4 | B | PAAS | HPMC | H2O | |
| P-0 | 132 | 44 | 0.352 | 123.2 | 71.77 | 17.6 | 0 | 0 | 50.24 |
| P-0.2 | 132 | 44 | 0.352 | 123.2 | 71.77 | 17.6 | 0.179 | 0 | 50.24 |
| P-0.5 | 132 | 44 | 0.352 | 123.2 | 71.77 | 17.6 | 0.447 | 0 | 50.24 |
| P-0.8 | 132 | 44 | 0.352 | 123.2 | 71.77 | 17.6 | 0.715 | 0 | 50.24 |
| P-1.1 | 132 | 44 | 0.352 | 123.2 | 71.77 | 17.6 | 0.983 | 0 | 50.24 |
| H-0.8 | 132 | 44 | 0.352 | 123.2 | 71.77 | 17.6 | 0 | 0.715 | 50.24 |
表2 MPC注浆封堵材料配合比
Table 2 Mix proportion of MPC grouting and sealing materials
| Sample | Mass/g | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Component A | Component B | ||||||||
| L-M | D-M | HPMC | H2O | NH4H2PO4 | B | PAAS | HPMC | H2O | |
| P-0 | 132 | 44 | 0.352 | 123.2 | 71.77 | 17.6 | 0 | 0 | 50.24 |
| P-0.2 | 132 | 44 | 0.352 | 123.2 | 71.77 | 17.6 | 0.179 | 0 | 50.24 |
| P-0.5 | 132 | 44 | 0.352 | 123.2 | 71.77 | 17.6 | 0.447 | 0 | 50.24 |
| P-0.8 | 132 | 44 | 0.352 | 123.2 | 71.77 | 17.6 | 0.715 | 0 | 50.24 |
| P-1.1 | 132 | 44 | 0.352 | 123.2 | 71.77 | 17.6 | 0.983 | 0 | 50.24 |
| H-0.8 | 132 | 44 | 0.352 | 123.2 | 71.77 | 17.6 | 0 | 0.715 | 50.24 |
| Sample | τ0/mPa | k/10-3 | Regression equation | R2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| P-0 | 36.18 | 1.63 | τ=0.036 18+0.001 63γ1.760 86 | 0.998 79 |
| P-0.2 | 80.61 | 0.99 | τ=0.080 61+0.000 99γ2.051 93 | 0.998 59 |
| P-0.5 | 166.11 | 2.51 | τ=0.166 11+0.002 51γ1.960 54 | 0.999 48 |
| P-0.8 | 450.44 | 27.68 | τ=0.450 44+0.027 68γ1.516 96 | 0.999 24 |
| P-1.1 | 943.20 | 60.81 | τ=0.943 20+0.060 81γ1.542 84 | 0.999 53 |
| H-0.8 | 32.24 | 14.06 | τ=0.032 24+0.014 06γ1.321 33 | 0.998 10 |
表3 Herschel-Bulkley模型拟合结果
Table 3 Fitting results of Herschel-Bulkley model
| Sample | τ0/mPa | k/10-3 | Regression equation | R2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| P-0 | 36.18 | 1.63 | τ=0.036 18+0.001 63γ1.760 86 | 0.998 79 |
| P-0.2 | 80.61 | 0.99 | τ=0.080 61+0.000 99γ2.051 93 | 0.998 59 |
| P-0.5 | 166.11 | 2.51 | τ=0.166 11+0.002 51γ1.960 54 | 0.999 48 |
| P-0.8 | 450.44 | 27.68 | τ=0.450 44+0.027 68γ1.516 96 | 0.999 24 |
| P-1.1 | 943.20 | 60.81 | τ=0.943 20+0.060 81γ1.542 84 | 0.999 53 |
| H-0.8 | 32.24 | 14.06 | τ=0.032 24+0.014 06γ1.321 33 | 0.998 10 |
| Sample | M | M+HPMC | M+PAAS | ADP | ADP+HPMC | ADP+PAAS | MPC | MPC+HPMC | MPC+PAAS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH value | 12.09 | 12.10 | 12.09 | 4.89 | 4.90 | 4.90 | 5.80 | 5.79 | 5.80 |
表4 MPC各浆液组分pH值
Table 4 pH values of MPC slurry components
| Sample | M | M+HPMC | M+PAAS | ADP | ADP+HPMC | ADP+PAAS | MPC | MPC+HPMC | MPC+PAAS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH value | 12.09 | 12.10 | 12.09 | 4.89 | 4.90 | 4.90 | 5.80 | 5.79 | 5.80 |
| Sample No. | Mass/g | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PAAS/Water | B/PAAS | ADP/PAAS | |
| PAAS | 0.002 | 0 | 0 |
| PAAS+ADP | 0.002 | 0 | 2.50 |
| PAAS+B | 0.002 | 0.25 | 0 |
| PAAS+B+ADP | 0.002 | 0.25 | 2.50 |
表5 不同类型PAAS水凝胶配合比
Table 5 Mix proportion of different types of PAAS hydrogels
| Sample No. | Mass/g | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PAAS/Water | B/PAAS | ADP/PAAS | |
| PAAS | 0.002 | 0 | 0 |
| PAAS+ADP | 0.002 | 0 | 2.50 |
| PAAS+B | 0.002 | 0.25 | 0 |
| PAAS+B+ADP | 0.002 | 0.25 | 2.50 |
| [1] |
龚晓南, 郭盼盼. 隧道及地下工程渗漏水诱发原因与防治对策[J]. 中国公路学报, 2021, 34(7): 1-30.
DOI |
| GONG X N, GUO P P. Prevention and mitigation methods for water leakage in tunnels and underground structures[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2021, 34(7): 1-30 (in Chinese). | |
| [2] | 荆永波. 盾构隧道突发涌水灾害成因分析及管片加固技术研究[J]. 铁道建筑技术, 2025(12): 33-36+52. |
| JING Y B. Cause analysis of sudden water inrush disasters in a shield tunnel and research on reinforcement technology for damaged segments[J]. Railway Construction Technology, 2025(12): 33-36+52 (in Chinese). | |
| [3] |
郑颖悟, 马泓健, 侯 宁, 等. 动水条件下粉煤灰基注浆堵水材料配比优化及性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(8): 2933-2943.
DOI |
| ZHENG Y W, MA H J, HOU N, et al. Mix ratio optimization and performance study of fly ash based grouting water blocking materials under dynamic water conditions[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2025, 44(8): 2933-2943 (in Chinese). | |
| [4] | 李术才, 张 霄, 张庆松, 等. 地下工程涌突水注浆止水浆液扩散机制和封堵方法研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2011, 30(12): 2377-2396. |
| LI S C, ZHANG X, ZHANG Q S, et al. Research on mechanism of grout diffusion of dynamic grouting and plugging method in water inrush of underground engineering[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2011, 30(12): 2377-2396 (in Chinese). | |
| [5] | 林荣峰. 微膨胀水泥基动水抗分散注浆材料及其岩溶管道封堵机理研究[D]. 济南: 山东大学, 2023. |
| LIN R F. Research on micro-expansion cement-based water-induced anti-dispersive grouting materials and their mechanism for sealing karst pipes[D]. Jinan: Shandong University, 2023 (in Chinese). | |
| [6] | 赵光明, 王艳芬, 艾 洁, 等. 矿用水泥基注浆材料的发展及展望[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2024, 53(1): 1-22. |
| ZHAO G M, WANG Y F, AI J, et al. Development and prospect of cement-based grouting materials for coal mine[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2024, 53(1): 1-22 (in Chinese). | |
| [7] | 刘人太. 水泥基速凝浆液地下工程动水注浆扩散封堵机理及应用研究[D]. 济南: 山东大学, 2012. |
| LIU R T. Research on the mechanism and application of dynamic water injection and diffusion sealing for underground engineering using cement-based rapid setting slurry[D]. Jinan: Shandong University, 2012 (in Chinese). | |
| [8] | 姜 瑜, 郭 飞, 孔 恒. 丙烯酸酯-水泥复合注浆材料制备及其性能研究[J]. 新型建筑材料, 2020, 47(8): 159-163. |
| JIANG Y, GUO F, KONG H. Preparation and properties of acrylate-cement grouting composite[J]. New Building Materials, 2020, 47(8): 159-163 (in Chinese). | |
| [9] | 赵 青, 张艺霞, 赵 军, 等. 速凝抗水分散型水泥基注浆材料的制备及性能研究[J]. 功能材料, 2020, 51(6): 6114-6119+6157. |
|
ZHAO Q, ZHANG Y X, ZHAO J, et al. Study on the preparation and performance of cement-based grouting material with quick setting and water resistance[J]. Journal of Functional Materials, 2020, 51(6): 6114-6119+6157 (in Chinese).
DOI |
|
| [10] |
SHA F, LI S C, LIU R T, et al. Experimental study on performance of cement-based grouts admixed with fly ash, bentonite, superplasticizer and water glass[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 161: 282-291.
DOI URL |
| [11] | 甄泽强. 水玻璃类浆材注浆性能及工程应用研究[D]. 太原: 太原理工大学, 2019. |
| ZHEN Z Q. Study on grouting performance and engineering application of sodium silicate grouting materials[D]. Taiyuan: Taiyuan University of Technology, 2019 (in Chinese). | |
| [12] |
LI S C, ZHANG J, LI Z F, et al. Investigation and practical application of a new cementitious anti-washout grouting material[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2019, 224: 66-77.
DOI URL |
| [13] | 秦继辉, 钱觉时, 宋 庆, 等. 磷酸镁水泥的研究进展与应用[J]. 硅酸盐学报, 2022, 50(6): 1592-1606. |
| QIN J H, QIAN J S, SONG Q, et al. Research progress on magnesium phosphate cement[J]. Journal of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2022, 50(6): 1592-1606 (in Chinese). | |
| [14] | 李 悦, 董 达, 林 辉, 等. 粉煤灰对轻烧氧化镁制备磷酸镁水泥性能影响的研究[J]. 江西建材, 2024(增刊1): 25-29. |
| LI Y, DONG D, LIN H, et al. Study on the effect of fly ash on the properties of magnesium phosphate cement prepared by light-burned magnesia[J]. Jiangxi Building Materials, 2024(supplement 1): 25-29 (in Chinese). | |
| [15] | 厉见芬, 李书进, 刘源涛, 等. 磷酸镁水泥基新型双液注浆材料试验研究[J]. 新型建筑材料, 2021, 48(3): 94-97+101. |
| LI J F, LI S J, LIU Y T, et al. Study on a novel two-component grouting material based on magnesium phosphate cement[J]. New Building Materials, 2021, 48(3): 94-97+101 (in Chinese). | |
| [16] |
XIE W J, MENG X R, CHEN B, et al. Fresh and hardened properties of two-component magnesium phosphate cement grouting materials[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2025, 470: 140622.
DOI URL |
| [17] |
DING Y C, AHMAD M R, CHEN B, et al. Ground granulated blast furnace slag-modified magnesium phosphate cement used as grouting material: workability, mechanical property and corrosion resistance optimization[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2024, 96: 110450.
DOI URL |
| [18] |
ZHANG Y J, WANG S, LI L P, et al. A preliminary study of the properties of potassium phosphate magnesium cement-based grouts admixed with metakaolin, sodium silicate and bentonite[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 262: 119893.
DOI URL |
| [19] |
ZHANG Y J, WANG J, LI L P, et al. Basic properties and mechanism of high activity phosphate-based slurry for dynamic water blocking-a feasibility research[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 275: 122040.
DOI URL |
| [20] |
CHEN N, WANG P M, ZHAO L Q, et al. Water retention mechanism of HPMC in cement mortar[J]. Materials, 2020, 13(13): 2918.
DOI URL |
| [21] |
ZHANG Y J, WANG S, LI L P, et al. A preliminary study of the properties of potassium phosphate magnesium cement-based grouts admixed with metakaolin, sodium silicate and bentonite[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 262: 119893.
DOI URL |
| [22] | HUANG K Y, LEI M, LIU Z C, et al. Carbon-absorbing inorganic coating with ultrahigh bonding strength for concrete: bonding, durability performances, and the underlying mechanisms[J]. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2024, 12(21): 8188-8202. |
| [23] |
HARINI M, DESHPANDE A P. Rheology of poly(sodium acrylate) hydrogels during cross-linking with and without cellulose microfibrils[J]. Journal of Rheology, 2009, 53(1): 31-47.
DOI URL |
| [24] |
WU X N, LI R Y, SHU J, et al. Anti-scour performance of fluidized solidified slurry in dynamic water for scour repair[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2024, 291: 116345.
DOI URL |
| [25] | 洪侨亨, 贺雄飞, 张明朗, 等. 固废基盾构惰性同步注浆材料力学性能及抗水分散性研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(2): 617-626. |
| HONG Q H, HE X F, ZHANG M L, et al. Mechanical property and resistance to water dispersion of solid waste shield inert synchronous grouting materials[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2024, 43(2): 617-626 (in Chinese). | |
| [26] |
王宏亮, 罗 冉, 刘夕奇, 等. 动水冲刷对水泥注浆材料力学性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(2): 417-423.
DOI |
|
WANG H L, LUO R, LIU X Q, et al. Effect of flowing water scouring on mechanical properties of cement grouting materials[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2025, 44(2): 417-423 (in Chinese).
DOI |
|
| [27] | HOT J, BESSAIES-BEY H, BRUMAUD C, et al. Adsorbing polymers and viscosity of cement pastes[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2014, 63: 12-19. |
| [28] |
ZALESKI A, ROCHA J C. Effect of phosphogypsum and water-retaining in the stabilization and durability of stabilized mortars[J]. Applied Rheology, 2022, 32(1): 138-154.
DOI URL |
| [29] |
GUO C C, CHEN N, WANG R. Study on hydroxypropyl methylcellulose modified Portland cement-sulphoaluminate cement composites: rheology, setting time, mechanical strength, resistance to chloride ingress, early reaction kinetics and microstructure[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2024, 98: 111070.
DOI URL |
| [30] |
CHEONG S I, KIM B, LEE H, et al. Physical adsorption of water-soluble polymers on hydrophobic polymeric membrane surfaces via salting-out effect[J]. Macromolecular Research, 2013, 21(6): 629-635.
DOI URL |
| [31] |
JOSHI S C. Sol-gel behavior of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) in ionic media including drug release[J]. Materials, 2011, 4(10): 1861-1905.
DOI URL |
| [32] |
ZHANG Q Q, CHEN J, ZHU J, et al. Advances in organic rheology-modifiers (chemical admixtures) and their effects on the rheological properties of cement-based materials[J]. Materials, 2022, 15(24): 8730.
DOI URL |
| [33] |
SIMION E L, STÎNGĂ G, BĂRAN A, et al. Smart borax complexes starting from anionic surfactant in association with unlabeled or fluorescently labeled poly(acrylic acid)s[J]. Colloid and Polymer Science, 2016, 294(5): 927-939.
DOI URL |
| [1] | 周辉勇, 王艳朝, 高华, 郭威, 凡涛涛, 司春棣, 马喜报. 水玻璃参数对碱激发地聚物工作与力学性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(9): 3163-3173. |
| [2] | 李维红, 邓永杰, 王朝英, 钟建军, 吕立博, 麻海燕, 余红发, 李栋伟. 混搅挤一体化快速3D打印实现速凝混凝土可连续建造的验证[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(8): 2699-2710. |
| [3] | 王秋澳, 陈烽, 彭荩影, 李悦, 钱珊珊. 响应面法优化D-甘露糖醇改性磷酸镁水泥性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(8): 2612-2623. |
| [4] | 朱家俊, 廖宜顺, 郭俊萍, 李文华, 李凌云. 水化热抑制剂对铁铝酸盐水泥水化的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(5): 1483-1490. |
| [5] | 王解放, 许德金, 李胜, 任万里, 陈佩圆. 纤维素醚对衬砌混凝土力学与工作性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(4): 1175-1183. |
| [6] | 李顺凯, 陈荣辉, 董勋, 窦华康, 孙凤品. 促凝早强剂对喷射混凝土性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(4): 1184-1192. |
| [7] | 喻秋淳, 李尉, 梁云, 邓永杰, 黄汉涵, 李维红, 李栋伟. 超速凝磷酸镁水泥涂层新型喷射工艺及裂缝修复性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(1): 21-29. |
| [8] | 蒋昊洋, 胡志德, 赵思勰, 张寒松, 许春霞. 环境温度对磷酸镁水泥水化温升的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(9): 3147-3155. |
| [9] | 杨阔, 王里, 李之建. 粘结剂喷射3D打印水泥基材料强度与精度协同优化研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(8): 2741-2751. |
| [10] | 袁宏, 杨敏, 蔡婷娅, 潘荣祥. 缓凝剂对矿渣-赤泥基地质聚合物性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(7): 2589-2596. |
| [11] | 吴庆勇, 赵爽, 韩斌, 王伟, 乔敏, 杜爽, 陈俊松. 铝硅复合微胶囊的制备及其在水泥基材料中的应用[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(7): 2388-2395. |
| [12] | 李志全, 张广田, 张艳佳, 贾彪, 刘东基, 张彪. 碱渣掺量对固废基胶凝材料性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(7): 2597-2607. |
| [13] | 梁云, 喻秋淳, 邓永杰, 董思伽, 李维红, 李栋伟. 喷射打印超速凝磷酸镁水泥涂层的粘结强度与耐久性[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(6): 1967-1978. |
| [14] | 周晶, 王周福, 刘浩, 马妍, 王玺堂. 不同乳酸盐对MgO水化过程的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(6): 2337-2342. |
| [15] | 张增起, 李思义, 刘晓明, 马善亮, 邵阳, 陈杰, 杜伟杰. 多源固废协同制备磷酸镁水泥研究进展[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(4): 1191-1207. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||