硅酸盐通报 ›› 2026, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (8): 2749-2759.DOI: 10.16552/j.cnki.issn1001-1625.2026.0139
张青青1,2(
), 朱泉峣2, 肖磊1,2, 孟子津1,2, 孙华君1,2(
)
收稿日期:2026-02-05
修订日期:2026-04-30
出版日期:2026-08-15
发布日期:2026-09-01
通信作者:
孙华君,博士,教授。E-mail:huajunsun@whut.edu.cn作者简介:张青青(2001—),女,硕士研究生。主要从事模拟月壤的研究。E-mail:3388701055@qq.com
基金资助:
ZHANG Qingqing1,2(
), ZHU Quanyao2, XIAO Lei1,2, MENG Zijin1,2, SUN Huajun1,2(
)
Received:2026-02-05
Revised:2026-04-30
Published:2026-08-15
Online:2026-09-01
摘要:
月壤是月面原位资源利用(ISRU)的直接对象,而粘结集块岩作为月壤的重要组分,其微观结构直接影响ISRU技术的可靠性。然而,粘结集块岩内部标志性的亚微米/纳米级单质铁(Fe0)和多孔囊泡结构在实验室环境下难以复现,导致现有模拟月壤保真度普遍不足。本研究以嫦娥五号(CE-5)月壤为目标,通过精确矿物匹配与可控原位热还原工艺,重点攻克了玻璃基质中Fe0原位析出的制备难题,成功研制出高保真WUT-1模拟月壤。分析结果显示,WUT-1在化学成分、物相组成及宏观物理性质上与真实月壤高度吻合,并精准复现了非均质微观结构。该研究显著提升了模拟物在微观结构和基础物理化学性质上的科学保真度,可为月面着陆、原位建造及资源提取等关键技术的地面验证提供高可靠性测试材料。
中图分类号:
张青青, 朱泉峣, 肖磊, 孟子津, 孙华君. 一种含粘结集块岩的高保真嫦娥五号模拟月壤[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(8): 2749-2759.
ZHANG Qingqing, ZHU Quanyao, XIAO Lei, MENG Zijin, SUN Huajun. A High-Fidelity Agglutinate-Containing Chang’E-5 Lunar Regolith Simulant[J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(8): 2749-2759.
| Sample | Mass fraction/% | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SiO2 | TiO2 | Al2O3 | TFeO | MnO | MgO | CaO | Na2O | K2O | P2O5 | |
| CE-5[ | 42.20 | 5.00 | 10.80 | 22.50 | 0.28 | 6.48 | 11.00 | 0.26 | 0.19 | 0.23 |
| Basalt | 46.07 | 2.14 | 17.92 | 9.02 | 0.13 | 5.29 | 8.72 | 6.62 | 2.60 | 1.11 |
| Fe2O3 | 0 | 0.03 | 0 | 99.95 | 0 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Hedenbergite | 47.29 | 0.04 | 0.68 | 25.67 | 1.87 | 1.79 | 22.40 | 0.06 | 0 | 0 |
| Ilmenite | 3.14 | 41.52 | 1.87 | 49.10 | 0.78 | 1.25 | 0.63 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Forsterite | 44.14 | 0 | 3.36 | 7.68 | 0.12 | 40.87 | 2.88 | 0.13 | 0 | 0 |
表1 原材料和月壤的化学组成
Table 1 Chemical composition of raw materials and lunar legolith
| Sample | Mass fraction/% | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SiO2 | TiO2 | Al2O3 | TFeO | MnO | MgO | CaO | Na2O | K2O | P2O5 | |
| CE-5[ | 42.20 | 5.00 | 10.80 | 22.50 | 0.28 | 6.48 | 11.00 | 0.26 | 0.19 | 0.23 |
| Basalt | 46.07 | 2.14 | 17.92 | 9.02 | 0.13 | 5.29 | 8.72 | 6.62 | 2.60 | 1.11 |
| Fe2O3 | 0 | 0.03 | 0 | 99.95 | 0 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Hedenbergite | 47.29 | 0.04 | 0.68 | 25.67 | 1.87 | 1.79 | 22.40 | 0.06 | 0 | 0 |
| Ilmenite | 3.14 | 41.52 | 1.87 | 49.10 | 0.78 | 1.25 | 0.63 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Forsterite | 44.14 | 0 | 3.36 | 7.68 | 0.12 | 40.87 | 2.88 | 0.13 | 0 | 0 |
| Mineral | Basalt | Hedenbergite | Forsterite | Ilmenite | Fe2O3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mass fraction/% | 50.18 | 29.98 | 7.06 | 10.78 | 2.00 |
表2 模拟月壤原材料配比
Table 2 Mix proportion of raw materials for lunar legolith simulants
| Mineral | Basalt | Hedenbergite | Forsterite | Ilmenite | Fe2O3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mass fraction/% | 50.18 | 29.98 | 7.06 | 10.78 | 2.00 |
图4 WUT-1模拟月壤和CE-5月壤的主要组成、XRD谱和矿物丰度
Fig.4 Major composition, XRD patterns, and major mineral composition of WUT-1 lunar regolith simulant and CE-5 lunar regolith
| Material | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WUT-1 | 4.55 | 22.58 | 52.81 | 69.70 | 15.32 | 1.61 | 4.25 | 4.71 | 1.90 | 0.29 | 1.06 |
| CE-5[ | 4.90 | 24.12 | 54.23 | 70.31 | 14.35 | 1.69 | 4.21 | 4.66 | 1.97 | 0.37 | 1.11 |
表3 基于体积的粒径参数与计算统计参数
Table 3 Volume-based particle size parameters and computational statistical parameters
| Material | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WUT-1 | 4.55 | 22.58 | 52.81 | 69.70 | 15.32 | 1.61 | 4.25 | 4.71 | 1.90 | 0.29 | 1.06 |
| CE-5[ | 4.90 | 24.12 | 54.23 | 70.31 | 14.35 | 1.69 | 4.21 | 4.66 | 1.97 | 0.37 | 1.11 |
| Material | Gs/(g·cm-3) | ρmax/(g·cm-3) | ρmin/(g·cm-3) | emin | emax | nmin | nmax |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAS-1[ | — | — | — | 0.80 | 1.10 | — | — |
| JSC-1[ | 2.90 | 1.33 | 1.80 | 0.61 | 1.17 | 0.38 | 0.54 |
| WUT-1 | 3.22 | 1.65 | 2.00 | 0.61 | 0.96 | 0.38 | 0.49 |
| IGG-01[ | 3.33 | 1.69 | 2.03 | 0.64 | 0.97 | 0.39 | 0.49 |
| PolyU-1[ | 3.17 | 1.22 | 1.83 | 0.72 | 1.63 | 0.42 | 0.62 |
| JSC-1A[ | 2.88 | 1.57 | 2.03 | 0.41 | 0.83 | 0.29 | 0.45 |
| UoM-B[ | 3.52 | 1.37 | 1.97 | 0.78 | 1.56 | 0.44 | 0.61 |
| CE-5[ | 3.20 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Apollo lunar mare regolith[ | 2.30~3.24 | 0.87~1.26 | 1.92 | 0.67 | 2.37 | 0.42 | 0.97 |
表4 WUT-1及其他六种模拟月壤与真实月壤参数汇总
Table 4 Summary of parameters for WUT-1, six other lunar regolith simulants, and actual lunar regolith
| Material | Gs/(g·cm-3) | ρmax/(g·cm-3) | ρmin/(g·cm-3) | emin | emax | nmin | nmax |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAS-1[ | — | — | — | 0.80 | 1.10 | — | — |
| JSC-1[ | 2.90 | 1.33 | 1.80 | 0.61 | 1.17 | 0.38 | 0.54 |
| WUT-1 | 3.22 | 1.65 | 2.00 | 0.61 | 0.96 | 0.38 | 0.49 |
| IGG-01[ | 3.33 | 1.69 | 2.03 | 0.64 | 0.97 | 0.39 | 0.49 |
| PolyU-1[ | 3.17 | 1.22 | 1.83 | 0.72 | 1.63 | 0.42 | 0.62 |
| JSC-1A[ | 2.88 | 1.57 | 2.03 | 0.41 | 0.83 | 0.29 | 0.45 |
| UoM-B[ | 3.52 | 1.37 | 1.97 | 0.78 | 1.56 | 0.44 | 0.61 |
| CE-5[ | 3.20 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Apollo lunar mare regolith[ | 2.30~3.24 | 0.87~1.26 | 1.92 | 0.67 | 2.37 | 0.42 | 0.97 |
| [1] | LI C L, WANG C, WEI Y, et al. China’s present and future lunar exploration program[J]. Science, 2019, 365(6450): 238-239. |
| [2] | SINHA R K, RANI A, RUJ T, et al. Geologic investigation of lobate scarps in the vicinity of Chandrayaan-3 landing site in the southern high latitudes of the moon[J]. Icarus, 2023, 402: 115636. |
| [3] | CREECH S, GUIDI J, ELBURN D. Artemis: an overview of NASA’s activities to return humans to the moon[C]//2022 IEEE Aerospace Conference (AERO). March 5-12, 2022, Big Sky, MT, USA. IEEE, 2022: 1-7. |
| [4] | SUN X M, ZHANG R, LI X J, et al. JLU-H: a novel lunar highland regolith simulant for use in large-scale engineering experiments[J]. Planetary and Space Science, 2022, 221: 105562. |
| [5] | ZHANG L, LV J G. Shear properties of lunar regolith simulants[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2014, 73: 178-185. |
| [6] | LI C L, HU H, YANG M F, et al. Characteristics of the lunar samples returned by the Chang’e-5 mission[J]. National Science Review, 2021, 221: 105562. |
| [7] | ZOU Y, WU H Y, CHAI S P, et al. Development and characterization of the PolyU-1 lunar regolith simulant based on Chang’e-5 returned samples[J]. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 2024, 34(9): 1317-1326. |
| [8] | RUAN R H, YANG W, ZHANG D, et al. A moderate-Ti lunar mare soil simulant: IGG-01[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2024, 224: 148-160. |
| [9] | SEN S, BUTTS D, RAY C S, et al. Production of high fidelity lunar agglutinate simulant[J]. Advances in Space Research, 2011, 47(11): 1912-1921. |
| [10] | CARRIER W D III. Particle size distribution of lunar soil[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2003, 129(10): 956-959. |
| [11] | CHEN Y, HU S, LI J H, et al. Chang’e-5 lunar samples shed new light on the Moon[J]. The Innovation Geoscience, 2023, 1(1): 100014. |
| [12] | FOLK R L, WARD W C. Brazos River bar: a study in the significance of grain size parameters[J]. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 1957, 27(1): 3-26. |
| [13] | SPRAY J G. Generation of a lunar regolith agglutinate simulant using friction welding apparatus[J]. Planetary and Space Science, 2010, 58(14/15): 1771-1774. |
| [14] | LONG-FOX J M, BRITT D T. Characterization of planetary regolith simulants for the research and development of space resource technologies[J]. Frontiers in Space Technologies, 2023, 4: 1255535. |
| [15] | ZHANG H, ZHANG X, ZHANG G, et al. Size, morphology, and composition of lunar samples returned by Chang’e-5 mission[J]. Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy, 2021, 65(2): 229511. |
| [16] | YANG W, WANG Y, GAO L, et al. Sci-tech arts on Chang’e-5 lunar soil[J]. The Innovation, 2022, 3(5): 100300. |
| [17] | MCKAY D S, HEIKEN G, BASU A, et al. The lunar regolith, in: lunar sourcebook[M]. Research supported by NASA. Cambridge, England, Cambridge University Press, 1991, 285-356. |
| [18] | HUANG T J, GANJU E, TORBATISARRAF H, et al. Advanced microstructural and compositional analysis of a lunar agglutinate from the Apollo 11 mission[J]. Meteoritics & Planetary Science, 2024, 59(6): 1455-1472. |
| [19] | SPARKS R S J. The dynamics of bubble formation and growth in magmas: a review and analysis[J]. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 1978, 3(1/2): 1-37. |
| [20] | XIONG M C, WU Y X, YAO W Q, et al. The formation mechanisms of np-Fe0 in lunar regolith: a review[J]. Materials, 2024, 17(23): 5866. |
| [21] | GUTAFSON R J, EDMUNSON J E, RICKMAN D L. Manufacturing high-fidelity lunar agglutinate simulants[C]//Space Resources Roundtable Ⅻ Golden, 2010. |
| [22] | SLYUTA E N. Physical and mechanical properties of the lunar soil (a review)[J]. Solar System Research, 2014, 48(5): 330-353. |
| [23] | TAYLOR L A, MEEK T T. Microwave sintering of lunar soil: properties, theory, and practice[J]. Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2005, 18(3): 188-196. |
| [24] | ZHENG Y C, WANG S J, OUYANG Z Y, et al. CAS-1 lunar soil simulant[J]. Advances in Space Research, 2009, 43(3): 448-454. |
| [25] | MCKAY D S, CARTER J L, BOLES W W, et al. JSC-1: a new lunar soil simulant[J]. American Society of Civil Engineers, 1994: 857-866. |
| [26] | JUST G H, JOY K H, ROY M J, et al. Geotechnical characterisation of two new low-fidelity lunar regolith analogues (UoM-B and UoM-W) for use in large-scale engineering experiments[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2020, 173: 414-424. |
| [1] | 代恒军, 吴光雄, 李海峰, 周薛, 章荣军. 水泥协同工业固废固化流态土工作性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(12): 4492-4502. |
| [2] | 孔爱散, 钱锶嘉, 王伟, 马绪坤, 李娜. 聚丙烯纤维协同碳化养护技术改性水泥土的抗剪特性研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(5): 1939-1948. |
| [3] | 安然, 蔡苏童, 张先伟, 高浩东, 姚淼, 刘魁. 基于单轴压缩与CT扫描的矿渣固化土细观裂隙及损伤模型研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(4): 1495-1503. |
| [4] | 张永杰, 李嘉兵, 邓沛宇, 龙康, 甘泽同, 田湘. 矿渣-粉煤灰地聚物注浆材料配比优化方法研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(10): 3726-3735. |
| [5] | 汪锦东, 罗梦婷, 鹿庆蕊, 王秋哲, 李栋伟. 干湿循环下稻草秸秆-聚乙烯醇增强粉质黏土强度特性与微观机理[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(7): 2630-2639. |
| [6] | 晏静, 吴道勇, 吴诗雨. 基于数字图像处理的盐溶液过饱和比与结晶压力测量方法[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(3): 1081-1085. |
| [7] | 王旭影, 乔京生, 赵建业, 蔡田明, 梁晨达. 电石渣激发钢渣-矿渣固化淤泥质土的试验研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(2): 733-739. |
| [8] | 程卓, 崔高航, 高原昊, 刚浩航, 高泽宁, 杨政, 张鑫. 季冻区粉煤灰加固路基土力学性能试验研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2021, 40(11): 3854-3864. |
| [9] | 姚鑫, 徐亚星, 董晓强. 黄麻与聚乙烯醇纤维增强水泥土的弯曲及早期抗裂性能[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2021, 40(9): 2921-2929. |
| [10] | 乔京生, 王旭影, 王冠泓, 赵建业. 粒化高炉矿渣微粉固化淤泥质土的动力特性及微观机理[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2021, 40(7): 2306-2312. |
| [11] | 谭仁义, 吴道勇, 黄佑芬, 吴诗雨. 冻结过程中水分盐分结晶相变对盐渍土压力的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2021, 40(4): 1296-1303. |
| [12] | 宋宝峰;李和玉;张淑芬;王保权. 火灾高温对混凝土残余强度和微观结构的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2020, 39(11): 3522-3527. |
| [13] | 王丽英;骆文进;王红梅;李鑫鑫. 盐-冻耦合作用下水泥基风积沙改性土基坑填料的性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2020, 39(9): 2912-2918. |
| [14] | 盛炎民;代国忠;李书进. 基于常规三轴试验PBFC防渗浆材破坏形态机理分析[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2020, 39(1): 132-136. |
| [15] | 徐行军. 基于CT扫描试验的透水混凝土孔隙分布特征研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2019, 38(11): 3670-367. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||