BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY ›› 2026, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (8): 2839-2849.DOI: 10.16552/j.cnki.issn1001-1625.2026.0180
• Solid Waste and Eco-Materials • Previous Articles Next Articles
CHENG Xiao1(
), WU Fade1, WANG Hongxia1(
), SONG Xiaoguang2, GAO Chunyong1, GUO Junhua1, LI Fan3
Received:2026-02-27
Revised:2026-04-06
Online:2026-08-15
Published:2026-09-01
Contact:
WANG Hongxia
CLC Number:
CHENG Xiao, WU Fade, WANG Hongxia, SONG Xiaoguang, GAO Chunyong, GUO Junhua, LI Fan. Influence Mechanism of Additives on Mildew of Phosphogypsum[J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(8): 2839-2849.
| Composition | CaO | SO3 | SiO2 | Al2O3 | P2O5 | Fe2O3 | Na2O | F | K2O | TiO2 | MgO | SrO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mass fraction/% | 40.80 | 48.90 | 5.65 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.42 | 0.37 | 0.37 | 0.21 | 0.14 | 0.12 | 0.10 |
Table 1 Main chemical composition of phosphogypsum
| Composition | CaO | SO3 | SiO2 | Al2O3 | P2O5 | Fe2O3 | Na2O | F | K2O | TiO2 | MgO | SrO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mass fraction/% | 40.80 | 48.90 | 5.65 | 0.77 | 0.72 | 0.42 | 0.37 | 0.37 | 0.21 | 0.14 | 0.12 | 0.10 |
| Name | Bacterial No. |
|---|---|
| 黑曲霉(Aspergillus niger) | AS3.4463 |
| 土曲霉(Aspergillus terreus) | AS3.3935 |
| 宛氏拟青霉(Paecilomyces Varioti) | AS3.4253 |
| 绳状青霉(Penicillium funicolosum) | AS3.3875 |
| 出芽短梗霉(Aureobasium Pullulans) | AS3.3984 |
| 球毛壳(Chaetoomium globsum) | AS3.4254 |
Table 2 Bacterial type used in experiment
| Name | Bacterial No. |
|---|---|
| 黑曲霉(Aspergillus niger) | AS3.4463 |
| 土曲霉(Aspergillus terreus) | AS3.3935 |
| 宛氏拟青霉(Paecilomyces Varioti) | AS3.4253 |
| 绳状青霉(Penicillium funicolosum) | AS3.3875 |
| 出芽短梗霉(Aureobasium Pullulans) | AS3.3984 |
| 球毛壳(Chaetoomium globsum) | AS3.4254 |
| Ingredient | NaNO3 | KH2PO4 | K2HPO4 | KCl | MgSO4·7H2O | FeSO4·7H2O | Sucrose |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mass/g | 2.00 | 0.70 | 0.30 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.01 | 5.00 |
Table 3 Composition of nutrient salt culture solution
| Ingredient | NaNO3 | KH2PO4 | K2HPO4 | KCl | MgSO4·7H2O | FeSO4·7H2O | Sucrose |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mass/g | 2.00 | 0.70 | 0.30 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.01 | 5.00 |
| Specimen category | Element content/% | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | C | H | S | O | |
| Blank control group | 0 | 0.29 | 1.65 | 16.24 | 36.58 |
| 0.5% FDN specimen before mildew | 0.03 | 0.58 | 1.91 | 10.53 | 36.60 |
| 0.5% FDN specimen after mildew | 0 | 0 | 1.53 | 13.40 | 29.66 |
| 0.5% PCE specimen before mildew | 0.05 | 0.42 | 2.02 | 8.28 | 40.13 |
| 0.5% PCE specimen after mildew | 0 | 0 | 1.57 | 6.92 | 30.14 |
Table 4 EA test analysis results of organic elements in specimens before and after mildew
| Specimen category | Element content/% | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | C | H | S | O | |
| Blank control group | 0 | 0.29 | 1.65 | 16.24 | 36.58 |
| 0.5% FDN specimen before mildew | 0.03 | 0.58 | 1.91 | 10.53 | 36.60 |
| 0.5% FDN specimen after mildew | 0 | 0 | 1.53 | 13.40 | 29.66 |
| 0.5% PCE specimen before mildew | 0.05 | 0.42 | 2.02 | 8.28 | 40.13 |
| 0.5% PCE specimen after mildew | 0 | 0 | 1.57 | 6.92 | 30.14 |
| Specimen category | Element content/% | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ca | S | Si | Fe | K | P | Mg | Al | Sr | Y | |
| Blank control group | 53.948 | 37.995 | 1.582 | 0.608 | 0.575 | 0.956 | 0.315 | 0.231 | 0.187 | 0.010 |
0.5% FDN specimen before mildew | 60.235 | 35.983 | 1.391 | 0.665 | 0.576 | 0.408 | 0.338 | 0.210 | 0.184 | 0.011 |
0.5% FDN specimen after mildew | 61.632 | 35.446 | 1.177 | 0.643 | 0.388 | 0.182 | 0.151 | 0.180 | 0.190 | 0.011 |
0.5% PCE specimen before mildew | 61.154 | 35.919 | 1.074 | 0.692 | 0.378 | 0.309 | 0.155 | 0.124 | 0.185 | 0.010 |
0.5% PCE specimen after mildew | 61.057 | 35.620 | 1.190 | 0.695 | 0.377 | 0.361 | 0.121 | 0.136 | 0.186 | 0.012 |
Table 5 XRF test analysis results of specimens before and after mildew
| Specimen category | Element content/% | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ca | S | Si | Fe | K | P | Mg | Al | Sr | Y | |
| Blank control group | 53.948 | 37.995 | 1.582 | 0.608 | 0.575 | 0.956 | 0.315 | 0.231 | 0.187 | 0.010 |
0.5% FDN specimen before mildew | 60.235 | 35.983 | 1.391 | 0.665 | 0.576 | 0.408 | 0.338 | 0.210 | 0.184 | 0.011 |
0.5% FDN specimen after mildew | 61.632 | 35.446 | 1.177 | 0.643 | 0.388 | 0.182 | 0.151 | 0.180 | 0.190 | 0.011 |
0.5% PCE specimen before mildew | 61.154 | 35.919 | 1.074 | 0.692 | 0.378 | 0.309 | 0.155 | 0.124 | 0.185 | 0.010 |
0.5% PCE specimen after mildew | 61.057 | 35.620 | 1.190 | 0.695 | 0.377 | 0.361 | 0.121 | 0.136 | 0.186 | 0.012 |
| Specimen category | Element content/% | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | C | H | S | O | |
| Blank control group | 0 | 0.29 | 1.65 | 16.24 | 36.58 |
| 1.00% waterproofing agent specimen before mildew | 0.09 | 0.45 | 2.05 | 15.45 | 39.42 |
| 1.00% waterproofing agent specimen after mildew | 0 | 0 | 1.86 | 11.73 | 29.69 |
Table 6 EA test analysis results of organic elements in specimens before and after mildew
| Specimen category | Element content/% | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | C | H | S | O | |
| Blank control group | 0 | 0.29 | 1.65 | 16.24 | 36.58 |
| 1.00% waterproofing agent specimen before mildew | 0.09 | 0.45 | 2.05 | 15.45 | 39.42 |
| 1.00% waterproofing agent specimen after mildew | 0 | 0 | 1.86 | 11.73 | 29.69 |
| Specimen category | Element content/% | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ca | S | Si | Fe | K | P | Mg | Al | Sr | Y | |
| Blank control group | 53.948 | 37.995 | 1.582 | 0.608 | 0.575 | 0.956 | 0.315 | 0.231 | 0.187 | 0.010 |
| 1.00% waterproofing agent specimen before mildew | 58.248 | 35.303 | 2.781 | 0.640 | 0.917 | 0.602 | 0.728 | 0.594 | 0.177 | 0.010 |
| 1.00% waterproofing agent specimen after mildew | 60.302 | 35.396 | 2.486 | 0.652 | 0.268 | 0.301 | 0.093 | 0.308 | 0.183 | 0.010 |
Table 7 XRF test analysis results of specimens before and after mildew
| Specimen category | Element content/% | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ca | S | Si | Fe | K | P | Mg | Al | Sr | Y | |
| Blank control group | 53.948 | 37.995 | 1.582 | 0.608 | 0.575 | 0.956 | 0.315 | 0.231 | 0.187 | 0.010 |
| 1.00% waterproofing agent specimen before mildew | 58.248 | 35.303 | 2.781 | 0.640 | 0.917 | 0.602 | 0.728 | 0.594 | 0.177 | 0.010 |
| 1.00% waterproofing agent specimen after mildew | 60.302 | 35.396 | 2.486 | 0.652 | 0.268 | 0.301 | 0.093 | 0.308 | 0.183 | 0.010 |
| Dosage/% | 0 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH value | 5.40 | 6.02 | 6.33 | 7.43 | 9.52 | 10.52 |
Table 8 pH values of specimens with different pH regulator dosages
| Dosage/% | 0 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH value | 5.40 | 6.02 | 6.33 | 7.43 | 9.52 | 10.52 |
| [1] | 祝国亮. 磷石膏的综合利用及其在环境领域的应用研究进展[J]. 生态产业科学与磷氟工程, 2024, 39(7): 65-70. |
| ZHU G L. Research progress on comprehensive utilization of phosphogypsum and its application in environment field[J]. Eco-industry Science & Phosphorus Fluorine Engineering, 2024, 39(7): 65-70 (in Chinese). | |
| [2] | AIT H S, SRAIDI A, KHALESS K, et al. Two steps leaching process for recovery of rare earths from Moroccan phosphogypsum[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2023, 427: 138976. |
| [3] | 周开雄. 工业湿法磷酸中的渣酸利用研究[D]. 昆明: 昆明理工大学, 2023. |
| ZHOU K X. Research on the utilization of slag acid in industrial wet phosphoric acid[D]. Kunming: Kunming University of Science and Technology, 2023 (in Chinese). | |
| [4] | 陈汉昭, 李德高, 黄迪, 等. 磷石膏综合利用的研究进展[J]. 云南化工, 2024, 51(9): 11-15. |
| CHEN H Z, LI D G, HUANG D, et al. Research progress on comprehensive utilization of phosphogypsum[J]. Yunnan Chemical Technology, 2024, 51(9): 11-15 (in Chinese). | |
| [5] | 张峻, 解维闵, 董雄波, 等. 磷石膏材料化综合利用研究进展[J]. 材料导报, 2023, 37(16): 163-174. |
| ZHANG J, XIE W M, DONG X B, et al. Research progress on comprehensive utilization of phosphogypsum for materials: a review[J]. Materials Reports, 2023, 37(16): 163-174 (in Chinese). | |
| [6] | 武发德, 张羽飞, 陈红霞, 等. 磷石膏在石膏板中的应用研究[J]. 磷肥与复肥, 2018, 33(10): 35-37+40. |
| WU F D, ZHANG Y F, CHEN H X, et al. Research on application of phosphogypsum in plasterboard production[J]. Phosphate & Compound Fertilizer, 2018, 33(10): 35-37+40 (in Chinese). | |
| [7] | 苗春, 李景程, 张德东. 住宅工程墙面壁纸霉变案例分析与预防[J]. 山西建筑, 2021, 47(16): 171-172. |
| MIAO C, LI J C, ZHANG D D. Case analysis and preventive measures for the mildew problem of wallpaper in residential project[J]. Shanxi Architecture, 2021, 47(16): 171-172 (in Chinese). | |
| [8] | SEDLBAUER K. Prediction of mould fungus formation on the surface of and inside building components[D]. Munich: Fraunhofer Institute for Building Physics, 2001. |
| [9] | LIU W S, LI L J, ZHOU X T. Molecular simulation study of the adhesion characteristics of β-phosphogypsum product surface to mold biomolecules[J]. Materials Research Express, 2023, 10(3): 035504. |
| [10] | 杨珖, 薄盛宏, 邓磊, 等. 聚羧酸减水剂对β-半水磷石膏性能的影响[J]. 新型建筑材料, 2023, 50(1): 124-127+153. |
| YANG G, BO S H, DENG L, et al. Effect of polycarboxylate superplasticizer on the properties of β-hemihydrate phosphogypsum[J]. New Building Materials, 2023, 50(1): 124-127+153 (in Chinese). | |
| [11] | GE H S, SUN Z P, LU Z C, et al. Influence and mechanism analysis of different types of water reducing agents on volume shrinkage of cement mortar[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2024, 82: 108204. |
| [12] | 李龙, 李北星, 陈鹏博, 等. 外加剂对磷建筑石膏的改性及其机理研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(7): 2400-2410. |
| LI L, LI B X, CHEN P B, et al. Modification and mechanism of phosphorus building gypsum using admixtures[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2022, 41(7): 2400-2410 (in Chinese). | |
| [13] | 马焕入. 磷建筑石膏在不同pH环境下与减水剂、防水剂适应性研究[D]. 重庆: 西南科技大学, 2024. |
| MA H R. Study on the adaptability of phosphorus building gypsum with water reducer and waterproof agent in different pH environments[D]. Chongqing: Southwest University of Science and Technology, 2024 (in Chinese). | |
| [14] | 刘婉双. β磷石膏水化产物霉变及防霉机制研究[D]. 贵州: 贵州大学, 2023. |
| LIU W S. Research on mildew and anti-mildew mechanism of β phosphogypsum hydration products[D]. Guizhou: Guizhou University, 2023 (in Chinese). | |
| [15] | 方双明. 耐水型抗霉磷石膏墙板的制备及性能研究[D]. 贵州: 贵州大学, 2024. |
| FANG S M. Study on the preparation and properties of water-resistant and mold-resistant phosphogypsum wallboard[D]. Guizhou: Guizhou University, 2024 (in Chinese). |
| [1] | ZONG Wei, LIU Cheng, ZHENG Wuxi, ZHANG Qixin, DONG Xianzheng. Road Performance of Base with Phosphogypsum Replacing Coarse/Fine Aggregates [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(8): 2956-2966. |
| [2] | TANG Pei, ZHU Meiyi, RONG Pengjie, CHEN Wei. Performance Enhancement of Excess-Sulfate Phosphogypsum-Slag Cement Through Electrochemically Activated Red Mud [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(8): 2806-2816. |
| [3] | TANG Pei, LIU Jiaxin, QU Bo, RONG Pengjie, CHEN Wei. Thermally Activated Coal Gangue and Its Application in Phosphogypsum Slag Cement [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(8): 2829-2838. |
| [4] | ZHANG Xuemei, JIN Qingqing, CHANG Shuo, WANG Lu, LI Zhaoqi, ZHANG Xingzhao, LIU Shuhua. Chemical Shrinkage Characteristics of Supersulfated Cement [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(7): 2215-2225. |
| [5] | LIU Xin, LI Mingyang, ZHANG Xihe, LAN Shaoding, GAO Xu. Durability and Microstructure of Phosphogypsum-Slag-Based All-Solid-Waste Cementitious Material Regulated by Red Mud and Recycled Cement Powder [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(7): 2478-2490. |
| [6] | JIN Zihao, ZOU Ziyong, HE Xingyang, SU Ying, CHEN Shuqin. Effect of Wet Grinding Carbonized Steel Slag on Properties and Microstructure of Beta-Hemihydrate Phosphogypsum [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(7): 2347-2356. |
| [7] | REN Jun, YAN Yunxiao, LI Miaoyuan, TIAN Zhenhe, ZHAO Lixing, WANG Dafu. Effect of Microbial-Modified Phosphogypsum on Properties of Supersulfated Cement [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(5): 1671-1681. |
| [8] | CHEN Zihan, GUO Yudong, LYU Qinfei, LIANG Yongning, JI Tao. Effect of Alkali Equivalent on Properties of Phosphogypsum- Alkali-Activated Slag Foam Concrete [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(4): 1315-1323. |
| [9] | HE Zhaoyi, ZOU Meng, YAO Qiwen, CAO Dongwei, QIN Meng. Performance and Strength Formation Mechanism of High Dosage Phosphogypsum-Cement-Curing Agent Stabilized Crushed Stone Base Layer Material [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(1): 346-358. |
| [10] | LI Yisheng, LYU Wei, WU Chiqiu, YU Zhengkang, HE Jing, SHUI Zhonghe. Hardened Body Preparation and Performance Adjustment of High Content Phosphogypsum Cementitious Materials [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2025, 44(8): 2944-2954. |
| [11] | HU Jianlin, LI Zhilin, ZHOU Yongxiang, LENG Faguang, DU Xiuli. Mechanical Properties of Quicklime-Activated Ground Blast Furnace Slag-Fly Ash Geopolymer-Stabilized Soil [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2025, 44(8): 2912-2923. |
| [12] | DENG Xinghui, XU Guihong, BAO Lixin, XU Weihong, CHEN Ziwei, YANG Bulei. Mechanical Properties and Pores Three-Parameter Distribution of Phosphogypsum-Based Extruded Special-Shaped Brick (PG-ESB) [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2025, 44(6): 2240-2249. |
| [13] | WANG Jiaming, LI Jing, YANG Shuguang, LI Yaohuan, GU Kai, YUAN Bowen, LIU Dongsheng, GUO Qilong. Effect of Residual Flocculant PAM in Sand on Fluidity of Cement Mortar and Its Degradation Method [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2025, 44(6): 2026-2035. |
| [14] | SU Ying, GONG Wei, LIU Chuanbei, ZHANG Jun. Mix Ratio Design and Mechanical Properties of Phosphogypsum Lightweight Aggregate Concrete Based on Machine Learning [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2025, 44(5): 1656-1665. |
| [15] | REN Jun, YU Yongkun, MAO Wenting, ZHANG Yu, WANG Dafu. Performance of Mortar Based on Phosphogypsum-Based Fine Lightweight Aggregate [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2025, 44(4): 1420-1427. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||