硅酸盐通报 ›› 2026, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (4): 1266-1281.DOI: 10.16552/j.cnki.issn1001-1625.2025.0941
邹仁华1(
), 胡小龙1(
), 冯泽平2, 牛高辉1, 邱继生1
收稿日期:2025-09-22
修订日期:2025-12-23
出版日期:2026-04-20
发布日期:2026-05-14
通信作者:
胡小龙,硕士研究生。E-mail:834872042@qq.com作者简介:邹仁华(1970—),男,副教授。主要从事高层建筑结构设计与化、建筑结构抗震与加固方面的研究。E-mail:zourenh@163.com
基金资助:
ZOU Renhua1(
), HU Xiaolong1(
), FENG Zeping2, NIU Gaohui1, QIU Jisheng1
Received:2025-09-22
Revised:2025-12-23
Published:2026-04-20
Online:2026-05-14
摘要:
本研究以煤矸石机制砂与风积砂按质量比6∶4全部替代河砂,并以不同质量分数(0%、20%、40%、60%、80%、100%)煤矸石粗骨料替代天然粗骨料制备煤矸石混合砂混凝土(CGMSG)。通过测定CGMSG的基本力学性能及吸水率,并结合X射线衍射仪和核磁共振技术分析其水化机理和微观孔隙结构。结果表明:CGMSG的抗压强度和劈裂抗拉强度随水胶比和煤矸石粗骨料掺量的增加而降低,吸水率则随二者增加而升高,基于抗压强度构建的GM(1,1)灰色预测模型能较好地反映其强度发展规律;当煤矸石粗骨料的掺量为40%~60%时,煤矸石活性与水泥水化作用能最大程度发挥。不同水胶比和煤矸石粗骨料掺量下,CGMSG的孔隙度和平均孔径均呈增长趋势,宏孔孔隙率与抗压强度相关性最高,总孔隙体积与抗压强度关联性最低。
中图分类号:
邹仁华, 胡小龙, 冯泽平, 牛高辉, 邱继生. 煤矸石混合砂混凝土宏观力学性能及微观机理研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(4): 1266-1281.
ZOU Renhua, HU Xiaolong, FENG Zeping, NIU Gaohui, QIU Jisheng. Macro-Mechanical Properties and Microscopic-Mechanism of Coal Gangue Mixed Sand Concrete[J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(4): 1266-1281.
| Fineness/% | Initial settingtime/min | Final settin | Specific surfacearea/(m2·kg-1) | Flexural strength/MPa | Compressive strength/MPa | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 d | 28 d | 3 d | 28 d | ||||
| 3.65 | 168 | 255 | 369 | 3.1 | 7.8 | 21.5 | 47.6 |
表1 水泥物理性能指标
Table 1 Pyhsical properties of cement
| Fineness/% | Initial settingtime/min | Final settin | Specific surfacearea/(m2·kg-1) | Flexural strength/MPa | Compressive strength/MPa | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 d | 28 d | 3 d | 28 d | ||||
| 3.65 | 168 | 255 | 369 | 3.1 | 7.8 | 21.5 | 47.6 |
| Chemical composition | SiO2 | Al2O3 | Fe2O3 | CaO | MgO | TiO2 | K2O | LOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mass fraction/% | 18.3 | 4.3 | 2.9 | 64.4 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 1.4 | 2.0 |
表2 水泥的主要化学成分
Table 2 Main chemical composition of cement
| Chemical composition | SiO2 | Al2O3 | Fe2O3 | CaO | MgO | TiO2 | K2O | LOI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mass fraction/% | 18.3 | 4.3 | 2.9 | 64.4 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 1.4 | 2.0 |
| Type | Fineness modulus | Apparent density/ (kg·m-3) | Bulk density/ (kg·m-3) | Water mass fraction/% | Mud mass fraction/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aeolian sand | 1.09 | 2 598 | 1 552 | 1.8 | 4 |
| Gangue sand | 3.88 | 2 351 | 1 418 | 2.2 | 2 |
表3 细集料物理性能指标
Table 3 Fine aggregates physical performance index
| Type | Fineness modulus | Apparent density/ (kg·m-3) | Bulk density/ (kg·m-3) | Water mass fraction/% | Mud mass fraction/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aeolian sand | 1.09 | 2 598 | 1 552 | 1.8 | 4 |
| Gangue sand | 3.88 | 2 351 | 1 418 | 2.2 | 2 |
| Material | Mass fraction/% | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Al2O3 | SiO2 | Fe2O3 | CaO | MgO | Other | |
| Aeolian sand | 7.56 | 82.15 | 4.95 | 3.22 | 0.56 | 1.56 |
| Gangue sand | 36.25 | 48.23 | 6.58 | 6.02 | 0.88 | 2.04 |
表4 矸石砂和风积砂化学成分
Table 4 Chemical composition of gangue sand and aeolian sand
| Material | Mass fraction/% | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Al2O3 | SiO2 | Fe2O3 | CaO | MgO | Other | |
| Aeolian sand | 7.56 | 82.15 | 4.95 | 3.22 | 0.56 | 1.56 |
| Gangue sand | 36.25 | 48.23 | 6.58 | 6.02 | 0.88 | 2.04 |
| Type | Apparent density/ (kg·m-3) | Water absorption/% | Mud mass fraction/% | Crush indicator/% | Needle-like granules/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natural crushed stone | 2 870 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 5.8 | 5 |
| Coal gangue | 2 556 | 5.6 | 3.4 | 23.5 | 9 |
表5 粗集料物理性能指标
Table 5 Coarse aggregates physical performance index
| Type | Apparent density/ (kg·m-3) | Water absorption/% | Mud mass fraction/% | Crush indicator/% | Needle-like granules/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natural crushed stone | 2 870 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 5.8 | 5 |
| Coal gangue | 2 556 | 5.6 | 3.4 | 23.5 | 9 |
| Sample | Mix proportion/(kg·m-3) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Water-binderratio | Water | Cement | Mixed sand | Macadam | Coal gangue | Water reducer | Air-entraining agent | |
| S35C0 | 0.35 | 170 | 485.7 | 627.9 | 1 116.3 | 0 | 3.89 | 0.97 |
| S45C0 | 0.45 | 170 | 377.8 | 666.8 | 1 185.4 | 0 | 3.02 | 0.76 |
| S45C20 | 0.45 | 170 | 377.8 | 666.8 | 948.3 | 211.1 | 3.02 | 0.76 |
| S45C40 | 0.45 | 170 | 377.8 | 666.8 | 711.3 | 422.3 | 3.02 | 0.76 |
| S45C60 | 0.45 | 170 | 377.8 | 666.8 | 474.2 | 633.4 | 3.02 | 0.76 |
| S45C80 | 0.45 | 170 | 377.8 | 666.8 | 237.1 | 844.6 | 3.02 | 0.76 |
| S45C100 | 0.45 | 170 | 377.8 | 666.8 | 0 | 1 055.7 | 3.02 | 0.76 |
| S55C0 | 0.55 | 170 | 309.1 | 691.5 | 1 229.4 | 0 | 2.47 | 0.62 |
表6 CGMSG配合比
Table 6 Mix proportion of CGMSG
| Sample | Mix proportion/(kg·m-3) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Water-binderratio | Water | Cement | Mixed sand | Macadam | Coal gangue | Water reducer | Air-entraining agent | |
| S35C0 | 0.35 | 170 | 485.7 | 627.9 | 1 116.3 | 0 | 3.89 | 0.97 |
| S45C0 | 0.45 | 170 | 377.8 | 666.8 | 1 185.4 | 0 | 3.02 | 0.76 |
| S45C20 | 0.45 | 170 | 377.8 | 666.8 | 948.3 | 211.1 | 3.02 | 0.76 |
| S45C40 | 0.45 | 170 | 377.8 | 666.8 | 711.3 | 422.3 | 3.02 | 0.76 |
| S45C60 | 0.45 | 170 | 377.8 | 666.8 | 474.2 | 633.4 | 3.02 | 0.76 |
| S45C80 | 0.45 | 170 | 377.8 | 666.8 | 237.1 | 844.6 | 3.02 | 0.76 |
| S45C100 | 0.45 | 170 | 377.8 | 666.8 | 0 | 1 055.7 | 3.02 | 0.76 |
| S55C0 | 0.55 | 170 | 309.1 | 691.5 | 1 229.4 | 0 | 2.47 | 0.62 |
| Sample | X(1) | X(0)’ | X(0) | Absolute error | Relative error/% | Correlation coefficient ξ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S45C0 | 40.83 | 40.83 | 40.83 | 0 | 0 | 1.00 |
| S45C20 | 77.92 | 37.09 | 37.54 | -0.45 | -1.20 | 0.35 |
| S45C40 | 110.90 | 32.98 | 32.63 | 0.35 | 1.07 | 0.41 |
| S45C60 | 140.22 | 29.33 | 29.03 | 0.30 | 1.02 | 0.45 |
| S45C80 | 166.30 | 26.08 | 25.93 | 0.15 | 0.57 | 0.62 |
| S45C100 | 189.49 | 23.19 | 23.68 | -0.49 | -2.07 | 0.33 |
表7 灰色预测模型的残差检验
Table 7 Residual test of gray predictive model
| Sample | X(1) | X(0)’ | X(0) | Absolute error | Relative error/% | Correlation coefficient ξ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S45C0 | 40.83 | 40.83 | 40.83 | 0 | 0 | 1.00 |
| S45C20 | 77.92 | 37.09 | 37.54 | -0.45 | -1.20 | 0.35 |
| S45C40 | 110.90 | 32.98 | 32.63 | 0.35 | 1.07 | 0.41 |
| S45C60 | 140.22 | 29.33 | 29.03 | 0.30 | 1.02 | 0.45 |
| S45C80 | 166.30 | 26.08 | 25.93 | 0.15 | 0.57 | 0.62 |
| S45C100 | 189.49 | 23.19 | 23.68 | -0.49 | -2.07 | 0.33 |
| Index | Model accuracy | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outstanding | Good | Pass | Fail | |
| P | >0.95 | >0.80 | >0.70 | ≤0.70 |
| C | <0.35 | <0.50 | <0.65 | ≥0.65 |
表8 灰色预测模型精度判断
Table 8 Accuracy judgment of gray prediction model
| Index | Model accuracy | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outstanding | Good | Pass | Fail | |
| P | >0.95 | >0.80 | >0.70 | ≤0.70 |
| C | <0.35 | <0.50 | <0.65 | ≥0.65 |
| Sample | Porosity/% | Average poresize/μm | Partial porosity/% | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cementitiouspore | Transitionhole | Pore | Macro hole | |||
| S35C0 | 2.72 | 0.014 | 2.41 | 0.90 | 1.02 | 0.93 |
| S45C0 | 3.49 | 0.021 | 3.09 | 0.91 | 1.03 | 0.99 |
| S55C0 | 4.68 | 0.030 | 4.14 | 0.99 | 1.01 | 1.07 |
表9 不同水胶比CGMSG孔结构参数
Table 9 CGMSG pore structure parameters with different water-binder ratios
| Sample | Porosity/% | Average poresize/μm | Partial porosity/% | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cementitiouspore | Transitionhole | Pore | Macro hole | |||
| S35C0 | 2.72 | 0.014 | 2.41 | 0.90 | 1.02 | 0.93 |
| S45C0 | 3.49 | 0.021 | 3.09 | 0.91 | 1.03 | 0.99 |
| S55C0 | 4.68 | 0.030 | 4.14 | 0.99 | 1.01 | 1.07 |
| Sample | Porosity/% | Average poresize/μm | Partial porosity/% | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cementitiouspore | Transitionhole | Pore | Macro hole | |||
| S45C0 | 3.49 | 0.021 | 3.09 | 0.91 | 1.03 | 0.99 |
| S45C20 | 4.30 | 0.029 | 3.96 | 0.93 | 1.01 | 0.95 |
| S45C40 | 4.81 | 0.033 | 4.42 | 0.99 | 0.96 | 0.98 |
| S45C60 | 4.91 | 0.034 | 4.41 | 1.02 | 1.04 | 0.98 |
| S45C80 | 6.86 | 0.053 | 6.37 | 0.96 | 1.04 | 1.03 |
| S45C100 | 6.94 | 0.053 | 6.41 | 1.00 | 1.05 | 1.01 |
表10 不同煤矸石粗骨料掺量CGMSG孔结构参数
Table 10 CGMSG pore structure parameters with different coal gangue coarse aggregate content
| Sample | Porosity/% | Average poresize/μm | Partial porosity/% | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cementitiouspore | Transitionhole | Pore | Macro hole | |||
| S45C0 | 3.49 | 0.021 | 3.09 | 0.91 | 1.03 | 0.99 |
| S45C20 | 4.30 | 0.029 | 3.96 | 0.93 | 1.01 | 0.95 |
| S45C40 | 4.81 | 0.033 | 4.42 | 0.99 | 0.96 | 0.98 |
| S45C60 | 4.91 | 0.034 | 4.41 | 1.02 | 1.04 | 0.98 |
| S45C80 | 6.86 | 0.053 | 6.37 | 0.96 | 1.04 | 1.03 |
| S45C100 | 6.94 | 0.053 | 6.41 | 1.00 | 1.05 | 1.01 |
| Evaluation item | m | X0 | X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | X6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 1.299 | 0.605 | 0.669 | 0.648 | 0.940 | 1.009 | 1.003 |
| 20 | 2 | 1.162 | 0.791 | 0.824 | 0.828 | 0.961 | 0.987 | 0.957 |
| 40 | 3 | 1.038 | 0.907 | 0.922 | 0.926 | 1.020 | 0.942 | 0.988 |
| 60 | 4 | 0.923 | 0.930 | 0.941 | 0.922 | 1.054 | 1.020 | 0.990 |
| 80 | 5 | 0.825 | 1.374 | 1.315 | 1.333 | 0.993 | 1.013 | 1.040 |
| 100 | 6 | 0.753 | 1.393 | 1.330 | 1.343 | 1.032 | 1.029 | 1.022 |
表11 CGMSG抗压强度评价指标汇总
Table 11 Summary of CGMSG compressive strength evaluation indexes
| Evaluation item | m | X0 | X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | X6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 1.299 | 0.605 | 0.669 | 0.648 | 0.940 | 1.009 | 1.003 |
| 20 | 2 | 1.162 | 0.791 | 0.824 | 0.828 | 0.961 | 0.987 | 0.957 |
| 40 | 3 | 1.038 | 0.907 | 0.922 | 0.926 | 1.020 | 0.942 | 0.988 |
| 60 | 4 | 0.923 | 0.930 | 0.941 | 0.922 | 1.054 | 1.020 | 0.990 |
| 80 | 5 | 0.825 | 1.374 | 1.315 | 1.333 | 0.993 | 1.013 | 1.040 |
| 100 | 6 | 0.753 | 1.393 | 1.330 | 1.343 | 1.032 | 1.029 | 1.022 |
| Evaluation items | X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | X6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.334 | 0.356 | 0.349 | 0.493 | 0.546 | 0.542 |
| 20 | 0.484 | 0.508 | 0.511 | 0.635 | 0.666 | 0.630 |
| 40 | 0.728 | 0.751 | 0.758 | 0.954 | 0.785 | 0.876 |
| 60 | 0.984 | 0.955 | 1.000 | 0.728 | 0.784 | 0.841 |
| 80 | 0.388 | 0.416 | 0.407 | 0.675 | 0.650 | 0.619 |
| 100 | 0.353 | 0.377 | 0.372 | 0.556 | 0.558 | 0.565 |
| si | 0.545 | 0.560 | 0.566 | 0.673 | 0.665 | 0.679 |
| Sort | 6 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 1 |
表12 各评价指标关联度
Table 12 Correlation degree of each evaluation index
| Evaluation items | X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | X6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.334 | 0.356 | 0.349 | 0.493 | 0.546 | 0.542 |
| 20 | 0.484 | 0.508 | 0.511 | 0.635 | 0.666 | 0.630 |
| 40 | 0.728 | 0.751 | 0.758 | 0.954 | 0.785 | 0.876 |
| 60 | 0.984 | 0.955 | 1.000 | 0.728 | 0.784 | 0.841 |
| 80 | 0.388 | 0.416 | 0.407 | 0.675 | 0.650 | 0.619 |
| 100 | 0.353 | 0.377 | 0.372 | 0.556 | 0.558 | 0.565 |
| si | 0.545 | 0.560 | 0.566 | 0.673 | 0.665 | 0.679 |
| Sort | 6 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 1 |
| [1] | 甄强, 郑锋. 煤的伴生资源煤矸石的综合利用[J]. 自然杂志, 2015, 37(2): 121-128. |
| ZHEN Q, ZHENG F. Comprehensive utilization of coal gangue as an associated resource with coal[J]. Chinese Journal of Nature, 2015, 37(2): 121-128 (in Chinese). | |
| [2] | 贾敏. 煤矸石综合利用研究进展[J]. 矿产保护与利用, 2019, 39(4): 46-52. |
| JIA M. The current situation research on comprehensive utilization of coal gangue[J]. Conservation and Utilization of Mineral Resources, 2019, 39(4): 46-52 (in Chinese). | |
| [3] | 国家统计局.中华人民共和国2022年国民经济和社会发展统计公报[J]. 中国统计, 2023(3): 12-29. |
| National Bureau of Statistics of the People's Republic of China. Statistical communique on national economic and social development of the people’s republic of China in 2022[J]. China Statistics, 2023(3):12-29 (in Chinese) | |
| [4] | 张锂, 韩国才, 陈慧, 等. 黄土高原煤矿区煤矸石中重金属对土壤污染的研究[J]. 煤炭学报, 2008, 33(10): 1141-1146. |
| ZHANG L, HAN G C, CHEN H, et al. Study on heavy metal contaminants in soil come from coal mining spoil in the Loess Plateau[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2008, 33(10): 1141-1146 (in Chinese). | |
| [5] | 梁冰, 薛强, 刘晓丽. 煤矸石中硫酸盐对地下水污染的环境预测[J]. 煤炭学报, 2003, 28(5): 527-530. |
| LIANG B, XUE Q, LIU X L. Environmental prediction on coal mine spoil of sulphateck for groundwater pollution[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2003, 28(5): 527-530 (in Chinese). | |
| [6] | 牟献友, 谷攀. 国内风积沙工程特性研究综述[J]. 内蒙古农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 31(1): 307-310. |
| MOU X Y, GU P. Review on engineering characteristics of wind-blown sand[J]. Journal of Inner Mongolia Agricultural University (Natural Science Edition), 2010, 31(1): 307-310 (in Chinese). | |
| [7] | LIU X Y, LIU R D, LYU K, et al. A quantitative evaluation of size and shape characteristics for desert sand particles[J]. Minerals, 2022, 12(5): 581. |
| [8] | LUO F J, HE L, PAN Z, et al. Effect of very fine particles on workability and strength of concrete made with dune sand[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2013, 47: 131-137. |
| [9] | YU L L, XIA J W, XIA Z, et al. Study on the mechanical behavior and micro-mechanism of concrete with coal gangue fine and coarse aggregate[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2022, 338: 127626. |
| [10] | GAO S, ZHANG S M, GUO L H. Application of coal gangue as a coarse aggregate in green concrete production: a review[J]. Materials, 2021, 14(22): 6803. |
| [11] | 李瑜. 煤矸石制砂的优势[J]. 砖瓦, 2020(1): 72. |
| LI Y. Advantages of making sand from coal gangue[J]. Brick-Tile, 2020(1): 72 (in Chinese). | |
| [12] | 邓焙元, 刘清, 韩风霞, 等. 风积砂混凝土力学性能研究综述[J]. 混凝土, 2021(6): 47-52. |
| DENG B Y, LIU Q, HAN F X, et al. Review of research on mechanics and durability of aeolian sand concrete[J]. Concrete, 2021(6): 47-52 (in Chinese). | |
| [13] | 刘旭军, 魏平平, 李睿妮, 等. 风积砂混凝土强度及耐久性试验研究[J]. 工程与建设, 2023, 37(5): 1585-1587+1599. |
| LIU X J, WEI P P, LI R N, et al. Experimental study on strength and durability of aeolian sand concrete[J]. Engineering and Construction, 2023, 37(5): 1585-1587+1599 (in Chinese). | |
| [14] | ZHU L L, ZHENG M L, ZHANG W, et al. Multicomponent cementitious materials optimization, characteristics investigation and reinforcement mechanism analysis of high-performance concrete with full aeolian sand[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2024, 84: 108562. |
| [15] | ZHANG M H, ZHU X Z, SHI J Y, et al. Utilization of desert sand in the production of sustainable cement-based materials: a critical review[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2022, 327: 127014. |
| [16] | LAKUSIC S. Influence of pore structure characteristics on the strength of aeolian sand concrete[J]. Journal of the Croatian Association of Civil Engineers, 2024, 76(1): 35-45. |
| [17] | QIU J S, ZHOU Y X, GUAN X, et al. The influence of fly ash content on ITZ microstructure of coal gangue concrete[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 298: 123562. |
| [18] | QIU J S, ZHU M Y, ZHOU Y X, et al. Effect and mechanism of coal gangue concrete modification by fly ash[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 294: 123563. |
| [19] | GUAN X, CHEN J X, QIU J S, et al. Damage evaluation method based on ultrasound technique for gangue concrete under freezing-thawing cycles[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 246: 118437. |
| [20] | GUAN X, QIU J S, SONG H T, et al. Stress-strain behaviour and acoustic emission characteristic of gangue concrete under axial compression in frost environment[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2019, 220: 476-488. |
| [21] | QIAN S L. A review study on performance improvement of coal gangue as coarse aggregate in concrete[J]. Journal of Engineering Research and Reports, 2023, 25(11): 142-148. |
| [22] | 周梅, 白金婷, 薛忠泉. 自燃煤矸石全集料混凝土强度研究[J]. 建筑结构, 2011, 41(增刊2): 200-202. |
| ZHOU M, BAI J T, XUE Z Q. Study on strength of self-igniting gangue aggregate concrete[J]. Building Structure, 2011, 41(supplement 2): 200-202 (in Chinese). | |
| [23] | 刘德清, 王建华, 李玉坤. 煤矸石混凝土劈裂抗拉强度的试验研究[J]. 房材与应用, 1997, 25(1): 38-46. |
| LIU D Q, WANG J H, LI Y K. Experimental study on splitting tensile strength of coal gangue concrete[J]. Housing Materials & Applications, 1997, 25(1): 38-46 (in Chinese). | |
| [24] | 王发洲. 高性能轻集料混凝土研究与应用[D]. 武汉: 武汉理工大学, 2003. |
| WANG F Z. Research and application of high performance lightweight aggregate concrete[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University of Technology, 2003 (in Chinese). | |
| [25] | 段晓牧, 夏军武, 杨建平. 煤矸石细集料对水泥浆体微观结构的影响及其作用机理[J]. 建筑材料学报, 2014, 17(4): 700-705. |
| DUAN X M, XIA J W, YANG J P. Influence of coal gangue fine aggregate on microstructure of cement mortar and its action mechanism[J]. Journal of Building Materials, 2014, 17(4): 700-705 (in Chinese). | |
| [26] | 吴中伟. 混凝土科学技术近期发展方向的探讨[J]. 硅酸盐学报, 1979, 7(3): 262-270. |
| WU Z W. An approach to the recent trends of concrete science and technology[J]. Journal of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 1979, 7(3): 262-270 (in Chinese). |
| [1] | 魏舒鹏, 崔晨晨, 王德辉, 罗正东, 罗进, 王亚军, 陈英豪. 混凝土裂缝用地聚物注浆修复材料的性能优化及应用研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(4): 1220-1230. |
| [2] | 王海皓, 甘元初, 侯庆振, 陈振富, 金丹, 付新博. 疏水改性煅烧硅藻土砂浆的制备及性能[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(4): 1122-1131. |
| [3] | 杨雪滢, 王开元, 王耀城, 占宝剑, 邢锋. 自然风化作用下碳化养护水泥基材料的力学性能劣化机制[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(4): 1132-1141. |
| [4] | 李顺凯, 陈荣辉, 董勋, 窦华康, 孙凤品. 促凝早强剂对喷射混凝土性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(4): 1184-1192. |
| [5] | 林明智, 陈旸, 陈波. 浅水海砂骨料矿物特征及物理力学性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(4): 1240-1247. |
| [6] | 郭阳光, 秦拥军, 罗玲, 谌君诚, 李琦, 程昊. 硅灰-玻璃纤维全再生粗骨料混凝土力学性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(4): 1296-1303. |
| [7] | 谌君诚, 罗玲, 秦拥军, 郭阳光, 李琦, 程昊. 硅灰-聚甲醛纤维再生水工混凝土力学和耐水性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(4): 1304-1314. |
| [8] | 贾旭赫, 赵仁龙, 张继红, 谢俊. Al2O3/SiO2对Li2O-Al2O3-SiO2-MgO微晶玻璃析晶行为及力学性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(3): 845-852. |
| [9] | 陈宇, 邱思远, 陈旭升, 张亚梅. 面向海工建设的海水海砂工程水泥基复合材料研究进展[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(2): 367-379. |
| [10] | 许凯钦, 廖宜顺, 张普, 张冬, 齐冬有. -10 ℃条件下硝酸钙对铁铝酸盐水泥性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(2): 380-389. |
| [11] | 孔昕, 吴佳明, 宋本腾, 王振兴, 叶正茂. 陶砂轻质砂浆的组分配合比优化及性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(2): 413-425. |
| [12] | 舒畅, 陈振中, 王伟, 梅友静, 王宁宁, 张亚梅. 流态固化土的固化机理及性能调控研究综述[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(2): 503-516. |
| [13] | 王熠江, 李梓俊, 何智海, 陆俊. 微波养护对香灰-水泥复合胶凝材料强度及微观结构的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(2): 540-548. |
| [14] | 张小龙, 孙为国, 王伟, 王朝晖, 晏茂豪, 刘红强, 杨军宏. 基于响应面法的全固废胶凝材料配合比优化设计及性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(2): 549-561. |
| [15] | 芮振华, 吕翔宇, 郭灿, 黄山, 牛冬瑜. 钼尾矿砂取代量对机制砂水泥砂浆力学性能及微观结构的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(2): 573-581. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||