硅酸盐通报 ›› 2026, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (6): 2203-2214.DOI: 10.16552/j.cnki.issn1001-1625.2025.1109
• 道路材料 • 上一篇
收稿日期:2025-11-12
修订日期:2026-01-03
出版日期:2026-06-15
发布日期:2026-07-14
通信作者:
张 航,硕士研究生。E-mail:zhanghang121316@163.com作者简介:倪 静(1983—),女,博士,副教授。主要从事软土地基加固方面的研究。E-mail:wendy_1943@163.com
基金资助:
NI Jing(
), ZHANG Hang(
), ZHU Lili
Received:2025-11-12
Revised:2026-01-03
Published:2026-06-15
Online:2026-07-14
摘要:
黄土强度低且水敏性高,给黄土地区土木工程带来了严峻挑战。为应对传统水泥/石灰固化剂存在的高碳排与生态破坏等问题,本文采用环境友好型生物聚合物黄原胶与椰壳纤维联合固化黄土,通过三轴剪切试验、崩解试验及SEM微观测试等手段,分析了不同生物质材料配比对固化黄土的应力-应变关系、抗剪强度参数与崩解特性的影响,并阐述了协同固化机理。三轴试验表明,黄原胶与椰壳纤维可显著提升土体抗剪强度,且改良效果与掺量呈正相关。其中,黄原胶对黏聚力的增强作用优于对内摩擦角的影响,而椰壳纤维的作用则相反。崩解试验表明,随着黄原胶与椰壳纤维掺量的增加,崩解率逐渐降低、崩解过程明显延缓,且黄原胶起主导作用。SEM试验表明,黄原胶通过胶结土颗粒、填充孔隙与形成阻水凝胶膜,发挥胶结与阻塞作用;椰壳纤维则通过嵌入土体形成三维网络,促进应力传递并抑制裂缝扩展;二者协同作用下,黄原胶可促进土颗粒与纤维间的黏结,形成“黄原胶-纤维-黏土”复合基质,增强界面约束与增韧效果,从而提升土体的抗剪强度与水稳定性。本研究为黄土地区推广应用生态友好型固土技术提供了重要的数据与理论支撑。
中图分类号:
倪静, 张航, 朱莉莉. 生物聚合物协同纤维固化黄土的三轴压缩与崩解特性研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(6): 2203-2214.
NI Jing, ZHANG Hang, ZHU Lili. Triaxial Compression and Disintegration Characteristics of Loess Stabilized by Biopolymer-Fiber Composites[J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(6): 2203-2214.
| Material | Liquid limit wL/% | Plastic limit wp/% | Plasticity index Ip/% | Optimum moisture content wopt/% | Maximum dry density ρd,max/(g·cm-3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loess | 24.5 | 16.4 | 8.1 | 17.5 | 1.76 |
表1 黄土的基本物理性质
Table 1 Basic physical properties of loess
| Material | Liquid limit wL/% | Plastic limit wp/% | Plasticity index Ip/% | Optimum moisture content wopt/% | Maximum dry density ρd,max/(g·cm-3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loess | 24.5 | 16.4 | 8.1 | 17.5 | 1.76 |
| Material | Diameter/μm | Density/(g·cm-3) | Tensile strength/MPa | Elastic modulus/GPa | Elongation at break/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coconut shell fiber | 100~450 | 1.12 | 131~175 | 2.5~6.0 | 15~40 |
表2 椰壳纤维的基本物理力学性质
Table 2 Basic physical and mechanical properties of coconut shell fiber
| Material | Diameter/μm | Density/(g·cm-3) | Tensile strength/MPa | Elastic modulus/GPa | Elongation at break/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coconut shell fiber | 100~450 | 1.12 | 131~175 | 2.5~6.0 | 15~40 |
| [1] | 张豫川, 张森安, 刘辰麟, 等. 黄土的改良及工程性质[M]. 北京: 中国建材工业出版社, 2023: 32. |
| ZHANG Y C, ZHANG S A, LIU C L, et al. Improvement and engineering properties of loess[M]. Beijing: China Building Materials Industry Press, 2023: 32 (in Chinese). | |
| [2] |
GU K, CHEN B. Loess stabilization using cement, waste phosphogypsum, fly ash and quicklime for self-compacting rammed earth construction[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 231: 117195.
DOI URL |
| [3] | 蒋应军, 王翰越, 乔怀玉, 等. 水、干湿及冻融循环作用下水泥改良黄土路基稳定性[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2020, 20(35): 14592-14599. |
| JIANG Y J, WANG H Y, QIAO H Y, et al. Stability of cement-modified loess subgrade under water, wet-dry and freezing-thawing cycles[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2020, 20(35): 14592-14599 (in Chinese). | |
| [4] |
PHOAK S, LUO Y S, LI S N, et al. Influence of submergence on stabilization of loess in Shaanxi Province by adding fly ash[J]. Applied Sciences, 2019, 9(1): 68.
DOI URL |
| [5] |
JHA A K, SIVAPULLAIAH P V. Mechanism of improvement in the strength and volume change behavior of lime stabilized soil[J]. Engineering Geology, 2015, 198: 53-64.
DOI URL |
| [6] | MOLABASI H, KHARAZMI P, KHAJEH A, et al. Low plasticity clay stabilized with cement and zeolite: an experimental and environmental impact study[J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2022, 184: 106408. |
| [7] | GRAVINA DA ROCHA C, BITTAR MARIN E J, QUINONEZ SAMANIEGO R A, et al. Decision-making model for soil stabilization: minimizing cost and environmental impacts[J]. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2020, 33(2): 04020035. |
| [8] |
WENG Z Y, YU J, DENG Y F, et al. Mechanical behavior and strengthening mechanism of red clay solidified by xanthan gum biopolymer[J]. Journal of Central South University, 2023, 30(6): 1948-1963.
DOI |
| [9] |
CHEN C H, WU L, PERDJON M, et al. The drying effect on xanthan gum biopolymer treated sandy soil shear strength[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2019, 197: 271-279.
DOI URL |
| [10] |
JOGA J R, VARAPRASAD B J S. Sustainable improvement of expansive clays using xanthan gum as a biopolymer[J]. Civil Engineering Journal, 2019, 5(9): 1893-1903.
DOI URL |
| [11] |
XU X, LI J L, WANG Q, et al. Investigation into the mechanical properties and microscopic mechanisms of dispersive saline soil improved by environmentally friendly biopolymers[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2025, 13(1): 115222.
DOI URL |
| [12] |
JIANG T, ZHAO J D, ZHANG J R. Splitting tensile strength and microstructure of xanthan gum-treated loess[J]. Scientific Reports, 2022, 12(1): 9921.
DOI PMID |
| [13] |
JIA Z L, YAN C G, LI B, et al. Performance test and effect evaluation of guar gum-stabilized loess as a sustainable slope protection material[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2023, 408: 137085.
DOI URL |
| [14] |
LIU Y F, TANG C X, WEN J X, et al. Mechanical characterization and water stability of loess improved by bio-based materials: an eco-friendly approach[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2024, 921: 171111.
DOI URL |
| [15] |
RONG X W, DENG S, LIANG B Z, et al. Mechanical behavior and strengthening mechanism of loess stabilized with xanthan gum and guar gum biopolymers[J]. Materials Research Express, 2024, 11(10): 105305.
DOI |
| [16] |
PU S Y, HOU Y Q, MA J, et al. Stabilization behavior and performance of loess using a novel biomass-based polymeric soil stabilizer[J]. Environmental and Engineering Geoscience, 2019, 25(2): 103-114.
DOI URL |
| [17] |
NI J, ZHAO R J, CHEN J Q, et al. Mechanical and hydraulic characteristics of unvegetated or vegetated loess soils amended with xanthan gum[J]. Transportation Geotechnics, 2024, 48: 101350.
DOI URL |
| [18] |
CONSOLI N C, CASAGRANDE M D, COOP M R. Effect of fiber reinforcement on the isotropic compression behavior of a sand[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2005, 131(11): 1434-1436.
DOI URL |
| [19] |
WANG D X, WANG H W, LARSSON S, et al. Effect of basalt fiber inclusion on the mechanical properties and microstructure of cement-solidified kaolinite[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 241: 118085.
DOI URL |
| [20] |
DE MENEZES L C P, DE SOUSA D B, SUKAR S F, et al. Analysis of the physical-mechanical behavior of clayey sand soil improved with coir fiber[J]. Soils and Rocks, 2019, 42(1): 31-42.
DOI URL |
| [21] |
KAR R, PRADHAN P. Strength and compressibility characteristics of randomly distributed fiber-reinforced soil[J]. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 5(2): 235-243.
DOI URL |
| [22] | 秦文帅, 李光范, 胡 伟, 等. 椰壳纤维土的三轴试验研究[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2017, 17(10): 272-276. |
| QIN W S, LI G F, HU W, et al. Study on coir fibre-reinforced soil by triaxial test[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2017, 17(10): 272-276 (in Chinese). | |
| [23] | 李良勇, 马炜迪, 曹宝珠. 以天然椰壳纤维加固的红黏土的力学性质研究[J]. 海南大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 38(3): 304-308. |
| LI L Y, MA W D, CAO B Z. Mechanical properties of red clay reinforced with natural coir fiber[J]. Natural Science Journal of Hainan University, 2020, 38(3): 304-308 (in Chinese). | |
| [24] | 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 土工试验方法标准: [S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2019. |
| Ministry of housing and urban-rural development of the People's republic of China. Standard for soil test methods: [S]. Beijing: China Planning Press, 2019 (in Chinese). | |
| [25] | NUGENT R A, ZHANG G P, GAMBRELL R P. Effect of exopolymers on the liquid limit of clays and its engineering implications[J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2009, 2101(1): 34-43. |
| [26] |
AYELDEEN M, NEGM A, EL-SAWWAF M, et al. Enhancing mechanical behaviors of collapsible soil using two biopolymers[J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 9(2): 329-339.
DOI URL |
| [27] |
SUJATHA E R, SAISREE S. Geotechnical behaviour of guar gum-treated soil[J]. Soils and Foundations, 2019, 59(6): 2155-2166.
DOI |
| [28] |
AYELDEEN M K, NEGM A M, SAWWAF M A EL. Evaluating the physical characteristics of biopolymer/soil mixtures[J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2016, 9(5): 371.
DOI URL |
| [29] |
FENG D Z, LIANG B, HE X X, et al. Mechanical properties of dredged soil reinforced by xanthan gum and fibers[J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2023, 15(8): 2147-2157.
DOI URL |
| [30] |
TANG C S, SHI B, ZHAO L Z. Interfacial shear strength of fiber reinforced soil[J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2010, 28(1): 54-62.
DOI URL |
| [1] | 孔爱散, 洪雅璐, 叶敏辉, 吴鸿祥, 汤薇, 李娜, 王伟. 竹杆生物炭改性水泥土的三轴力学特性研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(5): 1603-1614. |
| [2] | 倪静, 朱莉莉, 耿雪玉. 生物聚合物联合纤维固化黄土的耐久性研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(6): 2222-2232. |
| [3] | 邱明明, 杨萌, 李晓敏, 李盛斌. 水泥固化高填方黄土抗压强度特性及其影响因素[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(5): 1927-1938. |
| [4] | 郭强, 张晓雷, 史晨曦, 门杰. 赤泥-矿渣基地聚物固化黄土冻融后力学特性研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(4): 1482-1489. |
| [5] | 张玉国, 赵春豪, 张兆彬, 张自来. 石灰-沸石粉改良膨胀土强度特性及微观机理研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(11): 4167-4176. |
| [6] | 董致成, 王光进, 李耀基, 蔡彬亭, 王孟来, 李树建. 玄武岩纤维加筋尾砂抗震液化试验研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(7): 2513-2520. |
| [7] | 许天驰, 张浩男, 贾苍琴, 王贵和. 微生物诱导碳酸钙沉淀改良黄土的崩解性试验研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(2): 674-681. |
| [8] | 李博, 石振武, 刘俊辰, 张洪瑞. 复合改良黄土状亚砂土强度特性及微观机制[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(1): 373-382. |
| [9] | 刘继鹏, 张哲. 黄麻纤维加筋黄土动力特性研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(5): 1663-1668. |
| [10] | 孔德成, 孙治国, 贾方方. 微生物诱导碳酸钙沉淀技术改良黄土湿陷性研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(3): 969-975. |
| [11] | 赵兵朝, 王海龙, 翟迪, 马云祥, 韦启蒙, 王京滨. 黄土-粉煤灰基新型充填材料性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(1): 199-208. |
| [12] | 乔京生, 王旭影, 王冠泓, 赵建业. 粒化高炉矿渣微粉固化淤泥质土的动力特性及微观机理[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2021, 40(7): 2306-2312. |
| [13] | 蒋应军, 张伟, 李启龙, 乔怀玉. 城际铁路水泥改良黄土填料力学特性[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2021, 40(7): 2409-2417. |
| [14] | 祁晓强, 袁可佳, 蔡露瑶, 刘海鹏, 董鑫. 水泥改良黄土抗冲刷性能影响因素研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2021, 40(7): 2418-2427. |
| [15] | 周茗如, 李宁, 钟琳, 李少飞. 湿陷性黄土地区劈裂注浆桩芯结石体强度试验研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2021, 40(4): 1147-1153. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||