固废基盾构惰性同步注浆材料力学性能及抗水分散性研究

硅酸盐通报 ›› 2024, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (2): 617-626.

所属专题：资源综合利用

固废基盾构惰性同步注浆材料力学性能及抗水分散性研究

洪侨亨¹, 贺雄飞^1,2, 张明朗³, 唐刚³, 黄伟³

1.广东省隧道结构智能监控与维护企业重点实验室,广州 511458;
2.中铁隧道勘察设计研究院有限公司,广州 511458;
3.安徽工业大学建筑工程学院,马鞍山 243002

收稿日期:2023-09-13 修订日期:2023-10-31 出版日期:2024-02-15 发布日期:2024-02-05
通信作者: 黄伟,教授。E-mail:hwpsagd@163.com
作者简介:洪侨亨(1992—),男,工程师。主要从事隧道与地下工程研究工作。E-mail:526881322@qq.com
基金资助:
中铁隧道局集团有限公司支持项目(隧研合2020-09)

Mechanical Property and Resistance to Water Dispersion of Solid Waste Shield Inert Synchronous Grouting Materials

HONG Qiaoheng¹, HE Xiongfei^1,2, ZHANG Minglang³, TANG Gang³, HUANG Wei³

1. Guangdong Key Laboratory of Intelligent Monitoring and Maintenance of Tunnel Structure, Guangzhou 511458, China;
2. China Railway Tunnel Survey and Design Research Institute Co., Ltd, Guangzhou 511458, China;
3. College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Anhui University of Technology, Ma'anshan 243002, China

Received:2023-09-13 Revised:2023-10-31 Online:2024-02-15 Published:2024-02-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以典型固废矿渣微粉、粉煤灰、硅灰为原料制备固废基盾构惰性同步注浆材料,采用六因素五水平正交试验,开展了注浆材料力学性能及抗水分散性的试验研究。结果发现:增大碱激发剂模数,减小其掺量,则浆液抗压强度下降;水胶比、膨水比对浆液抗动水冲刷能力的影响较大;碱激发剂掺量和水胶比是影响浆液水陆强度比的主要因素。根据正交试验极差分析和综合性能平衡,确定了注浆材料的优选配合比:水胶比1.00,胶砂比0.45,膨水比0.35,减水剂掺量1.5%(质量分数),碱激发剂模数1.6,碱激发剂掺量20%(质量分数),此时注浆材料28 d抗压强度为13.02 MPa,水陆强度比为80.83%,3 h动水冲刷质量损失率为5.62%;并开展了稠度、凝结时间、泌水率和结石率等性能试验,测试指标均达到了活性浆液的要求。以上研究为工业固废在盾构注浆技术领域的应用提供了一定的研究基础和实验依据。

关键词: 工业固废, 注浆材料, 惰性浆液, 正交试验, 力学性能, 抗水分散性, 极差分析

Abstract: As typical solid wastes, slag powder, fly ash and silica fume were used as raw materials to fabricate solid waste shield inert synchronous grouting materials. The mechanical property and resistance to water dispersion of grouting materials were investigated by using six-factor and five-level orthogonal test. The results show that the compressive strength of slurry decreases with the increase of alkali activator modulus and the decrease of dosage. The water-binder ratio and bentonite-water ratio exhibit great influence on the hydrodynamic erosion resistance of slurry. The dosage of alkali activator and the water-binder ratio are the main factors affecting the water land strength ratio of slurry. According to the range analysis of orthogonal test and comprehensive performance balance, the optimal mix ratio of grouting material is determined as follows: water-binder ratio 1.00, binder-sand ratio 0.45, bentonite-water ratio 0.35, dosage of water reducer 1.5% (mass fraction), alkali activator modulus 1.6, dosage of alkali activator 20% (mass fraction), and grouting material exhibits compressive strength (28 d) of 13.02 MPa, water land strength ratio of 80.83% and hydrodynamic erosion mass loss rate (3 h) of 5.62%. Furthermore, performance tests such as consistency, setting time, bleeding rate and stone rate were conducted, and the indexes all met the requirements of active slurry. The above research provides a certain research and experimental basis for the application of industrial solid wastes in the field of shield grouting technology.

Key words: industrial solid waste, grouting material, inert slurry, orthogonal test, mechanical property, resistance to water dispersion, range analysis

中图分类号:

TU528

洪侨亨, 贺雄飞, 张明朗, 唐刚, 黄伟. 固废基盾构惰性同步注浆材料力学性能及抗水分散性研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(2): 617-626.

HONG Qiaoheng, HE Xiongfei, ZHANG Minglang, TANG Gang, HUANG Wei. Mechanical Property and Resistance to Water Dispersion of Solid Waste Shield Inert Synchronous Grouting Materials[J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2024, 43(2): 617-626.

参考文献

[1] ZHANG D M, HUANG Z K, YIN Z Y, et al. Predicting the grouting effect on leakage-induced tunnels and ground response in saturated soils[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2017, 65: 76-90.
[2] 贾建平. 地铁盾构隧道掘进中的同步注浆施工技术[J]. 工程技术研究, 2019, 4(18): 39-40.
JIA J P. Synchronous grouting construction technology in metro shield tunnel excavation[J]. Engineering and Technological Research, 2019, 4(18): 39-40 (in Chinese).
[3] 有智慧, 李雪, 霍鹏, 等. 城市轨道交通盾构同步注浆国内外现状及发展[J]. 都市快轨交通, 2020, 33(4): 72-83.
YOU Z H, LI X, HUO P, et al. Present status and development of simultaneous grouting of shield tunnel in the urban rail transit industry[J]. Urban Rapid Rail Transit, 2020, 33(4): 72-83 (in Chinese).
[4] 张文宏, 刘映晶, 王军棋, 等. 基于硅灰对注浆材料抗水分散性能影响的外加剂优化研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2022, 59(4): 265-272+283.
ZHANG W H, LIU Y J, WANG J Q, et al. Study on the optimization of admixtures based on the impact of silica fume on the water dispersion resistance of grouting materials[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2022, 59(4): 265-272+283 (in Chinese).
[5] 李小飞, 孙江涛, 陈卫忠, 等. 纤维硅灰水泥石强度与浆液抗冲刷特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(9): 3157-3163+3173.
LI X F, SUN J T, CHEN W Z, et al. Strength and anti-washout property of fiber silica fume cement grout[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39(9): 3157-3163+3173 (in Chinese).
[6] 高学通. 水泥-水玻璃双液浆抗动水冲刷性能及灌注工艺研究[J]. 采矿技术, 2020, 20(2): 99-101.
GAO X T. Study on the anti-scouring performance of cement-sodium silicate double liquid slurry and its grouting technology[J]. Mining Technology, 2020, 20(2): 99-101 (in Chinese).
[7] 韩波, 顾洋, 刘丙全, 等. 抗水分散剂对高抗水分散同步注浆材料性能的影响[J]. 混凝土, 2022(11): 82-86.
HAN B, GU Y, LIU B Q, et al. Effect of water-resistant dispersant on properties of high water-resistant dispersion synchronous grouting material[J]. Concrete, 2022(11): 82-86 (in Chinese).
[8] 朱先发, 宋普涛, 杜峰, 等. 高性能同步注浆材料的耐久性与抗水分散性能研究[J]. 混凝土, 2021(12): 157-160.
ZHU X F, SONG P T, DU F, et al. Research on durability and water dispersibility of high performance shield grouting material[J]. Concrete, 2021(12): 157-160 (in Chinese).
[9] 庄培镇, 马玉玮, 罗甜恬, 等. 碱激发矿渣/粉煤灰净浆/砂浆力学性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(10): 3578-3589.
ZHUANG P Z, MA Y W, LUO T T, et al. Mechanical properties of alkali-activated slag/fly ash paste/mortar[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2022, 41(10): 3578-3589 (in Chinese).
[10] 杨达, 庞来学, 宋迪, 等. 粉煤灰对碱激发矿渣/粉煤灰体系的作用机理研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2021, 40(9): 3005-3011.
YANG D, PANG L X, SONG D, et al. Reaction mechanism of fly ash in alkali-activated slag/fly ash system[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2021, 40(9): 3005-3011 (in Chinese).
[11] 周翔. 水泥基与非水泥基注浆材料性能对比[J]. 水利科技与经济, 2022, 28(8): 126-129.
ZHOU X. Performance comparison of cement-based and non cement-based grouting materials[J]. Water Conservancy Science and Technology and Economy, 2022, 28(8): 126-129 (in Chinese).
[12] 李标, 马芹永, 张发. 超细矿渣粉与硅灰对水泥基注浆材料性能影响机理分析[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(12): 4342-4352.
LI B, MA Q Y, ZHANG F. Influence mechanism analysis of ultrafine ground granulated blast furnace slag and silica fume on properties of cement-based grouting material[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2022, 41(12): 4342-4352 (in Chinese).
[13] 王树清, 蔡胜华, 蒋硕忠. 盾构法隧道施工同步注浆材料研究[J]. 长江科学院院报, 1998, 15(4): 28-30+38.
WANG S Q, CAI S H, JIANG S Z. Study on simultaneous grouting material for shield tunnel[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 1998, 15(4): 28-30+38 (in Chinese).
[14] KAPLAN G, ÖZ A, BAYRAK B, et al. Effect of quartz powder on mid-strength fly ash geopolymers at short curing time and low curing temperature[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2022, 329: 127153.
[15] 杜野. 抗分散注浆材料研发及其动水冲蚀特性研究[D]. 成都: 成都理工大学, 2021.
DU Y. Development of anti-dispersion grouting material and research on dynamic water erosion characteristics[D]. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Technology, 2021 (in Chinese).
[16] ALZAMEL M, FALL M, HARUNA S. Swelling ability and behaviour of bentonite-based materials for deep repository engineered barrier systems: influence of physical, chemical and thermal factors[J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2022, 14(3): 689-702.
[17] GE X N, HU X, SHI C J. The effect of different types of class F fly ashes on the mechanical properties of geopolymers cured at ambient environment[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2022, 130: 104528.

固废基盾构惰性同步注浆材料力学性能及抗水分散性研究

Mechanical Property and Resistance to Water Dispersion of Solid Waste Shield Inert Synchronous Grouting Materials

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	姜德民, 徐浩东, 康红龙, 胡思宇. 植物纤维增强水泥基复合材料面临的问题及相关改性研究现状[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(2): 387-396.
[2]	潘慧敏, 张昊, 李梦谊, 谢少康, 赵庆新. 钢纤维喷射砂浆力学性能与流动度多因素正交试验分析[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(2): 466-477.
[3]	祝毫华, 杨黎, 刘剑辉, 史才军. 杨木纤维对砂浆流动度、力学性能和自收缩的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(2): 487-494.
[4]	吕绍品, 郑光, 郑宇轩, 聂宏, 周风华. 静水压下白砂岩的动态力学性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(2): 543-554.
[5]	孙彬强, 田茂盛, 谢超, 李彦宵, 安健民. 花岗斑岩石粉高韧性水泥基复合材料性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(2): 555-563.
[6]	燕可洲, 孙向阳, 张鑫泽, 温凯, 郭彦霞, 程芳琴. 循环流化床粉煤灰组成与含量对其水化胶凝性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(2): 564-571.
[7]	庞建勇, 郑瑞琪, 胡秀月, 孙健, 徐国平, 苏永强. 高温后冷却方式对玄武岩纤维混凝土力学性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(1): 92-101.
[8]	杨鑫, 于奎, 吉冯春, 聂堂哲, 李科, 白天. SiO₂/KH560改性玄武岩纤维混凝土力学性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(1): 102-112.
[9]	林元明, 林佳福, 熊晓立, 杨政险. TiO₂改性钢渣基透水混凝土的力学和NO_x降解性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(1): 191-199.
[10]	单俊鸿, 张泽, 高鹏, 王奎. 无机胶凝材料改性脱硫建筑石膏性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(1): 268-275.
[11]	张喜飞, 陈定, 顾华志, 黄奥, 付绿平. 碳源对反应烧结碳化硅性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(1): 312-316.
[12]	郭政, 穆松, 庄智杰, 张浩, 张蕾. 中/高度真空环境下水泥基材料性能的研究进展[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(9): 3075-3082.
[13]	邓永刚, 代婷婷, 孙晨, 杨元全. 沸石微粉对磷酸钾镁水泥水化性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(9): 3083-3088.
[14]	胡阳, 刘亚炜, 吴颖辉, 鲁刘磊, 黄文昊, 牛伟锋, 李生生, 汪峻峰. 两种改性剂对注浆材料流变性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(9): 3135-3142.
[15]	陈友治, 吴修齐, 殷伟淞, 李万民, 汤世昌. 电石渣对复合胶凝材料力学性能和微观结构的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(9): 3196-3203.