三种固废改性生土材料配方设计及力学性能研究

硅酸盐通报 ›› 2024, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (2): 603-616.

所属专题：资源综合利用

三种固废改性生土材料配方设计及力学性能研究

张坤^1,2, 付智勇³, 张凌寒², 杨文豪³, 兰官奇¹, 朱熹育¹

1.西安石油大学土木工程学院,西安 710065;
2.西安石油大学博士后创新基地/基建处,西安 710065;
3.西安石油大学机械工程学院,西安 710065

收稿日期:2023-07-07 修订日期:2023-11-15 出版日期:2024-02-15 发布日期:2024-02-05
作者简介:张坤(1986—),男,博士,高级工程师。主要从事混凝土及生土结构方面的研究。E-mail:491543584@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(52308204);陕西省自然科学基础研究计划(2022JQ-301);西安市科技计划(2022JHRYFW-0125);陕西省重点研发计划(2022GY-431);研究生创新与实践能力培养计划(YCS23214275);西安石油大学“立德树人”研究课题(LD202214)

Formula Design and Mechanical Properties of Three Kinds of Modified Raw Soil Materials Mixed with Solid Waste

ZHANG Kun^1,2, FU Zhiyong³, ZHANG Linghan², YANG Wenhao³, LAN Guanqi¹, ZHU Xiyu¹

1. Civil Engineering College, Xi'an Shiyou University, Xi'an 710065, China;
2. Postdoctoral Innovation Base/Construction of Infrastructure Department, Xi'an Shiyou University, Xi'an 710065, China;
3. Mechanical Engineering College, Xi'an Shiyou University, Xi'an 710065, China

Received:2023-07-07 Revised:2023-11-15 Online:2024-02-15 Published:2024-02-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为改善生土材料的力学性能,本研究以铁尾矿、煤矸石、电石渣、油泥与水泥等材料作为掺和料对生土进行改性。基于单形格子法设计配方,对3种配方、180个改性生土试件进行抗压强度试验,研究不同因素对试件破坏形态、抗压强度和试验数据离散性的影响;利用频数分析法,研究了固废改性生土材料的最优配方;通过CT扫描,从细观层面分析受荷后材料内部的分形和孔隙。结果表明:改性生土试件抗压破坏形态基本相同,极限位移受掺料影响显著。以煤矸石与电石渣、铁尾矿与水泥、油泥与水泥作为掺和料均可大幅提高改性生土试件的力学性能,掺和料种类、掺量对改性生土试件强度及数据离散性影响显著。经过频数寻优,3种配方的理想强度掺和料配比分别为1)铁尾矿12.1%~19.5%(质量分数,下同)、水泥13.9%~19.1%、生土65.5%~69.9%;2)电石渣6.7%~14.1%、煤矸石8.9%~11.8%、生土76.7%~81.8%;3)油泥11.4%~14.4%、水泥17.4%~19.4%、生土67.1%~70.5%。材料内部的分形和孔隙特征稳定,表现出较小的波动性和良好的密实性。

关键词: 改性生土, 固废利用, 抗压强度, 配方设计, 频数分析法

Abstract: In order to improve the mechanical properties of raw soil materials, iron tailings, gangue, calcium carbide slag, oil sludge and cement were used as admixtures to modify raw soil. On the basis of the monomorphic lattice method, the effects of different factors on the failure morphology, compressive strength and data discreteness of the specimen were studied through compressive test of 180 modified raw soil specimens of three modified formulas. Using the frequency analysis method, the optimal formula of solid waste modified raw soil material was studied. Then, the fractal and pore structures inside the loaded material were analyzed at a microscopic level through CT scanning. The results show that the compressive failure forms of different admixture-modified raw soil specimens are basically the same, but the admixture significantly affects the limit displacement. Gangue and calcium carbide slag, iron tailings and cement, oil sludge and cement as raw soil admixtures can greatly improve the mechanical properties of modified raw soil specimens, the type and the amount of admixture have a significant impact on the strength and data discreteness of modified raw soil specimens. After frequency optimization, the ideal strength admixture ratios for the three formulas are 1) iron tailings 12.1%~19.5% (mass fraction, the same below), cement 13.9%~19.1% and raw soil 65.5%~69.9%; 2) calcium carbide slag 6.7%~14.1%, coal gangue 8.9%~11.8% and raw soil 76.7%~81.8%; 3) oil sludge 11.4%~14.4%, cement 17.4%~19.4% and raw soil 67.1%~70.5%. The fractal and pore characteristics inside the material are stable, exhibiting small fluctuations and good compactness.

Key words: modified raw soil, solid waste utilization, compressive strength, formula design, frequency analysis

中图分类号:

张坤, 付智勇, 张凌寒, 杨文豪, 兰官奇, 朱熹育. 三种固废改性生土材料配方设计及力学性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(2): 603-616.

ZHANG Kun, FU Zhiyong, ZHANG Linghan, YANG Wenhao, LAN Guanqi, ZHU Xiyu. Formula Design and Mechanical Properties of Three Kinds of Modified Raw Soil Materials Mixed with Solid Waste[J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2024, 43(2): 603-616.

参考文献

[1] PARRACHA J L, LIMA J, FREIRE M T, et al. Vernacular earthen buildings from Leiria, Portugal-Architectural survey towards their conservation and retrofitting[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2021, 35: 102115.
[2] 刘奕彤, 李广洲, 郭龙龙, 等. 改性生土材料最优配比试验研究[J]. 非金属矿, 2021, 44(2): 46-49.
LIU Y T, LI G Z, GUO L L, et al. Experimental study on optimum ratio of modified raw soil materials[J]. Non-Metallic Mines, 2021, 44(2): 46-49 (in Chinese).
[3] 张福鹏, 石磊, 柳思勉, 等. 国内生土建筑材料改性进展研究[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2022, 19(10): 2919-2929.
ZHANG F P, SHI L, LIU S M, et al. Research on modification progress of raw soil building materials in China[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2022, 19(10): 2919-2929 (in Chinese).
[4] 王毅红, 梁楗, 张项英, 等. 我国生土结构研究综述[J]. 土木工程学报, 2015, 48(5): 98-107.
WANG Y H, LIANG J, ZHANG X Y, et al. Review of raw-soil structure in China[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2015, 48(5): 98-107 (in Chinese).
[5] 王沛钦, 郑山锁, 柴俊, 等. 走向生土建筑结构[J]. 工业建筑, 2008, 38(3): 101-105.
WANG P Q, ZHENG S S, CHAI J, et al. To earth buildings and their structures[J]. Industrial Construction, 2008, 38(3): 101-105 (in Chinese).
[6] 王毅红, 董飞, 张坤, 等. 砾石与水泥改性生土材料配方优化研究[J]. 新型建筑材料, 2019, 46(8): 56-59+72.
WANG Y H, DONG F, ZHANG K, et al. Study on formulation optimization of gravel and cement modified soil materials[J]. New Building Materials, 2019, 46(8): 56-59+72 (in Chinese).
[7] 刘志华, 杨久俊, 陈兵. 磷石膏粉煤灰改性生土材料试验研究[J]. 粉煤灰综合利用, 2016, 29(1): 3-6+11.
LIU Z H, YANG J J, CHEN B. Experimental study on properties of modified raw soil material adding phosphogypsum and fly ash[J]. Fly Ash Comprehensive Utilization, 2016, 29(1): 3-6+11 (in Chinese).
[8] 沈万岳. 基于正交试验的生土改性材料最优配合比及其改性机理研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2018, 37(11): 3712-3716.
SHEN W Y. Research on optimum mix proportion and modification mechanism of raw soil materials based on orthogonal tests[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2018, 37(11): 3712-3716 (in Chinese).
[9] ACHENZA M, FENU L. On earth stabilization with natural polymers for earth masonry construction[J]. Materials and Structures, 2006, 39(1): 21-27.
[10] LIU B, MENG H N, PAN G H, et al. Properties and microstructure of blended cement containing activated iron tailings powder[J]. Advances in Cement Research, 2023, 35(6): 258-275.
[11] LI X Y, QIAO Y J, SHAO J H, et al. Sodium-based alkali-activated foams from self-ignition coal gangue by facile microwave foaming route[J]. Ceramics International, 2022, 48(22): 33914-33925.
[12] 刘刚, 封孝信, 胡晨光, 等. 利用铁尾矿制备陶粒研究[J]. 华北理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 43(3): 49-54.
LIU G, FENG X X, HU C G, et al. Research on preparation of ceramsite with iron tailings[J]. Journal of North China University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2021, 43(3): 49-54 (in Chinese).
[13] 武彦辉. 我国煤矸石的处置利用现状及展望[J]. 中国环保产业, 2019(1): 53-55.
WU Y H. Disposal and utilization of coal gangue and its prospect in China[J]. China Environmental Protection Industry, 2019(1): 53-55 (in Chinese).
[14] 张杨, 李远勋. 分析电石渣的综合利用[J]. 中国金属通报, 2022(8): 237-239.
ZHANG Y, LI Y X. Comprehensive utilization of carbide slag was analyzed[J]. China Metal Bulletin, 2022(8): 237-239 (in Chinese).
[15] 孙志勇, 林栋, 张芹. 中国铁尾矿资源的综合利用途径[J]. 自然资源情报, 2023(8): 1-5.
SUN Z Y, LIN D, ZHANG Q. Comprehensive utilization of iron ore tailings in China[J]. Natural Resources Information, 2023(8): 1-5 (in Chinese).
[16] 杨晓伟, 张爱生, 曲俊蓉, 等. 油田污泥基高强陶粒的制备及性能优化[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2021, 40(1): 215-222.
YANG X W, ZHANG A S, QU J R, et al. Preparation and properties optimization of high strength ceramsite obtained from oily sludge[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2021, 40(1): 215-222 (in Chinese).
[17] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 土工试验方法标准: GB/T 50123—2019[S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2019.
Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development, People's Republic of China. Geotechnical test method standard: GB/T 50123—2019[S]. Beijing: China Planning Press, 2019 (in Chinese).
[18] 徐向宏, 何明珠. 试验设计与Design-Expert、SPSS应用[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2010.
XU X H, HE M Z. Experimental design and application of Design-Expert and SPSS[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2010 (in Chinese).
[19] 刘芳. 掺入石子、砂子、水泥的改性生土材料抗压试验研究[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2017.
LIU F. Experimental study on compressive strength of modified raw soil materials mixed with stones, sand and cement[D]. Xi'an: Changan University, 2017 (in Chinese).
[20] 湖南大学, 天津大学, 同济大学, 等. 土木工程材料[M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2002.
Hunan University, Tianjin University, Tongji University, et al. Civil engineering materials[M]. Beijing: China Building Industry Press, 2002 (in Chinese).
[21] 王兴仁, 张福锁, 杨靖一, 等. 现代肥料试验设计[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1996.
WANG X R, ZHANG F S, YANG J Y, et al. Modern fertilizer experimental design[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 1996 (in Chinese).
[22] 陈方. 苦瓜N、P、K配方施肥数学模型的建立[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2009.
CHEN F. Establishment of mathematical model for N, P and K formula fertilization of bitter gourd[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2009 (in Chinese).
[23] 张坤, 卫杨杨, 邵鑫辉, 等. CT技术下掺煤矸石和电石渣的生土材料损伤演化及孔隙研究[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2023, 23(28): 12182-12192.
ZHANG K, WEI Y Y, SHAO X H, et al. Damage evolution and pore space of raw soil materials mixed with coal gangue and calcium carbide slag under CT technique[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2023, 23(28): 12182-12192 (in Chinese).

三种固废改性生土材料配方设计及力学性能研究

Formula Design and Mechanical Properties of Three Kinds of Modified Raw Soil Materials Mixed with Solid Waste

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	倪勇军, 李文荣, 宋维昌, 张生华, 李军, 田乾, 关博文. 低温环境微生物灌入法修复砂浆效果及性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(2): 478-486.
[2]	王稷良, 郭文彬, 宋庆凯, 徐伟东, 刘鹏. 激振搅拌对水泥稳定碎石与煤矸石抗压强度的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(2): 757-765.
[3]	宗炜, 王远辉, 许亮, 刘成, 郑武西. 工业固废磷石膏路面基层材料路用性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(2): 766-773.
[4]	单社, 郭海贞, 魏定邦, 刘辉, 阮志琦, 任国斌. 水泥稳定再生骨料混合料力学性能和抗冻性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(2): 774-780.
[5]	林淑瑾, 罗盛洋, 熊晓立. 负载S-g-C₃N₄/MgAl-CLDH光催化砂浆的去污及水化性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(1): 44-51.
[6]	杜爽, 王伟, 乔敏, 曾鲁平, 赵爽, 陈俊松, 吴庆勇, 朱伯淞. 低温环境下液体速凝剂的适应性及强度增强机理研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(1): 61-70.
[7]	张海霞, 董昊. 地聚物混凝土干燥收缩性能及活性氧化镁补偿收缩研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(1): 219-226.
[8]	刘浩, 胡娟, 金清平, 李帆, 张新胜, 杨曌, 廖宜顺. 高温蒸汽养护复掺混凝土力学性能时变特性与模型研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(1): 227-235.
[9]	李永清, 倪勇军, 李芳芳, 郭伟龙, 曹轩豪, 关博文. 尾泥微粉-粉煤灰-水泥复合胶凝体系性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(1): 236-245.
[10]	王立川, 李景, 于长彬, 曹文权, 凌建军, 王倩倩. 角闪岩弃碴机制砂和石粉掺量对混凝土性能的影响机理[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(1): 246-256.
[11]	周文娟, 胡牛涛, 钮浩翔, 谢谦. 全固废再生流态混合料制备及性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(1): 257-267.
[12]	赵成琳, 袁文海, 董祎然, 姜葱葱, 何彪, 黄世峰, 程新. 花岗岩废料与玻璃废渣制备发泡陶瓷的研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(1): 329-338.
[13]	黎帅, 周凤娇, 谭新宇, 张宾, 林永权, 陶从喜, 黄明俊. 二氧化碳浓度对低钙固碳胶凝材料性能影响及机理研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(9): 3109-3116.
[14]	贠建洲, 陈顺超, 郑维龙, 聂良鹏, 袁胜涛. 龄期对超声回弹综合法检测混凝土构件的误差影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(9): 3166-3175.
[15]	潘荣祥, 杨敏, 袁宏. 减水剂对赤泥-粉煤灰基地质聚合物性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(9): 3212-3220.