模拟地震作用下PP-ECC桥墩抗弯性能试验研究

硅酸盐通报 ›› 2024, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (10): 3623-3633.

模拟地震作用下PP-ECC桥墩抗弯性能试验研究

贾毅^1,2, 刘鹏曾^1,2, 柳其钱^1,2, 王子浩^1,2, 宋浩博^1,2

1.昆明理工大学建筑工程学院,昆明 650500;
2.云南省抗震工程技术研究中心,昆明 650500

收稿日期:2024-03-26 修订日期:2024-05-16 出版日期:2024-10-15 发布日期:2024-10-16
通信作者: 刘鹏曾,硕士研究生。E-mail:18213774431@163.com
作者简介:贾毅(1988—),男,博士,副教授。主要从事大跨度桥梁抗震及高性能纤维混凝土的研究。E-mail:jiayi0715vip@sina.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(52068037);云南省自然科学基金(140520210091);云南省博士后科研基金(109820210012);省级人培项目(241120200027)

Flexural Performance of PP-ECC Bridge Pier under Simulated Earthquake

JIA Yi^1,2, LIU Pengzeng^1,2, LIU Qiqian^1,2, WANG Zihao^1,2, SONG Haobo^1,2

1. Faculty of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China;
2. Earthquake Engineering Researching Center of Yunnan, Kunming 650500, China

Received:2024-03-26 Revised:2024-05-16 Published:2024-10-15 Online:2024-10-16

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为研究聚丙烯纤维水泥基复合材料(PP-ECC)桥墩与普通混凝土桥墩在压弯荷载作用下承载力差异,本文通过拟静力试验对6个局部采用PP-ECC桥墩和2个普通混凝土桥墩的抗弯性能进行试验研究。结合PP-ECC桥墩的破坏过程,确定PP-ECC桥墩的压弯破坏的特征点,之后基于PP-ECC材料的简化本构模型推导出PP-ECC桥墩的理论开裂、屈服和极限荷载公式。对PP-ECC材料进行单轴拉伸和单轴压缩试验,得到简化PP-ECC本构模型的特征参数,通过试验结果对计算结果进行验证,并对比不同轴压比和PP-ECC区高度下桥墩的抗弯承载力、最大变形的差异。结果表明:PP-ECC桥墩在开裂之后,受拉区PP-ECC并未退出工作,而是协同受拉钢筋参与截面受力;PP-ECC桥墩在达到极限荷载时,裂缝稳态发展,没有出现普通混凝土桥墩保护层混凝土大面积剥落的情况;局部采用PP-ECC桥墩极限荷载时最大变形较普通混凝土桥墩有较大提升,且增加轴压比会降低桥墩的变形能力;在较高轴压比下增加PP-ECC区高度,桥墩的抗弯承载力提升了8.8%;使用简化本构模型计算PP-ECC桥墩特征点抗弯承载力时计算精度为0.86~1.13,且方差分析值偏小,具备良好的计算精度。

关键词: 聚丙烯纤维水泥基复合材料(PP-ECC), PP-ECC桥墩, 抗弯性能, 简化本构模型, 低周反复水平荷载

Abstract: In order to study the difference of bearing capacity between polypropylene fiber reinforced engineered cementitious composite (PP-ECC) bridge pier and ordinary concrete bridge pier under compressive-bending load, the flexural performance of six PP-ECC bridge piers and two ordinary concrete bridge piers were studied by quasi-static test. Combined with the failure process of PP-ECC bridge pier, the characteristic points of compressive-bending failure of PP-ECC bridge pier were determined. Then, based on the simplified constitutive model of PP-ECC material, the theoretical cracking, yield and ultimate load formulas of PP-ECC bridge pier were derived. The characteristic parameters of the simplified PP-ECC constitutive model were determined by uniaxial tensile and uniaxial compression tests of PP-ECC materials. The calculation results were verified by the experimental results, and the differences of flexural bearing capacity and maximum deformation of piers under different axial compression ratios and PP-ECC zone heights were compared. The results show that after PP-ECC bridge pier is cracked, PP-ECC in the tensile zone still work, and cooperates with the tensile steel bar to participate in the section force. When PP-ECC bridge pier reaches the ultimate load, the crack develops steadily, and there is no large area of concrete spalling in the protective layer of ordinary concrete pier. The maximum deformation of PP-ECC bridge piers under ultimate load are larger than that of ordinary concrete piers, and the increase of axial compression ratio will reduce the deformation capacity of piers. Increasing the height of PP-ECC zone at a higher axial compression ratio, the flexural capacity of the pier increases by 8.8%. When using the simplified constitutive model to calculate the flexural bearing capacity of PP-ECC bridge pier feature points, the calculation accuracy reaches 0.86~1.13, and the variance analysis value is small, which has good calculation accuracy.

Key words: polypropylene fiber reinforced engineered cementitious composite (PP-ECC), PP-ECC bridge pier, flexural performance, simplify constitutive model, low-cycle repeated horizontal load

中图分类号:

U448.215

贾毅, 刘鹏曾, 柳其钱, 王子浩, 宋浩博. 模拟地震作用下PP-ECC桥墩抗弯性能试验研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(10): 3623-3633.

JIA Yi, LIU Pengzeng, LIU Qiqian, WANG Zihao, SONG Haobo. Flexural Performance of PP-ECC Bridge Pier under Simulated Earthquake[J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2024, 43(10): 3623-3633.

参考文献

[1] ZHANG R, MATSUMOTO K, HIRATA T, et al. Application of PP-ECC in beam-column joint connections of rigid-framed railway bridges to reduce transverse reinforcements[J]. Engineering Structures, 2015, 86: 146-156.
[2] 徐礼华, 邓方茜, 徐浩然, 等. 钢-聚丙烯混杂纤维混凝土柱抗震性能试验研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2016, 49(1): 3-13.
XU L H, DENG F Q, XU H R, et al. On seismic behavior of steel-polypropylene hybrid fiber reinforced concrete columns[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2016, 49(1): 3-13 (in Chinese).
[3] DU H X, QIN Y X, ZHANG W, et al. Mechanics performance of high-performance concrete with polypropylene fibers[J]. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2011, 99/100: 1233-1238.
[4] SHIMIZU K, KANAKUBO T, KANDA T, et al. Shear behavior of steel reinforced PVA-ECC beams[C]//13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Conference Proceedings DVD, 2004.
[5] 邓宗才, 王海忠, 程舒锴. 基于修正压力场理论的超高性能钢纤维混凝土柱抗剪承载力[J]. 北京工业大学学报, 2015, 41(4): 573-578.
DENG Z C, WANG H Z, CHENG S K. Shear capacity of ultra-high performance steel fiber reinforced concrete columns based on modified compression field theory[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Technology, 2015, 41(4): 573-578 (in Chinese).
[6] HALIM N A, ALIH S C, VAFAEI M. Analytical calculation on shear capacity of RC columns internally confined with CFRP strips[J]. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2019, 220: 012023.
[7] 罗素蓉, 郑建岚, 郑作樵. 钢纤维钢筋混凝土柱的抗剪承载力计算方法[J]. 工程力学, 2002, 19(6): 78-81.
LUO S R, ZHENG J L, ZHENG Z Q. Calculation methods for shearing capacity of steel fiber reinforced concrete column[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2002, 19(6): 78-81 (in Chinese).
[8] 曾梓逸, 缪长青, 孙传智. 塑性铰区采用PVA纤维高强混凝土柱抗震性能[J]. 东南大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 53(2): 242-251.
ZENG Z Y, MIAO C Q, SUN C Z. Seismic behavior of columns with PVA fiber high strength reinforced concrete in potential plastic region[J]. Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition), 2023, 53(2): 242-251 (in Chinese).
[9] 周长东, 黄承逵. 玻璃纤维聚合物加固混凝土柱的抗弯性能研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2005, 38(2): 38-45.
ZHOU C D, HUANG C K. A study on the flexural behavior of concrete columns strengthened with GFRP[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2005, 38(2): 38-45 (in Chinese).
[10] 李福海, 胡丁涵, 余泳江, 等. PP-ECC梁抗弯性能试验研究[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2021, 56(2): 272-281.
LI F H, HU D H, YU Y J, et al. Experimental study on flexural capacity of PP-ECC beam[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2021, 56(2): 272-281 (in Chinese).
[11] LI V C. On engineered cementitious composites (ECC)[J]. Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, 2003, 1(3): 215-230.
[12] 贾毅, 赵人达, 廖平, 等. PP-ECC用于墩底塑性铰区域的抗震性能试验[J]. 中国公路学报, 2019, 32(7): 100-110.
JIA Y, ZHAO R D, LIAO P, et al. Experimental investigation on seismic behavior of bridge piers with polypropylene-engineered cementitious composite in plastic hinge regions[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2019, 32(7): 100-110 (in Chinese).
[13] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 混凝土结构设计标准(2024年版): GB/T 50010—2010[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2011.
Ministry of Housing and Urban Rural Development of the People's Republic of China. Design standard for concrete structures (2024 edition): GB/T 50010—2010[S]. Beijing: China Architecture&Building Press, 2011 (in Chinese).
[14] CHEN Y X, YU J, LEUNG C K Y. Use of high strength strain-hardening cementitious composites for flexural repair of concrete structures with significant steel corrosion[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 167: 325-337.
[15] 张于晔, 魏红一, 袁万城. 钢纤维混凝土局部增强桥墩抗震性能试验研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2012, 31(21): 102-107.
ZHANG Y Y, WEI H Y, YUAN W C. Tests for aseismic behavior of bridge piers with local steel fiber reinforced concrete[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2012, 31(21): 102-107 (in Chinese).
[16] 刘立平, 肖闲, 郑歆耀, 等. 钢筋混凝土柱-钢梁盒式节点抗剪机理及抗剪承载力计算[J]. 振动与冲击, 2022, 41(24): 11-18+26.
LIU L P, XIAO X, ZHENG X Y, et al. Research on shear behavior and bearing capacity of box joints for a RC column-steel beam[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2022, 41(24): 11-18+26 (in Chinese).
[17] 王苏岩, 曹怀超, 徐振清. CFRP布约束增强高强混凝土柱抗震性能数值分析[J]. 防灾减灾工程学报, 2014, 34(6): 712-717.
WANG S Y, CAO H C, XU Z Q. Numerical study on seismic behavior of high strength concrete columns retrofitted with CFRP sheets[J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering, 2014, 34(6): 712-717 (in Chinese).