硅酸盐通报 ›› 2026, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (5): 1638-1649.DOI: 10.16552/j.cnki.issn1001-1625.2025.1009
李秉函1(
), 李世纪1, 赵伊萌1, 刘云鹏2, 许达1, 赵淑丽1(
)
收稿日期:2025-10-16
修订日期:2026-01-07
出版日期:2026-05-15
发布日期:2026-06-10
通信作者:
赵淑丽,副教授。E-mail:969334836@qq.com作者简介:李秉函(2000—),男,硕士研究生。主要从事碱激发胶凝材料的研究。E-mail:457753434@qq.com
LI Binghan1(
), LI Shiji1, ZHAO Yimeng1, LIU Yunpeng2, XU Da1, ZHAO Shuli1(
)
Received:2025-10-16
Revised:2026-01-07
Published:2026-05-15
Online:2026-06-10
摘要:
碱激发材料虽具有较低的温室气体排放量,且力学性能与硅酸盐水泥相当,但存在干燥收缩大、易开裂、性能波动明显等问题。通过掺入聚乙烯醇(PVA)可有效降低干燥收缩、提高抗折强度与韧性,并促进结构致密化。本研究系统考察了不同PVA掺量(0%、2.5%、5.0%、7.5%、10.0%,质量分数)对矿渣粉-粉煤灰基碱激发胶凝材料流动度、凝结时间、水化热、抗压强度、抗折强度、干燥收缩、质量损失、pH值、吸水率及微观结构的影响。结果表明:随着PVA掺量增加,浆体流动度降低,终凝时间延长;水化放热速率与累计放热量均下降;抗压强度随着PVA掺量提高而降低,而养护28 d后抗折强度升高,其中PVA掺量为5.0%时,抗折强度最高(6.63 MPa);当PVA掺量不大于5.0%时,干燥收缩有所减小,当PVA掺量超过5.0%则干燥收缩增大;PVA的引入还会导致浆体pH值下降、吸水率上升。微观分析表明,PVA膜与水化产物相互包裹、填充,形成复合结构,增强了材料的致密性。本研究明确了PVA对碱激发胶凝材料水化行为与宏观性能的调控作用,为其工程应用提供了依据。
中图分类号:
李秉函, 李世纪, 赵伊萌, 刘云鹏, 许达, 赵淑丽. 聚乙烯醇改性矿渣粉-粉煤灰基碱激发胶凝材料水化性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(5): 1638-1649.
LI Binghan, LI Shiji, ZHAO Yimeng, LIU Yunpeng, XU Da, ZHAO Shuli. Hydration Properties of Polyvinyl Alcohol-Modified Slag-Fly Ash-Based Alkali-Activated Cementitious Materials[J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(5): 1638-1649.
| Material | Mass fraction/% | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SiO2 | Al2O3 | Fe2O3 | CaO | TiO2 | K2O | SO3 | MgO | P2O3 | Na2O | |
| Slag | 29.43 | 14.38 | 0.90 | 44.50 | 1.61 | 0.35 | 2.34 | 5.49 | 0.03 | 0.28 |
| Fly ash | 48.70 | 35.90 | 5.06 | 3.88 | 0.70 | 1.36 | 0.80 | 0.61 | 0.50 | 0.38 |
表1 矿渣粉、粉煤灰的主要化学组成
Table 1 Main chemical composition of slag and fly ash
| Material | Mass fraction/% | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SiO2 | Al2O3 | Fe2O3 | CaO | TiO2 | K2O | SO3 | MgO | P2O3 | Na2O | |
| Slag | 29.43 | 14.38 | 0.90 | 44.50 | 1.61 | 0.35 | 2.34 | 5.49 | 0.03 | 0.28 |
| Fly ash | 48.70 | 35.90 | 5.06 | 3.88 | 0.70 | 1.36 | 0.80 | 0.61 | 0.50 | 0.38 |
| Test item | Methylation degree (mass fraction)/% | Viscosity/(MPa·s) | Volatile matter (mass fraction)/% | Purity(mass fraction)/% | pH value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Test result | 87.6% | 50.3 | 4.37 | 94.3 | 5.3 |
表2 聚乙烯醇的性能指标
Table 2 Performance indexes of PVA
| Test item | Methylation degree (mass fraction)/% | Viscosity/(MPa·s) | Volatile matter (mass fraction)/% | Purity(mass fraction)/% | pH value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Test result | 87.6% | 50.3 | 4.37 | 94.3 | 5.3 |
| Group | Mass/g | Water-binder ratio | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slag | Fly ash | PVA | Na2O | ||
| PVA0 | 80 | 20 | 0 | 3 | 0.4 |
| PVA1 | 80 | 20 | 2.5 | 3 | 0.4 |
| PVA2 | 80 | 20 | 5.0 | 3 | 0.4 |
| PVA3 | 80 | 20 | 7.5 | 3 | 0.4 |
| PVA4 | 80 | 20 | 10.0 | 3 | 0.4 |
表3 聚乙烯醇改性矿渣粉-粉煤灰基碱激发胶凝材料的配合比
Table 3 Mix proportion of PVA-modified slag-fly ash-based alkali-activated cementitious materials
| Group | Mass/g | Water-binder ratio | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slag | Fly ash | PVA | Na2O | ||
| PVA0 | 80 | 20 | 0 | 3 | 0.4 |
| PVA1 | 80 | 20 | 2.5 | 3 | 0.4 |
| PVA2 | 80 | 20 | 5.0 | 3 | 0.4 |
| PVA3 | 80 | 20 | 7.5 | 3 | 0.4 |
| PVA4 | 80 | 20 | 10.0 | 3 | 0.4 |
| Age/d | Sample | CON(strength) | 2.5%PVA | 5.0%PVA | 7.5%PVA | 10.0%PVA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 1 | 0.836 | 0.731 | 0.485 | 0.289 | |
| 3 | 1 | 0.626 | 0.602 | 0.579 | 0.390 | |
| 7 | 1 | 0.911 | 0.826 | 0.604 | 0.398 | |
| 7 | 1 | 0.583 | 0.581 | 0.604 | 0.352 | |
| 14 | 1 | 0.860 | 0.738 | 0.635 | 0.495 | |
| 14 | 1 | 0.964 | 1.111 | 1.054 | 0.697 | |
| 28 | 1 | 0.890 | 0.844 | 0.686 | 0.533 | |
| 28 | 1 | 1.139 | 1.295 | 1.230 | 1.049 |
表4 相对抗压强度与相对抗折强度
Table 4 Relative compressive strength and relative flexural strength
| Age/d | Sample | CON(strength) | 2.5%PVA | 5.0%PVA | 7.5%PVA | 10.0%PVA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 1 | 0.836 | 0.731 | 0.485 | 0.289 | |
| 3 | 1 | 0.626 | 0.602 | 0.579 | 0.390 | |
| 7 | 1 | 0.911 | 0.826 | 0.604 | 0.398 | |
| 7 | 1 | 0.583 | 0.581 | 0.604 | 0.352 | |
| 14 | 1 | 0.860 | 0.738 | 0.635 | 0.495 | |
| 14 | 1 | 0.964 | 1.111 | 1.054 | 0.697 | |
| 28 | 1 | 0.890 | 0.844 | 0.686 | 0.533 | |
| 28 | 1 | 1.139 | 1.295 | 1.230 | 1.049 |
| Item | Sample mass/g | c(HCL)/(mol·L-1) | V0(Blank)/mL | V1(EP1)/mL | OH- content/(mg·g-1) | Average OH- content/(mg·g-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PVA1-1 | 0.512 4 | 0.1 | 0.009 5 | 2.043 2 | 6.750 | 6.773 |
| PVA1-2 | 0.515 4 | 0.1 | 0.009 5 | 2.069 3 | 6.797 | 6.773 |
| PVA4-1 | 0.511 2 | 0.1 | 0.009 5 | 1.044 6 | 3.444 | 3.425 |
| PVA4-2 | 0.499 2 | 0.1 | 0.009 5 | 1.009 2 | 3.406 | 3.425 |
表5 PVA1和PVA4的OH-含量
Table 5 OH- content of PVA1 and PVA4
| Item | Sample mass/g | c(HCL)/(mol·L-1) | V0(Blank)/mL | V1(EP1)/mL | OH- content/(mg·g-1) | Average OH- content/(mg·g-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PVA1-1 | 0.512 4 | 0.1 | 0.009 5 | 2.043 2 | 6.750 | 6.773 |
| PVA1-2 | 0.515 4 | 0.1 | 0.009 5 | 2.069 3 | 6.797 | 6.773 |
| PVA4-1 | 0.511 2 | 0.1 | 0.009 5 | 1.044 6 | 3.444 | 3.425 |
| PVA4-2 | 0.499 2 | 0.1 | 0.009 5 | 1.009 2 | 3.406 | 3.425 |
| [1] | LI Y L, YIN J, YUAN Q, et al. Greener strain-hardening cementitious composites (SHCC) with a novel alkali-activated cement[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2022, 134: 104735. |
| [2] | 武亚磊, 杨俊杰. 一种全固废碱激发胶凝材料设计方法[J]. 长沙理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 20(5): 25-40. |
| WU Y L, YANG J J. A design method of alkali⁃activated binder based on all⁃solid⁃waste[J]. Journal of Changsha University of Science and Technology (Natural Science), 2023, 20(5): 25-40 (in Chinese). | |
| [3] | HE J, ZHU M M, SANG G C, et al. Effect of PVA latex powder and PP fiber on property of self-compacting alkali-activated slag repair mortar[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2023, 408: 133703. |
| [4] | WANG T Y, YANG L, RAO F, et al. Effect of chitosan on the mechanical properties and acid resistance of metakaolin-blast furnance slag-based geopolymers[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30(16): 47025-47037. |
| [5] | THONG C C, TEO D C L, NG C K. Application of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) in cement-based composite materials: a review of its engineering properties and microstructure behavior[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2016, 107: 172-180. |
| [6] | MA G W, HU T Y, WANG F, et al. Magnesium phosphate cement for powder-based 3D concrete printing: systematic evaluation and optimization of printability and printing quality[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2023, 139: 105000. |
| [7] | CHEN Y F, WANG R X, WANG H C, et al. Study on PVA-siloxane mixed emulsion coatings for hydrophobic cement mortar[J]. Progress in Organic Coatings, 2020, 147: 105775. |
| [8] | AQUINO ROCHA J H, TOLEDO FILHO R D. The utilization of recycled concrete powder as supplementary cementitious material in cement-based materials: a systematic literature review[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2023, 76: 107319. |
| [9] | DONG D, HUANG Y B, GAO X, et al. Effect of polyvinyl alcohol powder on the impermeability, frost resistance and pore structure of calcium sulfoaluminate cement concrete[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2023, 409: 133858. |
| [10] | XIE Y D, LIN X J, LI H F, et al. Effect of polyvinyl alcohol powder on the bonding mechanism of a new magnesium phosphate cement mortar[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 239: 117871. |
| [11] | GAN X Y, ZHU Y, MA K, et al. Water resistance, mechanical properties, hydration characteristic and microstructure of magnesium ammonium phosphate cement modified by polyvinyl alcohol powder[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2024, 440: 137439. |
| [12] | ALLAHVERDI A, KIANPUR K, MOGHBELI M R. Effect of polyvinyl alcohol on flexural strength and some important physical properties of Portland cement paste[J]. Iranian Journal of Materials Science and Engineering, 2010, 7(1): 1-6. |
| [13] | NGUYEN D D, DEVLIN L P, KOSHY P, et al. Effect of polyvinyl alcohol on rheology of portland cement pastes[J]. Journal of the Australian Ceramic Society, 2015, 51(2): 23-28. |
| [14] | 赵启迪, 薛平, 贾明印, 等. 水溶性树脂改性地质聚合物材料的性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2018, 37(10): 3141-3146+3153. |
| ZHAO Q D, XUE P, JIA M Y, et al. Study on the properties of the water-soluble organic modified geopolymer[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2018, 37(10): 3141-3146+3153 (in Chinese). | |
| [15] | 阚鑫禹, 薛 平, 贾明印, 等. 聚乙烯醇改性地质聚合物复合材料的性能研究[J]. 矿产综合利用, 2018, 39(3): 125-128+51. |
| KAN X Y, XUE P, JIA M Y, et al. Study on the properties of polyvinyl alcohol modified geopolymer composites[J]. Multipurpose Utilization of Mineral Resources, 2018, 39(3): 125-128+51 (in Chinese). | |
| [16] | 李 真, 水亮亮, 刘 瑾. 不同类型水性聚合物水泥净浆的制备与性能研究[J]. 混凝土与水泥制品, 2012(7): 17-21. |
| LI Z, SHUI L L, LIU J. Preparation and performance research on different types of water-based polymer cement pastes[J]. China Concrete and Cement Products, 2012(7): 17-21 (in Chinese). | |
| [17] | 付振博, 杨曦昊, 赵伊萌, 等. 粉煤灰掺量对碱激发材料干燥收缩及抗压强度的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(5): 1717-1725. |
| FU Z B, YANG X H, ZHAO Y M, et al. Effect of fly ash content on drying shrinkage and compressive strength of alkali-activated materials[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2025, 44(5): 1717-1725 (in Chinese). | |
| [18] | SUN Z Y, LI Y J, MING X, et al. Yield stress of in-situ polymerization modified cement paste[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2023, 174: 107346. |
| [19] | NASEEM Z, SHAMSAEI E, SAGOE-CRENTSIL K, et al. Antifoaming effect of graphene oxide nanosheets in polymer-modified cement composites for enhanced microstructure and mechanical performance[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2022, 158: 106843. |
| [20] | HOT J, BESSAIES-BEY H, BRUMAUD C, et al. Adsorbing polymers and viscosity of cement pastes[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2014, 63: 12-19. |
| [21] | ZHANG C Y, KONG X M, YU J W, et al. Correlation between the adsorption behavior of colloidal polymer particles and the yield stress of fresh cement pastes[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2022, 152: 106668. |
| [22] | XU B, WANG R, ZHOU K W, et al. Research on the physical characteristics of a novel modified foamed cement slurry with non-foamed PVA material[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2025, 459: 139710. |
| [23] | 李红轩, 齐冬有, 邹德麟, 等. 铁铝酸盐、硫铝酸盐和硅酸盐水泥的水化进程对比研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(7): 2335-2345. |
| LI H X, QI D Y, ZOU D L, et al. Comparative study on hydration process of ferroaluminate, sulfoaluminate and Portland cement[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2024, 43(7): 2335-2345 (in Chinese). | |
| [24] | 杨君健, 殷祥男, 丁源, 等. 水泥水化热与矿物成分相关性研究综述[J]. 中国水泥, 2025(): 215-218. |
| YANG J J, YIN X N, DING Y, et al. Review on the correlation between hydration heat of cement and mineral composition[J]. China Cement, 2025(supplement 1): 215-218 (in Chinese). | |
| [25] | LI L, WANG R, LU Q Y. Influence of polymer latex on the setting time, mechanical properties and durability of calcium sulfoaluminate cement mortar[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 169: 911-922. |
| [26] | LIU R W, CHEN D, CAI X L, et al. Hardened properties of mortar mixtures containing pre-treated waste oyster shells[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 266: 121729. |
| [27] | YAOWARAT T, HORPIBULSUK S, ARULRAJAH A, et al. Compressive and flexural strength of polyvinyl alcohol-modified pavement concrete using recycled concrete aggregates[J]. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2018, 30(4): 04018046. |
| [28] | LI G Y, WANG L B, YU J, et al. Mechanical properties and material characterization of cement mortar incorporating CNT-engineered polyvinyl alcohol latex[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2022, 345: 128320. |
| [29] | FAN J, LI G Y, DENG S J, et al. Mechanical properties and microstructure of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) modified cement mortar[J]. Applied Sciences, 2019, 9(11): 2178. |
| [30] | 王禹升. 粉煤灰-矿渣基地质聚合物的增韧及水化机理研究[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳工业大学, 2023. |
| WANG Y S. Study on toughening and hydration mechanism of fly ash-slag based geopolymer[D]. Shenyang: Shenyang University of Technology, 2023 (in Chinese). | |
| [31] | MANSUR A A P, SANTOS D B, MANSUR H S. A microstructural approach to adherence mechanism of poly(vinyl alcohol) modified cement systems to ceramic tiles[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2007, 37(2): 270-282. |
| [1] | 陈子涵, 郭煜东, 吕钦飞, 梁咏宁, 季韬. 碱当量对磷石膏-碱矿渣泡沫混凝土性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(4): 1315-1323. |
| [2] | 王介瑞, 赵云良, 王振磊, 张婷婷, 张鑫, 李滢. 聚乙烯醇改性对二维蒙脱石通道薄膜锂镁分离的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(2): 675-683. |
| [3] | 喻秋淳, 李尉, 梁云, 邓永杰, 黄汉涵, 李维红, 李栋伟. 超速凝磷酸镁水泥涂层新型喷射工艺及裂缝修复性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(1): 21-29. |
| [4] | 岳鹏飞, 郭思标, 丁秀娟, 王玉松, 王大周, 胡悦, 张蓉蓉, 章纲, 丁金孟. 粉煤灰-矿渣-赤泥基胶凝材料固化土强度和微观机理研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(1): 336-345. |
| [5] | 姜德民, 胡思雨, 康红龙, 李御锦, 候宇翔. 改性处理对3D打印稻草纤维水泥基复合材料性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(1): 47-57. |
| [6] | 张书峰, 王蕾, 徐世龙, 蔡佳成, 陈锦帆, 黄继志. 环氧树脂各组分对环氧树脂砂浆的性能影响研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(9): 3156-3167. |
| [7] | 孔伟鹏, 庞来学, 郭威, 田晓峰. 碱激发超细粉-粉煤灰胶凝材料压阻性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(9): 3288-3294. |
| [8] | 余洁歆, 朱艺婷, 庄旭, 陈玉霜, 张广达, 许莉. 以尾矿砂为骨料的绿色工程水泥基复合材料力学性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(9): 3337-3346. |
| [9] | 金珊珊, 李响, 张扬, 刘鹏飞, 王志华, 李刘欢, 赵耀东. 沥灰比对水泥乳化沥青砂浆疲劳性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(9): 3472-3482. |
| [10] | 张争奇, 刘祉鑫, 芮照诚, 石杰荣, 杨新红. 地聚物稳定建筑固废再生集料性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(9): 3347-3354. |
| [11] | 刘琦, 黄世谋, 郝建英, 崔步哲, 朱振国, 白朔. 二氧化钛对铝酸锌耐火陶瓷性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(8): 3042-3048. |
| [12] | 李杰, 李顺凯, 赵欢, 曾秦威. 纳米TiO2改性发泡剂对泡沫混凝土性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(8): 2839-2848. |
| [13] | 颜婉滢, 王东星, 聂利文. 全工业固废基高贝利特硫铝酸盐水泥熟料的制备与矿物形成微观机理[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(8): 2955-2964. |
| [14] | 何梦真, 李月明, 张小娜, 王宇晖, 李恺, 黄圆圆. 利用海南紫金陶泥制备低膨胀耐热紫砂陶的研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(8): 3005-3013. |
| [15] | 徐龙飞, 刘世玺, 李艳杰, 杨令强. SMAF-FRCC抗折性能及循环加载性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(7): 2378-2387. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||