硅酸盐通报 ›› 2026, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (5): 1603-1614.DOI: 10.16552/j.cnki.issn1001-1625.2026.0041
孔爱散1(
), 洪雅璐2, 叶敏辉2, 吴鸿祥2, 汤薇1, 李娜2(
), 王伟2
收稿日期:2026-01-11
修订日期:2026-03-09
出版日期:2026-05-15
发布日期:2026-06-10
通信作者:
李 娜,教授。E-mail:lina@usx.edu.cn作者简介:孔爱散(1975—),女,副教授。主要从事土木工程的研究。E-mail:kongas@sxvtc.com
基金资助:
KONG Aisan1(
), HONG Yalu2, YE Minhui2, WU Hongxiang2, TANG Wei1, LI Na2(
), WANG Wei2
Received:2026-01-11
Revised:2026-03-09
Published:2026-05-15
Online:2026-06-10
摘要:
为了探究竹杆生物炭对不同龄期下水泥土的改性效果,通过不固结不排水三轴试验,研究了竹杆生物炭改性水泥土(BBMCS)的偏应力-应变曲线、峰值偏应力、内摩擦角和黏聚力等力学特性。结果表明:竹杆生物炭可通过优化水泥土内部结构改善其应力-应变曲线形态,BBMCS试样的偏应力-应变曲线均呈软化型,表现为脆性破坏特征;在7和28 d养护龄期下,6%(质量分数)竹杆生物炭掺量的BBMCS试样力学性能最优,其峰值偏应力较未掺竹杆生物炭的对照组分别提升89%和81%;竹杆生物炭对BBMCS力学性能的增强作用主要源于黏聚力的提升,对内摩擦角无显著影响。基于试验数据,建立了不同龄期下竹杆生物炭掺量、围压与峰值偏应力的二次函数预测模型,模型预测值与实测值吻合良好。研究结果可为竹杆生物炭改性水泥土的工程应用提供基础。
中图分类号:
孔爱散, 洪雅璐, 叶敏辉, 吴鸿祥, 汤薇, 李娜, 王伟. 竹杆生物炭改性水泥土的三轴力学特性研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(5): 1603-1614.
KONG Aisan, HONG Yalu, YE Minhui, WU Hongxiang, TANG Wei, LI Na, WANG Wei. Triaxial Mechanical Properties of Bamboo Stem Biochar-Modified Cement-Stabilized Soil[J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(5): 1603-1614.
| Component | CaO | SiO2 | Fe2O3 | Al2O3 | SO3 | MgO | Other |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mass fraction/% | 50.20 | 18.50 | 12.50 | 8.90 | 4.60 | 3.40 | 1.90 |
表1 水泥的主要氧化物组成
Table 1 Main oxide composition of cement
| Component | CaO | SiO2 | Fe2O3 | Al2O3 | SO3 | MgO | Other |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mass fraction/% | 50.20 | 18.50 | 12.50 | 8.90 | 4.60 | 3.40 | 1.90 |
| Component | K2O | CaO | SiO2 | Fe2O3 | SO3 | P2O5 | MnO | Other |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mass fraction/% | 59.11 | 11.63 | 10.16 | 4.42 | 4.22 | 3.66 | 3.43 | 3.37 |
表2 竹杆生物炭的主要氧化物组成
Table 2 Main oxide composition of bamboo stem biochar
| Component | K2O | CaO | SiO2 | Fe2O3 | SO3 | P2O5 | MnO | Other |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mass fraction/% | 59.11 | 11.63 | 10.16 | 4.42 | 4.22 | 3.66 | 3.43 | 3.37 |
| No. | Cement content/% | Bamboo stem biochar content/% | Moisture content/% | Confining pressure/kPa | Curing age/d |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CS-7 | 5 | 0 | 18 | 100, 200, 300, 400 | 7 |
| BBMCS-2-7 | 5 | 2 | 18 | 100, 200, 300, 400 | 7 |
| BBMCS-4-7 | 5 | 4 | 18 | 100, 200, 300, 400 | 7 |
| BBMCS-6-7 | 5 | 6 | 18 | 100, 200, 300, 400 | 7 |
| BBMCS-8-7 | 5 | 8 | 18 | 100, 200, 300, 400 | 7 |
| CS-28 | 5 | 0 | 18 | 100, 200, 300, 400 | 28 |
| BBMCS-2-28 | 5 | 2 | 18 | 100, 200, 300, 400 | 28 |
| BBMCS-4-28 | 5 | 4 | 18 | 100, 200, 300, 400 | 28 |
| BBMCS-6-28 | 5 | 6 | 18 | 100, 200, 300, 400 | 28 |
| BBMCS-8-28 | 5 | 8 | 18 | 100, 200, 300, 400 | 28 |
表3 不同竹杆生物炭掺量下试样的配合比设计与测试龄期
Table 3 Mix proportion design and test ages of specimens with different content of bamboo stem biochar
| No. | Cement content/% | Bamboo stem biochar content/% | Moisture content/% | Confining pressure/kPa | Curing age/d |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CS-7 | 5 | 0 | 18 | 100, 200, 300, 400 | 7 |
| BBMCS-2-7 | 5 | 2 | 18 | 100, 200, 300, 400 | 7 |
| BBMCS-4-7 | 5 | 4 | 18 | 100, 200, 300, 400 | 7 |
| BBMCS-6-7 | 5 | 6 | 18 | 100, 200, 300, 400 | 7 |
| BBMCS-8-7 | 5 | 8 | 18 | 100, 200, 300, 400 | 7 |
| CS-28 | 5 | 0 | 18 | 100, 200, 300, 400 | 28 |
| BBMCS-2-28 | 5 | 2 | 18 | 100, 200, 300, 400 | 28 |
| BBMCS-4-28 | 5 | 4 | 18 | 100, 200, 300, 400 | 28 |
| BBMCS-6-28 | 5 | 6 | 18 | 100, 200, 300, 400 | 28 |
| BBMCS-8-28 | 5 | 8 | 18 | 100, 200, 300, 400 | 28 |
| No. | Peak deviatoric stress/kPa | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 kPa | 200 kPa | 300 kPa | 400 kPa | |
| CS-7 | 1 309 | 1 396 | 1 877 | 1 988 |
| BBMCS-2-7 | 1 498 | 1 759 | 1 996 | 2 429 |
| BBMCS-4-7 | 1 672 | 1 995 | 2 385 | 2 490 |
| BBMCS-6-7 | 2 180 | 2 987 | 3 154 | 3 232 |
| BBMCS-8-7 | 1 946 | 2 316 | 2 432 | 2 854 |
| CS-28 | 1 648 | 1 942 | 2 033 | 2 448 |
| BBMCS-2-28 | 1 723 | 2 362 | 2 468 | 2 577 |
| BBMCS-4-28 | 2 166 | 2 628 | 2 864 | 3 081 |
| BBMCS-6-28 | 3 062 | 3 365 | 4 062 | 4 068 |
| BBMCS-8-28 | 2 357 | 2 914 | 3 032 | 3 109 |
表4 不同竹杆生物炭掺量、不同围压下试样的峰值偏应力
Table 4 Peak deviatoric stress of specimens with different bamboo stem biochar content and confining pressures
| No. | Peak deviatoric stress/kPa | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 kPa | 200 kPa | 300 kPa | 400 kPa | |
| CS-7 | 1 309 | 1 396 | 1 877 | 1 988 |
| BBMCS-2-7 | 1 498 | 1 759 | 1 996 | 2 429 |
| BBMCS-4-7 | 1 672 | 1 995 | 2 385 | 2 490 |
| BBMCS-6-7 | 2 180 | 2 987 | 3 154 | 3 232 |
| BBMCS-8-7 | 1 946 | 2 316 | 2 432 | 2 854 |
| CS-28 | 1 648 | 1 942 | 2 033 | 2 448 |
| BBMCS-2-28 | 1 723 | 2 362 | 2 468 | 2 577 |
| BBMCS-4-28 | 2 166 | 2 628 | 2 864 | 3 081 |
| BBMCS-6-28 | 3 062 | 3 365 | 4 062 | 4 068 |
| BBMCS-8-28 | 2 357 | 2 914 | 3 032 | 3 109 |
图8 不同竹杆生物炭掺量、围压和龄期下试样峰值偏应力预测值与试验值对比图
Fig.8 Comparison diagrams of predicted and experimental values of peak deviatoric stress of specimens with different bamboo stem biochar content, confining pressures and ages
| Coefficient | Data for 7 d | Data for 28 d | Formulas related to curing ages(D: curing age) |
|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | -18.23 | -27.67 | A1= -0.45D-15.08 |
| A2 | 256.95 | 362.59 | A2= 5.03D+221.74 |
| A3 | 701.93 | 840.06 | A3= 6.58D+655.89 |
表5 预测模型系数A与龄期相关公式
Table 5 Correlation formula between prediction model coefficient A and age
| Coefficient | Data for 7 d | Data for 28 d | Formulas related to curing ages(D: curing age) |
|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | -18.23 | -27.67 | A1= -0.45D-15.08 |
| A2 | 256.95 | 362.59 | A2= 5.03D+221.74 |
| A3 | 701.93 | 840.06 | A3= 6.58D+655.89 |
| Coefficient | Data for 7 d | Data for 28 d | Weighted average of curing age |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 | 0 | -0.01 | -0.01 |
| B2 | -0.05 | 0.04 | 0.02 |
| B3 | 4.47 | 6.26 | 5.90 |
表6 预测模型系数B与龄期加权平均值
Table 6 Predicted model coefficient B and weighted average of age
| Coefficient | Data for 7 d | Data for 28 d | Weighted average of curing age |
|---|---|---|---|
| B1 | 0 | -0.01 | -0.01 |
| B2 | -0.05 | 0.04 | 0.02 |
| B3 | 4.47 | 6.26 | 5.90 |
| No. | Curing age/d | Angle of internal friction/(°) | Cohesion/kPa | Shear stress envelope curve |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CS-7 | 7 | 34.73 | 256.70 | τ=0.69σ+256.70 |
| BBMCS-2-7 | 7 | 37.26 | 285.85 | τ=0.76σ+285.85 |
| BBMCS-4-7 | 7 | 36.40 | 355.09 | τ=0.74σ+355.09 |
| BBMCS-6-7 | 7 | 41.29 | 434.25 | τ=0.87σ+434.25 |
| BBMCS-8-7 | 7 | 36.33 | 419.90 | τ=0.74σ+419.90 |
| CS-28 | 28 | 34.21 | 364.03 | τ=0.68σ+364.03 |
| BBMCS-2-28 | 28 | 37.04 | 379.78 | τ=0.75σ+379.28 |
| BBMCS-4-28 | 28 | 37.15 | 477.60 | τ=0.76σ+477.60 |
| BBMCS-6-28 | 28 | 41.80 | 590.37 | τ=0.89σ+590.37 |
| BBMCS-8-28 | 28 | 34.89 | 569.90 | τ=0.70σ+569.90 |
表7 不同竹杆生物炭掺量、养护龄期下试样的抗剪强度
Table 7 Shear strength of specimens with different bamboo stem biochar content and curing ages
| No. | Curing age/d | Angle of internal friction/(°) | Cohesion/kPa | Shear stress envelope curve |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CS-7 | 7 | 34.73 | 256.70 | τ=0.69σ+256.70 |
| BBMCS-2-7 | 7 | 37.26 | 285.85 | τ=0.76σ+285.85 |
| BBMCS-4-7 | 7 | 36.40 | 355.09 | τ=0.74σ+355.09 |
| BBMCS-6-7 | 7 | 41.29 | 434.25 | τ=0.87σ+434.25 |
| BBMCS-8-7 | 7 | 36.33 | 419.90 | τ=0.74σ+419.90 |
| CS-28 | 28 | 34.21 | 364.03 | τ=0.68σ+364.03 |
| BBMCS-2-28 | 28 | 37.04 | 379.78 | τ=0.75σ+379.28 |
| BBMCS-4-28 | 28 | 37.15 | 477.60 | τ=0.76σ+477.60 |
| BBMCS-6-28 | 28 | 41.80 | 590.37 | τ=0.89σ+590.37 |
| BBMCS-8-28 | 28 | 34.89 | 569.90 | τ=0.70σ+569.90 |
| [1] | ZHOU A Z, WANG H N, HUANG R D, et al. Enhancement-type graphene treated cement-soil for building foundation improvement: experimental and microscopic investigations[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2025, 114: 114251. |
| [2] | VAN ROIJEN E, MILLER S A, DAVIS S J. Building materials could store more than 16 billion tonnes of CO2 annually[J]. Science, 2025, 387(6730): 176-182. |
| [3] | CHEN Y Y, ZHAN B G, GUO B L, et al. Accelerated carbonation curing of biochar-cement mortar: effects of biochar pyrolysis temperatures on carbon sequestration, mechanical properties and microstructure[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2024, 449: 138446. |
| [4] | LIN X Q, NGUYEN Q D, CASTEL A, et al. Self-healing efficiency of sustainable biochar-cement composites incorporating crystalline admixtures[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2025, 458: 139542. |
| [5] | SOBUZ M H R, KHAN M H, KABBO M K I, et al. Assessment of mechanical properties with machine learning modeling and durability, and microstructural characteristics of a biochar-cement mortar composite[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2024, 411: 134281. |
| [6] | LIU K N, FAN D Q, ZOU S, et al. Capacitance capacity of biochar-incorporated cementitious composite[J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2025, 218: 108223. |
| [7] | LIU W, TAN S L, QING L B, et al. Pozzolanic activity of biochar with high carbon content and its influence on comprehensive strength-emission performance of biochar-cement composite paste[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2025, 478: 141427. |
| [8] | ZHAO Z H, EL-NAGGAR A, KAU J, et al. Biochar affects compressive strength of Portland cement composites: a meta-analysis[J]. Biochar, 2024, 6(1): 21. |
| [9] | XU W J, ZHANG Y Y, SU Y L, et al. Using waste to improve the weak: recycled seashell as an ideal way to regulate the interfacial transition zone in biochar-cement composites[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2024, 444: 137765. |
| [10] | KANG Z Y, ZHANG J R, LI N, et al. Utilization of biochar as a green additive in supersulfated cement: properties, mechanisms, and environmental impacts[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2024, 445: 137923. |
| [11] | CHEN X Y, CHEN F M, YANG Q, et al. An environmental food packaging material part I: a case study of life-cycle assessment (LCA) for bamboo fiber environmental tableware[J]. Industrial Crops and Products, 2023, 194: 116279. |
| [12] | GIMBUN J, GUNASEKARAN P K, CHE J L, et al. Bamboo biochar addition enhanced cement mortar strength and CO2 sequestration ability[J]. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 2025, 141: 104155. |
| [13] | SUN H L, QING L B, LIU W, et al. Effects of bamboo waste biochar on fracture behavior of cementitious materials[J]. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, 2025, 139: 105106. |
| [14] | SHAO Y L, HU A Q, JIANG Y C, et al. Preparation of biochars from different sources and study on their phosphorus adsorption properties[J]. Molecules, 2025, 30(12): 2633. |
| [15] | REVATHI S, ALICE ELIZABETH TANIA D, ANCY SHADIN S, et al. Effect of zeolite and bamboo biochar as CO2 absorbant in concrete[J]. Carbon Research, 2024, 3(1): 43. |
| [16] | CHATURVEDI K, SINGHWANE A, DHANGAR M, et al. Bamboo for producing charcoal and biochar for versatile applications[J]. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 2024, 14(14): 15159-15185. |
| [17] | SU J Z, GUO Z L, ZHANG M Y, et al. Mn-modified bamboo biochar improves soil quality and immobilizes heavy metals in contaminated soils[J]. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 2024, 34: 103630. |
| [18] | LI L S, JIANG Y, CHEN T F, et al. Porous biochar-assisted aqueous carbonation of steel slag as an adsorptive crystallization modifier for value-added cement applications[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2025, 159: 106002. |
| [19] | AWAD M, LIU Z Z, SKALICKY M, et al. Fractionation of heavy metals in multi-contaminated soil treated with biochar using the sequential extraction procedure[J]. Biomolecules, 2021, 11(3): 448. |
| [20] | 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 土工试验方法标准: [S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2019. |
| Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China. Standard for soil test methods: [S]. Beijing: China Planning Press, 2019 (in Chinese). | |
| [21] | 中华人民共和国交通运输部. 公路土工试验规程: [S]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2020. |
| Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China. Test methods of soils for highway engineering: [S]. Beijing: China Communications Press, 2020 (in Chinese). | |
| [22] | 中华人民共和国交通运输部. 公路工程无机结合料稳定材料试验规程: [S]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2024. |
| Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China. Test methods of materials stabilized with inorganic binders for highway engineering: [S]. Beijing: China Communications Press, 2024 (in Chinese). | |
| [23] | LIN W L, LIU A, MAO W W, et al. Acoustic emission characteristics of a dry sandy soil subjected to drained triaxial compression[J]. Acta Geotechnica, 2020, 15(9): 2493-2506. |
| [24] | JIANG P, HU X C, WANG W, et al. Mechanical properties and energy dissipation of fiber-modified iron tailings under triaxial stress[J]. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2024, 24(12): 06024022. |
| [25] | ZHANG Q, CHEN Y, JI J R, et al. Influence of biochar addition on the strength characteristics of red clay[J]. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2025, 25(9): 04025192. |
| [26] | YANG Y Y, SUN L, LI P, et al. From agricultural waste to geotechnical application: investigation of apple tree biochar for loess reinforcement[J]. Powder Technology, 2025, 466: 121454. |
| [27] | LIU W, LI K N, XU S L. Utilizing bamboo biochar in cement mortar as a bio-modifier to improve the compressive strength and crack-resistance fracture ability[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2022, 327: 126917. |
| [28] | LING Y F, WU X H, TAN K H, et al. Effect of biochar dosage and fineness on the mechanical properties and durability of concrete[J]. Materials, 2023, 16(7): 2809. |
| [29] | ALFEI S, PANDOLI O G. Bamboo-based biochar: a still too little-studied black gold and its current applications[J]. Journal of Xenobiotics, 2024, 14(1): 416-451. |
| [30] | XIAO S, LI Y C, XU C X, et al. The influence of biochar addition on the mechanical performance, hydration mechanism, and carbonation capacity of Super Sulfated Cement[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2025, 463: 140073. |
| [1] | 陈伟忠, 李明阳, 麦鹏, 周旋, 刘旭聪. 节段预制UHPC大键齿胶接缝直剪性能[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(4): 1459-1470. |
| [2] | 刘高喜, 吴云峰, 刘永亮, 刘勇. 路基中粒砂岩在差速疲劳荷载作用下的变形与能量演化特征[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(2): 712-724. |
| [3] | 杨青原, 王垚, 单红日, 李辉, 陈聪, 姜能栋. 泡沫轻质混凝土常规三轴压缩力学性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(9): 3246-3254. |
| [4] | 王佳慧, 王凤池, 孙畅. 回收轮胎聚合物纤维水泥改良碳酸盐渍土抗冻性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(7): 2720-2729. |
| [5] | 任恩重, 张翔, 董珑慧. 冻融循环下灌浆修复裂缝混凝土试件力学特性研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(6): 2135-2148. |
| [6] | 孔爱散, 钱锶嘉, 王伟, 马绪坤, 李娜. 聚丙烯纤维协同碳化养护技术改性水泥土的抗剪特性研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(5): 1939-1948. |
| [7] | 郑立阳, 惠迎新, 郭聚坤, 闫升, 董旭光. 粉煤灰路基的力学变形特性及综合含水率研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(4): 1486-1494. |
| [8] | 高立堂, 马加涛, 田玉鹏, 王海超, 杜延鑫. 高温后再生混凝土纯Ⅱ型剪切断裂性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(10): 3587-3596. |
| [9] | 熊家归, 李焱, 胡松涛, 廖铖, 周闽, 王锦辉, 罗绍杨. 不同母土对水泥土微观结构及强度的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(5): 1832-1839. |
| [10] | 孙敏, 侯德瑞, 耿立涛, 颜卓然, 毕玉峰, 黄照亮, 任帅宇, 王本毅. 多碎石聚氨酯混凝土路用性能与力学特性研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(2): 746-756. |
| [11] | 张贺, 刘艳章, 黄诗冰, 胡谱达, 夏永西, 曹文耀, 苏旭. 不同龄期与灰砂比胶结充填体力学损伤特性及断口形貌分形特征研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(11): 3976-3985. |
| [12] | 张玉国, 赵春豪, 张兆彬, 张自来. 石灰-沸石粉改良膨胀土强度特性及微观机理研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(11): 4167-4176. |
| [13] | 董致成, 王光进, 李耀基, 蔡彬亭, 王孟来, 李树建. 玄武岩纤维加筋尾砂抗震液化试验研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(7): 2513-2520. |
| [14] | 刘江, 袁康, 张松林, 陈楠. 生土砌体砌筑泥浆生态改性配方研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(2): 496-508. |
| [15] | 刘景锦, 罗昊鹏, 雷华阳, 郑刚, 程雪松. 碱激发地质聚合物固化软土的研究进展[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(2): 565-574. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||