多元固废胶凝材料在20和40 ℃固化洗砂余泥的研究

doi:10.16552/j.cnki.issn1001-1625.2024.1094

硅酸盐通报 ›› 2025, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (2): 590-601.DOI: 10.16552/j.cnki.issn1001-1625.2024.1094

多元固废胶凝材料在20和40 ℃固化洗砂余泥的研究

高云楠¹, 张领帅², 侯莉³, 周永祥^1,4

1.北京工业大学建筑工程学院,北京 100124;
2.深圳宏业基岩土科技股份有限公司,深圳 518057;
3.中国城市环境卫生协会建筑垃圾管理与资源化工作委员会,北京 100037;
4.中国混凝土与水泥制品协会岩土稳定与固化技术分会,北京 100831

收稿日期:2024-09-12 修订日期:2024-11-16 出版日期:2025-02-15 发布日期:2025-02-28
通信作者: 周永祥,博士,教授。E-mail:zhouyx@bjut.edu.cn
作者简介:高云楠(1999—),女,硕士研究生。主要从事多元固废协同处置渣土和固废基人工骨料方面的研究。E-mail:gaoyunnan@emails.bjut.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2023YFE0199600);国家自然科学基金(52378213)

Solidification of Sand Washing Residue Mud byUsing Multivariant Solid Waste Cementitious Materials at 20 and 40 ℃

GAO Yunnan¹, ZHANG Lingshuai², HOU Li³, ZHOU Yongxiang^1,4

1. The College of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China;
2. Shenzhen Hongyeji Geotechnical Technology Co., Ltd, Shenzhen 518057, China;
3. China City Sanitation Association Building Waste Management and Resource Utilization Work Committee, Beijing 100037, China;
4. Geotechnical Stability and Solidification Technology Branch of China Concrete and Cement Products Association, Beijing 100831, China

Received:2024-09-12 Revised:2024-11-16 Published:2025-02-15 Online:2025-02-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究利用矿渣、钢渣、赤泥、烧石膏及少量自制激发剂CH(以多种价态的碱混合而成)和NS(以多种易溶性硫酸盐和卤族盐混合而成)制备多元固废胶凝材料固化洗砂余泥,采用XRD、MIP和SEM等测试技术,研究了化学激发剂类型、胶凝材料掺量、养护温度(20和40 ℃)对洗砂余泥固化体抗压强度和微观结构的影响,并评估了其水稳性和重金属浸出特性。结果表明:单掺CH多元固废胶凝材料对洗砂余泥的固化效果最优,养护温度和多元固废胶凝材料掺量为40 ℃和40%时,7 d抗压强度可达5.57 MPa,软化系数为0.88;单掺NS多元固废胶凝材料对洗砂余泥的固化效果最差,原因是缺乏高碱环境,削弱了钙和铝的溶出,水化硅酸钙(C-S-H)和钙矾石(AFt)的生成量降低,孔隙率增高;而使用复掺CH-NS多元固废胶凝材料,会因为生成过量的膨胀性产物AFt而造成试样抗压强度降低。提高多元固废胶凝材料掺量和养护温度,可提高洗砂余泥固化体的抗压强度。单掺CH多元固废胶凝材料可使洗砂余泥固化体养护温度40 ℃的7 d抗压强度比20 ℃的7 d抗压强度增长169.08%。此外,洗砂余泥固化体的重金属(铁、锰、钛)浸出含量均符合环保性要求。

关键词: 固废胶凝材料, 洗砂余泥, 养护温度, 抗压强度, 水稳性, 重金属浸出

Abstract: This study used granulated blast furnace slag, steel slag, red mud, calcined gypsum and a small amount of self-synthesized activator CH (made by mixing multiple valence states of alkali) and NS (made by mixing various soluble sulfates and halogen salts) to prepare multivariate solid waste cementitious materials (MSWCM) to solidify sand washing residue mud. The effects of chemical activator type, cementitious material content and curing temperature (20 and 40 ℃) on the compressive strength and microstructure of the solidified body of sand washing residue mud were studied by XRD, MIP and SEM. The water stability and heavy metal leaching characteristics were evaluated. The results show that the MSWCM with addition of CH has the best curing effect on the sand washing residue mud. When the curing temperature and the content of MSWCM are 40 ℃ and 40%, the 7 d compressive strength can reach 5.57 MPa, and the softening coefficient is 0.88. The solidification effect of sand washing residue mud is the worst for MSWCM with addition of NS, because of the lack of a high alkaline environment, which weakens the leaching of calcium and aluminum, reducing the generation of C-S-H and ettringite, and has a high porosity. The use of MSWCM with addition of CH-NS reduces the compressive strength of sample due to the formation of excessive expansion product AFt. By increasing the content of MSWCM and curing temperature, the compressive strength of solidified body of sand washing residue mud increases. The 7 d compressive strength of solidified body of sand washing residue mud at 40 ℃ can be increased by 169.08% compared with the 7 d compressive strength at 20 ℃ by MSWCM with addition of CH. In addition, the leaching content of heavy metals (iron, manganese, titanium) in the solidified body of sand washing residue mud meets the environmental protection requirements.

Key words: solid waste cementitious material, sand washing residue mud, curing temperature, compressive strength, water stability, heavy metal leaching

中图分类号:

TU526

高云楠, 张领帅, 侯莉, 周永祥. 多元固废胶凝材料在20和40 ℃固化洗砂余泥的研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(2): 590-601.

GAO Yunnan, ZHANG Lingshuai, HOU Li, ZHOU Yongxiang. Solidification of Sand Washing Residue Mud byUsing Multivariant Solid Waste Cementitious Materials at 20 and 40 ℃[J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2025, 44(2): 590-601.

参考文献

[1] 李思文, 王毅, 李师. 国外余泥渣土的处置方法及其借鉴作用[J]. 中国土地, 2020(12): 44-46.
LI S W, WANG Y, LI S. Disposal methods of foreign residual mud and dregs and their reference[J]. China Land, 2020(12): 44-46 (in Chinese).
[2] 李丹, 孙占琦, 苏颖, 等. 深圳市余泥渣土现状及策略分析[J]. 施工技术, 2018, 47(增刊3): 129-131.
LI D, SUN Z Q, SU Y, et al. Current situation and strategy analysis of residual sludge in Shenzhen[J]. Construction Technology, 2018, 47(supplement 3): 129-131 (in Chinese).
[3] 孙佳诚. 免烧结余泥骨料的制备及性能试验研究[D]. 青岛: 青岛理工大学, 2023.
SUN J C. Experimental study on the preparation and performance ofsinter-free residual clayaggregates[D]. Qingdao: Qingdao University of Technology, 2023 (in Chinese).
[4] 孙佳诚, 朱亚光, 徐培蓁, 等. 水泥基固化剂对余泥的固化效果研究[J]. 青岛理工大学学报, 2024, 45(3): 27-34.
SUN J C, ZHU Y G, XU P Z, et al. Study on the curing effect of cement-based curing agent on residual mud[J]. Journal of Qingdao University of Technology, 2024, 45(3): 27-34 (in Chinese).
[5] 李晨, 张正甫, 刘松玉, 等. 水泥石灰固化软土中的钙矾石形成研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2013, 35(增刊2): 662-665.
LI C, ZHANG Z F, LIU S Y, et al. Study on ettringite formation in soft soil solidified by cement lime[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(supplement 2): 662-665 (in Chinese).
[6] 杨君健, 兰明章, 王剑锋, 等. 多元固废基胶凝材料水化性能研究[J]. 新型建筑材料, 2022, 49(10): 107-113.
YANG J J, LAN M Z, WANG J F, et al. Research on hydration properties of multiple solid waste-based cementitious materials[J]. New Building Materials, 2022, 49(10): 107-113 (in Chinese).
[7] 周丽波, 陈平, 胡成, 等. 钢渣-赤泥-水泥基复合砂浆的水化硬化特性[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(8): 2837-2845.
ZHOU L B, CHEN P, HU C, et al. Hydration hardening characteristics of steel slag-red mud-cement based composite mortar[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2023, 42(8): 2837-2845 (in Chinese).
[8] 刘倩, 周永祥, 王祖琦, 等. 稻壳灰-脱硫灰-钢渣复合胶凝材料的制备及在固化土中的应用[J]. 建筑科学, 2022, 38(7): 72-77.
LIU Q, ZHOU Y X, WANG Z Q, et al. Preparation of rice husk ash-desulfurization ash-steel slag composite cementitious material and its application in solidified soil[J]. Building Science, 2022, 38(7): 72-77 (in Chinese).
[9] CUI S H, FAN K J, YAO Y. Preparation and characterization of quaternary clinker-free cementitious materials containing phosphorus slag, calcium carbide slag, desulfurization gypsum, and metakaolin[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2024, 411: 134602.
[10] 董泽, 赵宇宏, 张国永, 等. 工业废渣基固化剂固化工程渣土的试验研究及工程应用[J]. 上海建设科技, 2023(1): 74-76+83.
DONG Z, ZHAO Y H, ZHANG G Y, et al. Experimental research and engineering application of industrial waste residue-based curing agent for solidify engineering residue[J]. Shanghai Construction Science & Technology, 2023(1): 74-76+83 (in Chinese).
[11] 陈哲宁. 建筑废弃物再生冗余土制备预拌流态固化土及性能研究[J]. 水泥工程, 2022(5): 63-68.
CHEN Z N. Preparation and performance of ready-mixed fluidic solidified soil by using construction waste recycled redundant soil[J]. Cement Engineering, 2022(5): 63-68 (in Chinese).
[12] 王旭影, 乔京生, 赵建业, 等. 电石渣激发钢渣-矿渣固化淤泥质土的试验研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(2): 733-739.
WANG X Y, QIAO J S, ZHAO J Y, et al. Solidification of muddy soil with steel slag and ground granulated blast-furnace slag activated by calcium carbide slag[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2022, 41(2): 733-739 (in Chinese).
[13] 厉帅康, 俞峰, 陈鑫, 等. 水泥-矿渣基早强固化剂制备及固化土宏微观性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(11): 3964-3977+4005.
LI S K, YU F, CHEN X, et al. Preparation of cement-slag based early strength curing agent and macro and micro properties of solidified soil[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2023, 42(11): 3964-3977+4005 (in Chinese).
[14] 张学林. 基于最优混料设计的洗砂余泥基低碳胶凝材料配合比优化[J]. 信息记录材料, 2023, 24(12): 41-43+46.
ZHANG X L. Optimization of mix proportion of low-carbon cementitious material based on sand washing residue based on optimal mix design[J]. Information Recording Materials, 2023, 24(12): 41-43+46 (in Chinese).
[15] LI Y, LIU X M, LI Z P, et al. Preparation, characterization and application of red mud, fly ash and desulfurized gypsum based eco-friendly road base materials[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 284: 124777.
[16] XU J Q, CHEN P. Synergistic effect of iron tailings, steel slag and red mud cementitious materials on mechanical and microstructure properties[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2024, 95: 110131.
[17] 朱增超, 刘贤平, 水中和, 等. 固废基复合胶凝材料配比优化设计及协同效应研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(12): 4368-4377+4388.
ZHU Z C, LIU X P, SHUI Z H, et al. Mix ratio optimization design and synergistic effect study of multi-source solid waste binders[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2023, 42(12): 4368-4377+4388 (in Chinese).
[18] 周永祥, 刘倩, 王祖琦, 等. 流态固化土用无熟料胶凝材料的性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(10): 3548-3555.
ZHOU Y X, LIU Q, WANG Z Q, et al. Properties of cementitious materials without clinker for fluid solidified soil[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2022, 41(10): 3548-3555 (in Chinese).
[19] HAO X S, LIU X M, ZHANG Z Q, et al. In-depth insight into the cementitious synergistic effect of steel slag and red mud on the properties of composite cementitious materials[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2022, 52: 104449.
[20] BIN L, ZHANG Q L, FENG Y, et al. Mechanical and microstructural analysis of cemented tailings backfill by copper slag through alkaline activation emphasizing red mud[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2024, 428: 136341.
[21] 崔孝炜, 倪文, 狄燕清. 钢渣矿渣基全固废胶凝材料的化学活化[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2018, 37(4): 1411-1417.
CUI X W, NI W, DI Y Q. Chemical activation of cementitious materials with all solid waste based of steel slag and blast furnace slag[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2018, 37(4): 1411-1417 (in Chinese).

编辑推荐

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	0	0	0	15

	来源	本网站

	次数	15
	比例	100%

摘要

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

0	0	23

	来源	本网站

	次数	23
	比例	100%

多元固废胶凝材料在20和40 ℃固化洗砂余泥的研究

Solidification of Sand Washing Residue Mud byUsing Multivariant Solid Waste Cementitious Materials at 20 and 40 ℃

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	吕阳, 吴远帅, 葛云露, 陈扬, 许金生, 蹇守卫, 但建明, 温小栋, 李相国. 稻壳灰与SAP协同内养护对碱激发矿渣胶凝材料性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(2): 634-641.
[2]	王波, 黄涛, 陈瑞杰, 祁泽峰, 宋子健, 蒋林华, 储洪强. 葡萄糖酸亚铁对氯氧镁水泥性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(2): 403-416.
[3]	阎杰, 邢国斌, 冯龙辉, 梁重阳, 谢军, 翁维素, 白启敬. 苎麻纤维对再生混凝土力学强度的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(2): 455-462.
[4]	杨旭清, 王辉, 高尚, 郭美丽, 孟泽浩, 武越宇. 高温作用对粉煤灰-矿渣基多孔地聚合物性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(2): 561-568.
[5]	黄梓谕, 丁之尧, 曹丹, 沈锭, 姚瞬雨, 陈益人, 任衍增, 包申旭. 基于响应面法的多固废基地聚合物配比优化及其表征[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(2): 569-578.
[6]	毕钰, 秦拥军, 罗玲, 姚子祺, 刘凤超, 阳毅恒. 混掺再生粗骨料和再生微粉混凝土的早期力学性能[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(2): 623-633.
[7]	张金龙, 唐孟雄, 衷从浩, 胡家兵, 邵强, 钟开红. 纳米C-S-H晶核早强剂对水泥早期水化的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(1): 21-30.
[8]	冉秋硕, 徐泽辉, 齐文超, 刘磊. 高温后钢-玄武岩混杂纤维混凝土动态力学性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(1): 69-80.
[9]	耿春雷, 郭宏达, 董阳, 张栋, 巩思宇, 李俏. 陶粒泡沫混凝土成型方式及性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(1): 124-132.
[10]	薛璐韬, 李育彪, 吴晓勇, 李瑞, 孙旭超, 吴开振, 池汝安. 氟石膏水化活性改性试验研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(1): 223-230.
[11]	窦占双, 李晓民, 秦宏涛, 魏定邦, 武旭, 闫升, 张富强, 韩方元. 化学激发大掺量粉煤灰复合胶凝材料力学性能与水化机理研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(1): 243-252.
[12]	余芳, 李林柏, 姚大立. 钢纤维自密实再生混凝土的力学性能[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(1): 264-273.
[13]	李琪, 王亮, 王浩, 王成龙, 徐建, 胡伟. 碳化再生微粉对碱激发矿渣材料的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(1): 289-296.
[14]	陈平, 李芳彬, 向玮衡, 胡成, 刘俊, 王启杰. 钙硅比对硅酸钙矿相烧结行为和固碳能力的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(1): 297-304.
[15]	徐婕, 梁剑辉, 齐乐, 龚英, 高玉峰. 原料土液限对自密实固化土工程性质的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(1): 360-367.