顶烧/侧烧燃烧方式对全氧燃烧玻纤窑炉温度场流场影响的数值模拟研究

硅酸盐通报 ›› 2024, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (4): 1246-1256.

• “玻璃材料与玻璃技术”专题(II) • 上一篇下一篇

顶烧/侧烧燃烧方式对全氧燃烧玻纤窑炉温度场流场影响的数值模拟研究

曾健华¹, 陈德全², 李浩然³, 韩建军¹, 王静¹, 李路瑶³

1.武汉理工大学硅酸盐建筑材料国家重点实验室,武汉 430070;
2.重庆国际复合材料股份有限公司,重庆 400000;
3.武汉理工大学汽车工程学院,武汉 430070

收稿日期:2023-12-14 修订日期:2024-02-06 出版日期:2024-04-15 发布日期:2024-04-17
通信作者: 李路瑶,博士,助理研究员。E-mail:791648660@qq.com
作者简介:曾健华(1998—),男,硕士研究生。主要从事玻璃熔窑模拟研究。E-mail:oliverjianhua@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金青年项目(52102030);湖北省自然科学基金青年项目(2021CFB072)

Numerical Simulation of Effects of Top/Side Firing Methods on Temperature and Flow Fields of Oxygen-Fuel Glass Fiber Furnace

ZENG Jianhua¹, CHEN Dequan², LI Haoran³, HAN Jianjun¹, WANG Jing¹, LI Luyao³

1. State Key Laboratory of Silicate Materials for Architectures, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China;
2. Chongqing Polycomp International Corporation, Chongqing 400000, China;
3. School of Automotive Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China

Received:2023-12-14 Revised:2024-02-06 Online:2024-04-15 Published:2024-04-17

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为优化全氧玻纤窑炉燃烧系统,提高窑炉传热效率,本文采用数值模拟方法探究了全氧燃烧玻纤窑炉顶烧与侧烧两种燃烧方式对燃烧空间温度场、烟气流场、玻璃液温度场和传热效率的影响。结果表明:顶烧窑炉火焰聚集,燃烧空间温度差异明显,侧烧窑炉火焰在窑长方向上均匀分布,燃烧空间整体温度高于顶烧窑炉;侧烧方式对大碹和胸墙耐火材料高温侵蚀程度更高的可能性更大;侧烧窑炉高温烟气在燃烧空间中停留时间延长有利于烟气与燃烧空间内气流和耐火材料进行热交换,统计得到侧烧窑炉出口烟气平均温度更低;侧烧窑炉玻璃液沿窑宽方向上温度分布较均匀,顶烧玻璃液平均温度为1 531 ℃,高于侧烧玻璃液平均温度1 523 ℃;顶烧窑炉传热效率为52.3%,侧烧窑炉传热效率为51.9%,顶烧窑炉和侧烧窑炉采用相同天然气供应量、电助熔功率、玻璃液熔化量条件下,顶烧窑炉中喷枪火焰直接作用到玻璃液和配合料层,传热效率更高。

关键词: 数值模拟, 全氧燃烧, 玻纤窑炉, 顶烧, 侧烧, 传热效率

Abstract: To optimize the combustion system of oxygen-fuel glass fiber furnace and improve the heat transfer efficiency of the furnace, this paper uses numerical simulation methods to investigate the effects of two combustion methods, the top firing furnace and the side firing furnace, on the temperature field within the combustion space, flue gas flow field, glass temperature field, and heat transfer efficiency of oxygen-fuel glass fiber furnace. The results indicate that, the flame of the top firing furnace is concentrated, resulting in pronounced temperature variations within the combustion space. In contrast, the side firing furnace features flames uniformly distributed along the length of the furnace. As a consequence, the overall temperature of the combustion space in the side firing furnace is higher than that in the top firing furnace. The side firing method is more likely to result in a higher degree of high-temperature corrosion on the refractory materials of the crown and breast wall. The prolonged presence of high-temperature flue gas in the combustion space of the side firing furnace is advantageous for facilitating heat exchange between the flue gas and the airflow, as well as refractory materials within the combustion space. The statistical analysis reveals that the side firing furnace exhibits a lower average flue gas temperature at its exits. The side firing furnace demonstrates a more uniform temperature distribution of molten glass along the width of the furnace. The average temperature of the molten glass in the top firing furnace is 1 531 ℃, exceeding the average temperature of 1 523 ℃ observed in the side firing furnace. The top firing furnace exhibits a heat transfer efficiency of 52.3%, surpassing the heat transfer efficiency of 51.9% observed in the side firing furnace. This implies that, under identical conditions of natural gas supply, electrical melting assistance, and molten glass melting capacity, the higher heat transfer efficiency in the top firing furnace is attributed to the direct interaction of the burner flame with the molten glass and batch layer.

Key words: numerical simulation, oxygen-fuel firing, glass fiber furnace, top firing, side firing, heat transfer efficiency

中图分类号:

TQ171

曾健华, 陈德全, 李浩然, 韩建军, 王静, 李路瑶. 顶烧/侧烧燃烧方式对全氧燃烧玻纤窑炉温度场流场影响的数值模拟研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(4): 1246-1256.

ZENG Jianhua, CHEN Dequan, LI Haoran, HAN Jianjun, WANG Jing, LI Luyao. Numerical Simulation of Effects of Top/Side Firing Methods on Temperature and Flow Fields of Oxygen-Fuel Glass Fiber Furnace[J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2024, 43(4): 1246-1256.

参考文献

[1] 何峰, 金明芳, 赵玉华, 等. 浮法玻璃窑炉用燃料及其烟气污染物排放特性与治理技术分析[J]. 玻璃, 2019, 46(3): 18-25.
HE F, JIN M F, ZHAO Y H, et al. Analysis of fuel used in float glass furnace, emission characteristics and treatment technology of flue gas pollutants[J]. Glass, 2019, 46(3): 18-25 (in Chinese).
[2] 习近平. 在第七十五届联合国大会一般性辩论上的讲话[N]. 人民日报, 2020-09-23(3).
XI J P. Speech at the general debate of the seventy-fifth United Nations General Assembly[N]. The People's Daily, 2020-09-23(3) (in Chinese).
[3] 张锁江, 张香平, 葛蔚, 等. 工业过程绿色低碳技术[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2022, 37(4): 511-521.
ZHANG S J, ZHANG X P, GE W, et al. Carbon neutral transformative technologies for industrial process[J]. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2022, 37(4): 511-521 (in Chinese).
[4] 贾子强, 方广, 牛晨晨, 等. 玻璃材料对我国碳中和目标实现的贡献浅析[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(2): 367-375.
JIA Z Q, FANG G, NIU C C, et al. Contributions of glass materials to China carbon neutrality[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2022, 41(2): 367-375 (in Chinese).
[5] 刘志海. 平板玻璃工业企业碳中和实施途径[J]. 玻璃, 2022, 49(4): 1-7.
LIU Z H. Implementation approaches to carbon neutrality in flat glass industrial enterprises[J]. Glass, 2022, 49(4): 1-7 (in Chinese).
[6] 陈兴孝, 张国礼. 燃发生炉煤气玻璃熔窑设计理念[J]. 玻璃与搪瓷, 2010, 38(6): 11-17.
CHEN X X, ZHANG G L. Design concept for producer gas fired glass tank furnace[J]. Glass Enamel & Ophthalmic Optics, 2010, 38(6): 11-17 (in Chinese).
[7] 杨海东, 陈强, 徐康康, 等. 基于数值模拟的马蹄焰玻璃窑蓄热室热效率研究[J]. 化工学报, 2019, 70(12): 4608-4616.
YANG H D, CHEN Q, XU K K, et al. Thermal efficiency research of regenerator for horseshoe flame glass furnace based on numerical simulation[J]. CIESC Journal, 2019, 70(12): 4608-4616 (in Chinese).
[8] 王新强, 刘琦, 华德生. 窑炉纯氧顶部燃烧与电助熔技术在日用玻璃企业的应用[J]. 玻璃搪瓷与眼镜, 2021, 49(6): 20-22.
WANG X Q, LIU Q, HUA D S. Application of furnace oxygen crown combustion and electric boosting technology in domestic glass enterprises[J]. Glass enamel & ophthalmic optics, 2021, 49(6): 20-22 (in Chinese).
[9] 杨平原, 曾勇, 李奉云, 等. 玻纤窑炉纯氧顶烧技术研究[J]. 玻璃纤维, 2020(6): 27-30+34.
YANG P Y, ZENG Y, LI F Y, et al. Oxy-fuel top firing technology research for glass fiber furnace[J]. Fiber Glass, 2020(6): 27-30+34 (in Chinese).
[10] 韩大河. 玻璃纤维窑炉平烧与顶烧方式比较[J]. 玻璃纤维, 2022(1): 16-20.
HAN D H. Comparison of side-fired and top-fired fiberglass furnaces[J]. Fiber Glass, 2022(1): 16-20 (in Chinese).
[11] 唐宇, 何栋, 夏江华. 玻纤池窑纯氧燃烧技术研究[J]. 玻璃纤维, 2015(2): 5-11.
TANG Y, HE D, XIA J H. Study on oxy-fuel firing technology for fiberglass furnaces[J]. Fiber Glass, 2015(2): 5-11 (in Chinese).
[12] Glass furnace model 4.17 user's guide[M]. Vsetín: Glass Service Inc. 2015.
[13] 晏丽琴, 徐宏彤. 基于CFD软件模拟精度与可信度影响因素分析[J]. 自动化与仪器仪表, 2014(9): 101-103.
YAN L Q, XU H T. CFD simulation software based on the accuracy and reliability of influencing factors[J]. Automation & Instrumentation, 2014(9): 101-103 (in Chinese).
[14] 马翠华, 卞从文, 韩韬. 全氧燃烧玻璃纤维窑炉火焰空间的数值模拟[J]. 玻璃纤维, 2013(6): 24-28+32.
MA C H, BIAN C W, HAN T. Numerical simulation of combustion space in oxy-fuel fired fiberglass furnace[J]. Fiber Glass, 2013(6): 24-28+32 (in Chinese).
[15] 于守富, 夏江华, 唐秀凤, 等. 数值模拟在玻纤池窑生产中的应用[J]. 玻璃纤维, 2015(4): 15-22.
YU S F, XIA J H, TANG X F, et al. Application of numerical simulation in direct-melt fiberglass production[J]. Fiber Glass, 2015(4): 15-22 (in Chinese).
[16] MINKOFF G. Seventh international symposium on combustion: a brief survey[J]. Combustion and Flame, 1958, 2: 322-326.
[17] CHOUDHARY M K, PURNODE B, LANKHORST A M, et al. Radiative heat transfer in processing of glass-forming melts[J]. International Journal of Applied Glass Science, 2018, 9(2): 218-234.
[18] KRAUSE D, LOCH H. Mathematical simulation in glass technology[M]. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
[19] 吕树欣, 刘涌, 宋晨路, 等. 基于火焰空间与玻璃液热耦合的玻璃熔窑数值模拟[J]. 材料科学与工程学报, 2012, 30(1): 25-28+24.
LYU S X, LIU Y, SONG C L, et al. Computational study of glass furnace based on thermal coupling between combustion space and liquid glass pool[J]. Journal of Materials Science and Engineering, 2012, 30(1): 25-28+24 (in Chinese).
[20] 吕树欣. 热耦合数值模型的研究及其在全氧燃烧玻璃熔窑中的应用[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2012: 13-23.
LYU S X. Study on thermal coupling numerical model and its application in oxygen-burning glass melting furnace[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2012: 13-23 (in Chinese).

顶烧/侧烧燃烧方式对全氧燃烧玻纤窑炉温度场流场影响的数值模拟研究

Numerical Simulation of Effects of Top/Side Firing Methods on Temperature and Flow Fields of Oxygen-Fuel Glass Fiber Furnace

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	朱经纬, 舒众众, 金良茂, 曹志强, 张冲, 郑际杰, 刘涌, 韩高荣. 残余应力分布对基板玻璃落球冲击强度影响的数值模拟研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(4): 1267-1273.
[2]	袁朝阳, 胡东方, 李彦兵. 支撑物参数对全钢化真空玻璃等效应力和变形量的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(9): 3372-3378.
[3]	张海燕, 唐国铭, 过民龙, 康胜国. 回字形3D打印混凝土受压性能试验及数值模拟[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(6): 1980-1986.
[4]	卓耀彬, 吕碧飞, 宋小文, 杨辰龙, 叶晓平, 陈旭绍. 玻璃管水平拉制成型过程的数值模拟[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(3): 1096-1105.
[5]	李宇航, 温勇, 韩国旗, 郝恩泽, 刘佳, 马丽莎. 持续荷载和锂渣取代量对混凝土抗氯离子渗透性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(2): 598-606.
[6]	曾红杰, 周文彩, 官敏, 沈中杰, 陈淑勇, 李红强, 齐帅, 左泽方. 全氧燃烧玻璃窑炉热化学再生技术实验研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(12): 4509-4517.
[7]	欧阳德光, 朱利平, 郭旭, 静行. ALC板专用砂浆早期抗剪黏结性能试验与数值模拟研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(11): 3843-3852.
[8]	朱明, 宫能平, 穆朝民, 蔡天宇, 章雨. 高温后钢纤维自密实混凝土动、静态力学性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(11): 3895-3905.
[9]	马泉, 肖建庄, 田丰, 晏文品, 宋敏, 付杰, 杨超, 曹雪. 再生砂粉混凝土抗压强度与细观损伤研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(11): 4042-4050.
[10]	陈淑勇, 陈家睿, 李瑾, 李从云, 欧元勋, 江琦, 左泽方. 浮法锡槽入口段玻璃液流动过程模拟分析[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(4): 1185-1194.
[11]	向阳开, 刘威震, 赵毅, 张庆宇, 张艳娟. 钢渣沥青混合料微波加热自愈合性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(2): 667-677.
[12]	刘云强, 左晓宝, 黎亮, 邹欲晓. 硫酸盐侵蚀下硬化水泥浆体微结构演变及膨胀过程的数值模拟[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(12): 4128-4138.
[13]	易立, 韩建军, 王桂荣, 李路瑶, 阮健, 陈德成, 王文田. 超大吨位一窑两线浮法玻璃熔窑的数值模拟研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(11): 3901-3909.
[14]	高帅, 岳高伟, 蔺海晓, 李敏敏, 刘慧. 钢化真空玻璃在温差作用下的变形特征[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(11): 3918-3924.
[15]	张福龙, 梁潇文. 半固态搅拌制 SiC 颗粒增强镁基复合材料过程的数值模拟[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2021, 40(3): 984-989.