植筋与3D打印砂浆粘结性能试验研究

硅酸盐通报 ›› 2024, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (5): 1633-1641.

• “3D 打印无机非金属材料”专题(II) • 上一篇下一篇

植筋与3D打印砂浆粘结性能试验研究

周荀¹, 柳根金², 王银辉², 李贺东¹, 耿健², 谢伟鸿², 倪坤³

1.浙江理工大学建筑工程学院,杭州 310018;
2.浙大宁波理工学院土木建筑工程学院,宁波 315100;
3.北京建工新型建材有限责任公司,北京 100015

收稿日期:2024-01-26 修订日期:2024-03-05 出版日期:2024-05-15 发布日期:2024-06-06
通信作者: 柳根金,博士,讲师。E-mail:liugenjin@163.com
作者简介:周荀(1997—),男,硕士研究生。主要从事3D打印水泥基材料的研究。E-mail:1209563584@qq.com
基金资助:
浙江省自然科学基金项目(LQ 22E080024);国家级大学生创新训练项目(202313022050)

Bond Performance Between Embedded Rebar and 3D Printed Mortar

ZHOU Xun¹, LIU Genjin², WANG Yinhui², LI Hedong¹, GENG Jian², XIE Weihong², NI Kun³

1. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China;
2. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Ningbo Tech University, Ningbo 315100, China;
3. Beijing Construction Engineering Group Advanced Construction Materials Co., Ltd., Beijing 100015, China

Received:2024-01-26 Revised:2024-03-05 Online:2024-05-15 Published:2024-06-06

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探索植筋技术在3D打印水泥基材料中应用的可行性,本文通过拉拔试验,系统研究了钢筋植入方式(预埋、植入)、成型方式(浇筑、打印)、打印条与钢筋夹角(0°、90°)、粘结长度(5Ø、7Ø、10Ø,Ø代表钢筋直径)对植筋与3D打印砂浆粘结性能的影响规律,对不同试件的极限荷载、钢筋与砂浆基体的相对滑移、破坏形态进行了对比分析。结果显示,打印条与钢筋垂直时,采用植筋方式,粘结效果最佳, 垂直打印植筋试件极限荷载相较于预埋筋试件提升了58.30%。植筋方式下,极限荷载对应的滑移值增大;且随着粘结长度增加,极限荷载有所提升,但粘结长度超过7Ø后,极限荷载提升不明显,破坏模式由劈裂破坏转变为钢筋拉断。研究表明采用植筋加固可以显著提高3D打印砂浆与钢筋之间的粘结性能,提升试件的变形能力。

关键词: 3D打印砂浆, 植筋, 打印方式, 粘结性能, 拉拔试验, 破坏模式

Abstract: In order to explore the feasibility of rebar embedding technology in 3D printed cement-based materials, this study conducted a series of pull out tests to investigate the influence of rebar embedding methods (pre-embedded, embedded), forming methods (pouring, printing), the angle between the printing bar and the rebar (0°, 90°), and bond length (5Ø, 7Ø, 10Ø, Ø is rebar diameter) on the bond performance between embedded rebar and 3D printed mortar. Comparative analysis was carried out on the ultimate load, relative slip between rebar and mortar matrix, and failure modes of different specimens. The results show that when the printing bar is perpendicular to the rebar, the best bonding effect is achieved using the rebar embedding method. The ultimate load of vertically printed embedded rebar specimens is 58.30% higher than that of pre-embedded rebar specimens. Under the rebar embedding method, the corresponding slip value of the ultimate load increases. Additionally, with the increase of the bond length, the ultimate load increases, but the increase becomes less significant when the bond length exceeds 7Ø, and the failure mode changes from splitting failure to rebar pullout. The study indicates that reinforcement with rebar embedding can significantly improve the bond performance between 3D printed mortar and rebar and enhance the deformation capacity of the specimens.

Key words: 3D printed mortar, embedded rebar, printing method, bond performance, pull out test, destruction mode

中图分类号:

TU528

周荀, 柳根金, 王银辉, 李贺东, 耿健, 谢伟鸿, 倪坤. 植筋与3D打印砂浆粘结性能试验研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(5): 1633-1641.

ZHOU Xun, LIU Genjin, WANG Yinhui, LI Hedong, GENG Jian, XIE Weihong, NI Kun. Bond Performance Between Embedded Rebar and 3D Printed Mortar[J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2024, 43(5): 1633-1641.

参考文献

[1] AGUSTÍ-JUAN I, MÜLLER F, HACK N, et al. Potential benefits of digital fabrication for complex structures: environmental assessment of a robotically fabricated concrete wall[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 154: 330-340.
[2] WENG Y W, LI M Y, RUAN S Q, et al. Comparative economic, environmental and productivity assessment of a concrete bathroom unit fabricated through 3D printing and a precast approach[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 261: 121245.
[3] BHUSHAN J B, JANGRA P. 3D printed concrete: a comprehensive review of raw material’s properties, synthesis, performance, and potential field applications[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2023, 387: 131614.
[4] ASPRONE D, MENNA C, BOS F P, et al. Rethinking reinforcement for digital fabrication with concrete[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2018, 112: 111-121.
[5] KLOFT H, EMPELMANN M, HACK N, et al. Reinforcement strategies for 3D-concrete-printing[J]. Civil Engineering Design, 2020, 2(4): 131-139.
[6] MECHTCHERINE V, BUSWELL R, KLOFT H, et al. Integrating reinforcement in digital fabrication with concrete: a review and classification framework[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2021, 119: 103964.
[7] 高超. BFRP筋增强3D打印混凝土梁式构件力学性能研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2020.
GAO C. Research on mechanical properties of 3D printed concrete beam members strengthened by BFRP bars[D].Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2020 (in Chinese).
[8] LUKAS G, LAURA E, COSTANTINO M, et al. Inter-laboratory study on the influence of 3D concrete printing set-ups on the bond behaviour of various reinforcements[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2022, 133: 104660.
[9] LE T T, AUSTIN S A, LIM S, et al. Hardened properties of high-performance printing concrete[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2012, 42(3): 558-566.
[10] DING T, QIN F, XIAO J Z, et al. Experimental study on the bond behaviour between steel bars and 3D printed concrete[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2022, 49: 104105.
[11] INGAGLIO J, FOX J, NAITO C J, et al. Material characteristics of binder jet 3D printed hydrated CSA cement with the addition of fine aggregates[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2019, 206: 494-503.
[12] 刘华新, 柳根金, 白云鹏, 等. ETS法加固钢筋混凝土短梁抗剪性能试验研究[J]. 混凝土与水泥制品, 2014(11): 64-67.
LIU H X, LIU G J, BAI Y P, et al. Experimental study on shearing capacity of reinforced concrete short beams by embedded through-section (ETS) method[J]. China Concrete and Cement Products, 2014(11): 64-67 (in Chinese).
[13] 刘华新, 柳根金, 孔祥清, 等. 纤维增强复合材料抗剪加固混凝土梁试验研究进展[J]. 科技导报, 2016, 34(2): 94-98.
LIU H X, LIU G J, KONG X Q, et al. Review of experimental researches on concrete beams shear-strengthened with fiber reinforced polymer[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2016, 34(2): 94-98 (in Chinese).
[14] BARROS J A O, DALFRÉ G M. Assessment of the effectiveness of the embedded through-section technique for the shear strengthening of reinforced concrete beams[J]. Strain, 2013, 49(1): 75-93.
[15] CARO M, JEMAA Y, DIRAR S, et al. Bond performance of deep embedment FRP bars epoxy-bonded into concrete[J]. Engineering Structures, 2017, 147: 448-457.
[16] SUN X Y, GAO C, WANG H L. Bond performance between BFRP bars and 3D printed concrete[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 269: 121325.
[17] MURCIA-DELSO J, STAVRIDIS A, SHING P B. Bond strength and cyclic bond deterioration of large-diameter bars[J]. ACI Structural Journal, 2013, 110(4): 659-669.

植筋与3D打印砂浆粘结性能试验研究

Bond Performance Between Embedded Rebar and 3D Printed Mortar

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	鲜雪蕾, 林梦凯, 陈天明, 王大宁. 植筋UHPC-NC界面直剪试验研究及有限元模拟[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(6): 2056-2063.
[2]	彭少斌, 管学茂. 3D打印煤矸石砂浆流变性能、打印性能与力学性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(5): 1623-1632.
[3]	孔令艳, 刘树昌, 鲍玖文, 尹相振, 曹银龙, 崔祎菲. FRP筋与海水海砂混凝土界面粘结性能研究进展[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(1): 147-157.
[4]	庄彬彬, 萧超雄, 刘强, 邓嘉辉, 汪大洋. 不同掺合料混凝土与锈蚀钢筋间粘结-滑移力学性能试验研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(8): 2767-2773.
[5]	张继旺, 黄满锋, 苏仕参, 易金, 覃庆龙, 王磊. 高强珊瑚混凝土(HSCC)单轴受压性能试验研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(7): 2275-2282.
[6]	范小春, 徐伟, 陈远程, 梁天福, 尹耀霄. BFRP筋碱激发混凝土粘结性能试验研究与数值模拟[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(6): 1896-1911.
[7]	滕晓丹, 姚淇耀, 陆宸宇, 潘丁菊, 李祚, 谢政专. BFRP筋与分级粒径河砂ECC粘结滑移性能试验研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(4): 1264-1275.
[8]	董磊, 赵坤, 靳文强, 聂丹, 张家玮, 郭乐乐. 硫酸盐干湿循环作用下CFRP-黏土砖界面粘结性能退化规律分析[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(12): 4290-4299.
[9]	赵楠, 卿龙邦, 杨卓凡, 慕儒. 不同龄期钢纤维增强水泥砂浆纤维拉拔试验与模拟研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2021, 40(7): 2165-2173.
[10]	张成龙, 刘漪, 张明. PP/PVA纤维增强硫铝酸盐水泥基快速修补材料试验研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2021, 40(7): 2174-2183.
[11]	焦泽坤, 王栋民, 王启宝, 黄天勇, 王吉祥, 李林坤. 3D打印混凝土材料可打印性的影响因素与测试方法[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2021, 40(6): 1821-1831.
[12]	张献民, 陈雪芳, 李长辉, 霍海峰, 陈宇. 纤维与水泥砂浆界面黏结性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2021, 40(12): 3927-3937.
[13]	朱豪伟, 刘长武, 陈小强, 赵超. 高渗透改性环氧树脂充填砂浆材料裂隙试验研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2021, 40(1): 77-82.
[14]	薛伶俐;黎红兵;高云龙;李胜伟. 磷酸镁水泥基材料与混凝土粘结性能研究进展[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2020, 39(9): 2724-2731.
[15]	易富;王政宇;杜常博;李军;孟兴涛. 土工格栅与不同粒径填料界面作用特性试验研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2019, 38(8): 2557-256.