模拟氢基竖炉工况条件下铝硅质耐火材料的结构与性能演变

硅酸盐通报 ›› 2024, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (3): 1133-1142.

所属专题：耐火材料

模拟氢基竖炉工况条件下铝硅质耐火材料的结构与性能演变

颉付博^1,2, 李亚伟^1,2, 廖宁^1,2, 史成龙³, 蔡国庆³, 秦建涛³

1.武汉科技大学省部共建耐火材料与冶金国家重点实验室,武汉 430081;
2.武汉科技大学高温材料与炉衬技术国家地方联合工程研究中心,武汉 430081;
3.山东耐材集团鲁耐窑业有限公司,淄博 255200

收稿日期:2023-09-19 修订日期:2023-11-15 出版日期:2024-03-15 发布日期:2024-03-27
通信作者: 李亚伟,博士,教授。E-mail:liyawei@wust.edu.cn
作者简介:颉付博(1997—),男,硕士研究生。主要从事耐火材料方面的研究。E-mail:773966865@qq.com
基金资助:
湖北省重点研发计划(2023BCB100);青海省自然科学基金面上项目(2022-ZJ-928)

Structural and properties Evolution of Al₂O₃-SiO₂ Refractories under Simulated Hydrogen-Based Shaft Furnace Condition

XIE Fubo^1,2, LI Yawei^1,2, LIAO Ning^1,2, SHI Chenglong³, CAI Guoqing³, QIN Jiantao³

1. The State Key Laboratory of Refractories and Metallurgy, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430081, China;
2. National-Provincial Joint Engineering Research Center of High Temperature Materials and Lining Technology, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430081, China;
3. Shandong Refractories Group Lunai Kiln Co., Ltd., Zibo 255200, China

Received:2023-09-19 Revised:2023-11-15 Online:2024-03-15 Published:2024-03-27

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于H₂/CO混合气强还原服役环境,本工作模拟常压氢基竖炉服役工况,研究典型的铝硅质耐火材料经还原处理后性能变化规律及失稳机制。结果表明,在V(H₂) ∶V(CO)=5 ∶2的条件下,热处理温度由450 ℃升高至950 ℃,混合气体对铝硅质耐火材料的还原能力逐渐增强。现有条件下,铝硅质耐火材料失稳的两个关键因素在于Fe₂O₃含量以及磷酸盐结合剂:1)当铝硅质耐火材料中Fe₂O₃含量较高时,在H₂/CO气氛下,Fe₂O₃极易被还原为单质铁。同时,这种情况会导致铝硅质耐火材料发生一定程度的体积变化和显著的力学性能下降。2)磷酸盐结合铝硅质耐火材料也面临磷酸盐挥发,导致显气孔率提高,结构稳定性降低。然而,研究还发现磷酸盐结合刚玉-莫来石砖中Fe₂O₃含量较低且伴生一定含量的TiO₂时,材料具有较好的抗H₂/CO气还原能力。通过比较铝硅质耐火材料在CO气氛和H₂/CO气氛下力学性能,发现V(H₂) ∶V(CO)=5 ∶2气氛下在850 ℃ 热处理3 h比CO气氛下500 ℃热处理100 h具有更强的还原能力。

关键词: 氢基竖炉, H₂/CO气氛, 铝硅质耐火材料, Fe₂O₃, 磷酸盐, CO气氛

Abstract: Currently, research on hydrogen-based shaft furnaces mainly focuses on the reduction thermodynamics and kinetic processes and furnace structure design, while research on refractories is rare. Based on the strong reducing environment of H₂/CO mixed gas, this study simulated the service conditions of atmospheric pressure hydrogen-based shaft furnaces, and researched the performance changes and instability mechanisms of typical Al₂O₃-SiO₂ refractories after reduction treatment. The results show that under the condition of V(H₂) ∶V(CO)=5 ∶2, the heat treatment temperature rises from 450 ℃ to 950 ℃, and the reduction ability of mixed gas to Al₂O₃-SiO₂ refractories is gradually enhanced. Under current conditions, the two key factors leading to the instability of Al₂O₃-SiO₂ refractories are the Fe₂O₃ content and the phosphate binder. 1) When the Fe₂O₃ content in Al₂O₃-SiO₂ refractories is high, it is easily reduced to elemental iron in the H₂/CO atmosphere. At the same time, this situation will lead to a certain degree of volume change and significant decrease in mechanical properties of Al₂O₃-SiO₂ refractories. 2) Phosphate-bonded Al₂O₃-SiO₂ refractories materials also face phosphate volatilization, leading to an increase of apparent porosity and a decrease in structural stability. However, it is found that when the Fe₂O₃ content in the phosphate-bonded alumina-mullite brick is lower and accompanied by a certain amount of TiO₂, the refractories exhibits good resistance to H₂/CO gas reduction. By comparing the mechanical properties of Al₂O₃-SiO₂ refractories in CO atmosphere and H₂/CO atmosphere, it is found that the heat treatment condition which holding 3 h at 850 ℃ in the atmosphere of V(H₂) ∶V(CO)=5 ∶2 has a stronger reducing ability than the heat treatment condition which holding 100 h at 500 ℃ in CO atmosphere.

Key words: hydrogen-based shaft furnace, H₂/CO atmosphere, Al₂O₃-SiO₂ refractory, Fe₂O₃, phosphate, CO atmosphere

中图分类号:

TQ175

颉付博, 李亚伟, 廖宁, 史成龙, 蔡国庆, 秦建涛. 模拟氢基竖炉工况条件下铝硅质耐火材料的结构与性能演变[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(3): 1133-1142.

XIE Fubo, LI Yawei, LIAO Ning, SHI Chenglong, CAI Guoqing, QIN Jiantao. Structural and properties Evolution of Al₂O₃-SiO₂ Refractories under Simulated Hydrogen-Based Shaft Furnace Condition[J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2024, 43(3): 1133-1142.

参考文献

[1] 熊柳. 低碳经济下冶金工程技术的发展现状研究[J]. 中国金属通报, 2022(22): 1-3.
XIONG L. Research on development status of metallurgical engineering technology in low-carbon economy[J]. China Metal Bulletin, 2022(22): 1-3 (in Chinese).
[2] 郭学益, 陈远林, 田庆华, 等. 氢冶金理论与方法研究进展[J]. 中国有色金属学报, 2021, 31(7): 1891-1906.
GUO X Y, CHEN Y L, TIAN Q H, et al. Research progress on hydrogen metallurgy theory and method[J]. The Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals, 2021, 31(7): 1891-1906 (in Chinese).
[3] 刘志国, 回士旭. 氢冶金原理及工业化应用研究进展[J]. 中国金属通报, 2021(9): 5-6.
LIU Z G, HUI S X. Research progress of hydrogen metallurgy principle and industrial application[J]. China Metal Bulletin, 2021(9): 5-6 (in Chinese).
[4] WANG R R, ZHAO Y Q, BABICH A, et al. Hydrogen direct reduction (H-DR) in steel industry: an overview of challenges and opportunities[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 329: 129797.
[5] LIU Z J, LU S F, WANG Y Z, et al. Study on optimization of reduction temperature of hydrogen-based shaft furnace: numerical simulation and multi-criteria evaluation[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2023, 48(42): 16132-16142.
[6] TANG J, CHU M S, LI F, et al. Development and progress on hydrogen metallurgy[J]. International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy and Materials, 2020, 27(6): 713-723.
[7] BAI M H, LONG H, REN S B, et al. Reduction behavior and kinetics of iron ore pellets under H₂-N₂ atmosphere[J]. ISIJ International, 2018, 58(6): 1034-1041.
[8] NAGASAKA T, HINO M, BAN-YA S. Interfacial kinetics of hydrogen with liquid slag containing iron oxide[J]. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, 2000, 31(5): 945-955.
[9] 方觉. 非高炉炼铁工艺与理论[M]. 北京: 冶金工业出版社, 2002: 1-62.
FANG J. Non-blast furnace ironmaking technology and theory[M]. Beijing: Metallurgical Industry Press, 2002: 1-62 (in Chinese).
[10] 葛俊礼. 气基直接还原竖炉炉内行为与炉型关系研究[D]. 秦皇岛: 燕山大学, 2014.
GE J L. Study on the relationship between furnace behavior and furnace type in gas-based direct reduction shaft furnace[D].Qinhuangdao: Yanshan University, 2014 (in Chinese).
[11] 周颖, 周红军, 徐春明. 中国钢铁工业低碳绿色生产氢源思考与探索[J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(2): 1073-1077.
ZHOU Y, ZHOU H J, XU C M. Exploration of hydrogen sources for the low-carbon and green production in the steel industry in China[J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2022, 41(2): 1073-1077 (in Chinese).
[12] 于国瀚, 崔竞文, 赵飞, 等. 氢基竖炉用耐火材料服役环境模拟及设计[J]. 硅酸盐学报, 2023, 51(3): 619-627.
YU G H, CUI J W, ZHAO F, et al. Service environment simulation and design of refractory for hydrogen-based shaft furnace[J]. Journal of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2023, 51(3): 619-627 (in Chinese).
[13] SANG S B, PU J, JIANG S P, et al. Prediction of H₂ leak rate in mica-based seals of planar solid oxide fuel cells[J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2008, 182(1): 141-144.
[14] BONALDE A, HENRIQUEZ A, MANRIQUE M. Kinetic analysis of the iron oxide reduction using hydrogen-carbon monoxide mixtures as reducing agent[J]. ISIJ International, 2005, 45(9): 1255-1260.
[15] 韩行禄, 刘景林. 耐火材料应用[M]. 北京: 冶金工业出版社, 1986.
HAN X L, LIU J L. Application of refractory materials[M]. Beijing: Metallurgical Industry Press, 1986 (in Chinese).
[16] LI Y, CHEN L, HONG L, et al. Fabrication of porous silicon carbide ceramics at low temperature using aluminum dihydrogen phosphate as binder[J]. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2019, 785: 838-845.
[17] ROUSSEAU G, MONTAGNE L, MÉAR F O. Further insights on the thermal degradation of aluminum metaphosphate prepared from aluminum dihydrogen phosphate solution[J]. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 2021, 41(9): 4970-4976.
[18] 王治峰, 马淑龙, 任博, 等. 红柱石原料高温结构演变及抗钾蒸气侵蚀行为研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(3): 1106-1114.
WANG Z F, MA S L, REN B, et al. Microstructural evolution of andalusite at elevated temperature and its potassium vapor attack resistance behavior[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2023, 42(3): 1106-1114 (in Chinese).
[19] 李柳生, 廖桂华, 徐国辉. 烧成温度和保温时间对红柱石基耐火材料莫来石化行为的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2007, 26(6): 1229-1232+1239.
LI L S, LIAO G H, XU G H. Effect of firing temperature and soaking time on mollitization of andalusite based refractory[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2007, 26(6): 1229-1232+1239 (in Chinese).
[20] MONDAL K, LORETHOVA H, HIPPO E, et al. Reduction of iron oxide in carbon monoxide atmosphere: reaction controlled kinetics[J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2004, 86(1): 33-47.
[21] BONALDE A, HENRIQUEZ A, MANRIQUE M. Kinetic analysis of the iron oxide reduction using hydrogen-carbon monoxide mixtures as reducing agent[J]. ISIJ International, 2005, 45(9): 1255-1260.
[22] XU M W P, BROWN J J Jr. Mechanism of iron catalysis of carbon monoxide decomposition in refractories[J]. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 1989, 72(1): 110-115.
[23] ASTM. Standard test method for disintegration of refractories in an atmosphere of carbon monoxide: C288-87[S]. PA: ASTM, 2014.
[24] British Standards Institution. Methods of testing refractory materials, general and textural properties, determination of resistance to carbon monoxide: BS 1902-3[S]. Britain: GB-BSI, 1988.

模拟氢基竖炉工况条件下铝硅质耐火材料的结构与性能演变

Structural and properties Evolution of Al₂O₃-SiO₂ Refractories under Simulated Hydrogen-Based Shaft Furnace Condition

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王嘉毅, 汪涛, 聂云鹏, 王琪. IP6-HA改性磷酸镁基复合骨水泥的制备与性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(8): 2888-2894.
[2]	薛兴勇, 韩要丛, 苏俏俏, 徐梦雪, 崔学民. 铜渣基磷酸盐胶凝材料的力学性能与微观结构[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(5): 1750-1757.
[3]	温红娟, 施思嘉, 吴修胜, 金正权, 李栋才, 曹菊芳. 低介电常数磷酸盐微波介质陶瓷的研究进展[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(3): 1025-1036.
[4]	孔祥辰, 白频波, 宋伟, 玄松桐, 张云玲, 田玉明. 煅烧煤矸石添加量对陶粒支撑剂力学性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(6): 2039-2046.
[5]	施麟芸, 徐玉华, 魏琦. Fe₂O₃对铜尾矿基CaO-MgO-Al₂O₃-SiO₂微晶玻璃析晶行为的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(11): 3844-3851.
[6]	李秀英, 陶歆月, 肖卓豪, 贺一峰, 李朝圆, 夏莹, 孔令兵. 高稳定性SrF₂-Na₂O-Fe₂O₃-P₂O₅体系氟磷酸盐玻璃的制备与表征[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(10): 3699-3707.
[7]	刁金龙, 于天来, 莫大洪, 郑涛, 郭艳艳, 吕景文. SnO对SnF₂-P₂O₅-WO₃系统玻璃结构和性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2021, 40(1): 266-270.
[8]	贾行伟;宋向荣;罗中秋;周新涛;王敬冬;李娜秋. 铜渣基磷酸盐胶凝材料的制备及其性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2018, 37(5): 1503-1508.
[9]	何廷树;谢彪. 微量磷酸盐对蒸养混凝土强度增效作用的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2017, 36(3): 1030-1034.
[10]	韩涛;杨学腾;靳秀芝;王慧奇;钟军超;李晓宇. 磷酸盐对石膏溶解性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2016, 35(5): 1418-1422.
[11]	郝旭涛;周新涛;陈卓;满亮;陶志超;陈小凤. 磷酸盐化学键合材料固化/稳定化重金属研究进展[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2015, 34(8): 2208-2213.
[12]	任慧;李海建;于慧君;梁晓峰. 铁磷酸盐玻璃析晶的拉曼光谱及显微分析[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2014, 33(9): 2312-2315.
[13]	梁晓峰;赖元明;李海建;王翠玲. 氧化钠对铁磷酸盐玻璃微结构影响的振动光谱分析[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2014, 33(3): 600-604.
[14]	高瑞;宋学锋;张县云;吴刚. 不同磷酸盐对磷酸镁水泥水化硬化性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2014, 33(2): 346-350.
[15]	施申勇;张青红;王宏志;李耀刚. 磷酸盐玻璃渗透3Y-TZP全瓷齿科材料的研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2012, 31(4): 780-784.

模拟氢基竖炉工况条件下铝硅质耐火材料的结构与性能演变

Structural and properties Evolution of Al2O3-SiO2 Refractories under Simulated Hydrogen-Based Shaft Furnace Condition

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

Structural and properties Evolution of Al₂O₃-SiO₂ Refractories under Simulated Hydrogen-Based Shaft Furnace Condition