石膏溶解特性对无水硫铝酸钙水化进程的影响

硅酸盐通报 ›› 2023, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (5): 1804-1813.

所属专题：资源综合利用

石膏溶解特性对无水硫铝酸钙水化进程的影响

黄炳银¹, 崔素萍¹, 王亚丽¹, 陈智丰², 王剑锋¹

1.北京工业大学材料与制造学部,北京 100124;
2.唐山北极熊建材有限公司,唐山 063705

收稿日期:2022-12-27 修订日期:2023-03-08 出版日期:2023-05-15 发布日期:2023-06-01
通信作者: 崔素萍,博士,教授。E-mail:cuisuping@bjut.edu.cn
作者简介:黄炳银(1999—),女,硕士研究生。主要从事石膏对含铝矿物水化影响的研究。E-mail:hbingyin@163.com
基金资助:
北京市科技计划(Z221100007522002);北京市自然科学基金-市教委联合资助项目(KZ202010005013)

Effects of Dissolution Characteristics of Gypsum on Hydration Process of Anhydrous Calcium Sulfoaluminate

HUANG Bingyin¹, CUI Suping¹, WANG Yali¹, CHEN Zhifeng², WANG Jianfeng¹

1. Materials and Manufacturing Department, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China;
2. Tangshan Polar Bear Building Materials Co., Ltd., Tangshan 063705, China

Received:2022-12-27 Revised:2023-03-08 Online:2023-05-15 Published:2023-06-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 石膏的溶解度和溶解速率等特性对无水硫铝酸钙水化及性能有重要的影响。本文采用等温量热仪、XRD、TG-DTG等多种测试方法,研究了半水石膏、二水石膏、硬石膏溶解特性及其对无水硫铝酸钙水化进程的影响,并基于Krstulovic-Dabic和Kondo模型,计算了水化反应各阶段的动力学参数。结果表明,半水石膏、二水石膏、硬石膏在纯水中的溶解度分别为2.74、2.30、2.38 g/L,半水石膏的溶解速率最大,其次是二水石膏,硬石膏的最小(1 h的溶解度为1.19 g/L)。石膏的加入缩短了无水硫铝酸钙水化诱导期进而加快了水化进程,其中半水石膏表现最为显著,水化热曲线几乎不存在诱导期,二水石膏次之,硬石膏对诱导期的影响最小;加速期初期的水化反应速率常数从小到大为硬石膏体系、二水石膏体系、半水石膏体系。石膏溶解速率和溶解度影响钙矾石的形成过程,溶解速率大的石膏促使水化早期钙矾石沉淀出现,生成量快速达到最大值;且在相同时间内,溶解度高的石膏体系钙矾石生成量大,在水化1 h时,半水石膏体系中钙矾石生成量约占试样总量的15.77%(质量分数),二水石膏体系中钙矾石生成量占13.28%(质量分数),硬石膏体系中钙矾石生成量仅占3.60%(质量分数)。

关键词: 石膏, 无水硫铝酸钙, 溶解特性, 水化进程, 钙矾石, 水化动力学

Abstract: The solubility and dissolution rate of gypsum have important effects on the hydration and properties of anhydrous calcium sulfoaluminate. In this paper, isothermal calorimeter, XRD, TG-DTG and other test methods were used to study the dissolution characteristics of hemihydrate gypsum, dihydrate gypsum and anhydrite and their effects on the hydration process of anhydrous calcium sulfoaluminate. Based on Krstulovic-Dabic and Kondo model, the kinetic parameters of each stage of hydration reaction were calculated. The results show that the solubility of hemihydrate gypsum, dihydrate gypsum and anhydrite in pure water is 2.74, 2.30, 2.38 g/L, respectively. The dissolution rate of hemihydrate gypsum is the maximum, followed by dihydrate gypsum, and the minimum is anhydrite (1 h solubility is 1.19 g/L). The addition of gypsum shortens the induction period of hydration of anhydrous calcium sulfoaluminate and accelerates the process of hydration, where hemihydrate behaves most significantly, with the hydration heat curve having almost no induction period, followed by dihydrate, and anhydrite having the least effect on the induction period. At the beginning of the acceleration period, the hydration rate constant from small to large is anhydrite system, dihydrate system, hemihydrate system. The dissolution rate and solubility of gypsum affect the formation process of ettringite. The gypsum with large dissolution rate prompts the appearance of ettringite precipitation at the early stage of hydration and the amount reaches the maximum value quickly. And in the same time, the system with the addition of gypsum with high solubility has a large amount of ettringite production. At 1 h of hydration, the amount of ettringite produced in the hemihydrate system is about 15.77% (mass fraction) of the total sample, 13.28% (mass fraction) in the dihydrate system and only 3.60% (mass fraction) in the anhydrite system.

Key words: gypsum, anhydrous calcium sulfoaluminate, dissolution characteristic, hydration process, ettringite, hydration kinetics

中图分类号:

TQ172.1

黄炳银, 崔素萍, 王亚丽, 陈智丰, 王剑锋. 石膏溶解特性对无水硫铝酸钙水化进程的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(5): 1804-1813.

HUANG Bingyin, CUI Suping, WANG Yali, CHEN Zhifeng, WANG Jianfeng. Effects of Dissolution Characteristics of Gypsum on Hydration Process of Anhydrous Calcium Sulfoaluminate[J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2023, 42(5): 1804-1813.

参考文献

[1] 沈燕, 张伟, 陈玺, 等. 硫铝酸盐水泥改性的研究进展[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2019, 38(3): 683-687.
SHEN Y, ZHANG W, CHEN X, et al. Research progress of sulfoaluminate cement modification[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2019, 38(3): 683-687 (in Chinese).
[2] WINNEFELD F, MARTIN L H J, MÜLLER C J, et al. Using gypsum to control hydration kinetics of CSA cements[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2017, 155: 154-163.
[3] JANSEN D, SPIES A, NEUBAUER J, et al. Studies on the early hydration of two modifications of ye’elimite with gypsum[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2017, 91: 106-116.
[4] 王硕, 常钧, 季娟, 等. 硫铝酸盐水泥胶凝膨胀性能与石膏种类的关系[J]. 新世纪水泥导报, 2019, 25(1): 69-72.
WANG S, CHANG J, JI J, et al. Influence of gypsum types on expansion performance of sulphoaluminate cement[J]. Cement Guide for New Epoch, 2019, 25(1): 69-72 (in Chinese).
[5] 贾韶辉, 陈彦翠, 刘恒波, 等. 石膏种类及掺量对硫铝酸盐水泥性能的影响研究[J]. 建材发展导向, 2015, 13(12): 59-61.
JIA S H, CHEN Y C, LIU H B, et al. Study on the influence of gypsum type and dosage on the properties of sulphoaluminate cement[J]. Development Guide to Building Materials, 2015, 13(12): 59-61 (in Chinese).
[6] GARCÍA-MATÉ M, DE LA TORRE A G, LEÓN-REINA L, et al. Effect of calcium sulfate source on the hydration of calcium sulfoaluminate eco-cement[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2015, 55: 53-61.
[7] ALLEVI S, MARCHI M, SCOTTI F, et al. Hydration of calcium sulphoaluminate clinker with additions of different calcium sulphate sources[J]. Materials and Structures, 2016, 49(1): 453-466.
[8] ZHANG J W, GUAN X M, WANG X, et al. Microstructure and properties of sulfoaluminate cement-based grouting materials: effect of calcium sulfate variety[J]. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2020, 2020: 1-8.
[9] WINNEFELD F, BARLAG S. Influence of calcium sulfate and calcium hydroxide on the hydration of calcium sulfoaluminate clinker[J]. Zkg International, 2009, 62: 42-53.
[10] WINNEFELD F, LOTHENBACH B. Hydration of calcium sulfoaluminate cements—experimental findings and thermodynamic modelling[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2010, 40(8): 1239-1247.
[11] 杨敏. 磷石膏的溶解度研究[J]. 广州化工, 2016, 44(15): 62-63+72.
YANG M. Study on solubility of phosphogypsum[J]. Guangzhou Chemical Industry, 2016, 44(15): 62-63+72 (in Chinese).
[12] 杨柳, 冯富宁, 刘振华, 等. 浅析半水石膏含量对水泥性能的影响[J]. 水泥, 2020(s1): 97-104.
YANG L, FENG F N, LIU Z H, et al. Analysis on the influence of gypsum hemihydrate content on cement properties[J]. Cement, 2020(s1): 97-104 (in Chinese).
[13] 崔素萍, 张彦林, 王子明, 等. 石膏品种对硅酸盐—硫铝酸盐复合体系水泥性能的影响[J]. 水泥工程, 2005(1): 38-40+59.
CUI S P, ZHANG Y L, WANG Z M, et al. Influence of different gypsum on performance of Portland-sulphoalminate composite cement system[J]. Cement Engineering, 2005(1): 38-40+59 (in Chinese).
[14] WINNEFELD F, BARLAG S. Calorimetric and thermogravimetric study on the influence of calcium sulfate on the hydration of ye’elimite[J]. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 2009, 101(3): 949-957.
[15] 李继野. C₄A₃$\bar{S}$-C₂S二元体系的烧成与水化机理研究[D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2019.
LI J Y. Study on the sintering and hydration mechanism of C₄A₃$\bar{S}$-C₂S binary system[D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2019 (in Chinese).
[16] 耿永娟. 石油焦脱硫灰渣制备硫铝酸盐水泥的反应动力学、水化动力学及性能研究[D]. 青岛: 青岛理工大学, 2018.
GENG Y J. Study on reaction kinetics, hydration kinetics and properties of sulphoaluminate cement prepared from petroleum coke desulfurization slag[D]. Qingdao: Qingdao Tehcnology University, 2018 (in Chinese).
[17] HE Z, YANG H M, LIU M Y. Hydration mechanism of sulphoaluminate cement[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology-Mater Sci Ed, 2014, 29(1): 70-74.
[18] KNUDSEN T. On particle size distribution in cement hydration[C]//Proceeding of 7th International Congress on the Chemistry of Cement. Paris, 1980: 170.
[19] KONDO R, UEDA S. Kinetics and mechanism of the hydration of cements[C]//Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on the Chemistry of Cement, Part II Hydration of Cements. Tokyo, 1968: 203-255.
[20] KRSTULOVIİAĆ R, DABIİAĆ P. A conceptual model of the cement hydration process[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2000, 30(5): 693-698.
[21] DABIČ P, KRSTULOVIČ R, RUšIČ D. A new approach in mathematical modelling of cement hydration development[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2000, 30(7): 1017-1021.
[22] 徐冠立, 孙遥, 林金辉. 含钡硫铝酸盐水泥的水化动力学与热力学研究[J]. 材料导报, 2013, 27(12): 126-130.
XU G L, SUN Y, LIN J H. Study on kinetics and thermodynamics of hydration of Ba-bearing sulphoaluminate cement[J]. Materials Review, 2013, 27(12): 126-130 (in Chinese).
[23] 吴学权. 矿渣水泥水化动力学研究[J]. 硅酸盐学报, 1988, 16(5): 423-429.
WU X Q. Kinetic study on hydration of blast furnace slag cement[J]. Journal of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 1988, 16(5): 423-429 (in Chinese).
[24] PADILLA-ENCINAS P, PALOMO A, BLANCO-VARELA M T, et al. Monitoring early hydration of calcium sulfoaluminate clinker[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 295: 123578.

石膏溶解特性对无水硫铝酸钙水化进程的影响

Effects of Dissolution Characteristics of Gypsum on Hydration Process of Anhydrous Calcium Sulfoaluminate

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	任鹏程, 郑和平, 金祖权, 李梦圆, 李金鑫, 逄博. 地热环境下AFt和AFm的转化机制[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(5): 1551-1560.
[2]	杜新宇, 陈潇, 周明凯, 张浩宇, 杨寅, 王瑜德. 含硫酸盐类固废对硅酸盐水泥水化影响研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(5): 1710-1720.
[3]	王杰, 王勇, 王宇强, 王彩萍, 叶圣茂, 高鹏. 循环流化床燃煤固硫灰的CBR特性及膨胀机理研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(4): 1323-1332.
[4]	余海燕, 徐晴, 王英翔, 董德宇. 不同环境下碳铝酸钙的稳定性研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(3): 845-853.
[5]	樊璐洋, 金子豪, 苏英, 崔程嘉, 王斌. 基于响应面法的半水磷石膏复合胶凝材料优化设计及性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(2): 626-636.
[6]	罗国夫, 陈开圣, 骆弟普. 磷石膏稳定红黏土的压缩特性及微观机理[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(2): 644-656.
[7]	李妤茜, 乔秀臣. 外部因素对钙矾石晶体结构及形貌的影响综述[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(1): 31-47.
[8]	李鑫, 杜惠惠, 倪文, 傅平丰, 王飞. KR脱硫渣碱激发矿渣的配比优化及水化特性[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(1): 170-179.
[9]	陆亚运, 罗旭, 刘川北. 不同减水剂对高强石膏浆体工作性的影响与作用机理[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(1): 205-212.
[10]	张天潇, 廖宜顺, 刘立军, 王海宝, 董淇. 苎麻纤维增强磷建筑石膏复合材料耐水性能和力学性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(1): 213-221.
[11]	张五怡, 聂松, 徐名凤, 周健, 李辉. 高贝利特硫铝酸盐水泥活化研究进展[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(9): 2979-2992.
[12]	武双磊, 季军荣, 周威杰, 陈宇, 周润铎, 周洲, 陈胡星. 乳酸钠对超硫酸盐水泥强度的影响及作用机理[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(9): 3008-3015.
[13]	吴泳霖, 张伟, 奠波, 陈建军. 磷石膏热分解研究现状[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(9): 3129-3137.
[14]	刘强, 汪潇, 金彪, 林星彤, 张建武, 王宇斌. H₂SO₄-NaCl-H₂O体系中滤液循环利用对脱硫石膏晶须制备的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(9): 3202-3207.
[15]	李相国, 田博, 何超, 吕阳, 蹇守卫, 姜东兵, 张乘, 周阳. SO₄^2-/C₃A对单矿C₃S水泥浆体中碳硫硅钙石形成的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(8): 2637-2643.