四元矿化剂对硅砖微观形貌及物理性能的影响

硅酸盐通报 ›› 2023, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (3): 1115-1121.

所属专题：耐火材料

四元矿化剂对硅砖微观形貌及物理性能的影响

王家燕, 董博, 余超, 邓承继, 丁军, 祝洪喜

武汉科技大学省部共建耐火材料与冶金国家重点实验室,武汉 430081

收稿日期:2022-10-13 修订日期:2022-12-27 出版日期:2023-03-15 发布日期:2023-03-31
通信作者: 余超,博士,副教授。E-mail:chaoyu@wust.edu.cn
作者简介:王家燕(1997—),男,硕士研究生。主要从事耐火材料的研究。E-mail:2673013268@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金联合基金(U21A2057);湖北省重点研发计划(2021BAD002,2022BAA032)

Effect of Quaternary Mineralizer on Microstructure and Physical Properties of Silica Brick

WANG Jiayan, DONG Bo, YU Chao, DENG Chengji, DING Jun, ZHU Hongxi

The State Key Laboratory of Refractories and Metallurgy, Wuhan University of Scienceand Technology, Wuhan 430081, China

Received:2022-10-13 Revised:2022-12-27 Online:2023-03-15 Published:2023-03-31

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以两种不同粒径的石英砂为原料,石灰乳和纸浆废液为结合剂,经1 430 ℃高温烧成制备硅砖,研究复合矿化剂及保温时间对硅砖物相组成、显微结构及主要物理性能的影响规律。研究结果表明,经1 430 ℃保温10 h后,烧成试样由鳞石英、方石英及少量残余石英组成。添加铁鳞粉-CaO-MnO₂-SiC或铁鳞粉-CaO-MnO₂-TiO₂四元矿化剂时,硅砖中典型的骨料-基质耐火材料结构消失,并逐步出现“均质化”效应。当矿化剂为铁鳞粉-CaO-MnO₂-TiO₂时,经1 430 ℃保温10 h后,烧成试样具有较好的综合性能,其体积密度、显气孔率及常温耐压强度分别约为(1.93±0.01) g·cm^-3、(14.9±0.1)%及(55.05±0.64) MPa。在最佳矿化剂组分及烧成制度基础上,延长保温时间至15或20 h时,材料中残余石英含量降低,但鳞石英含量增大,导致体积膨胀效应增强,使材料的物理性能受损。

关键词: 硅砖, 复合矿化剂, 物相组成, 鳞石英, 方石英, 残余石英, 显微结构, 物理性能

Abstract: Quartz sand with two kinds of particle sizes was used as raw materials and the lime milk and waste paper pulp were used as binders to prepare silica brick after sintering at 1 430 ℃. The effects of multi-mineralizer and holding time on the phase composition, microstructure and main physical properties of silica brick were studied. The results show that the fired specimen is composed of tridymite, cristobalite, and a small content of residual quartz after sintering at 1 430 ℃ for 10 h. With the addition of iron scale powder-CaO-MnO₂-SiC or iron scale powder-CaO-MnO₂-TiO₂, the typical aggregate-matrix refractory structure in silica brick disappears, as well as the homogenization effect appears. The fired specimen has good comprehensive properties after sintering at 1 430 ℃ for 10 h when the mineralizer is iron scale powder-CaO-MnO₂-TiO₂, and the bulk density, apparent porosity, and cold crushing strength are (1.93±0.01) g·cm^-3, (14.9±0.1)%, and (55.05±0.64) MPa, respectively. Based on the optimal mineralizer composition and firing system, when the holding time is extended to 15 or 20 h, the residual quartz content in the material decreases, and tridymite content increases, which make that the volume expansion effect is enhanced, and the physical properties of the material are damaged.

Key words: silica brick, multi-mineralizer, phase composition, tridymite, cristobalite, residual quartz, microstructure, physical property

中图分类号:

TQ175

王家燕, 董博, 余超, 邓承继, 丁军, 祝洪喜. 四元矿化剂对硅砖微观形貌及物理性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(3): 1115-1121.

WANG Jiayan, DONG Bo, YU Chao, DENG Chengji, DING Jun, ZHU Hongxi. Effect of Quaternary Mineralizer on Microstructure and Physical Properties of Silica Brick[J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2023, 42(3): 1115-1121.

参考文献

[1] 李楠, 顾华志, 赵惠忠. 耐火材料学[M]. 北京: 冶金工业出版社, 2010: 118-129.
LI N, GU H Z, ZHAO H Z. Refractory science[M]. Beijing: Metallurgical Industry Press, 2010: 118-129 (in Chinese).
[2] 李素平, 张慧敏, 李丙文, 等. 硅砖的研究进展及应用[J]. 耐火材料, 2015, 49(3): 238-240.
LI S P, ZHANG H M, LI B W, et al. Research progress and application of silica bricks[J]. Refractories, 2015, 49(3): 238-240 (in Chinese).
[3] 郑德胜, 薄钧, 甘菲芳, 等. 高导热硅砖在焦炉上的应用[J]. 耐火材料, 2017, 51(4): 287-288.
ZHENG D S, BO J, GAN F F, et al. Application of high thermal conductivity silica brick in coke oven[J]. Refractories, 2017, 51(4): 287-288 (in Chinese).
[4] 任博, 桑绍柏, 徐义彪, 等. 石油焦煅烧炉用后硅砖分析及其损毁机制初探[J]. 耐火材料, 2016, 50(2): 104-108.
REN B, SANG S B, XU Y B, et al. Analysis of used silica bricks from petroleum coke calcinators and their corrosion mechanism[J]. Refractories, 2016, 50(2): 104-108 (in Chinese).
[5] 任刚伟, 常亮, 卫晓辉, 等. 硅砖中α-方石英的晶体结构与形貌[J]. 硅酸盐学报, 2006, 34(1): 123-126.
REN G W, CHANG L, WEI X H, et al. Crystal structure and morphology of α-cristobalite in silica bricks[J]. Journal of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2006, 34(1): 123-126 (in Chinese).
[6] PRYDE A K A, DOVE M T. On the sequence of phase transitions in tridymite[J]. Physics and Chemistry of Minerals, 1998, 26(2): 171-179.
[7] SCHNEIDER H, MAJDIC A, VASUDEVAN R. Kinetics of the quartz-cristobalite transformation in refractory-grade silica materials[J]. Materials Science Forum, 1986, 7: 91-102.
[8] 王维邦. 耐火材料工艺学[M]. 北京: 冶金工业出版社, 1990: 123.
WANG W B. Refractory technology[M]. Beijing: Metallurgical Industry Press, 1990: 123 (in Chinese).
[9] 徐平坤, 魏国钊. 耐火材料新工艺技术[M]. 北京: 冶金工业出版社, 2005: 29-34.
XU P K, WEI G Z. New technology of refractory materials[M]. Beijing: Metallurgical Industry Press, 2005: 29-34 (in Chinese).
[10] 张尼尼. 高级硅砖中SiO₂变体的X衍射分析[J]. 玻璃与搪瓷, 1993, 21(4): 20-26.
ZHANG N N. X-ray diffraction analysis of SiO₂ crystals in high-duty silica brickt[J]. Glass ＆ Enamel, 1993, 21(4): 20-26 (in Chinese).
[11] 柴俊兰. 矿化剂对硅砖相变及烧结行为的影响[J]. 耐火材料, 2002, 36(1): 30.
CHAI J L. Effect of mineralizer on phase transformation and sintering behavior of silicon brick[J]. Refractories, 2002, 36(1): 30 (in Chinese).
[12] 孙彪, 翟萌萌, 赵鹏飞, 等. 碳化硅粉添加量对碳素炉用硅砖性能的影响[J]. 山东冶金, 2018, 40(3): 27-29.
SUN B, ZHAI M M, ZHAO P F, et al. Effect of adding amount of silicon carbide powder on properties of silica brick for carbon furnace[J]. Shandong Metallurgy, 2018, 40(3): 27-29 (in Chinese).
[13] MANIVASAKAN P, RAJENDRAN V, RAUTA P R, et al. Effect of TiO₂ nanoparticles on properties of silica refractory[J]. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 2010, 93(8): 2236-2243.
[14] 王威. 服役条件下熔融硅砖的组成和结构演变与其断裂行为的相关性研究[D]. 武汉: 武汉科技大学, 2019.
WANG W. Correlation between composition and structural evolution of fused silica brick and fracture behavior under service condition[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University of Science and Technology, 2019 (in Chinese).
[15] YANG J Y, XU L H, HAO H S, et al. Effect of TiO₂ on the thermal conductivity of eco-friendly silica bricks fabricated by Yellow River silt[J]. Materials Science Forum, 2009, 610/611/612/613: 206-210.
[16] 刘爱平, 王者来, 赵鹏飞, 等. 膨润土添加量对焦炉用硅砖性能的影响[J]. 山东冶金, 2019, 41(5): 40-41+46.
LIU A P, WANG Z L, ZHAO P F, et al. Effects of adding content of bentonite on properties of coke oven[J]. Shandong Metallurgy, 2019, 41(5): 40-41+46 (in Chinese).
[17] 张志豪, 张玲, 关岩, 等. 纳米SiO₂的引入方式对焦炉硅砖导热性能的影响[J]. 冶金能源, 2018,37(3): 47-50.
ZHANG Z H, ZHANG L, GUAN Y, et al. Effect of nano SiO₂ on the thermal conductivity of silica brick for coke oven[J]. Energy for Metallurgical Industry, 2018, 37(3): 47-50 (in Chinese).

四元矿化剂对硅砖微观形貌及物理性能的影响

Effect of Quaternary Mineralizer on Microstructure and Physical Properties of Silica Brick

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	孙悦, 刘小青, 何峰, 邓玉华, 李润国, 张超, 郑现明, 谢峻林. 煅烧温度对低品位黏土物相和结构的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(4): 1309-1314.
[2]	刘德嵩, 杨忠德, 林鑫, 谢虎, 张菡欣, 王开, 黄守武, 刘振英. 轻质氧化镁含量对方镁石-镁铝尖晶石砖性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(3): 1122-1129.
[3]	王含, 沈瑞麟, 王鸿妹, 汪庆卫. 晶相组成对硅质耐火材料抗碱侵蚀性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(3): 1130-1136.
[4]	陈辛, 曾祥会, 方伟, 何漩, 杜星, 王大珩, 李薇馨, 赵雷, 陈辉. 二次铝灰制备高强度陶粒及其性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(2): 618-625.
[5]	樊璐洋, 金子豪, 苏英, 崔程嘉, 王斌. 基于响应面法的半水磷石膏复合胶凝材料优化设计及性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(2): 626-636.
[6]	王济伟, 李家科, 刘欣, 江和栋, 郭平春, 朱华, 王艳香. 核桃壳粉为碳源制备C@ZrSiO₄黑色色料[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(2): 657-665.
[7]	董博, 闵昌胜, 陈博, 邓承继, 谢哲, 杨千秋, 丁军, 祝洪喜, 杨昕雨, 余超. 陶瓷相结合粉煤灰漂珠轻质隔热材料的制备及性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(9): 3315-3323.
[8]	张日红, 明维, 万文豪, 刘云鹏. 高强粉煤灰-渣土人造骨料的制备与微结构表征[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(8): 2819-2827.
[9]	张粤, 王宏杰, 杨林, 陈鸿, 曹建新. 磷石膏粒径对湿拌砂浆性能及微观结构的影响研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(8): 2836-2843.
[10]	张晶, 张伟儒, 孙峰, 徐学敏, 王再义, 吕沛远, 王梅. Y₂O₃对高热导率Si₃N₄陶瓷显微结构和性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(7): 2485-2493.
[11]	刘文静, 单江博, 廖宁, 李亚伟, 潘丽萍, 戴亚洁, 朱天彬. 不同温度下合成沸石对铝酸钙水泥水化行为的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(5): 1510-1521.
[12]	吴建锋, 吴昌虎, 徐晓虹, 田克忠, 刘洋, 马思童. 利用黄金尾矿制备陶瓷清水砖的研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(2): 640-648.
[13]	张衡, 吴赟, 李道谦, 李卓霖, 王怡洋, 吴松松, 孙志远, 温广武. 热处理气氛对SiBON陶瓷材料析晶行为的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2021, 40(9): 3114-3121.
[14]	姚苏琴, 查文华, 刘新权, 季圣星, 何昌春, 余跃. 萍乡废弃煤矸石理化特性及热活化性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2021, 40(7): 2280-2287.
[15]	张爱菊, 李子成, 冯婧, 李志宏. 金刚石增强Na₂O-B₂O₃-Al₂O₃-SiO₂系陶瓷基复合材料的界面研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2021, 40(5): 1666-1671.