赤泥基发泡地质聚合物的性能研究

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 拜耳法赤泥含有较多赤铁矿且活性较低,一定程度上限制了其资源化利用。将拜耳法赤泥、矿渣微粉和粉煤灰以5 ∶3 ∶2的质量比混合,以水玻璃和氢氧化钠为碱激发剂,硬脂酸钙为稳泡剂,双氧水为发泡剂,制备发泡地质聚合物。通过调节碱激发剂模数,探究其对赤泥基发泡地质聚合物表观密度、强度以及微观结构的影响。结果表明,随着碱激发剂模数的增加,发泡地质聚合物的表观密度呈先增加后降低的趋势,抗压强度逐渐下降。当碱激发剂模数为1.4时,发泡地质聚合物的28 d表观密度最低,为195.86 kg/m³;28 d抗压强度达到最高值,为0.55 MPa,对应比强度为2 821.12 N·m/kg。这说明碱激发剂模数为1.4时发泡地质聚合物兼顾轻质与高强的性能。

关键词: 赤泥, 发泡, 地质聚合物, 表观密度, 力学性能

Abstract: Red mud from Bayer process contains more hematite and has lower activity, which limit its resource utilization to some extent. The Bayer red mud, blast furnace slag and fly ash were mixed at a mass ratio of 5 ∶3 ∶2, sodium silicate and sodium hydroxide were used as alkali activator, calcium stearate was used as foam stabilizer and hydrogen peroxide was used as foaming agent, then the foamed geopolymer was prepared. The influence of alkali activator modulus on the bulk density, strength and microstructure of red mud-based foamed geopolymer was investigated. The results show that, with the increase of modulus of alkali activator, the bulk density of foamed geopolymer increases first and then decreases, and the compressive strength decreases gradually. When the modulus of alkali activator is 1.4, the bulk density at 28 d of foamed geopolymer is the lowest (195.86 kg/m³), the compressive strength at 28 d is the highest (0.55 MPa), and the specific strength reaches the highest (2 821.12 N·m/kg). The results show that the foamed geopolymer has the best performance of low density and high strength when the modulus of alkali activator is 1.4.

Key words: red mud, foaming, geopolymer, bulk density, mechanical property

中图分类号:

TU52

吕政晔, 张延博, 刘泽, 彭中昊, 王栋民. 赤泥基发泡地质聚合物的性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(10): 3624-3632.

LYU Zhengye, ZHANG Yanbo, LIU Ze, PENG Zhonghao, WANG Dongmin. Properties of Red Mud-Based Foamed Geopolymer[J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2023, 42(10): 3624-3632.

参考文献

[1] 刘冲昊, 岳雪涛, 矫川本, 等. 赤泥基胶凝材料的制备与性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2020, 39(11): 3574-3581.
LIU C H, YUE X T, JIAO C B, et al. Study on preparation and properties of red mud-based cementitious materials[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2020, 39(11): 3574-3581 (in Chinese).
[2] 张默, 王诗彧. 常温制备赤泥-低钙粉煤灰基地聚物的试验和微观研究[J]. 材料导报, 2019, 33(6): 980-985.
ZHANG M, WANG S Y. Experimental investigation and microstructural analysis of ambient temperature cured red mud-class F fly ash based geopolymer[J]. Materials Reports, 2019, 33(6): 980-985 (in Chinese).
[3] 史迪, 叶家元, 张鹏, 等. 蒸汽养护对赤泥基碱激发胶凝材料性能及微观结构的影响[J]. 混凝土, 2017(10): 87-89+92.
SHI D, YE J Y, ZHANG P, et al. Effect of steam curing on properties and microstructure of red mud-based alkali-activated cementitious materials[J]. Concrete, 2017(10): 87-89+92 (in Chinese).
[4] 夏瑞杰, 朱建平, 刘少雄, 等. 赤泥和脱硫石膏制备高贝利特硫铝酸盐水泥熟料[J]. 有色金属工程, 2017, 7(6): 58-63+79.
XIA R J, ZHU J P, LIU S X, et al. Preparation of high belite sulphoaluminate cement clinkers using red mud and desulfurization gypsum[J]. Nonferrous Metals Engineering, 2017, 7(6): 58-63+79 (in Chinese).
[5] 王玉麟, 漆贵海, 许国伟. 拜耳法赤泥对砌筑砂浆性能影响试验研究[J]. 混凝土, 2011(9): 110-112.
WANG Y L, QI G H, XU G W. Rearch on performanc of masonry mortar with Bayer red-mud[J]. Concrete, 2011(9): 110-112 (in Chinese).
[6] 张鹏, 张文生, 韦江雄, 等. 养护温度对赤泥-矿渣碱激发胶凝材料强度和水化产物的影响[J]. 新型建筑材料, 2017, 44(10): 1-3+11.
ZHANG P, ZHANG W S, WEI J X, et al. Influence of curing conditions on the strength, hydration properties of geopolymer synthesized from red mud and slag[J]. New Building Materials, 2017, 44(10): 1-3+11 (in Chinese).
[7] 罗忠涛, 康少杰, 张美香, 等. 碱激发赤泥-矿渣地质聚合物制备及力学性能研究[J]. 武汉理工大学学报, 2019, 41(3): 47-51.
LUO Z T, KANG S J, ZHANG M X, et al. Preparation and mechanical properties of alkali-activated red mud-slag geopolymer[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology, 2019, 41(3): 47-51 (in Chinese).
[8] 刘英, 倪文, 黄晓燕, 等. 拜耳法低铁赤泥在电石渣-脱硫石膏体系中的水化硬化特性[J]. 材料导报, 2016, 30(14): 120-124.
LIU Y, NI W, HUANG X Y, et al. Characteristics of hydration and hardening of red mud of Bayer process in carbide slag-flue gas desulfurization gypsum system[J]. Materials Review, 2016, 30(14): 120-124 (in Chinese).
[9] 宋丽娜. 陈化拜耳法赤泥基地聚合材料的制备与水化机理研究[D]. 青岛: 青岛理工大学, 2019.
SONG L N. Study on preparation and hydration mechanism of polymeric materials in red mud base of aging Bayer process[D]. Qingdao: Qingdao Tehcnology University, 2019 (in Chinese).
[10] 彭玉清, 郭荣鑫, 林志伟, 等. 粉煤灰地聚合物力学性能影响因素研究综述[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2021, 40(3): 858-866.
PENG Y Q, GUO R X, LIN Z W, et al. Review on influencing factors of mechanical properties of fly ash geopolymer[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2021, 40(3): 858-866 (in Chinese).
[11] 赵献辉, 王浩宇, 周博宇, 等. 粉煤灰基地聚物的性能影响因素及其凝胶产物研究进展[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2021, 40(3): 867-876.
ZHAO X H, WANG H Y, ZHOU B Y, et al. Research development on influencing factors of performances and gel products in fly ash-based geopolymer material[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2021, 40(3): 867-876 (in Chinese).
[12] 荆锐, 刘宇, 张慧杰, 等. 偏高岭土和粉煤灰对碱-矿渣复合胶凝材料的凝结时间及早期力学性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2020, 39(10): 3237-3243.
JING R, LIU Y, ZHANG H J, et al. Influences of metakaolin and fly ash on setting time and early age mechanical properties of alkali-activated slag composite cementitious materials[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2020, 39(10): 3237-3243 (in Chinese).
[13] 刘泽, 周瑜, 孔凡龙, 等. 碱激发矿渣基地质聚合物微观结构与性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2017, 36(6): 1830-1834.
LIU Z, ZHOU Y, KONG F L, et al. Microstructure and properties of alkali-activated blast furnace slag based geopolymer[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2017, 36(6): 1830-1834 (in Chinese).
[14] LI G Y, TAN H B, ZHANG J J, et al. Ground granulated blast-furnace slag/fly ash blends activated by sodium carbonate at ambient temperature[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 291: 123378.
[15] JIN Y X, LIU Z, HAN L, et al. Synthesis of coal-analcime composite from coal gangue and its adsorption performance on heavy metal ions[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2022, 423: 127027.
[16] DAVIDOVITS J. Geopolymers[J]. Journal of Thermal Analysis, 1991, 37(8): 1633-1656.
[17] PALOMO A, GRUTZECK M W, BLANCO M T. Alkali-activated fly ashes[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 1999, 29(8): 1323-1329.
[18] FERNÁNDEZ-JIMÉNEZ A, PALOMO A, CRIADO M. Microstructure development of alkali-activated fly ash cement: a descriptive model[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2005, 35(6): 1204-1209.
[19] NOVAIS R M, PULLAR R C, LABRINCHA J A. Geopolymer foams: an overview of recent advancements[J]. Progress in Materials Science, 2020, 109: 100621.
[20] LIANG G W, LIU T J, LI H X, et al. A novel synthesis of lightweight and high-strength green geopolymer foamed material by rice husk ash and ground-granulated blast-furnace slag[J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2022, 176: 105922.
[21] SHEN S W, TIAN J, ZHU Y C, et al. Synthesis of industrial solid wastes based geopolymer foams for building energy conservation: effects of metallic aluminium and reclaimed materials[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2022, 328: 127083.
[22] HAN L, WANG J X, LIU Z, et al. Synthesis of fly ash-based self-supported zeolites foam geopolymer via saturated steam treatment[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2020, 393: 122468.
[23] CHINDAPRASIRT P, JITSANGIAM P, RATTANASAK U. Hydrophobicity and efflorescence of lightweight fly ash geopolymer incorporated with calcium stearate[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 364: 132449.
[24] LIU Z, SHAO N N, WANG D M, et al. Fabrication and properties of foam geopolymer using circulating fluidized bed combustion fly ash[J]. International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy, and Materials, 2014, 21(1): 89-94.
[25] MUDGAL M, SINGH A, CHOUHAN R K, et al. Fly ash red mud geopolymer with improved mechanical strength[J]. Cleaner Engineering and Technology, 2021, 4: 100215.
[26] 侯双明, 高嵩, 张蕾, 等. 热活化和机械活化对拜耳法赤泥性能影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2020, 39(5): 1573-1577.
HOU S M, GAO S, ZHANG L, et al. Effects of thermal and mechanical activation on properties of Bayer red mud[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2020, 39(5): 1573-1577 (in Chinese).
[27] YE N, YANG J K, LIANG S, et al. Synthesis and strength optimization of one-part geopolymer based on red mud[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2016, 111: 317-325.
[28] SHAO Z Y, WANG J Q, JIANG Y H, et al. The performance of micropore-foamed geopolymers produced from industrial wastes[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 304: 124636.
[29] 刘泽, 彭中昊, 张延博, 等. 一种防火保温材料及其制备方法: CN115093244B[P]. 2023-02-24.
LIU Z, PENG Z H, ZHANG Y B, et al. A fireproof heat preservation material and a preparation method thereof: CN115093244B[P]. 2023-02-24 (in Chinese).
[30] CRIADO M, FERNÁNDEZ-JIMÉNEZ A, DE LA TORRE A G, et al. An XRD study of the effect of the SiO₂/Na₂O ratio on the alkali activation of fly ash[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2007, 37(5): 671-679.
[31] PALOMO A, BLANCO-VARELA M T, GRANIZO M L, et al. Chemical stability of cementitious materials based on metakaolin[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 1999, 29(7): 997-1004.
[32] HUANG Y, HAN M F. The influence of α-Al₂O₃ addition on microstructure, mechanical and formaldehyde adsorption properties of fly ash-based geopolymer products[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2011, 193: 90-94.
[33] LI N, FARZADNIA N, SHI C J. Microstructural changes in alkali-activated slag mortars induced by accelerated carbonation[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2017, 100: 214-226.
[34] SWANEPOEL J C, STRYDOM C A. Utilisation of fly ash in a geopolymeric material[J]. Applied Geochemistry, 2002, 17(8): 1143-1148.
[35] LEE W K W, VAN DEVENTER J S J. The effects of inorganic salt contamination on the strength and durability of geopolymers[J]. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2002, 211(2/3): 115-126.
[36] GARCIA-LODEIRO I, PALOMO A, FERNÁNDEZ-JIMÉNEZ A, et al. Compatibility studies between N-A-S-H and C-A-S-H gels. Study in the ternary diagram Na₂O-CaO-Al₂O₃-SiO₂-H₂O[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2011, 41(9): 923-931.
[37] CORNELL R M, SCHWERTMANN U, CORNELL R, et al. The iron oxides: structure, properties, reactions, occurrences and uses[J]. Mineralogical Magazine, 2003, 34(408): 740-741.
[38] KHAN M I, AZIZLI K, SUFIAN S, et al. Sodium silicate-free geopolymers as coating materials: effects of Na/Al and water/solid ratios on adhesion strength[J]. Ceramics International, 2015, 41(2): 2794-2805.
[39] GAO K, LIN K L, WANG D Y, et al. Effects SiO₂/Na₂O molar ratio on mechanical properties and the microstructure of nano-SiO₂ metakaolin-based geopolymers[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2014, 53: 503-510.
[40] RUIZ-SANTAQUITERIA C, SKIBSTED J, FERNÁNDEZ-JIMÉNEZ A, et al. Alkaline solution/binder ratio as a determining factor in the alkaline activation of aluminosilicates[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2012, 42(9): 1242-1251.
[41] JAFARI NADOUSHAN M, RAMEZANIANPOUR A A. The effect of type and concentration of activators on flowability and compressive strength of natural pozzolan and slag-based geopolymers[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2016, 111: 337-347.
[42] MORSY M S, ALSAYED S H, AL-SALLOUM Y, et al. Effect of sodium silicate to sodium hydroxide ratios on strength and microstructure of fly ash geopolymer binder[J]. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 2014, 39(6): 4333-4339.