欢迎访问《硅酸盐通报》官方网站,今天是
分享到:

硅酸盐通报 ›› 2023, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (10): 3530-3537.

• 水泥混凝土 • 上一篇    下一篇

长龄期自密实混凝土与普通混凝土强度及弹性模量对比试验研究

贠建洲1, 陈顺超1, 董春彦1, 王磊2, 聂良鹏3   

  1. 1.西南林业大学土木工程学院,昆明 650224;
    2.苏交科集团检测认证有限公司云南分公司,昆明 650224;
    3.云南通衢工程检测有限公司,昆明 650224
  • 收稿日期:2023-06-07 修订日期:2023-07-03 出版日期:2023-10-15 发布日期:2023-10-17
  • 通信作者: 陈顺超,博士,副教授。E-mail:410106781@qq.com
  • 作者简介:贠建洲(1998—),男,硕士研究生。主要从事桥梁检测与加固的研究。E-mail:yunjianzhou2022@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    云南省交通运输厅科技项目(云交科教便[2020]91号)

Comparative Experimental Study on Strength and Elastic Modulus of Long Age Self-Compacting Concrete and Normal Concrete

YUN Jianzhou1, CHEN Shunchao1, DONG Chunyan1, WANG Lei2, NIE Liangpeng3   

  1. 1. College of Civil Engineering, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China;
    2. Yunnan Branch of Sujiaoke Group Testing and Certification Co., Ltd., Kunming 650224, China;
    3. Yunnan Tongqu Engineering Testing Co., Ltd., Kunming 650224, China
  • Received:2023-06-07 Revised:2023-07-03 Online:2023-10-15 Published:2023-10-17

摘要: 为了研究不同龄期下自密实混凝土(SCC)与普通混凝土(NC)试件抗压强度、劈裂抗拉强度、弹性模量的发展规律和差异,设计并浇筑了8组不同龄期(3、7、14、28、56、120、200、400 d)下的SCC与NC试件(强度等级均为C40),测试不同龄期下SCC、NC立方体抗压强度、棱柱体抗压强度、劈裂抗拉强度和弹性模量。根据试验结果对比分析不同龄期下两种混凝土力学参数的发展规律与差异。结果表明,长龄期下两种混凝土抗压强度、劈裂抗拉强度、弹性模量发展规律近似,均为早期(28 d以前)增长较快,后期(200 d以后)增长缓慢且趋于稳定。同强度等级下的SCC抗压强度及劈裂抗拉强度大于NC,弹性模量小于NC。长龄期(400 d以后)下SCC抗压强度比NC高25%左右,劈裂抗拉强度比NC高9%左右,弹性模量比NC小8%左右。NC实测弹性模量与规范公式计算值较吻合,SCC实测弹性模量大约为规范公式计算值的85.9%,采用NC弹性模量规范计算公式预测SCC弹性模量时需乘0.859进行修正。

关键词: 自密实混凝土, 普通混凝土, 抗压强度, 劈裂抗拉强度, 弹性模量

Abstract: In order to study the development patterns and differences in compressive strength, splitting tensile strength, and elastic modulus of self-compacting concrete (SCC) and normal concrete (NC) specimens at different ages, eight groups of SCC and NC specimens were designed and poured at different ages (3, 7, 14, 28, 56, 120, 200, 400 d) with strength class C40, and the cube compressive strength, prism compressive strength, splitting tensile strength and elastic modulus of SCC and NC were tested at different ages. According to the test results, the development laws and differences of the two kinds of concrete mechanical parameters at different ages were compared and analysed. The results show that the compressive strength, splitting tensile strength and elastic modulus of the two types of concrete have similar development law at long ages, with rapid growth in early stage (before 28 d) and slow and stable growth in later stage (after 200 d). The compressive strength and splitting tensile strength of SCC at the same strength level are greater than NC, and the elastic modulus is smaller than NC. The compressive strength of SCC is about 25% higher than NC, the splitting tensile strength is about 9% higher than NC, and the elastic modulus is about 8% smaller than NC at long age (after 400 d). The measured elastic modulus of NC is in good agreement with the calculated elastic modulus of specification formula, and the measured elastic modulus of SCC is about 85.9% of calculated elastic modulus of specification formula. If the NC elastic modulus formula is used to predict SCC elastic modulus, the correction should be multiplied by 0.859.

Key words: self-compacting concrete, normal concrete, compressive strength, splitting tensile strength, elastic modulus

中图分类号: