正交试验法及响应曲面法优化某铁矿细磨中间粒级产率的对比试验

硅酸盐通报 ›› 2021, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (4): 1304-1311.

正交试验法及响应曲面法优化某铁矿细磨中间粒级产率的对比试验

裴英杰¹, 肖庆飞^1,2,3, 张谦³, 马帅³, 武煜凯¹

1.昆明理工大学国土资源工程学院,昆明 650093;
2.矿冶过程自动控制技术国家(北京市)重点实验室,北京 100070;
3.省部共建复杂有色金属资源清洁利用国家重点实验室,昆明 650093

收稿日期:2020-11-11 修回日期:2021-02-18 出版日期:2021-04-15 发布日期:2021-05-11
通讯作者: 肖庆飞,博士,教授。E-mail:13515877@qq.com
作者简介:裴英杰(1997—),男,硕士研究生。主要从事碎磨理论与工艺的研究。E-mail:z179180802@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金面上项目(51774157);矿冶过程自动控制技术国家(北京市)重点实验室开放基金(201905)

Optimizing Yield Comparison of an Iron Ore Fine Grinding Intermediate Grain Size by Orthogonal Test Method and Response Surface Method

PEI Yingjie¹, XIAO Qingfei^1,2,3, ZHANG Qian³, MA Shuai³, WU Yukai¹

1. School of Land Resource Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Automatic Control Technology of Mining and Metallurgy Process, Beijing 100070, China;
3. State Key Laboratory for Clean Utilization of Complex Nonferrous Metal Resources, Kunming 650093, China

Received:2020-11-11 Revised:2021-02-18 Online:2021-04-15 Published:2021-05-11

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于正交试验法与响应曲面法,针对山西某铁矿磨矿产品中间易选粒级产率低的问题,通过单因素试验探究磨矿时间、磨矿浓度和介质充填率对中间易选粒级产率的影响规律,开展优化细磨中间粒级产率的试验研究。结果表明,采用正交试验法和响应曲面法得到的最优中间易选粒级产率分别为81.27%和81.80%。响应曲面法优化后得到的最佳磨矿条件为:磨矿时间14.15 min、磨矿浓度70.80%(质量分数)、充填率30.50%(体积分数),该条件优于正交试验法最佳条件,响应曲面法在分析因素之间交互作用对中间易选粒级产率的影响具有一定优势。研究明确了响应曲面法可充分实现提高磨矿产品中间易选粒级产率的目的,为相关厂矿同类问题提供可借鉴的方法。

关键词: 响应曲面法, 正交试验法, 细磨, 中间粒级, 产率

Abstract: Using the orthogonal test method and response surface method, aiming at the low yield of intermediate easy-to-selection grades of an iron ore grinding product in Shanxi, the single factor test was used to explore the effects of grinding time, grinding concentration and medium filling rate on the yield of intermediate easy-to-selection grades, and the experimental research on optimizing the yield of the fine grinding intermediate grain size was carried out. The results show that the optimal intermediate easy-to-selection grade yields obtained by the orthogonal test method and response surface method are 81.27% and 81.80%, respectively. The optimal grinding condition obtained after optimization by response surface method is as follows: grinding time 14.15 min, grinding concentration 70.80% (mass fraction) and the filling rate 30.50% (volume fraction). This condition is better than the best condition of orthogonal test method, and the response surface method has certain advantages in the influence of the interaction between the analysis factors on the yield of the intermediate easy-to-selection grade. The study clarifies that the response surface method can fully realize the purpose of increasing the yield of intermediate easy-to-selection grades of grinding products, and provide a reference method for similar problems in related factories and mines.

Key words: response surface method, orthogonal test method, fine grinding, intermediate grain size, yield

中图分类号:

TD921⁺.4

裴英杰, 肖庆飞, 张谦, 马帅, 武煜凯. 正交试验法及响应曲面法优化某铁矿细磨中间粒级产率的对比试验[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2021, 40(4): 1304-1311.

PEI Yingjie, XIAO Qingfei, ZHANG Qian, MA Shuai, WU Yukai. Optimizing Yield Comparison of an Iron Ore Fine Grinding Intermediate Grain Size by Orthogonal Test Method and Response Surface Method[J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2021, 40(4): 1304-1311.

参考文献

[1] JÉGOUREL Y. The global iron ore market: from cyclical developments to potential structural changes[J]. The Extractive Industries and Society, 2020, 7(3): 1128-1134.
[2] SUN Y S, ZHU X R, HAN Y X, et al. Iron recovery from refractory limonite ore using suspension magnetization roasting: a pilot-scale study[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 261: 121221.
[3] JIANG H D, HAO W T, XU Q Y, et al. Socio-economic and environmental impacts of the iron ore resource tax reform in China: a CGE-based analysis[J]. Resources Policy, 2020, 68: 101775.
[4] 韩跃新,孙永升,李艳军,等.我国铁矿选矿技术最新进展[J].金属矿山,2015(2):1-11.
HAN Y X, SUN Y S, LI Y J, et al. New development on mineral processing technology of iron ore resources in China[J]. Metal Mine, 2015(2): 1-11 (in Chinese).
[5] QIU T S, WU C Y, AI G H, et al. Effects of multi-stage grinding process and grinding fineness on desulfurization separation of high-sulfurous iron ore[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2015, 102: 722-730.
[6] KOHLS E, ZMICH R, HEINZEL C, et al. Residual stress change in multistage grinding[J]. Procedia CIRP, 2020, 87: 186-191.
[7] REICHERT M, GEROLD C, FREDRIKSSON A, et al. Research of iron ore grinding in a vertical-roller-mill[J]. Minerals Engineering, 2015, 73: 109-115.
[8] LITTLE L, MAINZA A N, BECKER M, et al. Fine grinding: how mill type affects particle shape characteristics and mineral liberation[J]. Minerals Engineering, 2017, 111: 148-157.
[9] 肖庆飞,康怀斌,肖珲,等.碎磨技术的研究进展及其应用[J].铜业工程,2016(1):15-27.
XIAO Q F, KANG H B, XIAO H, et al. Research progresses and applications of crushing and grinding technology[J]. Copper Engineering, 2016(1): 15-27 (in Chinese).
[10] 王明星,李艳军,刘金长,等.黑沟铁矿石粉矿(-15 mm)棒磨磨矿工艺试验[J].金属矿山,2016(12):89-93.
WANG M X, LI Y J, LIU J Z, et al. Research on rod-grinding technology of Heigou iron ore fines (-15 mm)[J]. Metal Mine, 2016(12): 89-93 (in Chinese).
[11] XIAO X, ZHANG G W, FENG Q M, et al. The liberation effect of magnetite fine ground by vertical stirred mill and ball mill[J]. Minerals Engineering, 2012, 34: 63-69.
[12] 王磊,郑纪民,齐加刚,等.海王精细分级旋流器在某特大型铁矿细粒磨矿分级工艺中的应用[J].现代矿业,2017,33(11):175-176+191.
WANG L, ZHENG J M, QI J G, et al. Application of neptune fine classification cyclone in fine grain grinding and classification process of a super large iron ore[J]. Modern Mining, 2017, 33(11): 175-176+191 (in Chinese).
[13] 何廷树,郭高巍,王宇斌,等.正交试验在白云母超细磨中的应用[J].非金属矿,2015,38(2):43-45.
HE T S, GUO G W, WANG Y B, et al. The application of orthogonal test in ultra-fine grinding of muscovite[J]. Non-Metallic Mines, 2015, 38(2): 43-45 (in Chinese).
[14] 刘吉顺,杨丽荣.湿式球磨机磨矿效率影响因素正交试验与分析[J].矿业研究与开发,2020,40(5):149-153.
LIU J S, YANG L R. Analysis on the factors affecting the grinding efficiency of wet ball mill by orthogonal experiment method[J]. Mining Research and Development, 2020, 40(5): 149-153 (in Chinese).
[15] EBADNEJAD A. Investigating of the effect of ore work index and particle size on the grinding modeling of some copper sulphide ores[J]. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 2016, 5(2): 101-110.
[16] EBADNEJAD A, KARIMI G R, DEHGHANI H. Application of response surface methodology for modeling of ball mills in copper sulphide ore grinding[J]. Powder Technology, 2013, 245: 292-296.
[17] 马帅,肖庆飞,杨森,等.响应曲面优化某铜矿细磨中间粒级含量试验研究[J].硅酸盐通报,2020,39(7):2184-2189+2203.
MA S, XIAO Q F, YANG S, et al. Experimental study on optimization of finely grinded intermediate grain size content of a copper ore by response surface[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2020, 39(7): 2184-2189+2203 (in Chinese).
[18] XIA S X, LIN R, CUI X, et al. The application of orthogonal test method in the parameters optimization of PEMFC under steady working condition[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41(26): 11380-11390.
[19] WANG B H, LIN R, LIU D C, et al. Investigation of the effect of humidity at both electrode on the performance of PEMFC using orthogonal test method[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(26): 13737-13743.
[20] DIXIT P, TIWARI R, MUKHERJEE A K, et al. Application of response surface methodology for modeling and optimization of spiral separator for processing of iron ore slime[J]. Powder Technology, 2015, 275: 105-112.
[21] ZAINOODIN A M, KAMARUDIN S K, MASDAR M S, et al. Optimization of a porous carbon nanofiber layer for the membrane electrode assembly in DMFC[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2015, 101: 525-531.