混杂PE/PVA纤维EGC与混凝土的界面粘结性能试验研究

doi:10.16552/j.cnki.issn1001-1625.2024.1020

硅酸盐通报 ›› 2025, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (2): 463-473.DOI: 10.16552/j.cnki.issn1001-1625.2024.1020

混杂PE/PVA纤维EGC与混凝土的界面粘结性能试验研究

褚丽晶^1,2, 卓柯先³, 杨泽铭³, 李潮森³, 刘润安³, 林嘉祥³

1.广州市城市规划勘测设计研究院有限公司,广州 510060;
2.广东省城市感知与监测预警企业重点实验室,广州 510060;
3.广东工业大学土木与交通工程学院,广州 510006

收稿日期:2024-09-02 修订日期:2024-11-06 出版日期:2025-02-15 发布日期:2025-02-28
通信作者: 林嘉祥,博士,副教授。E-mail:jxiang.lin@gdut.edu.cn
作者简介:褚丽晶(1983—),男,高级工程师。主要从事市政工程规划和设计的工作。E-mail:chulijing@gzpi.com.cn
基金资助:
广东省城市感知与监测预警企业重点实验室基金项目(2020B121202019);国家自然科学基金(12002090)

Experimental Study on Interfacial Bonding Performance Between Engineered Geopolymer Composites with Hybrid PE/PVA Fiber and Concrete

CHU Lijing^1,2, ZHUO Kexian³, YANG Zeming³, LI Chaosen³, LIU Run’an³, LIN Jiaxiang³

1. Guangzhou Urban Planning & Design Survey Research Institute Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510060, China;
2. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Urban Perception, Monitoring and Early Warning Enterprises, Guangzhou 510060, China;
3. School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China

Received:2024-09-02 Revised:2024-11-06 Published:2025-02-15 Online:2025-02-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 工程地聚物基复合材料(EGC)具备优异的拉伸延性和裂缝控制能力,在混凝土结构修复领域具有潜力,但高成本和对EGC-混凝土界面粘结机制理解的缺乏限制了EGC的广泛应用。本文采用聚乙烯(PE)纤维和国产聚乙烯醇(PVA)纤维制备了混杂PE/PVA纤维EGC(PE/PVA-EGC),并开展了EGC-混凝土界面粘结性能试验研究,通过斜剪试验探讨了单掺PE纤维掺量、混杂PE/PVA纤维比例及前驱体比例对界面粘结性能的影响规律和机理。结果表明,增加PE纤维含量、PVA纤维替代率、矿渣含量和混凝土基体强度均能提高混凝土的界面剪切粘结强度。当单掺PE纤维掺量从1.0%(体积分数)增加到2.0%时,试件的界面剪切粘结强度增加了13.24%;界面剪切粘结强度随着PVA纤维替代率和基体强度的增加而逐渐增大;当既有混凝土强度等级为C50时,混凝土与EGC有着最佳的粘结性能。因此,在适当的基体强度下,混杂PE/PVA纤维能有效改善EGC与既有混凝土的界面粘结性能并控制修复或加固成本。

关键词: 工程地聚物基复合材料, PE纤维, PVA纤维, 界面粘结性能, 斜剪试验

Abstract: Engineered geopolymer composites (EGC) exhibit excellent tensile ductility and crack control capabilities, making it promising materials for concrete structure repair. However, EGC high cost and the lack of understanding regarding the bonding mechanisms between EGC and concrete have limited EGC widespread application. By using polyethylene (PE) fiber and domestically produced polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) fiber, hybrid PE/PVA fiber EGC (PE/PVA-EGC) were prepared and the bonding performance at EGC-concrete interface was investigated. Slant shear tests were conducted to explore the effect mechanisms of varying PE fiber content, hybrid PE/PVA fiber ratio, and precursor ratio on the interfacial bonding performance. Results indicate that increasing PE fiber content, PVA fiber replacement ratio, ground granulated blast furnace slag content and concrete strength can improve the interfacial shear bonding strength. Increasing the PE fiber content from 1.0% (volume fraction) to 2.0% improves the interfacial shear bonding strength of specimens by 13.24%. The interfacial shear bonding strength increases with higher replacement ratio of PVA fiber and the strength of matrix. The best bonding performance is observed when the existing concrete strength grade is C50. In conclusion, with an appropriate matrix strength, hybrid PE/PVA fiber can effectively enhance the interfacial bonding performance between EGC and existing concrete while controlling repair or reinforcement costs.

Key words: engineered geopolymer composite, PE fiber, PVA fiber, interfacial bonding performance, slant shear test

中图分类号:

TU528

褚丽晶, 卓柯先, 杨泽铭, 李潮森, 刘润安, 林嘉祥. 混杂PE/PVA纤维EGC与混凝土的界面粘结性能试验研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(2): 463-473.

CHU Lijing, ZHUO Kexian, YANG Zeming, LI Chaosen, LIU Run’an, LIN Jiaxiang. Experimental Study on Interfacial Bonding Performance Between Engineered Geopolymer Composites with Hybrid PE/PVA Fiber and Concrete[J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2025, 44(2): 463-473.

参考文献

[1] 袁波, 田原. 混凝土结构加固修复业技术现状与发展对策[J]. 建筑技术开发, 2020, 47(23): 137-139.
YUAN B, TIAN Y. Technology status and development countermeasures of concrete structure reinforcement and repair industry[J]. Building Technology Development, 2020, 47(23): 137-139 (in Chinese).
[2] KRYVENKO P, RUDENKO I, SIKORA P, et al. Alkali-activated cements as sustainable materials for repairing building construction: a review[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2024, 90: 109399.
[3] 李艳, 赵一多, 周明杨. ECC修复既有RC梁界面粘结与受弯性能试验研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2019, 38(9): 2794-2800.
LI Y, ZHAO Y D, ZHOU M Y. Experimental study on interfacial bonding and flexural properties of reinforced concrete beams repaired with ECC[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2019, 38(9): 2794-2800 (in Chinese).
[4] CAVALETT O, WATANABE M D B, VOLDSUND M, et al. Paving the way for sustainable decarbonization of the European cement industry[J]. Nature Sustainability, 2024, 7: 568-580.
[5] HASSAN A, ARIF M, SHARIQ M. A review of properties and behaviour of reinforced geopolymer concrete structural elements: a clean technology option for sustainable development[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 245: 118762.
[6] 张品乐, 曾靖渊, 胡静, 等. 钢-PVA混杂纤维水泥基复合材料抗压力学性能及经济性研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(11): 3827-3835.
ZHANG P L, ZENG J Y, HU J, et al. Compressive mechanical properties and economic performance of steel-PVA hybrid fiber cement-based composites[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2023, 42(11): 3827-3835 (in Chinese).
[7] 石玉成, 李贺东. 国产PVA/PE纤维混杂超高韧性水泥基复合材料拉压性能试验研究[J]. 新型建筑材料, 2024, 51(4): 111-115.
SHI Y C, LI H D. Experimental study on the tensile and compressive properties of domestic PVA/PE fibers hybrid reinforced ultra high toughness cementitious composite[J]. New Building Materials, 2024, 51(4): 111-115 (in Chinese).
[8] NGUYȆN H H, NGUYȆN P H, LUONG Q H, et al. Mechanical and autogenous healing properties of high-strength and ultra-ductility engineered geopolymer composites reinforced by PE-PVA hybrid fibers[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2023, 142: 105155.
[9] 张品乐, 朱昊天, 胡静, 等. 高性价比混杂纤维工程水泥基复合材料的力学性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(11): 3816-3826.
ZHANG P L, ZHU H T, HU J, et al. Mechanical properties of high cost performance hybrid fiber engineered cementitious composites[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2023, 42(11): 3816-3826 (in Chinese).
[10] HU B, LI Y, LIU Y. Dynamic slant shear bond behavior between new and old concrete[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 238: 117779.
[11] 任亮, 方蕈, 王凯, 等. 超高性能混凝土与水泥基材料界面粘结性研究进展[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2019, 38(7): 2087-2094.
REN L, FANG X, WANG K, et al. Research progress on interface bond behavior between ultra high performance concrete and cement-based materials[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2019, 38(7): 2087-2094 (in Chinese).
[12] ZANOTTI C, BORGES P H R, BHUTTA A, et al. Bond strength between concrete substrate and metakaolin geopolymer repair mortar: effect of curing regime and PVA fiber reinforcement[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2017, 80: 307-316.
[13] DIAB A M, ABD ELMOATY A E M, TAG ELDIN M R. Slant shear bond strength between self compacting concrete and old concrete[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2017, 130: 73-82.
[14] GAO Z, ZHANG P, WANG J, et al. Interfacial properties of geopolymer mortar and concrete substrate: effect of polyvinyl alcohol fiber and nano-SiO₂ contents[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2022, 315: 125735.
[15] LING Y F, WANG K J, LI W G, et al. Effect of slag on the mechanical properties and bond strength of fly ash-based engineered geopolymer composites[J]. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2019, 164: 747-757.
[16] PUERTAS F, PALACIOS M, MANZANO H, et al. A model for the C-A-S-H gel formed in alkali-activated slag cements[J]. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 2011, 31(12): 2043-2056.
[17] NĚMEČEK J, ŠMILAUER V, KOPECKÝ L. Nanoindentation characteristics of alkali-activated aluminosilicate materials[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2011, 33(2): 163-170.
[18] ZHONG H, ZHANG M Z. Engineered geopolymer composites: a state-of-the-art review[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2023, 135: 104850.
[19] 高剑平, 潘景龙, 王雨光. 检验新旧混凝土粘结强度合适的试件形式[J]. 哈尔滨建筑大学学报, 2001(2): 32-35.
GAO J P, PAN J L, WANG Y G. Specimen for testing bond strength between fresh and hardened concrete[J]. Journal of Harbin University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 2001(2): 32-35 (in Chinese).
[20] ZANOTTI C, BANTHIA N, PLIZZARI G. Towards sustainable repairs: substrate-repair interface mode-I fracture analysis[J]. International Journal of Sustainable Materials and Structural Systems, 2014, 1(3): 265.
[21] LIM Y M, LI V C. Durable repair of aged infrastructures using trapping mechanism of engineered cementitious composites[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 1997, 19(4): 373-385.
[22] LI F P, YANG Z M, CHEN D F, et al. Research on mechanical properties and micro-mechanism of engineering geopolymers composites (EGCs) incorporated with modified MWCNTs[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 303: 124516.
[23] TIAN J, WU X W, WANG W W, et al. Experimental study and mechanics model of ECC-to-concrete bond interface under tensile loading[J]. Composite Structures, 2022, 285: 115203.
[24] WANG B G, FENG H, HUANG H, et al. Bonding properties between fly ash/slag-based engineering geopolymer composites and concrete[J]. Materials, 2023, 16(12): 4232.
[25] AUSTIN S, ROBINS P, PAN Y G. Shear bond testing of concrete repairs[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 1999, 29(7): 1067-1076.
[26] KUMAR S, SEKHAR DAS C, LAO J C, et al. Effect of sand content on bond performance of engineered geopolymer composites (EGC) repair material[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2022, 328: 127080.

编辑推荐

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	0	2	0	11

	来源	本网站

	次数	13
	比例	100%

摘要

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

1	0	25

	来源	本网站

	次数	26
	比例	100%

混杂PE/PVA纤维EGC与混凝土的界面粘结性能试验研究

Experimental Study on Interfacial Bonding Performance Between Engineered Geopolymer Composites with Hybrid PE/PVA Fiber and Concrete

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	韩子默, 杨国梁, 李峰, 张志飞, 毕京九, 赵康朴, 刘依. 动态荷载下聚乙烯醇纤维混凝土阻裂性能试验研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(1): 59-68.
[2]	王彦朝, 吕景辉, 王英倡, 郭永昌. PE/PP混杂纤维应变硬化碱激发复合材料力学性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(8): 2879-2887.
[3]	朱利帅, 谢群, 惠婧, 赵鹏, 李俊锋. PVA-铁尾矿砂混凝土抗折性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(2): 593-602.
[4]	姚杰, 杨澜, 吴璞伟. 石墨烯/氧化石墨烯与水化硅酸钙界面粘结性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(10): 3524-3533.
[5]	陈月顺, 汤成宇. 碳酸钙晶须混杂聚乙烯纤维增强水泥基复合材料力学性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(1): 16-26.
[6]	李海礁, 王加军, 韩希平, 陶琦, 张仕龙. 大掺量矿物掺合料纤维增强轻骨料混凝土的抗疲劳性能[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(8): 2856-2864.
[7]	王睿, 张品乐, 胡静. 基于PCA的PVA/钢HFRCC配合比优化和综合评估[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(12): 4283-4297.
[8]	臧芸, 王攀, 王慕涵, 王鑫鹏, 侯东帅, 赵铁军. 基于分子动力学的氧化石墨烯对PVA纤维-CSH界面影响机理研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(11): 3799-3806.
[9]	张品乐, 朱昊天, 胡静, 曾靖渊, 陶忠. 高性价比混杂纤维工程水泥基复合材料的力学性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(11): 3816-3826.
[10]	姚鑫, 徐亚星, 董晓强. 黄麻与聚乙烯醇纤维增强水泥土的弯曲及早期抗裂性能[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2021, 40(9): 2921-2929.
[11]	赵楠, 卿龙邦, 杨卓凡, 慕儒. 不同龄期钢纤维增强水泥砂浆纤维拉拔试验与模拟研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2021, 40(7): 2165-2173.
[12]	张成龙, 刘漪, 张明. PP/PVA纤维增强硫铝酸盐水泥基快速修补材料试验研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2021, 40(7): 2174-2183.
[13]	朱弘康, 林常, 蔡舒, 徐树英, 潘莉莎. PVA纤维类型对应变硬化地聚合物基复合材料力学性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2021, 40(11): 3693-3701.
[14]	张亚男;臧栋;林常;潘莉莎;徐树英;张玉苍. 无表面修饰PVA纤维增强高韧应变硬化水泥基复合材料的性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2020, 39(9): 2745-2753.
[15]	魏华;张鹏;王娟;张天航. 纳米粒子和石英砂对PVA纤维水泥基复合材料单轴拉伸性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2020, 39(6): 1709-1714.