BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY ›› 2026, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (5): 1559-1570.DOI: 10.16552/j.cnki.issn1001-1625.2025.1000
• Cement and Concrete • Previous Articles Next Articles
YANG Taihua1(
), WANG Gonglue1, LUO Xufeng2, ZHOU Zhe2, TU Ming2, LIU Bin3(
), LIU Xuewei3
Received:2025-10-13
Revised:2025-12-23
Online:2026-05-15
Published:2026-06-10
Contact:
LIU Bin
CLC Number:
YANG Taihua, WANG Gonglue, LUO Xufeng, ZHOU Zhe, TU Ming, LIU Bin, LIU Xuewei. Research on Mechanical Properties of Nanomaterial and Fiber Modified Tunnel Spoil Concrete[J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(5): 1559-1570.
| Apparent density/(kg·m-3) | Fineness/% | Water content/% | Water demand ratio/% | Loss on ignition/% | SO3 content/% | f-CaO content/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 410 | 23.4 | 0.2 | 103 | 2.6 | 0.2 | 0.03 |
Table 1 Technical specifications of fly ash
| Apparent density/(kg·m-3) | Fineness/% | Water content/% | Water demand ratio/% | Loss on ignition/% | SO3 content/% | f-CaO content/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 410 | 23.4 | 0.2 | 103 | 2.6 | 0.2 | 0.03 |
| Diameter/μm | Length/mm | Tensile strength/MPa | Elastic modulus/GPa | Elongation at break/% | Density/(kg·m-3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17.4 | 6/12 | ≥2 000 | ≥85 | 2.5 | 2 650 |
Table 2 Technical indicators of fibers
| Diameter/μm | Length/mm | Tensile strength/MPa | Elastic modulus/GPa | Elongation at break/% | Density/(kg·m-3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17.4 | 6/12 | ≥2 000 | ≥85 | 2.5 | 2 650 |
| Level | NS content/% | FA content/% | BF6 content/% | BF12 content/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | C | D | |
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | 0.5 | 10 | 0.10 | 0.10 |
| 3 | 1.0 | 15 | 0.15 | 0.15 |
| 4 | 1.5 | 20 | 0.20 | 0.20 |
Table 3 Factors and levels table of orthogonal experiment
| Level | NS content/% | FA content/% | BF6 content/% | BF12 content/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | C | D | |
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | 0.5 | 10 | 0.10 | 0.10 |
| 3 | 1.0 | 15 | 0.15 | 0.15 |
| 4 | 1.5 | 20 | 0.20 | 0.20 |
| Composition | Water | Cement | Fine aggregate | Coarse aggregate | Water reducer |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mix proportion/(kg·m-3) | 189 | 420 | 833 | 977 | 9.8 |
Table 4 Mix proportion of NC
| Composition | Water | Cement | Fine aggregate | Coarse aggregate | Water reducer |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mix proportion/(kg·m-3) | 189 | 420 | 833 | 977 | 9.8 |
| Sample No. | A | B | C | D | Slump/mm | Compressive strength/MPa | Splitting tensile strength/MPa |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NC | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 170 | 46.0 | 3.34 |
| A1B2C2D2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 180 | 45.4 | 3.53 |
| A1B3C3D3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 160 | 45.8 | 3.50 |
| A1B4C4D4 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 100 | 39.8 | 3.95 |
| A2B1C2D3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 175 | 46.3 | 3.57 |
| A2B2C1D4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 215 | 47.4 | 4.00 |
| A2B3C4D1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 210 | 47.0 | 3.82 |
| A2B4C3D2 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 220 | 46.0 | 3.52 |
| A3B1C3D4 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 165 | 51.1 | 4.22 |
| A3B2C4D3 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 185 | 55.2 | 4.10 |
| A3B3C1D2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 190 | 48.2 | 3.57 |
| A3B4C2D1 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 210 | 46.3 | 3.46 |
| A4B1C4D2 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 150 | 43.2 | 3.63 |
| A4B2C3D1 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 155 | 42.2 | 3.48 |
| A4B3C2D4 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 140 | 41.8 | 3.56 |
| A4B4C1D3 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 150 | 36.4 | 3.19 |
Table 5 Results of orthogonal experiment
| Sample No. | A | B | C | D | Slump/mm | Compressive strength/MPa | Splitting tensile strength/MPa |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NC | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 170 | 46.0 | 3.34 |
| A1B2C2D2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 180 | 45.4 | 3.53 |
| A1B3C3D3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 160 | 45.8 | 3.50 |
| A1B4C4D4 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 100 | 39.8 | 3.95 |
| A2B1C2D3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 175 | 46.3 | 3.57 |
| A2B2C1D4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 215 | 47.4 | 4.00 |
| A2B3C4D1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 210 | 47.0 | 3.82 |
| A2B4C3D2 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 220 | 46.0 | 3.52 |
| A3B1C3D4 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 165 | 51.1 | 4.22 |
| A3B2C4D3 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 185 | 55.2 | 4.10 |
| A3B3C1D2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 190 | 48.2 | 3.57 |
| A3B4C2D1 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 210 | 46.3 | 3.46 |
| A4B1C4D2 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 150 | 43.2 | 3.63 |
| A4B2C3D1 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 155 | 42.2 | 3.48 |
| A4B3C2D4 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 140 | 41.8 | 3.56 |
| A4B4C1D3 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 150 | 36.4 | 3.19 |
| Factor | Level | NS | FA | BF6 | BF12 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kavg value | 1 | 152.50 | 165.00 | 181.25 | 186.25 |
| 2 | 205.00 | 183.75 | 176.25 | 185.00 | |
| 3 | 187.50 | 175.00 | 175.00 | 167.50 | |
| 4 | 148.75 | 170.00 | 161.25 | 155.00 | |
| Optimal level | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |
| R | 56.25 | 18.75 | 20.00 | 31.25 | |
Table 6 Range analysis of slump
| Factor | Level | NS | FA | BF6 | BF12 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kavg value | 1 | 152.50 | 165.00 | 181.25 | 186.25 |
| 2 | 205.00 | 183.75 | 176.25 | 185.00 | |
| 3 | 187.50 | 175.00 | 175.00 | 167.50 | |
| 4 | 148.75 | 170.00 | 161.25 | 155.00 | |
| Optimal level | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |
| R | 56.25 | 18.75 | 20.00 | 31.25 | |
| Factor | Level | NS | FA | BF6 | BF12 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kavg value | 1 | 44.25 | 46.65 | 44.50 | 45.38 |
| 2 | 46.68 | 47.55 | 44.95 | 45.70 | |
| 3 | 50.20 | 45.70 | 46.28 | 45.93 | |
| 4 | 40.90 | 42.13 | 46.30 | 45.03 | |
| Optimal level | 3 | 2 | 4 | 2 | |
| R | 9.30 | 5.43 | 1.80 | 0.90 | |
Table 7 Range analysis of compressive strength
| Factor | Level | NS | FA | BF6 | BF12 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kavg value | 1 | 44.25 | 46.65 | 44.50 | 45.38 |
| 2 | 46.68 | 47.55 | 44.95 | 45.70 | |
| 3 | 50.20 | 45.70 | 46.28 | 45.93 | |
| 4 | 40.90 | 42.13 | 46.30 | 45.03 | |
| Optimal level | 3 | 2 | 4 | 2 | |
| R | 9.30 | 5.43 | 1.80 | 0.90 | |
| Factor | Level | NS | FA | BF6 | BF12 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kavg value | 1 | 3.58 | 3.69 | 3.53 | 3.53 |
| 2 | 3.75 | 3.77 | 3.53 | 3.56 | |
| 3 | 3.83 | 3.63 | 3.68 | 3.59 | |
| 4 | 3.46 | 3.53 | 3.88 | 3.93 | |
| Optimal level | 3 | 2 | 4 | 4 | |
| R | 0.37 | 0.24 | 0.35 | 0.40 | |
Table 8 Range analysis of splitting tensile strength
| Factor | Level | NS | FA | BF6 | BF12 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kavg value | 1 | 3.58 | 3.69 | 3.53 | 3.53 |
| 2 | 3.75 | 3.77 | 3.53 | 3.56 | |
| 3 | 3.83 | 3.63 | 3.68 | 3.59 | |
| 4 | 3.46 | 3.53 | 3.88 | 3.93 | |
| Optimal level | 3 | 2 | 4 | 4 | |
| R | 0.37 | 0.24 | 0.35 | 0.40 | |
| Type | Influencing factor | Sum of squares | Degrees of freedom | Mean square | F value | Fn | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28 d compressive strength | A | 184.772 | 3 | 61.591 | 8.783 | F0.1(3,3)=5.46 F0.05(3,3)=9.28 F0.01(3,3)=29.46 | * |
| B | 67.882 | 3 | 22.627 | 3.224 | — | ||
| C | 10.172 | 3 | 3.391 | 0.484 | — | ||
| D | 1.847 | 3 | 0.616 | 0.088 | — | ||
| Error | 21.037 | 3 | 7.012 | — | |||
| Total | 285.649 | 15 | |||||
| 28 d splitting tensile strength | A | 0.321 | 3 | 0.107 | 39.393 | ** | |
| B | 0.135 | 3 | 0.045 | 16.509 | * | ||
| C | 0.326 | 3 | 0.109 | 40.012 | ** | ||
| D | 0.427 | 3 | 0.142 | 52.350 | ** | ||
| Error | 0.008 | 3 | 0.003 | ||||
| Total | 1.217 | 15 |
Table 9 Analysis of variance for experimental results
| Type | Influencing factor | Sum of squares | Degrees of freedom | Mean square | F value | Fn | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28 d compressive strength | A | 184.772 | 3 | 61.591 | 8.783 | F0.1(3,3)=5.46 F0.05(3,3)=9.28 F0.01(3,3)=29.46 | * |
| B | 67.882 | 3 | 22.627 | 3.224 | — | ||
| C | 10.172 | 3 | 3.391 | 0.484 | — | ||
| D | 1.847 | 3 | 0.616 | 0.088 | — | ||
| Error | 21.037 | 3 | 7.012 | — | |||
| Total | 285.649 | 15 | |||||
| 28 d splitting tensile strength | A | 0.321 | 3 | 0.107 | 39.393 | ** | |
| B | 0.135 | 3 | 0.045 | 16.509 | * | ||
| C | 0.326 | 3 | 0.109 | 40.012 | ** | ||
| D | 0.427 | 3 | 0.142 | 52.350 | ** | ||
| Error | 0.008 | 3 | 0.003 | ||||
| Total | 1.217 | 15 |
| Sample No. | Individual efficacy coefficient di of each indicator | Comprehensive efficacy coefficient D | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slump | Compressive strength | Splitting tensile strength | ||
| NC | 60 | 60.00 | 60.00 | 60.00 |
| A1B2C2D2 | 68 | 57.39 | 68.64 | 64.46 |
| A1B3C3D3 | 52 | 59.13 | 67.27 | 59.14 |
| A1B4C4D4 | 4 | 33.04 | 87.73 | 22.63 |
| A2B1C2D3 | 64 | 61.30 | 70.45 | 65.14 |
| A2B2C1D4 | 96 | 66.09 | 90.00 | 82.96 |
| A2B3C4D1 | 92 | 64.35 | 81.82 | 78.53 |
| A2B4C3D2 | 100 | 60.00 | 68.18 | 74.23 |
| A3B1C3D4 | 56 | 82.17 | 100.00 | 77.20 |
| A3B2C4D3 | 72 | 100.00 | 94.55 | 87.97 |
| A3B3C1D2 | 76 | 69.57 | 70.45 | 71.95 |
| A3B4C2D1 | 92 | 61.30 | 65.45 | 71.74 |
| A4B1C4D2 | 44 | 47.83 | 73.18 | 53.60 |
| A4B2C3D1 | 48 | 43.48 | 66.36 | 51.74 |
| A4B3C2D4 | 36 | 41.74 | 70.00 | 47.20 |
| A4B4C1D3 | 44 | 18.26 | 53.18 | 34.96 |
Table 10 Calculation results of efficacy coefficient
| Sample No. | Individual efficacy coefficient di of each indicator | Comprehensive efficacy coefficient D | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slump | Compressive strength | Splitting tensile strength | ||
| NC | 60 | 60.00 | 60.00 | 60.00 |
| A1B2C2D2 | 68 | 57.39 | 68.64 | 64.46 |
| A1B3C3D3 | 52 | 59.13 | 67.27 | 59.14 |
| A1B4C4D4 | 4 | 33.04 | 87.73 | 22.63 |
| A2B1C2D3 | 64 | 61.30 | 70.45 | 65.14 |
| A2B2C1D4 | 96 | 66.09 | 90.00 | 82.96 |
| A2B3C4D1 | 92 | 64.35 | 81.82 | 78.53 |
| A2B4C3D2 | 100 | 60.00 | 68.18 | 74.23 |
| A3B1C3D4 | 56 | 82.17 | 100.00 | 77.20 |
| A3B2C4D3 | 72 | 100.00 | 94.55 | 87.97 |
| A3B3C1D2 | 76 | 69.57 | 70.45 | 71.95 |
| A3B4C2D1 | 92 | 61.30 | 65.45 | 71.74 |
| A4B1C4D2 | 44 | 47.83 | 73.18 | 53.60 |
| A4B2C3D1 | 48 | 43.48 | 66.36 | 51.74 |
| A4B3C2D4 | 36 | 41.74 | 70.00 | 47.20 |
| A4B4C1D3 | 44 | 18.26 | 53.18 | 34.96 |
| Factor | Level | NS | FA | BF6 | BF12 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kavg value | 1 | 51.56 | 63.99 | 62.47 | 65.50 |
| 2 | 75.22 | 71.78 | 62.14 | 66.06 | |
| 3 | 77.22 | 64.21 | 65.58 | 61.80 | |
| 4 | 46.88 | 50.89 | 60.68 | 57.50 | |
| R | 30.34 | 20.89 | 4.90 | 8.56 |
Table 11 Range analysis of comprehensive efficacy coefficient
| Factor | Level | NS | FA | BF6 | BF12 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kavg value | 1 | 51.56 | 63.99 | 62.47 | 65.50 |
| 2 | 75.22 | 71.78 | 62.14 | 66.06 | |
| 3 | 77.22 | 64.21 | 65.58 | 61.80 | |
| 4 | 46.88 | 50.89 | 60.68 | 57.50 | |
| R | 30.34 | 20.89 | 4.90 | 8.56 |
| [1] | 殷继伟, 马永胜, 张 磊, 等. 黏度改性剂对机制砂混凝土性能影响的试验研究[J]. 混凝土, 2022(6): 89-93. |
| YIN J W, MA Y S, ZHANG L, et al. Test research on the effect of viscosity modifier on the performance of concrete with manufactured sand[J]. Concrete, 2022(6): 89-93 (in Chinese). | |
| [2] | 徐秀珍, 牛亚露, 吴雯婷, 等. 抗裂材料对洞渣砂输水隧洞混凝土强度、变形和抗裂性能的影响[J]. 混凝土, 2024(7): 237-242. |
| XU X Z, NIU Y L, WU W T, et al. Influence of anti-cracking materials on strength, deformation and anti-cracking performance of tunnel slag sand water conveyance tunnel concrete[J]. Concrete, 2024(7): 237-242 (in Chinese). | |
| [3] | SUN X J, GAO Z, CAO P, et al. Mechanical properties tests and multiscale numerical simulations for basalt fiber reinforced concrete[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2019, 202: 58-72. |
| [4] | JALASUTRAM S, SAHOO D R, MATSAGAR V. Experimental investigation of the mechanical properties of basalt fiber-reinforced concrete[J]. Structural Concrete, 2017, 18(2): 292-302. |
| [5] | SMARZEWSKI P. Flexural toughness of high-performance concrete with basalt and polypropylene short fibres[J]. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2018, 2018(1): 5024353. |
| [6] | SINGH D, SENTHIL K, EMMANUEL P C. Mechanical and durability properties of recycled aggregate self-compacting concrete along with basalt fibers[M]//Recycled Waste Materials. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2019: 199-211. |
| [7] | KHAN M, CAO M L, ALI M. Cracking behaviour and constitutive modelling of hybrid fibre reinforced concrete[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2020, 30: 101272. |
| [8] | KHAN M, CAO M L, ALI M. Effect of basalt fibers on mechanical properties of calcium carbonate whisker-steel fiber reinforced concrete[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 192: 742-753. |
| [9] | LI Y, SHEN A Q, WU H. Fractal dimension of basalt fiber reinforced concrete (BFRC) and its correlations to pore structure, strength and shrinkage[J]. Materials, 2020, 13(14): 3238. |
| [10] | ALY M, HASHMI M S J, OLABI A G, et al. Effect of colloidal nano-silica on the mechanical and physical behaviour of waste-glass cement mortar[J]. Materials & Design, 2012, 33: 127-135. |
| [11] | NAZARI A, RIAHI S. The effects of ZrO2 nanoparticles on physical and mechanical properties of high strength self compacting concrete[J]. Materials Research, 2010, 13(4): 551-556. |
| [12] | AMIRI B. Use of AFM technique to study the nano-silica effects in concrete mixture[J]. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 2012, 5(2): 1-5. |
| [13] | WU Z M, KHAYAT K H, SHI C J, et al. Mechanisms underlying the strength enhancement of UHPC modified with nano-SiO2 and nano-CaCO3 [J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2021, 119: 103992. |
| [14] | 张珅侨, 俞家珺, 李浩雄, 等. 纳米SiO2对再生骨料混凝土性能及微观结构的影响[J/OL]. 工程科学与技术, 1-12 (2024-09-30) [2026-03-02]. . |
| ZHANG S Q, YU J J, LI H X, et al. Effect of nano-SiO2 on the properties and microstructure of recycled aggregate concrete[J/OL].Engineering Science and Technology, 1-12 (2024-09-30) [2026-03-02]. (in Chinese). | |
| [15] | WU R D, GU Q, GAO X, et al. Effect of basalt fibers and silica fume on the mechanical properties, stress-strain behavior, and durability of alkali-activated slag-fly ash concrete[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2024, 418: 135440. |
| [16] | ELKADY H M, YASIEN A M, ELFEKY M S, et al. Assessment of mechanical strength of nano silica concrete (NSC) subjected to elevated temperatures[J]. Journal of Structural Fire Engineering, 2019, 10(1): 90-109. |
| [17] | SHAIKH F U A, SUPIT S W M. Chloride induced corrosion durability of high volume fly ash concretes containing nano particles[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2015, 99: 208-225. |
| [18] | 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部, 国家市场监督管理总局. 混凝土物理力学性能试验方法标准: [S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2019. |
| Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China, State Administration for Market Regulation. Standard for test methods of concrete physical and mechanical properties: [S]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2019 (in Chinese). | |
| [19] | 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 普通混凝土拌合物性能试验方法标准: [S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2017. |
| Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China. Standard for test method of performance on ordinary fresh concrete: [S]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2017 (in Chinese). | |
| [20] | 余成行, 曲东杰, 刘敬宇, 等. 骨料浆体厚度对混凝土抗压强度的影响[J]. 混凝土, 2021(2): 25-29+33. |
| YU C H, QU D J, LIU J Y, et al. Effect of average paste thickness on coated aggregates on mechanical properties of concrete[J]. Concrete, 2021(2): 25-29+33 (in Chinese). | |
| [21] | CHITHRA S, SENTHIL KUMAR S R R, CHINNARAJU K. The effect of colloidal nano-silica on workability, mechanical and durability properties of high performance concrete with copper slag as partial fine aggregate[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2016, 113: 794-804. |
| [22] | 李 瑶, 邓永刚, 徐长伟. 掺纳米SiO2/粉煤灰/硅灰的钢纤维混凝土力学性能及界面的研究[J]. 混凝土, 2020(5): 60-63+68. |
| LI Y, DENG Y G, XU C W. Mechanical and interface properties of steel fiber-reinforced concrete incorporated with nano-SiO2/fly ash/silica fume[J]. Concrete, 2020(5): 60-63+68 (in Chinese). | |
| [23] | 周 梅, 白金婷, 唱志勇. 粉煤灰掺量对预拌混凝土塌落度/扩展度经时损失的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2012, 31(1): 187-192. |
| ZHOU M, BAI J T, CHANG Z Y. Effect of fly ash amount on gradual loss in slump and flow of the ready-mixed concrete[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2012, 31(1): 187-192 (in Chinese). | |
| [24] | NOVÁKOVÁ I, BODNÁROVÁ L. High strength concrete with enhanced properties by addition of chopped basalt fibres[J]. Materials Science Forum, 2017, 908: 164-170. |
| [25] | KHAWAJI M, CHO B H, NAM B H, et al. Edge-oxidized graphene oxide as additive in fiber-reinforced concrete: effects on fresh and hardened properties[J]. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2020, 32(4): 04020028. |
| [26] | 韩 霞, 刘 清, 韩风霞, 等. 基于正交试验风积砂自密实混凝土配合比试验研究[J]. 混凝土, 2021(5): 113-118. |
| HAN X, LIU Q, HAN F X, et al. Experimental study on aeolian sand self-compacting concrete based on orthogonal experiment[J]. Concrete, 2021(5): 113-118 (in Chinese). | |
| [27] | TAYLOR H F W, NEWBURY D E. An electron microprobe study of a mature cement paste[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 1984, 14(4): 565-573. |
| [1] | ZHANG Yunzhe, CHEN Minsun, WANG Honglei, ZHOU Xingui, YU Jinshan. Laser Ablation Behavior and Development Trend of Ceramic Matrix Composites [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(5): 1727-1740. |
| [2] | SU Hui, ZHANG Linkang, BAI Yanjie, LYU Jiaxin, ZHANG Xin, NAN Bowen, PI Haojun. Mechanism of FeSO4·H2O Synergistic with DTPA Modified Magnesium Oxychloride Cement [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(5): 1491-1500. |
| [3] | KONG Aisan, HONG Yalu, YE Minhui, WU Hongxiang, TANG Wei, LI Na, WANG Wei. Triaxial Mechanical Properties of Bamboo Stem Biochar-Modified Cement-Stabilized Soil [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(5): 1603-1614. |
| [4] | LI Meng’en, QIN Yanhui, YIN Jinshuai, ZHENG Zihao, MA Haoyuan, LI Shuo. Effect of Nano-Silica Content on Freezing Temperature of Concrete [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(5): 1536-1544. |
| [5] | KONG Shuo, GENG Yongjuan, LIU Yancen, LI Shaochun. Preparation of Silica-Modified Epoxy Coating and Its Protective Performance on Steel Bars [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(5): 1580-1590. |
| [6] | LI Binghan, LI Shiji, ZHAO Yimeng, LIU Yunpeng, XU Da, ZHAO Shuli. Hydration Properties of Polyvinyl Alcohol-Modified Slag-Fly Ash-Based Alkali-Activated Cementitious Materials [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(5): 1638-1649. |
| [7] | REN Jun, YAN Yunxiao, LI Miaoyuan, TIAN Zhenhe, ZHAO Lixing, WANG Dafu. Effect of Microbial-Modified Phosphogypsum on Properties of Supersulfated Cement [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(5): 1671-1681. |
| [8] | TIAN Shumei, LUO Haowen, WANG Hongxing, RUAN Junhao, ZHAO Tiantian, ZHANG Xiaoyi, WU Shangwei. Solidification of Red Mud Based on Geopolymerization and Nanomaterial Composite Optimization [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(5): 1693-1708. |
| [9] | LI You, WANG Xueqi, ZHAO Yuxia, ZHENG Mulian, HUANG Jie, LU Chuan, LI Yifeng. Shrinkage Compensation Mechanism and Properties of Dense-Skeleton Cement-Stabilized Crushed Stone-Steel Slag Mixture [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(5): 1823-1837. |
| [10] | XIE Xiangbing, JIA Yapeng, LI Cheng, HOU Boyan, ZHANG Yanxiang, WAN Zhenmin, SHAO Jinggan. Influence and Mechanism of Micro-Nano Bubble Water on Physical and Mechanical Properties of Cement-Stabilized Crushed Stone [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(5): 1838-1850. |
| [11] | YANG Xueying, WANG Kaiyuan, WANG Yaocheng, ZHAN Baojian, XING Feng. Mechanisms of Mechanical Property Degradation of Carbonation Curing Cement-Based Materials under Natural Weathering [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(4): 1132-1141. |
| [12] | YAN Fei, WENG Yukuan, CUI Zheqi, CHEN Zhengkang, DENG Ziyi, JIA Minghao. Bending Properties of Basalt Fiber Fabric Reinforced Cement-Based Composite Materials with Different Structural Forms [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(4): 1142-1150. |
| [13] | HONG Chuanhai, LIANG Ruiqing, LIANG Zhensheng, ZHANG Botao, TANG Xuemei, RUAN Guowei, LIN Jiaxiang. Properties of Seawater Coral Sand Powder Engineered Cementitious Composites after High-Temperature Exposure [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(4): 1151-1159. |
| [14] | LI Shunkai, CHEN Ronghui, DONG Xun, DOU Huakang, SUN Fengpin. Effect of Accelerator and Early Strength Agent on Properties of Shotcrete [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(4): 1184-1192. |
| [15] | ZHU Shidong, CHEN Wannian, LI Zhonghui, ZHANG Yu, ZHANG Yunsheng, LI Wangxin. Effect of Vibration Mixing on Performance and Carbon Emissions of Fly Ash Concrete [J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(4): 1193-1207. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||