硅酸盐通报 ›› 2026, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (7): 2408-2418.DOI: 10.16552/j.cnki.issn1001-1625.2026.0062
余哲俊1,2(
), 王景然1,2(
), 张锦化1,2, 韩兵强1,2, 倪月娥1,2
收稿日期:2026-01-15
修订日期:2026-03-02
出版日期:2026-07-15
发布日期:2026-08-13
通信作者:
王景然,博士,副教授。E-mail:wangjingran@wust.edu.cn作者简介:余哲俊(2000—),男,硕士研究生。主要从事水泥材料方面的研究。E-mail:2456120680@qq.com
基金资助:
YU Zhejun1,2(
), WANG Jingran1,2(
), ZHANG Jinhua1,2, HAN Bingqiang1,2, NI Yue’e1,2
Received:2026-01-15
Revised:2026-03-02
Published:2026-07-15
Online:2026-08-13
摘要:
为解决废弃风机叶片的固废处理难题,并探究其在建筑材料中的高价值化利用潜力,本文对比分析了不同掺量(0.5%、1.0%、1.5%,质量分数)的回收风机叶片纤维(RWTBF)和玻璃纤维对硅酸盐水泥水化进程的影响,重点探究了两种纤维对水泥基体力学性能和显微结构的作用规律。结果表明,两种纤维的引入均延长了水泥的初凝和终凝时间,对早期水化过程产生了一定缓凝作用。在力学性能方面,回收风机叶片纤维表现出更显著的增强效果。28 d龄期时,添加1.5%回收纤维组的抗折强度达11.7 MPa,显著优于对照组的8.8 MPa及同等掺量玻璃纤维组的9.4 MPa。同时,相较于对照组68.7 MPa的抗压强度,添加1.5%回收纤维组提升至71.4 MPa,同等掺量的玻璃纤维组的抗压强度提升至70.9 MPa。微观结构分析显示,与玻璃纤维相比,回收风机叶片纤维在水泥基体中构建了更有效的网络结构,从而大幅提高了净浆的抗折强度。回收风机叶片纤维用于水泥胶凝材料不仅能有效提升材料性能,还为解决风电废弃物的高值化回收利用提供了可行途径。
中图分类号:
余哲俊, 王景然, 张锦化, 韩兵强, 倪月娥. 回收风机叶片纤维与玻璃纤维对硅酸盐水泥性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(7): 2408-2418.
YU Zhejun, WANG Jingran, ZHANG Jinhua, HAN Bingqiang, NI Yue’e. Effects of Recycled Wind Turbine Blade Fibers and Glass Fibers on Properties of Portland Cement[J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(7): 2408-2418.
| Material | Mass fraction/% | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CaO | SiO2 | Al2O3 | Fe2O3 | SO3 | MgO | TiO2 | Na2O and K2O | LOI | |
| Portland cement | 63.25 | 21.08 | 6.95 | 2.36 | 1.94 | 1.32 | — | 0.09 | 3.01 |
| Recycled fiber | 15.93 | 48.24 | 11.28 | 0.60 | — | 3.12 | 0.33 | 0.40 | 18.65 |
| Glass fiber | 23.97 | 54.68 | 14.93 | 0.31 | — | 3.78 | 0.20 | 1.32 | 0.81 |
表1 硅酸盐水泥和两种纤维的主要化学成分
Table 1 Main chemical composition of Portland cement and two types of fibers
| Material | Mass fraction/% | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CaO | SiO2 | Al2O3 | Fe2O3 | SO3 | MgO | TiO2 | Na2O and K2O | LOI | |
| Portland cement | 63.25 | 21.08 | 6.95 | 2.36 | 1.94 | 1.32 | — | 0.09 | 3.01 |
| Recycled fiber | 15.93 | 48.24 | 11.28 | 0.60 | — | 3.12 | 0.33 | 0.40 | 18.65 |
| Glass fiber | 23.97 | 54.68 | 14.93 | 0.31 | — | 3.78 | 0.20 | 1.32 | 0.81 |
| Fiber type | Average length/mm | Diameter range/μm | Aspect ratio | Density/(kg·m-3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glass fiber | 10 | 13~15 | ~700 | 2 540 |
| Recycled fiber | 8~12 | 50~100 | 80~240 | 1 874 |
表2 两种纤维的物理性质对比
Table 2 Physical properties of two types of fibers
| Fiber type | Average length/mm | Diameter range/μm | Aspect ratio | Density/(kg·m-3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glass fiber | 10 | 13~15 | ~700 | 2 540 |
| Recycled fiber | 8~12 | 50~100 | 80~240 | 1 874 |
| Sample | Mass fraction/% | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Portland cement | Fiber | Water | Water reducer | |
| W | 100 | — | 26 | 0.1 |
| Xa | 100 | 0.5 | 26 | 0.1 |
| Ya | 100 | 1.0 | 26 | 0.1 |
| Za | 100 | 1.5 | 26 | 0.1 |
| Xc | 100 | 0.5 | 26 | 0.1 |
| Yc | 100 | 1.0 | 26 | 0.1 |
| Zc | 100 | 1.5 | 26 | 0.1 |
表3 两种纤维对水泥水化影响的试验配比
Table 3 Experimental mix proportion for analyzing effects of two types of fibers on cement hydration
| Sample | Mass fraction/% | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Portland cement | Fiber | Water | Water reducer | |
| W | 100 | — | 26 | 0.1 |
| Xa | 100 | 0.5 | 26 | 0.1 |
| Ya | 100 | 1.0 | 26 | 0.1 |
| Za | 100 | 1.5 | 26 | 0.1 |
| Xc | 100 | 0.5 | 26 | 0.1 |
| Yc | 100 | 1.0 | 26 | 0.1 |
| Zc | 100 | 1.5 | 26 | 0.1 |
图5 添加不同掺量两种纤维的硅酸盐水泥试样在不同龄期的抗折强度和抗压强度
Fig.5 Flexural and compressive strength of Portland cement specimens with different dosages of two types of fibers at different ages
图6 经养护28 d并完成抗折强度测试的硅酸盐水泥试样及其断口面SEM照片
Fig.6 SEM images of Portland cement specimens and their fracture surfaces after flexural strength testing at 28 d
| [1] |
CHEN Y H, LIN H Y. Overview of the development of offshore wind power generation in China[J]. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 2022, 53: 102766.
DOI URL |
| [2] |
FENG Y, LIN H Y, HO S L, et al. Overview of wind power generation in China: status and development[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 50: 847-858.
DOI URL |
| [3] |
段珍华, 张 韦, 朱仄平, 等. 退役风机叶片的回收与资源化应用研究进展[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(4): 1267-1275.
DOI |
|
DUAN Z H, ZHANG W, ZHU Z P, et al. Research progress on recycling and resource application of retired wind turbine blades[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2025, 44(4): 1267-1275 (in Chinese).
DOI |
|
| [4] |
HUANG F, LIANG Y Y, LI J H, et al. Barriers to China’s wind power target: waste generation and supply risks analysis[J]. Environmental Development, 2026, 57: 101352.
DOI URL |
| [5] |
LI L Y, WANG Y B, WANG M, et al. Collaborative disposal of exhaust gas and waste wind turbine blades: mechanical properties of recycled glass fibres and economic analysis[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2024, 471: 143351.
DOI URL |
| [6] |
WANG Z Q, XU C Q, CHANG H M, et al. Life cycle environmental impact and disposal strategy selection of wind turbine blades based on uncertainty analysis[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2026, 117: 108214.
DOI URL |
| [7] |
HASHEMINEZHAD A, NAZARI Z, YANG B, et al. A comprehensive review of sustainable solutions for reusing wind turbine blade waste materials[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2024, 366: 121735.
DOI URL |
| [8] | HE X Y, GAO W Q, LU T J, et al. Navigating closed-loop recycling technologies for a circular economy of wind turbine blades[J]. Energy & Environmental Sustainability, 2025, 1(4): 100056. |
| [9] | JOHST P, BÜHL M, ENDERLE C, et al. Forecasting wind turbine blade waste with material composition and geographical distribution: methodology and application to Germany[J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2024, 211: 107876. |
| [10] |
CHENG L L, CHEN R Z, YANG J L, et al. Mechanisms, technical optimization, and perspectives in the recycling and reprocessing of waste wind turbine blades: a review[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2025, 218: 115834.
DOI URL |
| [11] |
LI L, KANG X. Recycling wind turbine blades: a comprehensive review of challenges, solutions, and future directions[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2025, 114: 114489.
DOI URL |
| [12] |
XU M X, JI H W, WU Y C, et al. Recovering glass fibers from waste wind turbine blades: recycling methods, fiber properties, and potential utilization[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2024, 202: 114690.
DOI URL |
| [13] |
ZHANG W, DUAN Z H, WU Y Q, et al. High-value recycling strategies for retired wind turbine blades in China: a spatiotemporal adaptability framework[J]. Waste Management, 2025, 205: 115010.
DOI URL |
| [14] |
LIU X H, MA B G, TAN H B, et al. Effect of aluminum sulfate on the hydration of Portland cement, tricalcium silicate and tricalcium aluminate[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 232: 117179.
DOI URL |
| [15] |
QIU Z M, BAO S X, ZHANG Y M, et al. Effect of Portland cement on the properties of geopolymers prepared from granite powder and fly ash by alkali-thermal activation[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2023, 76: 107363.
DOI URL |
| [16] | 王玉华, 孙拴虎. 纳米SiO2改性纤维增强普通硅酸盐水泥-硫铝酸盐水泥复合材料早期性能及微观结构[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(3): 795-801+809. |
| WANG Y H, SUN S H. Effect of nano-SiO2 on early properties and microstructure of fiber-reinforced ordinary Portland cement-sulphoaluminate cement composites[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2022, 41(3): 795-801+809 (in Chinese). | |
| [17] | 张 琰, 黄业胜, 刘佳龙, 等. 硫铝酸盐水泥对硅酸盐水泥早期水化和力学性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(10): 3552-3560+3594. |
| ZHANG Y, HUANG Y S, LIU J L, et al. Effect of sulphoaluminate cement on early hydration and mechanical properties of Portland cement[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2024, 43(10): 3552-3560+3594 (in Chinese). | |
| [18] | 张熠爽, 周 健, 李 辉, 等. 硅酸盐水泥-富铝材料复合体系Cl-结合能力的研究进展[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(5): 1672-1687. |
| ZHANG Y S, ZHOU J, LI H, et al. Research progress on Cl- binding capacity of Portland cement and aluminium-rich material composite systems[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2023, 42(5): 1672-1687 (in Chinese). | |
| [19] |
HAN H, MANDAL P, ENGELBERG D, et al. Performance of basalt fibre-reinforced cement composites under hydrothermal curing up to 200 ℃[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2025, 115: 114571.
DOI URL |
| [20] | ZHANG B X, FANG L W, DING Z W, et al. The effect of modified basalt fiber on mechanical properties of oil well cement slurry[J]. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 2024, 20: e03228. |
| [21] |
ZHU M H, DU C B, YI F, et al. Nano-modification of basalt fiber surface and its improvement on mechanical properties and salt resistance of cement-based materials[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2025, 472: 141000.
DOI URL |
| [22] | HOUANKPO T O N, MA Z Y, ZHAO Z, et al. Performance of cementitious high-pressure mixtures with wheat and corn straw fiber and straw ashes[J]. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 2025, 22: e04175. |
| [23] |
LI Q F, ZHAO Y, CHEN H, et al. Effect of waste corn stalk ash on the early-age strength development of fly ash/cement composite[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 303: 124463.
DOI URL |
| [24] |
WU Z, WANG X L, CHEN Z H. Experimental study on corn straw fiber (CSF) toughening EPS concrete[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2024, 429: 136325.
DOI URL |
| [25] |
CHEN Z H, YUE W J, WANG C W. Recent progress of using carbon fiber in reinforcing cement-based composite and their enlightenment for oil-well cement future[J]. Petroleum, 2025, 11(5): 568-586.
DOI URL |
| [26] |
LI H Y, ZHANG N, YANG J, et al. Synergistic reinforcement of recycled carbon fibers and biochar in high-performance, low-carbon cement composites: a sustainable pathway for construction materials[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2025, 162: 106148.
DOI URL |
| [27] |
ZHU J H, WANG X F, YU H T, et al. Advanced industrial-grade carbon-fiber-reinforced geopolymer cement supercapacitors for building-integrated energy storage solutions[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2025, 161: 106106.
DOI URL |
| [28] | 吴志涛, 张云升, 刘乃东, 等. 玻璃纤维增强水泥基材料收缩性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2019, 38(8): 2570-2577. |
| WU Z T, ZHANG Y S, LIU N D, et al. Shrinkage properties of glass fiber reinforced cement-based materials[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2019, 38(8): 2570-2577 (in Chinese). | |
| [29] | 李永靖, 潘 铖, 张淑坤, 等. 耐碱玻璃纤维砖骨料混凝土性能正交试验研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2019, 38(7): 2196-2201. |
| LI Y J, PAN C, ZHANG S K, et al. Orthogonal experiment study on performance of alkali-resistant glass fiber brick aggregate concrete[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2019, 38(7): 2196-2201 (in Chinese). | |
| [30] |
REN Q M, MA L, LI Y J, et al. Review: chemical recycling of fiber reinforced polymer composites in wind turbine blade waste[J]. Polymer Degradation and Stability, 2025, 241: 111576.
DOI URL |
| [31] |
WANG Y, DONG B Q, DAI J G, et al. Value-added recycling strategies for decommissioned wind turbine blades: a review[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2025, 222: 115950.
DOI URL |
| [32] |
XU Y, WANG F, LIANG D H, et al. A comprehensive review of waste wind turbine blades in China: current status and resource utilization[J]. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2024, 12(3): 113077.
DOI URL |
| [33] | 王富平, 张 默, 周博宇. 再生风机叶片纤维对混凝土力学和抗冻性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(1): 231-238. |
| WANG F P, ZHANG M, ZHOU B Y. Effect of recycled wind turbine blade fiber on mechanical properties and frost resistance of concrete[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2023, 42(1): 231-238 (in Chinese). | |
| [34] |
GAO F F, DUAN S Y, WANG W D, et al. Mechanical properties and microscopic mechanism of concrete incorporation of recycled GFRP fiber with different sizes recovered from ex-service wind turbine blades[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2025, 491: 142833.
DOI URL |
| [35] | MANSO-MORATO J, HURTADO-ALONSO N, SERRANO-LÓPEZ R, et al. Long-term mechanical performance of concrete with high amounts of wind turbine blade mixed waste: analysis of temporal evolution mechanisms[J]. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 2025, 23: e05194. |
| [36] | LIU T, PARASKEVOULAKOS C, MUGHAL U A, et al. Mechanisms and applications of wind turbine blade waste in cementitious composites: a review[J]. Materials & Design, 2025, 251: 113732. |
| [37] |
DUAN Z H, ZHANG W, LIU C, et al. Recycled wind turbine blade fibers as reinforcement in mortar: a comprehensive performance evaluation[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2025, 528: 146740.
DOI URL |
| [1] | 王富桓, 李艳杰, 吕浩平, 杨令强. 掺玻璃粉的改性聚丙烯纤维增强水泥基材料力学性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(7): 2397-2407. |
| [2] | 金子豪, 邹自勇, 贺行洋, 苏英, 陈淑琴. 湿磨碳化钢渣对磷建筑石膏性能及微观结构的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(7): 2347-2356. |
| [3] | 肖伟, 李一航, 王栋琦, 钟祖良, 周仁, 朱开新. 硅灰-粉煤灰复掺对混凝土强度演化与抗渗性能的影响机理[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(7): 2419-2427. |
| [4] | 单志龙, 张云升, 张守祺, 张宇, 刘庆阳, 王友平. 钼酸钠复合溶液下预应力锈蚀钢绞线的再钝化研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(7): 2549-2560. |
| [5] | 李富云, 黄胜晶, 焦威力, 邓孝炜, 陈春恒, 韦驰, 赖芳, 李晶. 赤泥基复合水化晶种对硅酸盐水泥砂浆性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(7): 2237-2249. |
| [6] | 欧阳琦, 尹健, 李思娇, 陈怡豪, 覃宇航, 曾一. 复合降碱改性生态多孔混凝土抗硫酸盐侵蚀性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(7): 2290-2298. |
| [7] | 张柳, 龚明, 丁盼, 周飞, 杨奉源, 卢忠远, 李军. 天然石膏掺量对高铝精炼渣复合胶凝材料水化及性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(7): 2389-2396. |
| [8] | 王月, 丛培良. 粉煤灰-电石渣-脱硫石膏胶凝材料力学性能与反应特性[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(7): 2438-2447. |
| [9] | 郝贠洪, 佟海岩, 王栋民, 孙浩, 杜根杰. 多因素交互作用下固废基生态矿区充填材料的制备及性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(7): 2466-2477. |
| [10] | 申彦利, 魏冠超, 王鹏, 王嘉炜, 徐磊, 王辉, 王志岭, 卫爱魁. 再生骨料水泥稳定碎石力学性能分析与最优配合比预测[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(7): 2561-2572. |
| [11] | 刘亚君, 薛善彬, 郑子昊, 史志浩, 王文焕. 冻融循环对硅烷改性ECC力学与吸水性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(6): 1876-1891. |
| [12] | 赵天璞, 占雪芳, 刘晓军, 黄聃, 赵怡彬, 王皓磊. 基于正交试验的多元共混绿色ECC制备与性能预测[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(6): 1988-2001. |
| [13] | 肖庆一, 张紫腾, 马明晓, 荆文龙, 李子祎. 芦苇纤维增强流态粉煤灰的力学性能及微观结构分析[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(6): 2181-2190. |
| [14] | 吴言坤, 陈健, 郝建帅, 房奎圳. 钢渣-矿渣-水泥-脱硫石膏四元胶凝体系的水化硬化机理与性能优化研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(6): 2052-2062. |
| [15] | 程坤阳, 刘晓林, 冯元, 王彦鹏, 张蕊, 于本田. 多元复合固废胶凝体系的力学性能与收缩特性[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(6): 2041-2051. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||