硅酸盐通报 ›› 2026, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (2): 613-624.DOI: 10.16552/j.cnki.issn1001-1625.2025.0840
收稿日期:2025-08-20
修订日期:2025-09-23
出版日期:2026-02-20
发布日期:2026-03-09
通信作者:
邓腾飞,博士,研究员。E-mail:dengtf@whut.edu.cn作者简介:曾樱子(2000—),女,硕士研究生。主要从事多孔陶瓷对香精吸附的研究。E-mail:2171190272@qq.com
基金资助:Received:2025-08-20
Revised:2025-09-23
Published:2026-02-20
Online:2026-03-09
摘要:
通过调整废瓷粉和玻璃粉的比例,在910~990 ℃系列温度梯度下,烧制了不同气孔率的多孔陶瓷。将不同气孔率的多孔陶瓷作为吸附剂,探究了多孔陶瓷对六种香精的吸附/释放性能,明晰了香精在多孔陶瓷中的截留成分,构建了多孔陶瓷对香精的释放模型。结果表明,40%气孔率多孔陶瓷的比表面积最大,达到2.33×106 mm2/g,对六种香精的吸附量最大(223.98~301.82 mg/g),吸附时间最短(2.68~9.90 s)。高气孔率多孔陶瓷的孔隙网络较为密集,有效缩短了香精的扩散路径,对香精的吸附速度较快。香精释放试验中,三种醇溶性香精的释放率均接近100%,而三种水溶性香精的释放率均小于70%。三种水溶性香精在多孔陶瓷中的主要截留成分分别为DL-甘油醛、L-乳酸和5-羟甲基糠醛。三种截留成分中含有羟基(—OH)、醛基(—CHO)和羧基(—COOH)中的两种极性基团,与多孔陶瓷表面的羟基形成强氢键网络,使多孔陶瓷对其的吸附效果增强。
中图分类号:
曾樱子, 邓腾飞. 废瓷粉/玻璃复相多孔陶瓷对不同香精选择性吸附的研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2026, 45(2): 613-624.
ZENG Yingzi, DENG Tengfei. Selective Adsorption of Different Flavors by Waste Porcelain Powder/Glass Composite Porous Ceramics[J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2026, 45(2): 613-624.
| Material | Mass fraction/% | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SiO2 | Al2O3 | K2O | Na2O | MgO | CaO | Fe2O3 | LOI | Other | |
| Waste porcelain powder | 69.90 | 22.73 | 2.96 | 1.22 | 0.60 | 0.81 | 0.32 | 0.74 | 0.72 |
| Glass powder | 58.27 | 5.25 | 0.36 | 11.26 | 3.92 | 13.08 | 0.72 | 4.54 | 2.60 |
表1 废瓷粉和玻璃粉的主要化学组成
Table 1 Main chemical composition of waste porcelain powder and glass powder
| Material | Mass fraction/% | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SiO2 | Al2O3 | K2O | Na2O | MgO | CaO | Fe2O3 | LOI | Other | |
| Waste porcelain powder | 69.90 | 22.73 | 2.96 | 1.22 | 0.60 | 0.81 | 0.32 | 0.74 | 0.72 |
| Glass powder | 58.27 | 5.25 | 0.36 | 11.26 | 3.92 | 13.08 | 0.72 | 4.54 | 2.60 |
| Flavor No. | Solubility | Formula composition |
|---|---|---|
| B1 | Water-soluble | Glucose, pure water, lactic acid, sodium dehydroacetate |
| B2 | Tobacco extract, jujube tincture, lactic acid, fig extract, jujube net oil, citric acid, fenugreek extract, tomato extract, propylene glycol, pure water | |
| B3 | Raisin fruit reactants, blackberry extract, chicory root extract, rye extract, propylene glycol, pure water | |
| C1 | Alcohol-soluble | Maotai-flavor liquor, furanone, alcohol, propylene glycol, purified water |
| C2 | Alfalfa distillation, Peru flow extract, mint flow extract, clove stem flow extract, alcohol, propylene glycol | |
| C3 | Tobacco extract, damascenone, citral, myrrh oil, lemon oil, sweet fennel oil, vanilla extract, tamarind extract, fenugreek tincture, alcohol |
表2 香精溶液的配方构成
Table 2 Formula composition of flavors solution
| Flavor No. | Solubility | Formula composition |
|---|---|---|
| B1 | Water-soluble | Glucose, pure water, lactic acid, sodium dehydroacetate |
| B2 | Tobacco extract, jujube tincture, lactic acid, fig extract, jujube net oil, citric acid, fenugreek extract, tomato extract, propylene glycol, pure water | |
| B3 | Raisin fruit reactants, blackberry extract, chicory root extract, rye extract, propylene glycol, pure water | |
| C1 | Alcohol-soluble | Maotai-flavor liquor, furanone, alcohol, propylene glycol, purified water |
| C2 | Alfalfa distillation, Peru flow extract, mint flow extract, clove stem flow extract, alcohol, propylene glycol | |
| C3 | Tobacco extract, damascenone, citral, myrrh oil, lemon oil, sweet fennel oil, vanilla extract, tamarind extract, fenugreek tincture, alcohol |
| Formula | Mass fraction/% | |
|---|---|---|
| Waste porcelain powder | Glass powder | |
| A1 | 70 | 30 |
| A2 | 75 | 25 |
| A3 | 80 | 20 |
| A4 | 85 | 15 |
| A5 | 90 | 10 |
表3 多孔陶瓷配方设计
Table 3 Formula design of porous ceramics
| Formula | Mass fraction/% | |
|---|---|---|
| Waste porcelain powder | Glass powder | |
| A1 | 70 | 30 |
| A2 | 75 | 25 |
| A3 | 80 | 20 |
| A4 | 85 | 15 |
| A5 | 90 | 10 |
| Porosity/% | Formula | Sintering temperature/℃ |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | A1 | 990 |
| 20 | A2 | 990 |
| 30 | A3 | 910 |
| 40 | A4 | 910 |
表4 四种不同气孔率样品的配方和烧结温度
Table 4 Formula and sintering temperature for four samples with different porosities
| Porosity/% | Formula | Sintering temperature/℃ |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | A1 | 990 |
| 20 | A2 | 990 |
| 30 | A3 | 910 |
| 40 | A4 | 910 |
| Porosity/% | Specific surface area/(mm2·g-1) | Average pore size/nm |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | 3.03×105 | 742 |
| 20 | 7.42×105 | 643 |
| 30 | 1.19×106 | 637 |
| 40 | 2.33×106 | 464 |
表5 四种不同气孔率样品的比表面积和孔径数据
Table 5 Pore surface area and pore size data for four samples with different porosities
| Porosity/% | Specific surface area/(mm2·g-1) | Average pore size/nm |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | 3.03×105 | 742 |
| 20 | 7.42×105 | 643 |
| 30 | 1.19×106 | 637 |
| 40 | 2.33×106 | 464 |
| Porosity/% | Flavor No. | Fitting equation | R2 | Release model |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20 | B1 | qt =25.74×(1-e-0.04t) | 0.997 | First-order model |
| B2 | qt =21.84×(1-e-0.03t) | 0.992 | ||
| B3 | qt =18.20×(1-e-0.04t) | 0.996 | ||
| C1 | qt =30.16×(1-e-0.19t) | 0.997 | ||
| C3 | qt =26.57×(1-e-0.38t) | 0.999 | ||
| C2 | qt =0.85+0.15t | 0.993 | Zero-order model | |
| 40 | B1 | qt =47.41×(1-e-0.05t) | 0.997 | First-order model |
| B2 | qt =42.90×(1-e-0.03t) | 0.994 | ||
| B3 | qt =35.91×(1-e-0.03t) | 0.998 | ||
| C1 | qt =57.25×(1-e-0.15t) | 0.994 | ||
| C3 | qt =49.47×(1-e-0.34t) | 0.999 | ||
| C2 | qt =0.97+0.20t | 0.993 | Zero-order model |
表6 香精在20%和40%气孔率多孔陶瓷中释放的拟合方程参数
Table 6 Fitting equation parameters of release of flavors in porous ceramics with 20% and 40% porosity
| Porosity/% | Flavor No. | Fitting equation | R2 | Release model |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20 | B1 | qt =25.74×(1-e-0.04t) | 0.997 | First-order model |
| B2 | qt =21.84×(1-e-0.03t) | 0.992 | ||
| B3 | qt =18.20×(1-e-0.04t) | 0.996 | ||
| C1 | qt =30.16×(1-e-0.19t) | 0.997 | ||
| C3 | qt =26.57×(1-e-0.38t) | 0.999 | ||
| C2 | qt =0.85+0.15t | 0.993 | Zero-order model | |
| 40 | B1 | qt =47.41×(1-e-0.05t) | 0.997 | First-order model |
| B2 | qt =42.90×(1-e-0.03t) | 0.994 | ||
| B3 | qt =35.91×(1-e-0.03t) | 0.998 | ||
| C1 | qt =57.25×(1-e-0.15t) | 0.994 | ||
| C3 | qt =49.47×(1-e-0.34t) | 0.999 | ||
| C2 | qt =0.97+0.20t | 0.993 | Zero-order model |
| Flavor No. | Flavor composition | Molecular formula | Mass fraction/% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pure fragrance | Retained fragrance | |||
| B1 | Furanone | C6H8O3 | 2.26 | 2.97 |
| DL-glyceraldehyde | C3H6O3 | 0.40 | 25.87 | |
| 3,6-dimethyl-2,5-piperazinedione | C6H10N2O2 | 1.11 | 2.40 | |
| Dehydroacetic acid | C8H8O4 | 1.13 | 5.16 | |
| Methyl 3-hydroxyhexanoate | C7H14O3 | 10.18 | 5.84 | |
| Ethylene glycol methyl vinyl ether | C5H10O2 | 28.22 | 22.52 | |
| (S)-(+)-citric acid | C10H16O4 | 1.67 | 1.14 | |
| 2,3-dihydro-3,5-dihydroxy-6-methyl-4(H)-pyran-4-one | C6H8O4 | 2.27 | 0.77 | |
| Beta-lactose | C12H22O11 | 11.01 | 22.81 | |
| 5-hydroxymethylfurfural | C6H6O3 | 0.62 | 1.96 | |
| B2 | l-lactic acid | C3H6O3 | 49.40 | 85.28 |
| 3-methyl-2-pentanol | C6H14O | 1.98 | 5.83 | |
| Isobutyl alcohol | C4H10O | 7.44 | 2.74 | |
| 5-hydroxymethylfurfural | C6H6O3 | 1.00 | 1.43 | |
| B3 | Furanone | C6H8O3 | 0.56 | 1.76 |
| 3-furoic acid | C5H4O3 | 0.46 | 0.56 | |
| Diacetin | C7H12O6 | 3.29 | 2.22 | |
| 5-hydroxymethylfurfural | C6H6O3 | 37.82 | 77.91 | |
| 2,3-dihydro-3,5-dihydroxy-6-methyl-4(H)-pyran-4-one | C6H8O4 | 12.71 | 0.82 | |
| Furfuryl alcohol | C5H6O2 | 5.75 | 0.51 | |
| Allyl phenoxyacetate | C11H12O3 | 10.07 | 0.43 | |
表7 水溶性香精和滞留香精气相色谱成分对比
Table 7 Comparison of gas chromatographic components of water-soluble flavors and retained flavor
| Flavor No. | Flavor composition | Molecular formula | Mass fraction/% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pure fragrance | Retained fragrance | |||
| B1 | Furanone | C6H8O3 | 2.26 | 2.97 |
| DL-glyceraldehyde | C3H6O3 | 0.40 | 25.87 | |
| 3,6-dimethyl-2,5-piperazinedione | C6H10N2O2 | 1.11 | 2.40 | |
| Dehydroacetic acid | C8H8O4 | 1.13 | 5.16 | |
| Methyl 3-hydroxyhexanoate | C7H14O3 | 10.18 | 5.84 | |
| Ethylene glycol methyl vinyl ether | C5H10O2 | 28.22 | 22.52 | |
| (S)-(+)-citric acid | C10H16O4 | 1.67 | 1.14 | |
| 2,3-dihydro-3,5-dihydroxy-6-methyl-4(H)-pyran-4-one | C6H8O4 | 2.27 | 0.77 | |
| Beta-lactose | C12H22O11 | 11.01 | 22.81 | |
| 5-hydroxymethylfurfural | C6H6O3 | 0.62 | 1.96 | |
| B2 | l-lactic acid | C3H6O3 | 49.40 | 85.28 |
| 3-methyl-2-pentanol | C6H14O | 1.98 | 5.83 | |
| Isobutyl alcohol | C4H10O | 7.44 | 2.74 | |
| 5-hydroxymethylfurfural | C6H6O3 | 1.00 | 1.43 | |
| B3 | Furanone | C6H8O3 | 0.56 | 1.76 |
| 3-furoic acid | C5H4O3 | 0.46 | 0.56 | |
| Diacetin | C7H12O6 | 3.29 | 2.22 | |
| 5-hydroxymethylfurfural | C6H6O3 | 37.82 | 77.91 | |
| 2,3-dihydro-3,5-dihydroxy-6-methyl-4(H)-pyran-4-one | C6H8O4 | 12.71 | 0.82 | |
| Furfuryl alcohol | C5H6O2 | 5.75 | 0.51 | |
| Allyl phenoxyacetate | C11H12O3 | 10.07 | 0.43 | |
| [1] |
LAI M, LI P Y, YAN D W, et al. Thermal behaviour, smoke transfer and antioxidant analysis of two synthesised 2, 5-dimethyl-N-substituted pyrrole leucine esters[J]. Flavour and Fragrance Journal, 2025, 40(2): 242-250.
DOI URL |
| [2] |
LI P Y, TIAN H Y, HAN L, et al. Synthesis and pyrolysis of various novel pyrrole ester fragrance precursors[J]. Flavour and Fragrance Journal, 2023, 38(4): 285-292.
DOI URL |
| [3] | 蔡有为, 刘欢, 谢明勇. 烟用天然植物香料的研究进展[C]// 中国食品科学技术学会第二十一届年会论文摘要集. 南昌大学食品科学与资源挖掘全国重点实验室, 中国-加拿大食品科学与技术联合实验室(南昌), 江西省生物活性多糖重点实验室, 2024: 374-375. |
| CAI Y W, LIU H, XIE M Y. Research progress on natural plant spices for tobacco[C]// Twenty-first Annual Meeting of the Chinese Society of Food Science and Technology. National Key Laboratory of Food Science and Resource Mining, Nanchang University, China-Canada Joint Laboratory of Food Science and Technology (Nanchang), Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Bioactive Polysaccharides, 2024: 374-375 (in Chinese). | |
| [4] |
ABEDI G, TALEBPOUR Z, JAMECHENARBOO F. The survey of analytical methods for sample preparation and analysis of fragrances in cosmetics and personal care products[J]. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 2018, 102: 41-59.
DOI URL |
| [5] |
CHO I H, PETERSON D G. Analytical approaches to flavor research and discovery: from sensory-guided techniques to flavoromics methods[J]. Food Science and Biotechnology, 2024, 34(1): 19-29.
DOI |
| [6] |
LIU S K, LI D, ZHAO X Y, et al. Production of food flavor and color by synthetic biology[J]. Current Opinion in Food Science, 2024, 57: 101168.
DOI URL |
| [7] |
SHARMEEN J B, MAHOMOODALLY F M, ZENGIN G, et al. Essential oils as natural sources of fragrance compounds for cosmetics and cosmeceuticals[J]. Molecules, 2021, 26(3): 666.
DOI URL |
| [8] | 王邹璐琪. 金属有机框架ZIF-8作为香精载体材料的研究[D]. 厦门: 厦门大学, 2021. |
| WANG Z L Q. Study on metal organic framework ZIF-8 as carrier material for fragrance[D]. Xiamen: Xiamen University, 2021 (in Chinese). | |
| [9] | 朱志扬, 蔡昊城, 何沛, 等. 多孔生物炭对烟用香料吸附性能的影响[J]. 当代化工研究, 2024(6): 49-51. |
| ZHU Z Y, CAI H C, HE P, et al. Effect of porous biochar on adsorption properties of tobacco flavor[J]. Modern Chemical Research, 2024(6): 49-51 (in Chinese). | |
| [10] |
SHABANI M, KESHAVARZ S T, FARAHMANDGHAVI F, et al. Long-lasting adsorption of golden flower oil on polyvinyl alcohol/clinoptilolite (PVA/CP) xerogel particles[J]. Applied Clay Science, 2020, 195: 105699.
DOI URL |
| [11] |
TEKIN R, BAC N, WARZYWODA J, et al. Encapsulation of a fragrance molecule in zeolite X[J]. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 2015, 215: 51-57.
DOI URL |
| [12] |
MANFREDINI N, ILARE J, INVERNIZZI M, et al. Polymer nanoparticles for the release of fragrances: how the physicochemical properties influence the adsorption on textile and the delivery of limonene[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2020, 59(28): 12766-12773.
DOI URL |
| [13] | KASPERKOWIAK M, STRZEMIECKA B, VOELKEL A. Characteristics of natural and synthetic molecular sieves and study of their interactions with fragrance compounds[J]. Physicochemical Problems of Mineral Processing, 2016, 52: 789-802. |
| [14] | 姚晶晶, 陈森林, 孔浩辉, 等. 活性炭的孔隙结构和表面酸性对其香料吸附性的影响[J]. 现代食品科技, 2014, 30(2): 72-77+116. |
| YAO J J, CHEN S L, KONG H H, et al. Effects of porosity property and acid functional groups of activated carbons on adsorption of three flavors[J]. Modern Food Science and Technology, 2014, 30(2): 72-77+116 (in Chinese). | |
| [15] |
LIU Y H, WANG Y X, HUANG J X, et al. Encapsulation and controlled release of fragrances from functionalized porous metal-organic frameworks[J]. AIChE Journal, 2019, 65(2): 491-499.
DOI URL |
| [16] | DINGY J, ZHANGX Y, WUB Y, et al. Highly porous ceramics production using slags from smelting of spent automotive catalysts[J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2021, 166: 105373. |
| [17] | 白利忠, 王超男, 程俊, 等. 粉煤灰基多孔陶瓷的制备及吸附性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(11): 4122-4130. |
| BAI L Z, WANG C N, CHENG J, et al. Preparation and adsorption performance of fly ash based porous ceramics[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2023, 42(11): 4122-4130 (in Chinese). | |
| [18] | 周小鹏. 煤矸石基多孔陶瓷复合材料的制备及其吸附性能研究[D]. 太原: 太原理工大学, 2024. |
| ZHOU X P. Preparation and adsorption performance study of coal gangue-based porous ceramic composite materials[D]. Taiyuan: Taiyuan University of Technology, 2024 (in Chinese). | |
| [19] | 范新会. 果壳类生物质炭及其改性对邻苯二甲酸二乙酯的吸附研究[D]. 郑州: 郑州大学, 2021. |
| FAN X H. Study on adsorption of diethyl phthalate by shell biomass charcoal and its modification[D]. Zhengzhou: Zhengzhou University, 2021 (in Chinese). | |
| [20] | 陈满英, 邹旭凤, 刘杏宜, 等. 食品及食品包装材料中塑化剂的检测研究进展[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报, 2017, 8(4): 1305-1311. |
| CHEN M Y, ZOU X F, LIU X Y, et al. Research progress on determination of plasticizers in food and food packaging materials[J]. Journal of Food Safety & Quality, 2017, 8(4): 1305-1311 (in Chinese). | |
| [21] |
ZHANG B, HUANG J X, LIU K X, et al. Biocompatible cyclodextrin-based metal-organic frameworks for long-term sustained release of fragrances[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2019, 58(43): 19767-19777.
DOI URL |
| [22] |
RAMAKRISHNAIAH R, ALKHERAIF A A, DIVAKAR D D, et al. The effect of hydrofluoric acid etching duration on the surface micromorphology, roughness, and wettability of dental ceramics[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2016, 17(6): 822.
DOI URL |
| [23] |
GAO L H, LIU Y H, XU K Y, et al. A short review of the sustainable utilization of coal gangue in environmental applications[J]. RSC Advances, 2024, 14(53): 39285-39296.
DOI PMID |
| [1] | 柴倩, 陈柳霖, 张恬恬, 程丰梅, 汪永鑫, 肖文轩, 张会, 贺攀阳. 升温制度对铁尾矿基陶粒性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(8): 2996-3004. |
| [2] | 王竞一, 杨一帆, 段国林. SiC多孔陶瓷的绿色制备及性能优化[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(5): 1869-1877. |
| [3] | 乔畅通, 余超, 邓承继, 王萱, 丁军, 刘正龙, 祝洪喜. 二次铝灰对低碳Al2O3-C耐火材料显微结构与性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2025, 44(5): 1878-1887. |
| [4] | 陈冬丽. 浸渍法制备堇青石质多孔陶瓷[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(3): 1070-1077. |
| [5] | 王蒙蒙, 隋学叶, 綦开宇, 徐杰, 刘瑞祥, 周长灵, 唐文哲, 段晓峰, 李占峰. 多孔陶瓷隔热材料的研究进展[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(2): 637-648. |
| [6] | 赖岳飞, 王辉军, 曾强, 熊成荣, 苏小丽, 罗婷. 工业废渣制备堇青石基陶瓷材料研究现状[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2024, 43(12): 4521-4531. |
| [7] | 白利忠, 王超男, 程俊, 赵梓彤, 耿佳旺, 李雪峰. 粉煤灰基多孔陶瓷的制备及吸附性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(11): 4122-4130. |
| [8] | 王璨, 彭同江, 孙红娟, 陈涛, 李湘. 石棉尾渣和粉煤灰制备堇青石多孔陶瓷及其理化性能[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(1): 151-161. |
| [9] | 李润丰, 刘艳军, 涂玉波, 王林俊, 温晓庆, 任磊. 石墨烯增强复合相变储能材料的热学性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(7): 2542-2548. |
| [10] | 武振飞, 王跃超, 陆丽芳, 张弘毅. 无压烧结氮化硅陶瓷的物理性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(5): 1782-1787. |
| [11] | 王卿, 鲍崇高, 李世佳, 董文彩, 马海强. 硅藻土光固化成型浆料和多孔陶瓷的制备[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(4): 1416-1422. |
| [12] | 罗彦恒, 马国军, 李志, 郑顶立, 张翔, 朱俊霖. 添加剂对铜渣还原尾渣微晶玻璃析晶行为及性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(11): 3852-3860. |
| [13] | 袁绮, 谭划, 杨廷旺, 陆文龙, 臧佳栋, 李浩宇, 鄢文超, 张升伟, 卢亚, 张海波. 多孔陶瓷的制备方法及研究现状[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2021, 40(8): 2687-2701. |
| [14] | 阿拉腾沙嘎, 陈冠宏, 陈星. 磁场作用下冷冻铸造法制备仿生材料研究进展[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2021, 40(7): 2348-2359. |
| [15] | 何逸宁, 戴高尚, 吴甲民, 张洁, 潘明珠, 陈敬炎, 陈颖, 王永均, 张红星. 环氧树脂含量对激光选区烧结制备多孔煤系高岭土陶瓷性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2021, 40(6): 1950-1956. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||
