BFRP复合水泥板与PUR保温板界面黏结性能研究

硅酸盐通报 ›› 2023, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (12): 4323-4331.

BFRP复合水泥板与PUR保温板界面黏结性能研究

宋小软¹, 黄崧¹, 高睿², 骆诗丽¹, 高怡静¹

1.北方工业大学土木工程学院,北京 100144;
2.深圳市福田区住房和建设局,深圳 518038

收稿日期:2023-07-26 修订日期:2023-09-07 出版日期:2023-12-15 发布日期:2023-12-12
通信作者: 黄崧,硕士研究生。E-mail:1149774105@qq.com
作者简介:宋小软(1972—),女,博士,教授。主要从事混凝土结构、建筑节能与结构一体化技术的研究。E-mail:sxr@ncut.edu.cn
基金资助:
北方工业大学毓优团队培养计划项目(107051360021XN083)

Interfacial Bonding Performance of BFRP Composite Cement Board and PUR Insulation Board

SONG Xiaoruan¹, HUANG Song¹, GAO Rui², LUO Shili¹, GAO Yijing¹

1. School of Civil Engineering, North China University of Technology, Beijing 100144, China;
2. Futian District Housing & Construction Bureau, Shenzhen 518038, China

Received:2023-07-26 Revised:2023-09-07 Online:2023-12-15 Published:2023-12-12

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 随着“双碳”目标的提出,各类新型复合保温模板及一体化复合墙体已成为当前研究热点。本文提出了一种以硬质聚氨酯(PUR)保温板为保温层,玄武岩纤维增强材料(BFRP)复合水泥板为面层的复合保温模板,通过设计的6组试件进行推出剪切试验,研究保温板上开槽类型、深度及数量等因素对面层与保温层界面黏结性能的影响,并引入耗能因子来评价试件耗能能力。结果表明:在保温板上开槽、加深开槽深度、增加开槽数量都可以提升试件的界面黏结强度和韧性。综合对比各工况,在PUR保温板表面开槽可以明显提升试件的界面黏结性能,开横槽试件的界面黏结性能优于开纵槽试件,开井字槽试件表现出最好的界面黏结性能,可使试件界面黏结强度、韧性、耗能能力较不开槽试件分别提升了163%、260%、28.57%,加深开槽深度对于界面黏结性能提升有限,对耗能能力基本没有影响;与开1条横槽相比,开2条横槽可使试件界面黏结性能提升约16%。通过回归分析,建立了界面黏结强度计算公式,与试验结果对比发现计算值与试验值吻合良好。

关键词: 复合保温模板, BFRP, 复合水泥板, PUR, 界面黏结性能, 耗能分析

Abstract: With the proposal of "dual carbon" goal, all kinds of new composite thermal insulation formwork and integrated composite wall have become the current research hotspot. A composite thermal insulation formwork with rigid polyurethane (PUR) insulation board as insulation layer and basalt fiber reinforced polymer (BFRP) composite cement board as surface layer was proposed. Six sets of specimens were designed for push-out shear test. The effects of groove type, depth and number on the interfacial bonding performance between surface layer and insulation layer were studied. The energy dissipation factor was introduced to evaluate the energy dissipation capacity of specimens. The results show that grooving on the insulation board, deepening the grooving depth and increasing the number of grooving can improve the interfacial bonding strength and toughness of the specimen. Comprehensive comparison of various working conditions, grooving on the surface of PUR insulation board can significantly improve the interfacial bonding performance of the specimen. The interfacial bonding performance of the transverse groove specimen is better than that of the longitudinal groove specimen. The "#"-shaped groove specimen makes that the interfacial bonding strength, toughness and energy dissipation capacity of specimen increase by 164%, 286% and 28.57%, respectively, compared with the unslotted specimen, showing the best interfacial bonding performance. Deepening the grooveing depth has limited improvement on the interfacial bonding performance and has little effect on the energy dissipation capacity. Increasing the number of grooving can improve the interfacial bonding performance of specimen by about 16%. Through regression analysis, the calculation formula ofinterfacial bonding strength was established, and compared with the experimental results, the calculated values are in good agreement with the experimental values.

Key words: composite thermal insulation formwork, BFRP, composite cement board, PUR, interfacial bonding performance, energy dissipation analysis

中图分类号:

TU528.58

宋小软, 黄崧, 高睿, 骆诗丽, 高怡静. BFRP复合水泥板与PUR保温板界面黏结性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(12): 4323-4331.

SONG Xiaoruan, HUANG Song, GAO Rui, LUO Shili, GAO Yijing. Interfacial Bonding Performance of BFRP Composite Cement Board and PUR Insulation Board[J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2023, 42(12): 4323-4331.

参考文献

[1] DING Y, WEI X T, WANG Q C. Optimization approach of passive cool skin technology application for the Building’s exterior walls[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 256: 120751.
[2] KHEIRI F. A review on optimization methods applied in energy-efficient building geometry and envelope design[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018, 92: 897-920.
[3] 宋小软, 牛伟, 姜余丰, 等. 复合保温模板夹芯混凝土的界面粘结性能试验研究[J]. 混凝土与水泥制品, 2013(8): 62-67.
SONG X R, NIU W, JIANG Y F, et al. Experimental study on interracial bond performance of composite insulation formwork sandwich-type concrete[J]. China Concrete and Cement Products, 2013(8): 62-67 (in Chinese).
[4] BISWAS K, DESJARLAIS A, SMITH D, et al. Development and thermal performance verification of composite insulation boards containing foam-encapsulated vacuum insulation panels[J]. Applied Energy, 2018, 228: 1159-1172.
[5] 段芳敏. 免模保温剪力墙抗震性能及结合界面剪切性能研究[D]. 长沙: 湖南大学, 2017.
DUAN F M. Study on seismic performance and shear performance of bonding interface of formwork-free thermal insulation shear wall[D]. Changsha: Hunan University, 2017 (in Chinese).
[6] FAM A, SHARAF T. Flexural performance of sandwich panels comprising polyurethane core and GFRP skins and ribs of various configurations[J]. Composite Structures, 2010, 92(12): 2927-2935.
[7] 潘鸿健. MF保温免拆模板与混凝土墙体连接性能及隔热性能研究[D]. 南京: 东南大学, 2019.
PAN H J. Study on connection performance and thermal insulation performance of MF thermal insulation formwork and concrete wall[D]. Nanjing: Southeast University, 2019 (in Chinese).
[8] YUAN K L, XIONG H R, WEN M J, et al. Visualization of localized deformation of external thermal insulation composite systems during aging[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2022, 206: 118108.
[9] 李传秀. 常规和冻融环境下ECC与保温材料的界面粘结性能研究[D]. 徐州: 中国矿业大学, 2021.
LI C X. Study on interfacial adhesion between ECC and thermal insulation materials in conventional and freeze-thaw environments[D]. Xuzhou: China University of Mining and Technology, 2021 (in Chinese).
[10] HODICKY K, SOPAL G, RIZKALLA S, et al. Experimental and numerical investigation of the FRP shear mechanism for concrete sandwich panels[J]. Journal of Composites for Construction, 2015, 19(5): 04014083.
[11] 李雨珊, 尹世平, 徐世烺, 等. 工程水泥基复合材料与发泡式聚苯乙烯保温板的界面粘结性能[J]. 复合材料学报, 2022, 39(11): 5251-5263.
LI Y S, YIN S P, XU S L, et al. Interfacial bonding properties of engineering cement-based composites and foamed polystyrene insulation board[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2022, 39(11): 5251-5263 (in Chinese).
[12] 李雨珊, 尹世平, 徐世烺, 等. ECC-XPS夹心复合墙板界面黏结性能试验[J]. 工程科学与技术, 2023, 55(1): 232-242.
LI Y S, YIN S P, XU S L, et al. Experimental study on interfacial bonding performance of ECC-XPS sandwich composite wallboard[J]. Advanced Engineering Sciences, 2023, 55(1): 232-242 (in Chinese).
[13] JANG S J, YOU Y C, DO YUN H. Effect of GFRP shear ties on shear behavior of interfaces between precast concrete panel and extruded polystyrene special insulation[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2013, 658: 46-49.
[14] 杨伟军, 黄婕. 免拆保温模板开槽构造分析[J]. 福建建材, 2017(3): 1-4.
YANG W J, HUANG J. Analysis on slotting structure of non-disassembly thermal insulation formwork[J]. Fujian Building Materials, 2017(3): 1-4 (in Chinese).
[15] 刘蒲云, 雷梦珂, 汪昕, 等. BFRP增强水泥砂浆薄板力学性能试验研究[J]. 混凝土与水泥制品, 2021(10): 52-56+61.
LIU P Y, LEI M K, WANG X, et al. Experimental study on mechanical properties of BFRP reinforced cement mortar slab[J]. China Concrete and Cement Products, 2021(10): 52-56+61 (in Chinese).
[16] 魏星, 刘水, 汪昕, 等. BFRP网格增强水泥砂浆永久模板力学与协同工作性能试验研究[J]. 南京工业大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 45(2): 202-210.
WEI X, LIU S, WANG X, et al. Experimental study on mechanics and cooperative performance of BFRP grid reinforced cement mortar permanent formwork[J]. Journal of Nanjing Tech University (Natural Science Edition), 2023, 45(2): 202-210 (in Chinese).
[17] 宋小软, 高睿, 黄成林, 等. BFRP增强复合水泥板与混凝土界面黏结性能试验研究[J]. 混凝土, 2019(8): 20-23.
SONG X R, GAO R, HUANG C L, et al. Experimental study on the interfacial bonding performance of BFRP reinforced composite cement plate and concrete[J]. Concrete, 2019(8): 20-23 (in Chinese).
[18] 宋小软, 黄成林, 闫朝, 等. 加速老化环境下GFRP/BFRP复合水泥板与混凝土的界面黏结性能研究[J]. 混凝土, 2019(6): 18-22.
SONG X R, HUANG C L, YAN C, et al. Experimental study on the interfacial bonding performance of GFRP/BFRP composite cement and concrete under accelerated aging environment[J]. Concrete, 2019(6): 18-22 (in Chinese).
[19] 陈宗平, 徐金俊, 李卫宁, 等. 再生粗骨料含量对钢管再生混凝土粘结强度及失效性态的影响研究[J]. 工程力学, 2014, 31(6): 70-78.
CHEN Z P, XU J J, LI W N, et al. Influence of recycled coarse aggregate content on bond strength and invalidation mechanism between steel tube and recycled aggregate concrete[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2014, 31(6): 70-78 (in Chinese).