ALC板专用砂浆早期抗剪黏结性能试验与数值模拟研究

硅酸盐通报 ›› 2023, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (11): 3843-3852.

所属专题：水泥混凝土

ALC板专用砂浆早期抗剪黏结性能试验与数值模拟研究

欧阳德光¹, 朱利平², 郭旭¹, 静行¹

1.河南工业大学土木工程学院,郑州 450001;
2.中国建筑第七工程局有限公司,郑州 450004

收稿日期:2023-06-20 修订日期:2023-08-03 出版日期:2023-11-15 发布日期:2023-11-22
通信作者: 静行,博士,教授。E-mail:hangjing@haut.edu.cn
作者简介:欧阳德光(1997—),男,硕士研究生。主要从事新型建筑材料与结构的研究。E-mail:13283812023@163.com
基金资助:
中建七局科技研发课题(CSCEC7b-2021-Z-14)

Experimental and Numerical Simulation Study on Early-Age Shear Bond Performance of Special Mortar for ALC Panel

OUYANG Deguang¹, ZHU Liping², GUO Xu¹, JING Hang¹

1. School of Civil Engineering, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 450001, China;
2. China Construction Seventh Engineering Division Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou 450004, China

Received:2023-06-20 Revised:2023-08-03 Online:2023-11-15 Published:2023-11-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为研究蒸压轻质混凝土(ALC)板专用砂浆的早期抗剪黏结性能,设计并制作了4组专用砂浆黏结Z型试件和1组普通砂浆黏结Z型试件,通过对试件进行单面剪切试验,分析了普通砂浆黏结试件和不同养护龄期下专用砂浆黏结试件的抗剪强度、破坏形式和荷载-滑移曲线等抗剪黏结性能指标,并采用ABAQUS软件建立了专用砂浆黏结试件受剪有限元模型。研究结果表明:专用砂浆的早期黏结强度较高且发展较快,养护1 d后的抗剪强度是同强度等级普通砂浆养护28 d后的3.5倍;随着养护龄期的增加,专用砂浆黏结面的剪切刚度和极限滑移量均有小幅度增长,相较于普通砂浆,专用砂浆的塑性变形能力和试块-砂浆界面的黏结强度均有所提高;有限元计算的荷载-滑移曲线以及破坏特征与试验结果吻合较好,验证了牵引力-分离定律模拟专用砂浆黏结行为的有效性和可靠性。

关键词: ALC板, 专用砂浆, 早期, 抗剪黏结性能, 数值模拟

Abstract: In order to study the early-age shear bond performance of special mortar for autoclaved lightweight concrete (ALC) panel, four groups of special mortar bonded Z-shaped specimens and one group of ordinary mortar bonded Z-shaped specimens were designed and fabricated. Through single-sided shear tests on these specimens, the shear bond strength, failure characteristics and load-slip curves of ordinary mortar bonded specimens and special mortar bonded specimens under different curing ages were analyzed, Additionally, a shear finite element model of special mortar bonded specimens was established by ABAQUS software. The results show that the early-age bond strength of special mortar is higher and develops more rapidly. After 1 d of curing, the shear bond strength of special mortar is 3.5 times higher than that of ordinary mortar of the same strength grade after 28 d of curing. With the increase of curing age, the shear stiffness and ultimate slip of the bond surface of special mortar increase slightly. Compared with the ordinary mortar, the plastic deformation capacity and the bond strength of the test block-mortar interface of special mortar are significantly improved. The load-slip curve and failure characteristics calculated by finite element are in good agreement with the test results, which verifies the effectiveness and reliability of the traction-separation law simulation of the bond behavior of special mortar.

Key words: ALC panel, special mortar, early-age, shear bond performance, numerical simulation

中图分类号:

欧阳德光, 朱利平, 郭旭, 静行. ALC板专用砂浆早期抗剪黏结性能试验与数值模拟研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(11): 3843-3852.

OUYANG Deguang, ZHU Liping, GUO Xu, JING Hang. Experimental and Numerical Simulation Study on Early-Age Shear Bond Performance of Special Mortar for ALC Panel[J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2023, 42(11): 3843-3852.

参考文献

[1] 唐凌霄, 姚华彦, 徐马云龙, 等. 蒸压加气混凝土板研究与应用综述[J]. 材料导报, 2022, 36(增刊1): 237-240.
TANG L X, YAO H Y, XU M Y L, et al. Review on the research and application of autoclaved aerated concrete slab[J]. Materials Reports, 2022, 36(supplement 1): 237-240 (in Chinese).
[2] 肖力光, 邢纹浩. 蒸压加气混凝土砌块专用配套薄灰缝砌筑砂浆的研究与展望[J]. 应用化工, 2020, 49(11): 2932-2935.
XIAO L G, XING W H. Autoclaved aerated concrete block special matching thin mortar joint masonry mortar research and prospect[J]. Applied Chemical Industry, 2020, 49(11): 2932-2935 (in Chinese).
[3] 易晓园, 张爱玲. 加气混凝土砌块墙体配套砂浆研究[J]. 新型建筑材料, 2015, 42(2): 66-69.
YI X Y, ZHANG A L. Research on supporting mortar for aerated concrete block wall[J]. New Building Materials, 2015, 42(2): 66-69 (in Chinese).
[4] 徐春一, 王凯乐, 阎磊. 蒸压加气混凝土薄灰缝砌体新型专用粘结剂性能研究[J]. 沈阳建筑大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 37(3): 462-469.
XU C Y, WANG K L, YAN L. Study on performance of new special mortar for thin mortar joint masonry of autoclaved aerated concrete[J]. Journal of Shenyang Jianzhu University (Natural Science), 2021, 37(3): 462-469 (in Chinese).
[5] PAPAIOANNOU S, ARGYROPOULOU R, KALOGIANNIDOU C, et al. Mechanical and adhesion properties of polymer-modified cement mortars in relation with their microstructure[J]. The Journal of Adhesion, 2019, 95(2): 126-145.
[6] RAJ A, BORSAIKIA A C, DIXIT U S. Bond strength of autoclaved aerated concrete (AAC) masonry using various joint materials[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2020, 28: 101039.
[7] JIANG H B, FANG Z C, LIU A R, et al. Interface shear behavior between high-strength precast girders and lightweight cast-in-place slabs[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2016, 128: 449-460.
[8] 彭世红, 周思源, 董卓越, 等. 新旧混凝土植筋界面抗剪承载力影响因素研究及规范对比[J]. 工程力学, 2023, 40(增刊1): 167-173.
PENG S H, ZHOU S Y, DONG Z Y, et al. Codes comparison and study on influencing factors of shear capacity of new and old concrete interface with post-installed rebars[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2023, 40(supplement 1): 167-173 (in Chinese).
[9] VENKATARAMA REDDY B V, UDAY VYAS C V. Influence of shear bond strength on compressive strength and stress-strain characteristics of masonry[J]. Materials and Structures, 2008, 41(10): 1697-1712.
[10] ZHANG J J, LI G X, YE W T, et al. Effects of ordinary Portland cement on the early properties and hydration of calcium sulfoaluminate cement[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 186: 1144-1153.
[11] 万宇豪, 朱金勇, 张川, 等. 硅酸盐-硫铝酸盐复合水泥水化协同效应研究[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2017, 17(14): 291-295.
WAN Y H, ZHU J Y, ZHANG C, et al. Hydration synergy effect of silicate-sulphoaluminate compound cement[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2017, 17(14): 291-295 (in Chinese).
[12] 史琛, 刘磊. 养护温度对硅酸盐水泥-硫铝酸盐水泥体系性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2016, 35(6): 1720-1724.
SHI C, LIU L. Effect of curing temperature on the performances of Portland cement-sulphoaluminate cement compound cementitious system[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2016, 35(6): 1720-1724 (in Chinese).
[13] 周美茹, 张文会. 外加剂对干混砂浆性能的影响[J]. 混凝土, 2007(6): 71-73.
ZHOU M R, ZHANG W H. Effect of additives on performance of dry-mixed mortar[J]. Concrete, 2007(6): 71-73 (in Chinese).
[14] 陈博珊. 蒸压加气混凝土板力学试验及数值模拟研究[D]. 北京: 北京建筑大学, 2016: 12-22.
CHEN B S. Mechanical test and numerical simulation of autoclaved aerated concrete slab[D]. Beijing: Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 2016: 12-22 (in Chinese).
[15] 过镇海. 钢筋混凝土原理[M]. 3版. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 1999: 18-22.
GUO Z H. Principle of reinforced concrete[M]. 3th ed. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 1999: 18-22 (in Chinese).
[16] 李志龙, 程才渊. 蒸压加气混凝土楼板抗弯性能试验与有限元理论分析[J]. 结构工程师, 2014, 30(1): 165-170.
LI Z L, CHENG C Y. Experimental and finite element analysis for the flexural performance of autoclaved aerated concrete floor slabs[J]. Structural Engineers, 2014, 30(1): 165-170 (in Chinese).
[17] 张斯, 徐礼华, 杨冬民, 等. 纤维布加固砖砌体墙平面内受力性能有限元模型[J]. 工程力学, 2015, 32(12): 233-242.
ZHANG S, XU L H, YANG D M, et al. Finite element modelling of frp-reinforced masonry walls under in-plane loadings[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2015, 32(12): 233-242 (in Chinese).
[18] 陈东方, 熊立红, 陈国武, 等. 配BFG蒸压加气混凝土砌块砌体基本力学性能数值模拟[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2020, 40(2): 216-226.
CHEN D F, XIONG L H, CHEN G W, et al. Numerical simulation on basic mechanical properties of BFG autoclaved aerated concrete block masonry[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2020, 40(2): 216-226 (in Chinese).
[19] STAVRIDIS A, SHING P B. Finite-element modeling of nonlinear behavior of masonry-infilled RC frames[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2010, 136(3): 285-296.
[20] THAMBOO J A, DHANASEKAR M, YAN C. Flexural and shear bond characteristics of thin layer polymer cement mortared concrete masonry[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2013, 46: 104-113.

ALC板专用砂浆早期抗剪黏结性能试验与数值模拟研究

Experimental and Numerical Simulation Study on Early-Age Shear Bond Performance of Special Mortar for ALC Panel

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	袁朝阳, 胡东方, 李彦兵. 支撑物参数对全钢化真空玻璃等效应力和变形量的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(9): 3372-3378.
[2]	张海燕, 唐国铭, 过民龙, 康胜国. 回字形3D打印混凝土受压性能试验及数值模拟[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(6): 1980-1986.
[3]	卓耀彬, 吕碧飞, 宋小文, 杨辰龙, 叶晓平, 陈旭绍. 玻璃管水平拉制成型过程的数值模拟[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(3): 1096-1105.
[4]	李宇航, 温勇, 韩国旗, 郝恩泽, 刘佳, 马丽莎. 持续荷载和锂渣取代量对混凝土抗氯离子渗透性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(2): 598-606.
[5]	朱明, 宫能平, 穆朝民, 蔡天宇, 章雨. 高温后钢纤维自密实混凝土动、静态力学性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(11): 3895-3905.
[6]	马泉, 肖建庄, 田丰, 晏文品, 宋敏, 付杰, 杨超, 曹雪. 再生砂粉混凝土抗压强度与细观损伤研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(11): 4042-4050.
[7]	陆亚运, 罗旭, 刘川北. 不同减水剂对高强石膏浆体工作性的影响与作用机理[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(1): 205-212.
[8]	李贝贝, 陈衡, 侯鹏坤, 王晓伟, 程新. 纳米SiO₂对超硫酸盐水泥性能影响研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(5): 1494-1501.
[9]	袁波, 汪恒昆, 陈伟, 唐佩. LDHs对碳酸盐激发胶凝材料早期水化反应与力学性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(5): 1696-1703.
[10]	陈淑勇, 陈家睿, 李瑾, 李从云, 欧元勋, 江琦, 左泽方. 浮法锡槽入口段玻璃液流动过程模拟分析[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(4): 1185-1194.
[11]	高琦, 张宇驰, 巴明芳, 张丹蕾, 成伟, 周书夙. 重金属污泥磨细粉对硅酸盐水泥基材料性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(2): 450-460.
[12]	向阳开, 刘威震, 赵毅, 张庆宇, 张艳娟. 钢渣沥青混合料微波加热自愈合性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(2): 667-677.
[13]	刘云强, 左晓宝, 黎亮, 邹欲晓. 硫酸盐侵蚀下硬化水泥浆体微结构演变及膨胀过程的数值模拟[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(12): 4128-4138.
[14]	苏美娟, 王子明, 赵攀, 刘晓. 碱性和无碱液体速凝剂促凝早强作用机理对比研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(12): 4172-4179.
[15]	易立, 韩建军, 王桂荣, 李路瑶, 阮健, 陈德成, 王文田. 超大吨位一窑两线浮法玻璃熔窑的数值模拟研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(11): 3901-3909.