基于响应面法的粉煤灰-电石渣地质聚合物固化软土试验研究

硅酸盐通报 ›› 2023, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (8): 2821-2829.

基于响应面法的粉煤灰-电石渣地质聚合物固化软土试验研究

张顶飞¹, 吕启航¹, 张鹏¹, 朱珍¹, 陈向南², 曹吉昌³

1.青岛理工大学土木工程学院,青岛 266520;
2.中铁通信信号勘测设计院有限公司,北京 100083;
3.住房和城乡建设部科技与产业化发展中心,北京 100083

收稿日期:2023-05-08 修订日期:2023-06-08 发布日期:2023-08-18
通信作者: 张鹏,博士,教授。E-mail:zhangpchn@qut.edu.cn
作者简介:张顶飞(1998—),男,硕士研究生。主要从事软土路基固化方向的研究。E-mail:2839914220@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金面上项目(42177167)

Experimental Study on Soft Soil Solidified by Fly Ash and Carbide Slag Geopolymer Based on Response Surface Method

ZHANG Dingfei¹, LYU Qihang¹, ZHANG Peng¹, ZHU Zhen¹, CHEN Xiangnan², CAO Jichang³

1. School of Civil Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266520, China;
2. China Railway Communication and Signal Survey and Design Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing 100083, China;
3. Technology and Industrialization Development Center of the Ministry of Housing and Urban Rural Development, Beijing 100083, China

Received:2023-05-08 Revised:2023-06-08 Published:2023-08-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 软土承载力低,工程特性较差,无法直接作为地基进行工程建设,此外我国工业废渣产量巨大,且利用率较低,为推动高质量发展要求,本文采用粉煤灰作为前驱体,电石渣、硫酸钠作为激发剂,研究软土的固化机理与微观结构发展。结果表明,最优配合比为粉煤灰掺量17.3%(质量分数,下同)、电石渣掺量7.3%、硫酸钠掺量5.0%。最优配合比下固化土7和28 d无侧限抗压强度分别为2 474.0和3 134.0 kPa,与预测强度相比误差较小,响应面法优化配比具备有效性和科学性。固化土7和28 d水稳系数分别为0.73和0.85,固化土具有较好的抗水侵蚀能力。28 d固化土水化产物主要为水化硅酸钙(C-S-H)和钙矾石(AFt),二者填充、包裹固化土内部孔隙,固化土微观结构逐渐密实,力学性能得到提高。

关键词: 地质聚合物, 粉煤灰, 电石渣, 响应面法, 配合比优化

Abstract: Soft soil has low bearing capacity and poor engineering characteristics, so it can not be directly used as foundation for engineering construction. In addition, China's industrial waste residue has a huge output and low utilization rate. In order to promote the requirements of high-quality development, this paper uses fly ash as precursor, carbide slag and sodium sulfate as activators to study the solidification mechanism and microstructure development of soft soil. The results show that the optimal mix ratio is 17.3% (mass fraction, the same below) of fly ash, 7.3% of carbide slag and 5.0% of sodium sulfate. The 7 and 28 d unconfined compressive strength of solidified soil under the optimal ratio are 2 474.0 and 3 134.0 kPa, respectively, and the error is small compared with the predicted strength. The response surface method is effective and scientific to optimize the mix ratio. The water stability coefficients of solidified soil at 7 and 28 d are 0.73 and 0.85, respectively, indicating that the solidified soil has good water erosion resistance. The hydration products of 28 d solidified soil are mainly hydrated calcium silicate (C-S-H) and ettringite (AFt), which fill and wrap the internal pores of solidified soil. The microstructure of solidified soil is gradually dense and the mechanical properties are improved.

Key words: geopolymer, fly ash, carbide slag, response surface method, mix ratio optimization

中图分类号:

TU447

张顶飞, 吕启航, 张鹏, 朱珍, 陈向南, 曹吉昌. 基于响应面法的粉煤灰-电石渣地质聚合物固化软土试验研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(8): 2821-2829.

ZHANG Dingfei, LYU Qihang, ZHANG Peng, ZHU Zhen, CHEN Xiangnan, CAO Jichang. Experimental Study on Soft Soil Solidified by Fly Ash and Carbide Slag Geopolymer Based on Response Surface Method[J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2023, 42(8): 2821-2829.

参考文献

[1] 骆嘉成, 邵吉成, 袁波, 等. 分层加固法对温州淤泥类渣土加固的现场试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2021, 40(增刊2): 3483-3492.
LUO J C, SHAO J C, YUAN B, et al. Study of field test on reforcement of Wenzhou sludge by layered reinforcement method[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2021, 40(supplement 2): 3483-3492 (in Chinese).
[2] 谈云志, 柯睿, 陈君廉, 等. 偏高岭土增强石灰-水泥固化淤泥的耐久性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1146-1152.
TAN Y Z, KE R, CHEN J L, et al. Enhancing durability of lime-cement solidified sludge with metakaolin[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(4): 1146-1152 (in Chinese).
[3] 王东星, 陈政光. 氯氧镁水泥固化淤泥力学特性及微观机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 77-85+92.
WANG D X, CHEN Z G. Mechanical properties and micro-mechanisms of magnesium oxychloride cement solidified sludge[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(1): 77-85+92 (in Chinese).
[4] 吴俊, 征西遥, 杨爱武, 等. 矿渣-粉煤灰基地质聚合物固化淤泥质黏土的抗压强度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 647-655.
WU J, ZHENG X Y, YANG A W, et al. Experimental study on the compressive strength of muddy clay solidified by the one-part slag-fly ash based geopolymer[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(3): 647-655 (in Chinese).
[5] SARGENT P, HUGHES P N, ROUAINIA M. A new low carbon cementitious binder for stabilising weak ground conditions through deep soil mixing[J]. Soils and Foundations, 2016, 56(6): 1021-1034.
[6] 杨振甲, 何猛, 吴杨, 等. 矿渣-粉煤灰地聚物固化淤泥力学性能和路用性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(2): 693-703+724.
YANG Z J, HE M, WU Y, et al. Mechanical properties and road performance of slag-fly ash geopolymer stabilized sludge[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2022, 41(2): 693-703+724 (in Chinese).
[7] 王东星, 王宏伟, 邹维列, 等. 碱激发粉煤灰固化淤泥微观机制研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2019, 38(增刊1): 3197-3205.
WANG D X, WANG H W, ZOU W L, et al. Research on micro-mechanisms of dredged sludge solidified with alkali-activated fly ash[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2019, 38(supplement 1): 3197-3205 (in Chinese).
[8] 易昕政, 骆睿栋, 高游, 等. 固化废弃软黏土的强度特性及水稳定性研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(3): 976-984.
YI X Z, LUO R D, GAO Y, et al. Research on strength behavior and water stability of solidified waste soft clay[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2022, 41(3): 976-984 (in Chinese).
[9] 万宗华, 张文芹, 刘志超, 等. 电石渣-矿渣复合胶凝材料性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(5): 1704-1714.
WAN Z H, ZHANG W Q, LIU Z C, et al. Properties of carbide slag-slag composite cementitious material[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2022, 41(5): 1704-1714 (in Chinese).
[10] HORPIBULSUK S, PHETCHUAY C, CHINKULKIJNIWAT A, et al. Strength development in silty clay stabilized with calcium carbide residue and fly ash[J]. Soils and Foundations, 2013, 53(4): 477-486.
[11] PHETCHUAY C, HORPIBULSUK S, SUKSIRIPATTANAPONG C, et al. Calcium carbide residue: alkaline activator for clay-fly ash geopolymer[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2014, 69: 285-294.
[12] 金胜赫, 王修山, 吴越鹏. 矿渣-脱硫石膏-电石渣固化剂固化黏土的研究[J]. 工程地质学报, 2023, 31(2): 397-408.
JIN S H, WANG X S, WU Y P. Study on modification of marine clay treated with new gdc soil stabilizer[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2023, 31(2): 397-408 (in Chinese).
[13] 肖林峻, 李丽民. 粉煤灰-电石渣-硫酸钠混凝土在农村公路中的应用[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2009, 28(5): 1097-1101.
XIAO L J, LI L M. Application of fly ash-acetylene sludge-sodium sulfate concrete in rural highway[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2009, 28(5): 1097-1101 (in Chinese).
[14] WANG D X, WANG R H, BENZERZOUR M, et al. Comparison between reactive MgO- and Na₂SO₄-activated low-calcium fly ash-solidified soils dredged from East Lake, China[J]. Marine Georesources & Geotechnology, 2020, 38(9): 1046-1055.
[15] YI Y L, LI C, LIU S Y. Alkali-activated ground-granulated blast furnace slag for stabilization of marine soft clay[J]. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2015, 27(4): 04014146.
[16] 朱坤垅. 淤泥质土固化及路用性能试验研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2021.
ZHU K L. Study on solidification of mucky soil and road performance[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2021 (in Chinese).
[17] 李媛媛. 固化土在道路工程软土地基处理中的应用[D]. 天津: 河北工业大学, 2015.
LI Y Y. Application of stabilized soil in soft clay embankments treatment of road engineering[D]. Tianjin: Hebei University of Technology, 2015 (in Chinese).
[18] 李雪刚, 徐日庆, 畅帅, 等. 响应面法优化有机质软土复合固化剂配方[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2014, 48(5): 843-849.
LI X G, XU R Q, CHANG S, et al. Application of response surface methodology on optimizing mixture ratio of composite curing agent used to improve organic matter soil stabilization[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science), 2014, 48(5): 843-849 (in Chinese).
[19] 吴蓬, 吕宪俊, 胡术刚, 等. 粒化高炉矿渣成分和细度对活性的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2014, 33(10): 2572-2577.
WU P, LV X J, HU S G, et al. Influence of composition and fineness of granulated blast furnace slags on activation index[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2014, 33(10): 2572-2577 (in Chinese).
[20] SHEKHOVTSOVA J, KEARSLEY E, KOVTUN M. Effect of activator dosage, water-to-binder-solids ratio, temperature and duration of elevated temperature curing on the compressive strength of alkali-activated fly ash cement pastes[J]. Journal of the South African Institution of Civil Engineering, 2014, 56(3): 44-52.
[21] 程国东, 黄天勇, 刘泽, 等. 不同减水剂对地质聚合物砂浆性能影响研究[J]. 混凝土, 2020(6): 109-112.
CHENG G D, HUANG T Y, LIU Z, et al. Research on the influence of different water reducers on the performance of geopolymer mortar[J]. Concrete, 2020(6): 109-112 (in Chinese).