CTAB改性地质聚合物对地下污染源的阻截作用

硅酸盐通报 ›› 2023, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (5): 1831-1840.

所属专题：资源综合利用

CTAB改性地质聚合物对地下污染源的阻截作用

刘佳宁^1,2, 洪梅^1,2, 魏涛¹, 陈日³, 宋博宇⁴

1.吉林大学新能源与环境学院,长春 130021;
2.吉林大学石油化工污染场地控制与修复技术国家地方联合工程实验室,长春 130021;
3.北京建工环境修复股份有限公司,北京 100020;
4.生态环境部对外合作与交流中心,北京 100035

收稿日期:2023-01-10 修订日期:2023-03-21 出版日期:2023-05-15 发布日期:2023-06-01
通信作者: 宋博宇,高级工程师。E-mail:song.boyu@fecomee.org.cn
作者简介:刘佳宁(1996—),女,硕士研究生。主要从事地质聚合物阻截墙的研究。E-mail:liujn20@jlu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(42177052)

Interception Effect of Geopolymer Modified by CTAB on Underground Pollution Sources

LIU Jianing^1,2, HONG Mei^1,2, WEI Tao¹, CHEN Ri³, SONG Boyu⁴

1. College of New Energy and Environment, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China;
2. National Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of Petrochemical Pollution Site Control and Remediation Technology, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China;
3. BCEG Environmental Remediation Co., Ltd., Beijing 100020, China;
4. Foreign Environmental Cooperation Center, Ministry of Ecology andEnvironment, Beijing 100035, China

Received:2023-01-10 Revised:2023-03-21 Online:2023-05-15 Published:2023-06-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对有机污染物和无机金属离子复合地下水污染源的阻截问题,本文提出了一种以十六烷基三甲基溴化铵(CTAB)为改性剂的地质聚合物阻截墙材料设计方法,并研究了改性剂掺加量对地质聚合物渗透系数、兼容性能、吸附能力及抗压强度的影响。结果表明:改性地质聚合物在保持良好渗透系数、兼容性能及抗压强度的前提下,对苯酚-六价铬复合地下水污染源表现出较高的吸附能力,可作为一种经济有效的阻截墙材料;当水玻璃掺量为8%(质量分数)、水玻璃模数为1.0、水灰比为0.30、CTAB掺加量为2.0%(质量分数)时,样品渗透系数为4.61×10^-8 cm/s,抗压强度为6.25 MPa,对苯酚和Cr(VI)的去除率可分别达57.51%和28.18%。此外,随CTAB掺加量增大,改性地质聚合物渗透系数、吸附能力呈上升趋势,抗压强度则呈下降趋势,试块表观均未出现劣化现象。

关键词: 地质聚合物, 十六烷基三甲基溴化铵, 阻截墙, 凝结时间, 渗透系数, 吸附能力

Abstract: In view of the interception problem of organic pollutants and inorganic metal ions combined with groundwater pollution sources, a design method of geopolymer interception wall material with cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) as modifier was proposed, and the influence of the amount of modifier on the permeability coefficient, compatibility, adsorption capacity and compressive strength of geopolymer were studied. The results show that the modified geopolymer has a high adsorption capacity to the phenol-hexavalent chromium compound groundwater pollution source under the premise of maintaining good permeability coefficient, compatibility and compressive strength, and can be used as an economical and effective interception wall material. When the content of sodium silicate is 8%(mass fraction), the modulus of sodium silicate is 1.0, the water-raw material ratio is 0.30, and CTAB addition is 2.0%(mass fraction), the permeability coefficient of the sample is 4.61×10^-8 cm/s, the compressive strength is 6.25 MPa, and the removal rates of phenol and Cr (VI) can reach 57.51% and 28.18%, respectively. In addition, with the increase of CTAB addition, the permeability coefficient and adsorption capacity of the modified geopolymer increase, while the compressive strength decreases, and no deterioration phenomenon appears in the test blocks.

Key words: geopolymer, cetyltrimethylammonium bromide, interception wall, setting time, permeability coefficient, adsorption performance

中图分类号:

X523

刘佳宁, 洪梅, 魏涛, 陈日, 宋博宇. CTAB改性地质聚合物对地下污染源的阻截作用[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(5): 1831-1840.

LIU Jianing, HONG Mei, WEI Tao, CHEN Ri, SONG Boyu. Interception Effect of Geopolymer Modified by CTAB on Underground Pollution Sources[J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2023, 42(5): 1831-1840.

参考文献

[1] 席北斗, 李娟, 汪洋, 等. 京津冀地区地下水污染防治现状、问题及科技发展对策[J]. 环境科学研究, 2019, 32(1): 1-9.
XI B D, LI J, WANG Y, et al. Strengthening the innovation capability of groundwater science and technology to support the coordinated development of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region: status quo, problems and goals[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2019, 32(1): 1-9 (in Chinese).
[2] 石效卷, 李璐, 张涛. 水十条水实条: 对《水污染防治行动计划》的解读[J]. 环境保护科学, 2015, 41(3): 1-3.
SHI X J, LI L, ZHANG T. Water pollution control action plan, a realistic and pragmatic plan: an interpretation of water pollution control action plan[J]. Environmental Protection Science, 2015, 41(3): 1-3 (in Chinese).
[3] LI Q, JIA Z, ZHAO Y S. Laboratory evaluation of hydraulic conductivity and chemical compatibility of bentonite slurry for grouting walls[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2021, 80(17): 569.
[4] 杨雁惠. 地质聚合物阻截墙对地下污染源的阻截研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2020.
YANG Y H. Study on the blocking of underground pollution source by geopolymer blocking wall[D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2020 (in Chinese).
[5] HEAH C Y, KAMARUDIN H, MUSTAFA AL BAKRI A M, et al. Study on solids-to-liquid and alkaline activator ratios on Kaolin-based geopolymers[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2012, 35: 912-922.
[6] DAVIDOVITS J. Geopolymers[J]. Journal of Thermal Analysis, 1991, 37(8): 1633-1656.
[7] 吴小缓, 张杨, 袁鹏, 等. 地质聚合物的研究进展与应用[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2016, 35(12): 4032-4037.
WU X H, ZHANG Y, YUAN P, et al. Research progress and applications of geopolymer[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2016, 35(12): 4032-4037 (in Chinese).
[8] 黎洁, 谢贤, 李博琦, 等. 地质聚合物研究进展[J]. 矿产保护与利用, 2020, 40(6): 141-148.
LI J, XIE X, LI B Q, et al. Overview of research on geopolymers[J]. Conservation and Utilization of Mineral Resources, 2020, 40(6): 141-148 (in Chinese).
[9] ARNOULT M, PERRONNET M, AUTEF A, et al. How to control the geopolymer setting time with the alkaline silicate solution[J]. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, 2018, 495: 59-66.
[10] 张凯铭, 杨浪, 饶峰, 等. 地质聚合物多孔材料的制备及应用研究进展[J]. 金属矿山, 2022(10): 226-237.
ZHANG K M, YANG L, RAO F, et al. Research progress on preparation and application of geopolymer porous materials[J]. Metal Mine, 2022(10): 226-237 (in Chinese).
[11] 杨勇, 何艳明, 栾景丽, 等. 国际污染场地土壤修复技术综合分析[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2012, 35(10): 92-98.
YANG Y, HE Y M, LUAN J L, et al. Comprehensive analysis on soil remediation technologies of international contaminated sites[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2012, 35(10): 92-98 (in Chinese).
[12] 杨雁惠, 洪梅. 地质聚合物污染阻截墙的泛碱控制及对重金属的吸附性能[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2020, 39(3): 804-811.
YANG Y H, HONG M. Efflorescence control of geopolymer barrier wall and adsorption performance of heavy metals[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2020, 39(3): 804-811 (in Chinese).
[13] CHEN S P, YONGSHENG QI Y S, JORDAO J C, et al. Efficient removal of radioactive iodide anions from simulated wastewater by HDTMA-geopolymer[J]. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 2019, 117 (C): 103112.
[14] AÇIŞLI Ö, İLKER A, ALIREZA K. Preparation of a surface modified fly ash-based geopolymer for removal of an anionic dye: parameters and adsorption mechanism[J]. Chemosphere (Oxford), 2022, 295: 133870-133870.
[15] 余泽峰, 宋卫锋, 王超, 等. CTAB改性地聚合物同时去除Cu(Ⅱ)和Cr(Ⅵ)[J]. 环境科学学报, 2020, 40(3): 968-975.
YU Z F, SONG W F, WANG C, et al. Simultaneous removal of Cu(Ⅱ) and Cr(Ⅵ) with CTAB modified geopolymer[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2020, 40(3): 968-975 (in Chinese).
[16] 国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 水泥标准稠度用水量、凝结时间、安定性检验方法: GB/T 1346—2011[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2012.
General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine, Standardization Administration of China. Test method for water consumption, setting time and stability of cement standard consistency: GB/T 1346—2011[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2012 (in Chinese).
[17] D’APPOLONIA D J. Soil-bentonite slurry trench cutoffs[J]. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, 1980, 106(4): 399-417.
[18] 国家环境保护局. 水质六价铬的测定二苯碳酰二肼分光光度法: GB 7467—1987[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 1987.
Environmental Protection Agency of the People’s Republic of China. Water quality: determination of chromium (6)-1,5 dtphenylcarbohydrazide spectrophotometric method: GB 7467—1987[S].Beijing: Standards Press of China, 1987 (in Chinese).
[19] 环境保护部. 水质挥发酚的测定 4-氨基安替比林分光光度法: HJ 503—2009[S]. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社, 2009.
Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China. Water quality-determination of volatile phenolic compounds-4-AAP spectrophotometric method: HJ 503—2009[S]. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 2009 (in Chinese).
[20] ZUHUA Z, XIAO Y, HUAJUN Z, et al. Role of water in the synthesis of calcined Kaolin-based geopolymer[J]. Applied Clay Science, 2009, 43(2): 218-223.
[21] STEVESON M, SAGOE-CRENTSIL K. Relationships between composition, structure and strength of inorganic polymers[J]. Journal of Materials Science, 2005, 40(16): 4247-4259.
[22] 国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 通用硅酸盐水泥: GB 175—2007[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2008.
General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China and Standardization Administration of China. General portland cement: GB 175—2007[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2008 (in Chinese).
[23] SINGHAL A, GANGWAR B P. CTAB modified large surface area nanoporous geopolymer with high adsorption capacity for copper ion removal[J]. Applied Clay Science, 2017, 150: 106-114.
[24] GIASUDDIN H M, SANJAYAN J G, RANJITH P G. Strength of geopolymer cured in saline water in ambient conditions[J]. Fuel, 2013, 107: 34-39.
[25] 李琴. 地下水污染膨润土/水泥/粘土系原位阻截材料防渗与兼容性能研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2020.
LI Q. Study on containment performance and chemical compatibility of bentonite/cement/clay based in-situ barrier materials for groundwater pollution[D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2020 (in Chinese).
[26] 韩琮. 改性钾长石对废水中苯酚、氨氮的净化研究[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆大学, 2020.
HAN C. Study on the purification of phenol and ammonia nitrogen in wastewater by modified potassium feldspar[D]. Urumqi: Xinjiang University, 2020 (in Chinese).

CTAB改性地质聚合物对地下污染源的阻截作用

Interception Effect of Geopolymer Modified by CTAB on Underground Pollution Sources

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张晓静, 王德志, 靳凯戎, 刘江, 关岩. 花岗岩石粉对水泥浆体力学性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(5): 1704-1709.
[2]	杜新宇, 陈潇, 周明凯, 张浩宇, 杨寅, 王瑜德. 含硫酸盐类固废对硅酸盐水泥水化影响研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(5): 1710-1720.
[3]	杨孟君, 曹义冬, 林常, 徐树英, 潘莉莎. 低钙粉煤灰地聚物的流变性能、凝结时间和抗压强度[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(5): 1721-1730.
[4]	陈娅, 万小梅, 崔允铮, 李辉. 纤维表面改性对EGC力学性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(4): 1174-1182.
[5]	陈新明, 张浩文, 焦华喆, 杨柳华, 荣阳阳. HPMC及硼砂对新型防漏高强注浆料性能及微观结构的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(3): 861-870.
[6]	刘景锦, 罗昊鹏, 雷华阳, 郑刚, 程雪松. 碱激发地质聚合物固化软土的研究进展[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(2): 565-574.
[7]	樊璐洋, 金子豪, 苏英, 崔程嘉, 王斌. 基于响应面法的半水磷石膏复合胶凝材料优化设计及性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(2): 626-636.
[8]	王传林, 张思仪, 黄俊轩, 姜涛, 梁萍, 周芷冰, 王屹鸿. 絮凝剂对硅酸盐水泥砂浆性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(9): 3028-3035.
[9]	谭正日, 谭洪波, 吕周岭, 孔祥辉, 蹇守卫, 马保国. 不同类型减水剂对渣土基高流态回填材料性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(9): 3227-3233.
[10]	王玲玲, 司晨玉, 李畅, 孙小巍, 周红红, 郭世萌. 氢氧化钾-钠水玻璃激发剂对碱激发矿渣胶凝材料性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(8): 2654-2662.
[11]	马保国, 邬磊, 陈偏, 戚华辉, 金子豪, 杨琪. 缓凝剂对磷建筑石膏-普通硅酸盐水泥复合体系性能的影响及其机理研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(7): 2411-2420.
[12]	宋向阳, 刘霖, 张永鹏. 聚丙烯酰胺改良土-膨润土的渗透性及对苯酚的吸附[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(6): 2201-2208.
[13]	杨辉, 徐鹏, 袁伟, 李磊, 柯伟席, 田晓航, 周天正. 复合缓凝剂对高强磷酸镁修补砂浆性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(5): 1562-1569.
[14]	王民, 李亚威, 阎爽. 基于高温活化钼尾矿地质聚合物胶凝材料制备与抗压强度[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(5): 1689-1695.
[15]	黄伟, 周佳敏, 衷从浩, 麻秀星, 方云辉, 柯余良, 韦建刚. 早强型聚羧酸系减水剂对基准水泥早期水化的影响研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(4): 1211-1221.