AOD炉渣对MgO-C砖的侵蚀机理研究

硅酸盐通报 ›› 2023, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1): 338-344.

所属专题：耐火材料

AOD炉渣对MgO-C砖的侵蚀机理研究

周婷¹, 余俊¹, 黄学忠², 赵惠忠¹, 谈利强³, 刘丛平⁴

1.武汉科技大学省部共建耐火材料与冶金国家重点实验室,武汉 430081;
2.广西北港新材料有限公司,北海 536000;
3.浙江父子岭特种耐火有限公司,湖州 313100;
4.浙江宏丰炉料有限公司,湖州 313100

收稿日期:2022-08-28 修订日期:2022-10-14 出版日期:2023-01-15 发布日期:2023-02-15
通信作者: 余俊,博士,副教授。E-mail:yjwust@163.com
作者简介:周婷(1998—),女,硕士研究生。主要从事耐火材料方面的研究。E-mail:1641518954@qq.com
基金资助:
校企合作基金(2021H20006)

Study on Corrosion Mechanism of AOD Slag on MgO-C Brick

ZHOU Ting¹, YU Jun¹, HUANG Xuezhong², ZHAO Huizhong¹, TAN Liqiang³, LIU Congping⁴

1. The State Key Laboratory of Refractories and Metallurgy, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430081, China;
2. Guangxi Beigang New Materials Co., Ltd., Beihai 536000, China;
3. Zhejiang Fuziling Special Refractory Co., Ltd., Huzhou 313100, China;
4. Zhejiang Hongfeng Charge Co., Ltd., Huzhou 313100, China

Received:2022-08-28 Revised:2022-10-14 Online:2023-01-15 Published:2023-02-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 不锈钢生产主要采用氩氧精炼(AOD)炉冶炼工艺,本文探究AOD炉渣对钢包内衬用MgO-C砖的侵蚀机理,为提高钢包内衬用MgO-C砖的使用性能和服役寿命提供理论支撑。结合FactSage6.2软件、X射线衍射(XRD)、场发射扫描电子显微镜(SEM)和能量色散光谱(EDS)等测试手段分析炉渣侵蚀后MgO-C砖的物相变化、显微结构和化学成分变化。结果表明,随着侵蚀反应的进行,方镁石逐渐被熔蚀,且逐步出现Ca₃MgSi₂O₈等低熔点物相,以及MgAl₂O₄等高熔点物相。AOD炉渣通过基质部分侵蚀渗透MgO-C砖,并与方镁石反应生成Ca₃MgSi₂O₈等低熔点物相,熔蚀方镁石;同时,方镁石边界处生成MgAl₂O₄,阻碍AOD炉渣对MgO-C砖的侵蚀渗透。

关键词: MgO-C砖, AOD炉渣, 侵蚀机理, 侵蚀, MgAl₂O₄, Ca₃MgSi₂O₈

Abstract: The argon oxygen decarburization (AOD) furnace smelting process is widely used in the stainless-steel production. The corrosion mechanism of AOD slag to MgO-C bricks used by ladle lining was studied to provide theoretical basis for improving the service life and performance of MgO-C bricks used by ladle lining. The phase change, microstructure and chemical composition change of MgO-C bricks after corrosion were analyzed by FactSage6.2 software, X-ray diffraction (XRD), field emission scanning electron microscope (SEM) and energy dispersion spectrum (EDS). The results show that, as the corrosion reaction proceeds, periclase is gradually eroded, and the low melting point phases such as Ca₃MgSi₂O₈ and the high melting point phases such as MgAl₂O₄ gradually appear. The corrosion is resulted by the penetration of AOD slag through the matrix in the MgO-C bricks, and the reaction between slag and periclase to form Ca₃MgSi₂O₈. The generation of MgAl₂O₄ at the boundary of periclase hinders the corrosion of AOD slag to MgO-C bricks.

Key words: MgO-C brick, AOD slag, corrosion mechanism, corrosion, MgAl₂O₄, Ca₃MgSi₂O₈

中图分类号:

TQ175

周婷, 余俊, 黄学忠, 赵惠忠, 谈利强, 刘丛平. AOD炉渣对MgO-C砖的侵蚀机理研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(1): 338-344.

ZHOU Ting, YU Jun, HUANG Xuezhong, ZHAO Huizhong, TAN Liqiang, LIU Congping. Study on Corrosion Mechanism of AOD Slag on MgO-C Brick[J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2023, 42(1): 338-344.

参考文献

[1] 程志旺,许勇.不锈钢冶炼工艺技术[J].特钢技术,2011,17(1):1-5.
CHENG Z W, XU Y. Process technology of stainless steel smelting[J]. Special Steel Technology, 2011, 17(1): 1-5 (in Chinese).
[2] 金沙江.不锈钢冶炼工艺及国内现状与发展[J].山西冶金,2017,40(5):43-44+104.
JIN S J. Smelting process of stainless steel and its present situation and development in China[J]. Shanxi Metallurgy, 2017, 40(5): 43-44+104 (in Chinese).
[3] 亓传军,赵刚,何敏,等.泰钢提高75 t钢包使用寿命的生产措施[J].山东冶金,2020,42(5):75+77.
QI C J, ZHAO G, HE M, et al. Production measures of improving working life of 75 t ladle in Taishan steel[J]. Shandong Metallurgy, 2020, 42(5): 75+77 (in Chinese).
[4] CAMPOS K S, LENZ E SILVA G F B, NUNES E H M, et al. The influence of B₄C and MgB₂ additions on the behavior of MgO-C bricks[J]. Ceramics International, 2012, 38(7): 5661-5667.
[5] GOKCE A S, GURCAN C, OZGEN S, et al. The effect of antioxidants on the oxidation behaviour of magnesia-carbon refractory bricks[J]. Ceramics International, 2008, 34(2): 323-330.
[6] 王堂玺,李享成,平振丰.电磁场环境下碳含量对MgO-C砖抗高碱度渣侵蚀性能的影响[J].耐火材料,2014,48(6):424-427.
WANG T X, LI X C, PING Z F. Effect of carbon content on resistance of MgO-C bricks to high basicity slag under electromagnetic field[J]. Refractories, 2014, 48(6): 424-427 (in Chinese).
[7] 李洪波.低碳钢对渣线砖侵蚀机理的研究[J].耐火与石灰,2022,47(3):27-29+33.
LI H B. Research on corrosion mechanism of low carbon steel on slag line brick[J]. Refractories ＆ Lime, 2022, 47(3): 27-29+33 (in Chinese).
[8] CHEN L G, MALFLIET A, JONES P T, et al. Comparison of the chemical corrosion resistance of magnesia-based refractories by stainless steelmaking slags under vacuum conditions[J]. Ceramics International, 2016, 42(1): 743-751.
[9] GUO M, PARADA S, JONES P T, et al. Degradation mechanisms of magnesia-carbon refractories by high-alumina stainless steel slags under vacuum[J]. Ceramics International, 2007, 33(6): 1007-1018.
[10] 庞善洋.MgO-C砖受CaO-SiO₂-Fe₂O₃系渣的侵蚀机理[J].国外耐火材料,1999,(3):57-58.
PANG S Y. Erosion mechanism of MgO-C brick by CaO-SiO₂-Fe₂O₃ slag[J]. Refractories & Lime, 1999, (3): 57-58 (in Chinese).
[11] 许原,刘清才,陈登福,等.镁碳砖和铝碳砖在高钛渣中的侵蚀[J].钢铁钒钛,2002,23(4):6-9.
XU Y, LIU Q C, CHEN D F, et al. Corrosion behavior of MgO-C brick and Al₂O₃-C brick immersed in high titania slag[J]. Iron Steel Vanadium Titanium, 2002, 23(4): 6-9 (in Chinese).
[12] KASIMAGWA I, BRABIE V, JÖNSSON P G. Slag corrosion of MgO-C refractories during secondary steel refining[J]. Ironmaking & Steelmaking, 2014, 41(2): 121-131.
[13] LIU Z Y, YU J K, WANG X N, et al. Comparative study of B₄C, Mg₂B₂O₅, and ZrB₂ powder additions on the mechanical properties, oxidation, and slag corrosion resistance of MgO-C refractories[J]. Ceramics International, 2022, 48(10): 14117-14126.
[14] 刘亮,艾锦瑾,尹艳山,等.FactSage模拟城市污泥与煤混燃过程中含铁、硫矿物的演变[J].环境科学与技术,2017,40(5):32-37.
LIU L, AI J J, YIN Y S, et al. Evolution of iron and sulfur containing minerals in the process of mixed combustion of municipal sewage sludge and coal by FactSage[J]. Environmental Science ＆ Technology, 2017, 40(5): 32-37 (in Chinese).
[15] 韩霄,曹颖川,景东荣,等.FactSage在钢渣处理研究中的应用[J].矿产综合利用,2019(3):102-107.
HAN X, CAO Y C, JING D R, et al. Application of FactSage in steel slag treatment[J]. Multipurpose Utilization of Mineral Resources, 2019(3): 102-107 (in Chinese).
[16] 周治军,李玉山,韩波.低碳镁钙碳砖与镁碳砖的抗AOD炉渣对比[J].耐火材料,2012,46(5):356-357+360.
ZHOU Z J, LI Y S, HAN B. AOD furnace slag resistance comparison of low carbon MgO-CaO-C brick and MgO-C brick[J]. Refractories, 2012, 46(5): 356-357+360 (in Chinese).
[17] 吴启帆,包燕平,林路,等.LF精炼渣的物相及其冷却过程研究[J].炼钢,2014,30(6):50-53.
WU Q F, BAO Y P, LIN L, et al. Study on the phase and cooling process of LF refining slag[J]. Steelmaking, 2014, 30(6): 50-53 (in Chinese).
[18] 李楠,顾华志,赵惠忠.耐火材料学[M].2版.北京:冶金工业出版社,2022:54-55.
LI N, GU H Z, ZHAO H Z. Refractory materials science[M]. 2nd. ed. Beijing: Metallurgical Industry Press, 2022: 54-55 (in Chinese).
[19] 樊新丽.钢包用含碳耐火材料侵蚀机理研究[D].武汉:武汉科技大学,2009:8-10.
FAN X L. Study on the erosion mechanism of refractories containing carbon for ladle lining[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University of Science and Technology, 2009: 8-10 (in Chinese).
[20] 茅沈栋,杜屏.降低MgO含量对高炉渣黏度和熔化性温度的影响[J].钢铁研究学报,2015,27(9):33-38.
MAO S D, DU P. Effect of reduction of MgO content in BF slag on viscosity and melting temperature[J]. Journal of Iron and Steel Research, 2015, 27(9): 33-38 (in Chinese).

AOD炉渣对MgO-C砖的侵蚀机理研究

Study on Corrosion Mechanism of AOD Slag on MgO-C Brick

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	周丽娜, 蔡颖, 马财龙, 罗玲. 水滑石复合水泥基材料氯离子吸附能力的研究进展[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(4): 1137-1147.
[2]	齐晓, 肖前慧, 邱继生, 刘书林. 冻融循环与硫酸盐侵蚀共同作用下再生混凝土的微观结构研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(4): 1194-1204.
[3]	陈春红, 俞江, 刘荣桂, 王磊, 刘惠, 伍金龙. 干湿循环下再生细骨料混凝土的氯离子渗透性能[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(4): 1217-1225.
[4]	何俊, 管家贤, 吕晓龙, 张驰. 纳米硅粉改良碱渣-矿渣固化淤泥的抗硫酸镁侵蚀性能[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(4): 1344-1352.
[5]	王恭一, 赵惠忠, 黄日清, 张寒, 余俊, 李学臣. AOD炉渣对镁钙质耐火材料的侵蚀机理[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(4): 1496-1505.
[6]	乔建刚, 董进国, 李明浩, 刘翔, 李庆楼. 生态混凝土植生与抗冲刷性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(3): 917-924.
[7]	赵立, 孙江涛, 吴定略, 李志堂, 何涛, 关业程, 沈卫国. 石屑湿喷混凝土的制备与性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(3): 1016-1024.
[8]	王治峰, 马淑龙, 任博, 李燕京, 徐义彪, 桑绍柏, 李亚伟. 红柱石原料高温结构演变及抗钾蒸气侵蚀行为研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(3): 1106-1114.
[9]	王含, 沈瑞麟, 王鸿妹, 汪庆卫. 晶相组成对硅质耐火材料抗碱侵蚀性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(3): 1130-1136.
[10]	王振军, 史文涛, 张婷, 李梦, 王泽辉. PNIPAM温敏凝胶对水泥材料抗硫酸盐侵蚀性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(2): 429-438.
[11]	徐宁, 杨恒, 熊传胜, 张栋, 蒋鹏, 刘璨, 刘欣昕, 程星燎. 钢筋混凝土中防腐添加剂的研究进展[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(1): 1-21.
[12]	彭蕾, 余俊, 赵惠忠, 张德强, 韩娟, 蔡霜. 多孔球形莫来石基浇注料的制备及性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(1): 319-328.
[13]	司国栋, 易帅, 邓丽娜, 许谦, 陈美娜, 王长安, 潘传才, 林国伟, 周吉, 魏霞, 薛飞, 谢金莉. 熔铸耐火材料抗盖板玻璃熔体侵蚀行为研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(1): 345-351.
[14]	徐鑫, 张鸿儒, 季韬, 赵宝军, 姚杰. 再生细骨料含水状态对砂浆性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(9): 3036-3046.
[15]	佘亮, 傅平丰, 邓威, 陈雨齐, 王显聪. 联合活化多元辅助胶凝材料对蒸养混凝土性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(9): 3059-3067.