不同应变速率下橡胶混凝土损伤本构模型

硅酸盐通报 ›› 2022, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (6): 1912-1919.

所属专题：水泥混凝土

不同应变速率下橡胶混凝土损伤本构模型

王攀峰¹, 曹玉贵², 邓晓光², 李龙龙²

1.河北省水利规划设计研究院有限公司,石家庄 050011;
2.武汉理工大学道路桥梁与结构工程湖北省重点实验室,武汉 430070

收稿日期:2022-01-20 修订日期:2022-03-15 出版日期:2022-06-15 发布日期:2022-07-01
通信作者: 曹玉贵,博士,副研究员。E-mail:caoyugui@163.com
作者简介:王攀峰(1982—),男,高级工程师。主要从事道路桥梁设计与施工方面的研究。E-mail:251365903@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(51808419);湖北省自然科学基金(2019CFB217)

Damage Constitutive Model of Rubber Concrete under Different Strain Rates

WANG Panfeng¹, CAO Yugui², DENG Xiaoguang², LI Longlong²

1. Hebei Water Conservancy Planning and Design Research Institute Co., Ltd., Shijiazhuang 050011, China;
2. Hubei Key Laboratory of Roadway Bridge and Structure Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China

Received:2022-01-20 Revised:2022-03-15 Online:2022-06-15 Published:2022-07-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为获得低应变速率下橡胶混凝土的力学性能,本文进行了不同应变速率下橡胶混凝土的轴压试验,分析了混凝土细骨料的橡胶颗粒体积替换率和应变速率对橡胶混凝土力学性能的影响规律。结果表明,随着应变速率的增加,橡胶混凝土的应力-应变关系曲线和抗压强度均呈现增大的趋势,橡胶混凝土初始损伤值呈现递减的趋势,但应变速率对橡胶混凝土的弹性模量影响不显著。当应变速率从3.3×10^-5/s增加至3.3×10^-3/s时,橡胶体积替换率为0%、20%和30%的橡胶混凝土抗压强度分别增加了31%、24%、10%。当橡胶体积替换率率从0%变化到30%时,承受应变速率为3.3×10^-5/s、3.3×10^-4/s和3.3×10^-3/s的橡胶混凝土抗压强度分别减少了17%、15%、30%;橡胶混凝土的耗能随着加载速率的增加,整体呈现增大的趋势。最后基于试验数据建立了不同应变率下橡胶混凝土的损伤本构关系模型,并采用试验数据验证了新建立模型的准确性。

关键词: 橡胶混凝土, 应变速率, 应力-应变曲线, 峰值应力, 峰值应变, 损伤演化

Abstract: To study the mechanical properties of rubber concrete under different strain rates, this paper presented an experimental study on rubber concrete under axial loading. The effects of rubber replacement ratio of fine aggregates and strain rate on the mechanical behavior of rubber concrete were analyzed. The test results show that the stress-strain curve and compressive strength of rubber concrete have increasing trend with the strain rate increasing, and the initial damage value of rubber concrete shows a decreasing trend with the strain rate increasing. However, the strain rate has insignificant effect on the elastic modulus of rubber concrete. When the strain rate increases from 3.3×10^-5/s to 3.3×10^-3/s, the compressive strength of rubber concrete with rubber volume replacement ratios of 0%, 20% and 30% increases by 31%, 24% and 10%, respectively. When the rubber volume replacement rate changes from 0% to 30%, the compressive strength of rubber concrete with strain rates of 3.3×10^-5/s, 3.3×10^-4/s and 3.3×10^-3/s is reduced 17%, 15%, 30%, respectively. The energy consumption of rubber concrete tends to increase as the loading rate increases. Finally, a damage constitutive relationship model of rubber concrete under different strain rates is established based on the experimental data, and the accuracy of the newly established model is verified by the experimental data.

Key words: rubber concrete, strain rate, stress-strain curve, peak stress, peak strain, damage evolution

中图分类号:

TU375

王攀峰, 曹玉贵, 邓晓光, 李龙龙. 不同应变速率下橡胶混凝土损伤本构模型[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(6): 1912-1919.

WANG Panfeng, CAO Yugui, DENG Xiaoguang, LI Longlong. Damage Constitutive Model of Rubber Concrete under Different Strain Rates[J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2022, 41(6): 1912-1919.

参考文献

[1] HUANG Y T, WANG J, YING M J, et al. Effect of particle-size gradation on cyclic shear properties of recycled concrete aggregate[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 301: 124143.
[2] 韩阳,张哲哲,白亚强,等.橡胶集料改性混凝土高温后力学性能试验研究[J].混凝土,2015(9):59-63.
HAN Y, ZHANG Z Z, BAI Y Q, et al. Experimental study on mechanical property of crumb rubber concrete after elevated temperature[J]. Concrete, 2015(9): 59-63 (in Chinese).
[3] ATAHAN A O, YÜCEL A Ö. Crumb rubber in concrete: static and dynamic evaluation[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2012, 36: 617-622.
[4] 许金余,李赞成,罗鑫,等.橡胶混凝土的静动压缩强度特性的对比研究[J].建筑材料学报,2014,17(6):1015-1019+1035.
XU J Y, LI Z C, LUO X, et al. A comparative study of the static and dynamic compression strength of rubber powder concrete[J]. Journal of Building Materials, 2014, 17(6): 1015-1019+1035 (in Chinese).
[5] 刘锋,潘东平,李丽娟,等.低强橡胶混凝土单轴受压本构关系的试验研究[J].建筑材料学报,2007,10(4):407-411.
LIU F, PAN D P, LI L J, et al. Experimental study on constitutive equation of crumb rubber concrete subject to uniaxial compression[J]. Journal of Building Materials, 2007, 10(4): 407-411 (in Chinese).
[6] 袁兵,刘锋,丘晓龙,等.橡胶混凝土不同应变率下抗压性能试验研究[J].建筑材料学报,2010,13(1):12-16.
YUAN B, LIU F, QIU X L, et al. Experimental study on compressive performances of rubber concrete under different strain rate[J]. Journal of Building Materials, 2010, 13(1): 12-16 (in Chinese).
[7] 赵秋红,董硕,朱涵.钢纤维-橡胶/混凝土单轴受压全曲线试验及本构模型[J].复合材料学报,2021,38(7):2359-2369.
ZHAO Q H, DONG S, ZHU H. Experiment on stress-strain behavior and constitutive model of steel fiber-rubber/concrete subjected to uniaxial compression[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2021, 38(7): 2359-2369 (in Chinese).
[8] BISCHOFF P H, PERRY S H. Compressive behaviour of concrete at high strain rates[J]. Materials and Structures, 1991, 24(6): 425-450.
[9] CAO Y G, LIU M Y, WU Y F. Effect of low strain rate on the axial behavior of concrete in CFRP-confined circular cylinders[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 255: 119351.
[10] CAO Y G, LIU M Y, ZHANG Y, et al. Effect of strain rates on the stress-strain behavior of FRP-confined pre-damaged concrete[J]. Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2020, 13(5): 1078.
[11] 肖诗云,张剑.不同应变率下混凝土受压损伤试验研究[J].土木工程学报,2010,43(3):40-45.
XIAO S Y, ZHANG J. Compressive damage experiment of concrete at different strain rates[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2010, 43(3): 40-45 (in Chinese).
[12] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.混凝土结构设计规范:GB 50010—2010[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2011.
Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development, PRC. Code for concrete structure design: GB 50010—2010[S]. Beijing: China Architecture and Architecture Press, 2011 (in Chinese).
[13] BOMPA D V, ELGHAZOULI A Y. Stress-strain response and practical design expressions for FRP-confined recycled tyre rubber concrete[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 237: 117633.
[14] 曹玉贵,张扬,侯灿,等.FRP约束损伤混凝土环向应变-轴向应变关系[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,2020,52(9):85-91.
CAO Y G, ZHANG Y, HOU C, et al. Lateral strain-axial strain relationship of FRP confined damage concrete[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2020, 52(9): 85-91 (in Chinese).
[15] 曹玉贵,赵国旭,尹亚运.基于广义回归神经网络的纤维增强聚合物复合材料约束损伤混凝土强度预测[J].复合材料学报,2021,38(5):1623-1628.
CAO Y G, ZHAO G X, YIN Y Y. Strength prediction of fiber reinforced polymer composite confined damaged concrete using general regression neural network[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2021, 38(5): 1623-1628 (in Chinese).
[16] LI F R, WU Y Y, XIE X H, et al. Experimental study on the dynamic behavior of rubber concrete under compression considering earthquake magnitude strain rate[J]. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 2020, 26(8): 733-748.

不同应变速率下橡胶混凝土损伤本构模型

Damage Constitutive Model of Rubber Concrete under Different Strain Rates

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	彭蔓, 高涌涛, 韩杨, 陈秀丽, 寇雄俊. 废旧钢纤维增强橡胶混凝土力学性能试验研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(9): 3286-3294.
[2]	金子恒, 谢发祥, 蔡定鹏, 韩旭, 掌昀. SAP内养护混凝土断裂过程声发射特性[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(7): 2419-2428.
[3]	陈宇, 林熙杰, 李长辉, 吴堃, 黄信. 抗收缩工程水泥基复合材料力学性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(5): 1599-1607.
[4]	姜天华, 莫定聪, 万聪聪, 卢旭刚, 李素珠. 玄武岩橡胶混凝土基本力学性能及受压应力-应变曲线[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(11): 4063-4071.
[5]	万聪聪, 姜天华, 余意. 基于正交试验的聚丙烯泡沫混凝土基本力学性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(10): 3518-3529.
[6]	左祥龙, 左珅, 侯宁, 李晋, 李天宇, 周天成. 脱硫石膏-粉煤灰流态轻质土宏细观力学性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2023, 42(10): 3722-3731.
[7]	贾飞, 阎王虎, 潘慧敏, 汤建华, 王选明, 高昆. 初始损伤对喷射混凝土抗硫酸盐侵蚀性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(7): 2258-2267.
[8]	张清芳, 洪鹤轩, 沈璐. 湿筛混凝土动态受压力学性能及破坏形态细观数值模拟[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(7): 2283-2291.
[9]	曾志伟, 梁剑, 曾宇鑫, 余波. 轴压与偏压状态下混凝土损伤全过程声发射特征参数分析[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(5): 1599-1608.
[10]	王顺国, 丁祖德, 汪伟伟, 张万平, 沈万虎. 往复荷载下含孔洞缺陷衬砌混凝土的力学性能试验研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(3): 833-843.
[11]	韩辰悦, 庞建勇. 不同应变率下橡胶混凝土抗压性能及能量特性研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(3): 922-930.
[12]	安红芳, 付汝松, 陆跃贤, 孔德文, 罗双, 王琳, 吕方涛. 热处理时间对磷石膏基复合胶凝材料劈裂抗拉性能的影响[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(2): 545-552.
[13]	王辉明, 李汝飞, 邓平贵. 基于分形理论和扩展有限元法的钢纤维混凝土损伤破坏机理[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(12): 4202-4213.
[14]	庄培镇, 马玉玮, 罗甜恬, 刘卫森, 傅继阳. 碱激发矿渣/粉煤灰净浆/砂浆力学性能研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(10): 3578-3589.
[15]	朱星曈, 耿欧, 朱思远. 废轮胎橡胶混凝土界面过渡区特征试验研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2021, 40(2): 573-578.