BFRP筋与分级粒径河砂ECC粘结滑移性能试验研究

硅酸盐通报 ›› 2022, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (4): 1264-1275.

BFRP筋与分级粒径河砂ECC粘结滑移性能试验研究

滕晓丹^1,2,3,4, 姚淇耀², 陆宸宇², 潘丁菊², 李祚², 谢政专⁵

1.广西新发展交通集团有限公司,南宁 530028;
2.广西大学土木建筑工程学院,南宁 530004;
3.广西大学广西防灾减灾与工程安全重点实验室,南宁 530004;
4.广西大学工程防灾与结构安全教育部重点实验室,南宁 530004;
5.广西交科集团有限公司,南宁 530007

收稿日期:2021-12-15 修回日期:2022-01-17 出版日期:2022-04-15 发布日期:2022-04-27
作者简介:滕晓丹(1984—),女,博士,讲师。主要从事高延性水泥基复合材料研究。Email:xdteng@gxu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(11962001);国家重点研发计划(2019YFC1511103);中国博士后科学基金(2018M633298);广西自然科学基金(2018GXNSFBA138060);广西自然科学基金面上项目(2018GXNSFAA281339)

Experimental Study on Bond-Slip Performance Between BFRP Bars and ECC with Graded Particle Size River Sand

TENG Xiaodan^1,2,3,4, YAO Qiyao², LU Chenyu², PAN Dingju², LI Zuo², XIE Zhengzhuan⁵

1. Guangxi Xinfazhan Communications Group Co., Ltd., Nanning 530028, China;
2. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China;
3. Guangxi Key Laboratory of Disaster Prevention and Engineering Safety, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China;
4. Key Laboratory of Disaster Prevention and Structural Safety of Ministry of Education, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China;
5. Guangxi Transportation Science & Technology Group Co., Ltd., Nanning 530007, China

Received:2021-12-15 Revised:2022-01-17 Online:2022-04-15 Published:2022-04-27

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 通过玄武岩纤维增强复合材料(BFRP)筋/高延性水泥基复合材料(ECC)的中心拉拔试验,分析了分级粒径ECC和BFRP筋表面形式及直径对BFRP筋/ECC粘结性能及粘结-滑移曲线的影响。结果表明,BFRP筋/ECC的破坏模式分为BFRP筋拔出破坏和BFRP筋拉伸破坏。选取BFRP筋/ECC粘结-滑移曲线中的残余波浪段各峰值应力点,采用拟合直线斜率的绝对值|k|表征ECC对BFRP筋横肋的磨损程度,当|k|值≥0.144时,BFRP筋横肋会被完全磨损,当|k|值＜0.144时,BFRP筋横肋会被磨损至与填充其凹陷的ECC齐平。BFRP筋/ECC的平均粘结强度随骨料粒径的变化并不显著,分级粒径ECC可使BFRP筋/ECC的平均粘结强度提高3.2%~9.6%,采用骨料粒径为0.15~0.3 mm的BFRP筋/ECC粘结性能最优。BFRP筋的直径越大,BFRP筋/ECC的平均粘结强度越小,BFRP筋直径为12 mm的BFRP筋/ECC平均粘结强度与BFRP筋直径为8 mm、10 mm的BFRP筋/ECC相比降低分别约8.2%、4.4%。采用浅螺纹BFRP筋的BFRP筋/ECC,平均粘结强度下降83.7%,但其整体粘结应力变化较为平稳,对ECC和BFRP筋的损伤程度均最小。减小BFRP筋直径、ECC骨料粒径,或BFRP筋/ECC自由端处BFRP筋的肋深,有助于提高BFRP筋/ECC的粘结性能及稳定性。

关键词: BFRP, 高延性水泥基复合材料, 粒径, 粘结滑移, 拉拔试验, 界面破坏

Abstract: Based on the center pull-out test of basalt fiber reinforced polymer bars/engineering cementitious composites (BFRP bars/ECC), the effects of graded particle size of ECC, surface treatment and diameter of BFRP bars on bond performance and bond-slip curve of BFRP bars/ECC were analyzed. The results show that the failure modes of the specimens are BFRP bar pull-out failure and BFRP bar rupture failure. The BFRP bars/ECC bond-slip curve is wave type. The peak point of each wave is selected and an absolute value of linear slope |k| is fitted to characterize the wear degree of ECC and tear degree of BFRP transverse rib. If the |k| ≥ 0.144, transverse rib of BFRP bar is deemed to wear completely, and if the |k| < 0.144, the transverse rib of BFRP bar is deemed to worn and flush with the ECC. The average bond strength of BFRP bars/ECC does not change significantly with the particle size. The graded particle size of ECC increases the average bond strength of BFRP bars/ECC by 3.2%~9.6%. The BFRP bars/ECC with the aggregate particle size of 0.15~0.3 mm has the best bond strength. The larger the diameter of BFRP bars is, the smaller the average bond strength of BFRP bars/ECC is. The average bond strength of BFRP bars/ECC with the diameter of 12 mm is about 8.2% and 4.4% lower than that of BFRP bars/ECC with the diameter of 8 mm and 10 mm. The average bond strength of BFRP bars/ECC with shallow thread BFRP bars decreases by 83.7%, but the overall bond stress changes stably, and the failure degree to both ECC and BFRP bars is minimal. Reducing the diameter of BFRP bars, ECC aggregate particle size, or the rib depth of BFRP bars at the free end of BFRP bars/ECC can improve the bond performance and stability of BFRP bars/ECC.

Key words: BFRP, engineering cementitious composite, particle size, bond-slip, pull-out test, interface failure

中图分类号:

TB332

滕晓丹, 姚淇耀, 陆宸宇, 潘丁菊, 李祚, 谢政专. BFRP筋与分级粒径河砂ECC粘结滑移性能试验研究[J]. 硅酸盐通报, 2022, 41(4): 1264-1275.

TENG Xiaodan, YAO Qiyao, LU Chenyu, PAN Dingju, LI Zuo, XIE Zhengzhuan. Experimental Study on Bond-Slip Performance Between BFRP Bars and ECC with Graded Particle Size River Sand[J]. BULLETIN OF THE CHINESE CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2022, 41(4): 1264-1275.

参考文献

[1] LEE H S, NOGUCHI T, TOMOSAWA F. Evaluation of the bond properties between concrete and reinforcement as a function of the degree of reinforcement corrosion[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2002, 32(8): 1313-1318.
[2] AUYEUNG Y, BALAGURU P, CHUNG L. Bond behavior of corroded reinforcement bars[J]. Aci Structural Journal, 2000, 97(2): 214-220.
[3] TORRES-ACOSTA A A, NAVARRO-GUTIERREZ S, TERÁN-GUILLÉN J. Residual flexure capacity of corroded reinforced concrete beams[J]. Engineering Structures, 2007, 29(6): 1145-1152.
[4] AZAD A K, AHMAD S, AZHER, S A. Residual strength of corrosion-damaged reinforced concrete beams[J]. ACI Materials Journal, 2007, 104(1): 40-47.
[5] DOLAN C W. FRP prestressing in the USA[J]. Concrete International, 1999, 21(10):59-62.
[6] 王茂龙,朱浮声,金延.纤维塑料筋(FRP筋)在混凝土结构中的应用[J].混凝土,2005(11):17-23.
WANG M L, ZHU F S, JIN Y. Fiber reinforced plastics (FRP) applying in concrete structures[J]. Concrete, 2005(11): 17-23 (in Chinese).
[7] 尹世平,华云涛,徐世烺.FRP配筋混凝土结构研究进展及其应用[J].建筑结构学报,2021,42(1):134-150.
YIN S P, HUA Y T, XU S L. A review on research progress and application of concrete structures internally reinforced with FRP bars[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2021, 42(1): 134-150 (in Chinese).
[8] YANG E H, LI V C. Tailoring engineered cementitious composites for impact resistance[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2012, 42(8): 1066-1071.
[9] YAO Q Y, LI Z, LU C Y, et al. Development of engineered cementitious composites using sea sand and metakaolin[J]. Frontiers in Materials, 2021, 8: 711872.
[10] 姚淇耀,陆宸宇,彭林欣,等.氯盐侵蚀作用下BFRP筋增强海砂ECC的拉伸及弯曲性能试验[J].复合材料学报,2022,39(3):1230-1242.
YAO Q Y,LU C Y,PENG L X,et al.Experimental study on tensile and bending properties of sea sand ECC reinforced by BFRP bars under chloride salt erosion[J].Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica,2022,39(3):1230-1242 (in Chinese).
[11] WANG H L, SUN X Y, PENG G Y, et al. Experimental study on bond behaviour between BFRP bar and engineered cementitious composite[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2015, 95: 448-456.
[12] 吴丽丽,王云飞,谢灵慧,等.玻璃纤维增强聚合物复合材料筋与工程水泥基复合材料黏结性能[J].复合材料学报,2020,37(3):696-706.
WU L L, WANG Y F, XIE L H, et al. Bonding behavior between glass fiber reinforced polymer composite bars and engineered cementitious composite[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2020, 37(3): 696-706 (in Chinese).
[13] KIM B, LEE J Y. Polyvinyl alcohol engineered cementitious composite (PVA-ECC) for the interfacial bond behaviour of glass fibre reinforced polymer bars (GFRP)[J]. Polymers and Polymer Composites, 2012, 20(6): 545-558.
[14] HOSSAIN K M A, ALAM S, ANWAR M S, et al. Bond strength of fibre-reinforced polymer bars in engineered cementitious composites[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Construction Materials, 2017: 1-13.
[15] HOSSAIN K M A. Bond strength of GFRP bars embedded in engineered cementitious composite using RILEM beam testing[J]. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 2018, 12: 6.
[16] 司豆豆,张普,孙新茂,等.GFRP筋与超高韧性水泥基复合材料黏结性能试验研究[J].混凝土,2019(8):108-111.
SI D D, ZHANG P, SUN X M, et al. Experimental study on bond properties betw een GFRP bar and ECC[J]. Concrete, 2019(8): 108-111 (in Chinese).
[17] 贾明皓,肖学良,冯古雨,等.玄武岩纤维增强复合材料及其应用最新研究进展[J].化工新型材料,2019,47(11):6-8+12.
JIA M H, XIAO X L, FENG G Y, et al. Recent progress in basalt fiber and its reinforced cement matrix composite[J]. New Chemical Materials, 2019, 47(11): 6-8+12 (in Chinese).
[18] 吴智深,汪昕,吴刚.FRP增强工程结构体系[M].北京:科学出版社,2017:10.
WU Z S, WANG X, WU G. FRP reinforced engineering structural system[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2017: 10 (in Chinese).
[19] 国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.建设用砂:GB/T 14684—2011[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2012.
General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine, Standardization Administration of China. Sand for construction: GB/T 14684—2011[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2012 (in Chinese).
[20] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.土木工程用玻璃纤维增强筋:JG/T 406—2013[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2013.
Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People's Republic of China. Class fibre reinforced plastics rebar for civil engineering: JG/T 406—2013[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2013 (in Chinese).
[21] DENG M K, PAN J J, SUN H Z. Bond behavior of steel bar embedded in engineered cementitious composites under pullout load[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 168: 705-714.
[22] 高婧,范凌云.CFRP筋与海水海砂混凝土粘结性试验与机理分析[J/OL].复合材料学报:1-11[2021-09-08].DOI:10.13801/j.cnki.fhclxb.20210512.001
GAO J, FAN L Y. Experiment on bond performance between CFRP bar and seawater sea sand concrete and its working mechanism[J/OL]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica: 1-11[2021-09-08]. DOI:10.13801/j.cnki.fhclxb.20210512.001 (in Chinese).
[23] ACHILLIDES Z, PILAKOUTAS K. Bond behavior of fiber reinforced polymer bars under direct pullout conditions[J]. Journal of Composites for Construction, 2004, 8(2): 173-181.
[24] DAVALOS J F, CHEN Y, RAY I. Effect of FRP bar degradation on interface bond with high strength concrete[J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2008, 30(8): 722-730.